Fan Rant: Adam Sandler, Republican Actor
Filed under: Comedy, New Releases, Sony, RumorMonger, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Exhibition, Politics, Columns
Adam Sandler's movies haver never represented the apex of cultural awareness, but they do tend to grapple, if somewhat brashly, with the finer points of human relations. In his latest raunchfest, You Don't Mess with the Zohan, the insolent comic creates "his stupidest character ever" (as an audience member muttered five minutes into last night's New York preview screening), but it's also his most symbolic one: Sporting a hyperbolic flair for disco music and using hummus as toothpaste, hardened Israeli soldier Zohan is a bloated creature of Semitic extremes.
Overall, however, the movie uses metaphors more than stereotypes. When Zohan and a furious Palestinian terrorist (John Turturro) use paddles to bat a live grenade back and forth, the result is a lowbrow editorial cartoon.
Taking this topicality into account, a recent story in The New York Times dealt with the difficulties of marketing a mainstream comedy with such polarizing issues at its core. But the story ignored a relevant topic that permeates Sandler's career: His decisively conservative outlook. It's no major secret that the actor belongs to a marginalized group of Republicans in a sea of Hollywood liberals -- just take a look at his generous donation to Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign last year -- and it's not that tough to find a current of conservatism in Sandler's films, even going back to his early days.
I'm not one to discount certain indisputably funny ingredients of Sandler's shtick, but the underlying philosophies behind his movies don't always go down with ease. I love Billy Madison -- challenge me on this if you must, but I'm convinced it's one of the great surrealist comedies of the 1990's, right up there with Naked Lunch -- which endorses a one-sided concept of social indoctrination in addition to corporate longevity. Billy isn't considered a proper adult until he decides to go to college, and the grandiose hotel chain started by his father winds up in somebody else's hands. Rather than responsibly putting his money towards a noble cause, Billy hands it off to a friend better equipped to navigate the commercial world.
Sandler's movies often embrace idealized notions of blue collar lifestyles. In Little Nicky, which Village Voice film critic J. Hoberman found "gross, but awash in family values," the devil's son is expected to replace his father, akin to the dilemma facing Billy Madison. The simplified correlation between family and work, a dated model of Norman Rockwell proportions, comes up in the blossoming fatherhood plot of Big Daddy and the stress of a demanding job in Click. The dynamic gets even more complicated with I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry, a movie about two straight guys disgusted by homosexuality. You could say the film eventually approves of gay marriage, but it does so with notable reluctance.
Many of the middle American heroes in Sandler's films build their successes out of nothing as if they existed in the imaginary realm of a corrupt politician's stump speech. President Bush once spoke of the all-American narrative as a "story in which evil is real, but courage and decency triumph," and if you squint a little, that pretty much sums up Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy and Spanglish at once. Then there's Mr. Deeds, a remake of the 1936 screwball comedy Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, which was directed by Frank Capra, Hollywood's quintessential chronicler of patriotic standards. In Reign Over Me, meanwhile, Sandler plays Charlie Fineman, an affluent New Yorker learning to overcome his 9/11 losses, recalling the bittersweet illusion of a happy ending that helped the Republican party in November 2004.
Terrorism forms the central concern in Zohan: Sandler's militant cartoon character doesn't like the Palestinians, but he expresses a desire to escape all the squabbling. "They've been fighting 2,000 years," his mother sighs. "It can't be much longer."
Nevertheless, Zohan throws in the towel, heads to New York incognito and pursues his dream of becoming a hairdresser (which prompts his Israeli brethren to label him a faygele, the derogatory Yiddish word used to describe homosexuals).
Working at a barbershop run by an alluring Lebanese woman (Emmanuelle Chriqui), he gradually assimilates himself into a world free of national boundaries. (He also concludes most sessions with -- nasty spoiler alert -- sexual favors in the back room, quickly making him the most popular barber in town among the little old lady contingent.)
Gliding along on stupid-humor autopilot, the movie operates under the guise of a balanced perspective. Zohan convinces the Israeli electronics vendors across the street to make nice with their Palestinian neighbors, and we even hear them discuss a little political common ground: It was the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin in 1995, they all agree, that really busted things up for both sides. Then, they bond through mutual appreciation for the sex appeal of Laura Bush.
The ability of these two opposing crowds to pull together would qualify as fantasy if we were supposed to view them as authentic Middle Easterners. Instead, they combine into a surprisingly potent symbol of communal tranquility. "Here," concludes one character, "we're all the same." That clinches it: Zohan isn't pro-Israel or pro-Palestine; it's pro-America.
There's nothing corrupt about Sandler promoting ethnic tolerance, even in a crass vehicle like this. At the same time, the zeal of its conclusion reads like the reductive "fair and balanced" mentality of a Fox newscast -- it's a blind stab at pragmatism that doesn't exist. It's practically an afterthought when somebody shows up in the end to explain the ease with which everybody can just kiss and make up. That's my own qualm with the consistently subdued politics recurring throughout this talented performer's uneven oeuvre: The ideas flow together with a steady stream of cheap quips and the occasional comic gem, but Sandler hardly possesses the astuteness of a satirist. Helplessly mugging for the camera until a good joke comes along, his political depth is just another punchline.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-03-2008 @ 9:39PM
mezzanine said...
...So was Zohan a good movie or not?
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 9:47PM
Jeff said...
God forbid an actor not follow the rest of the people he works with politically.
The rest of us conservatives have to largely let go when enjoying all sorts of media, from movies to music to television. Somehow, a flick or two escapes that bucks the liberal trend in the entertainment world, and it's worth a rant like this? Where were you when "Stop-Loss" decided to completely ignore basic military norms, as a contrast?
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 9:57PM
CajunMike said...
Oh Eric, you must be one of those blue-state enlightened people who just cant understand all those imbeciles in red-state America.
Your rant is totally ridiculous. Please don't post anymore crap like that here. Go see if it's something that the Huffington Post might want.
I'm sure your next piece will be a review for "Recount". That's a great piece of fiction that you will surely think is high brow material.
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 10:06PM
Peter Hall said...
I don't want to sound like an asshole here, but what exactly was the point of this rant? Rants, by nature, are not necessarily logic bound, but they are at least goal bound. As far as I can discern, you may as well have titled it "Fan Rant, who cares about Republicans?"
Sandler may be an open Republican (was news to me, but I don't care about Sandler; I agree with you on one point, though, an astute satirist he is not), but I think you're stretching to find a party line in some of his flicks. If anything, Billy Madison handing off the business to someone more concerned with big chain business is a liberal thing to do. What is the 'simplified correlation between family and work in Big Daddy'? As far as I remember, Sandler was unemployed and one of his biggest parables of family unity in the flick was a gay couple. Not too Republican...
Click is an argument against working stiffs; working stiffs typically being a caricature of more conservative, ie Republican, values.
I haven't seen a few of the other flicks cited (Spanglish, Reign Over Me, Zohan), but I think there is a more compelling argument that Adam Sandler's films are more categorical of conservative concessions, rather than as right as possible rigidness. If balance is the goal struck by end of most of his films, films he clearly has a creative hand in, why even go out of the way to make his politics an issue?
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 10:07PM
Jason said...
Hey Eric... what you've just written is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read this post. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 10:28PM
Marty said...
I am no Adam Sandler fan for I find his most of movies to be inane bores apart from the splendidly wonderful Punch-drunk Love. However, your rant about Sandler being a conservative is futile. What was the point? heaven forbid, his political leanings go against the Hollywood liberal views. Does everyone in Hollywood have to align themselves politically to Susan Sarandon who claims she will leave the US for Canada or Europe if McCain wins. Guess what, McCain will win now that Obama is the Democrat candidate and I wait with bated breath to see if Sarandon puts pay to her lip service. The lies and fabrications in many Hollywood films when dealing with political films like the Middle East conflict are so large you can fly and jumbo jet through them but as long as they are liberal views, it doesn't matter. They are more Hollywood propaganda films pushing their own liberal agenda on the poor, uneducated saps who swallow it hook, line and sink without doing their own research beyond the typically biased mainstream media.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 12:08AM
Jimmy said...
Sarandon can live wherever she wants, but I would still see most anything she is. Regardless of politics, she's one hell of an actress. So what if Sandler's a Republican, I think it's a stretch to say his films are advertisements for the Republican Party; I mean, most of them are just stupid.
6-03-2008 @ 10:36PM
Gustavo Brunetti said...
And God forbid a blogger to express his/her opinion!
If internet users start doing this, where will it stop?
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 10:55PM
Mr. R said...
A guy who always plays the part of an idiot who is a Republican? What is wrong with that?????
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 11:16PM
Rick Deckard said...
I'm seeing a lot of one-sided, politically charged posts here on Cinematical. I'm not going to stick around for it much longer. I agree with CajunMike - save it for Huffington. Likewise, I wouldn't want to see anything that would be welcome on the Drudge Report either - stick to talking about movies.
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 11:45PM
Erik Davis said...
"I'm seeing a lot of one-sided, politically charged posts here on Cinematical."
Really, Rick -- point me to "a lot" please, I'd love to see them. We're in the midst of a very important election year, Rick, and from time to time, even in Hollywood, that subject will spill over.
Frankly, though, I think the regular old movie news seriously outweighs whatever small amount of politics leak in. There's an audience for everything, and more than enough stories/topics for those who'd rather read about something else.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 12:52AM
Marty said...
Imagine the vitriolic hate-filled posts on this site when John McCain wins the election.
6-04-2008 @ 11:39PM
Graham said...
The problem is that you are the one who usually posts politics in the news posts. You usually have to get your little digs in someplace when you see something political. Now you are being called on it and you are pissing an moaning about it. As they say, if you can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen.
6-04-2008 @ 3:44AM
Bob said...
Not trying to be mean here, but I don't understand the point of this article. I actually didn't realize Sandler was a Republican, so I did find the article informative. However, I don't see a conservative slant in Sandler's films.
In response to Erik's message in the comments section... Even if this is an election year, I'm not sure I see how the filmography of Sandler has much to do with Obama's and McCain's Presidential campaigns.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 8:39AM
kel said...
Why do all Republicans have to be conservative? Yes, Sandler's a Republican, but that doesn't mean he's necessarily a conservative. There is a distinction. Just look at the presidential candidate he endorsed-Guiliani. He was a moderate. Another example-the current governor of California. Erik you would have been better off with your rant you didn't paint everyone with such a broad brush. When you do that, you're no better than the knee-jerk ditto heads who posted above here.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 9:35AM
Kevin said...
The one enlightening thing I found about this article is how conservatives can get so mad at hollywood. I always thought that their arguments were a little ridiculous. Yes, some hollywood films are blatantly liberal, but c'mon, get over it and judge it on its merits. But the fact that a liberal can say "the underlying principles of his movies don't always go down with ease" about Sandlers movies is as ridiculous if not more so than a conservative complaint, and I'm a liberal! His movies may espouse "typical american family values" but I don't find anything aggressive or offensive about the way they do that. As others have stated, many of the very movies you argue are conservative could be shown to have more liberal viewpoints in mind. Which brings me to my final point, which is that its somewhat ridiculous to buy into this notion that one party has this set of moral codes and the other party is totally opposite. Democrats don't have a monopoly on tolerance and the laid back, hippy lifestyle, and republicans aren't all money grubbing racists wearing 3 piece suits. The fact that his dad wants him to go to college and take over the family business by getting a job is NOT conservative, and the fact that he passes of a job that pays millions to someone else who is better qualifed is not liberal. The mere presence of those arguments means that people are stooping to the broad generalizations that we should be trying to avoid in order to find common ground between various ideologies.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 11:17AM
Ant said...
Every now and then Cinematical has to throw some liberal political rant - usually spewed by Davis (note his defensive comment). At least someone else is doing it now :-)
I look forward to you next piece: "Fan Rant: Michael Moore, Liberal Actor". Where you challenge the "facts" laid out by the director.
Seriously guys, can we leave the politics out of the movie blog?
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 1:18PM
rex said...
Was this really a rant about the politics of Billy Madison and Little Nicky? Seriously? ... no really, Seriously?
Actually I found Billy Madison to be about tolerance. You see he drew a blue duck because he had never seen a blue duck. It was quacktastic.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 3:49PM
Pat said...
Good post, Eric. Don't listen to these assholes. Very smart, and even though I haven't dug Sandler since Happy Gilmore, I enjoyed it.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 3:57PM
Pat said...
Ant said,
"Seriously guys, can we leave the politics out of the movie blog?"
Ant, Movies ARE politics. Any time anyone makes a movie, they are choosing to portray the world in a certain way, manipulating it from their perspective; perhaps challenging, confirming, rejecting, reaffirming etc. the common worldview of the society in which they live.
Sicko is political, but so is High School Musical. People who consider film as more than just something with colors and cool explosions address it as they would any other text, and the politics and worldview of any text is an important critical consideration.
The article is rather fair (I actually didn't see how it could be considered a "rant"), perhaps written by a liberal but not refuting the filmmaker's politics - instead, he's just pointing them out, analyzing the texts and gleaning what he can from them. This is what critics do in academia, in newspapers, and yes, even on movie blogs.
Reply