RvB's After Images: True Grit (1969)
Filed under: Classics, After Image, Western

Before it opened, there was much public mulling over whether Harrison Ford had the stamina at age 65 to play Indiana Jones one more time. Apparently the box office grosses answered that question. It was an irrelevant question, anyway. In those Indiana Jones movies, the machinery is what mattered. Ford was there for the ride, just like the audience. I think what was missing in ...Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is the elegiac qualities of a late period performance ... for example, the aging heroism in John Wayne's last great movie.
True Grit isn't just the sword outwearing the sheath, and the soul outwearing the breast, as Byron put it. It's also about remaining power in an old carcass. Wayne's rallying of that power in the film's memorable duel: blinking his one good eye at the shock of being called a fat old man, he takes his horse's reins in his teeth and rides down four gunmen. The film is often a comedy, with lines worthy of Mark Twain in it; so much so that the emotional content blindsides you. Every film class in the world quite justly talks about the end of The Searchers, John Ford's image of Wayne framed by a doorway, never at home or really at ease. True Grit has a scene to equal it: a gentle if tersely written scene at a snow-covered grave yard in the high country, with approximately the emotional fire power of the finale of James Joyce's The Dead.
Tom Wolfe claimed that Charles Portis, his colleague at the New York Herald Tribune, was the only journalist he'd ever heard of who had done what journalists always claim they'll do someday. Apparently Portis really did take three weeks off, went to a cabin, and wrote the novel that got him straight out of the newspaper business. Portis' book True Grit was reputedly written with Wayne in mind, but the part of deputy Marshal Reuben J. "Rooster" Cogburn is as juicy a role as Long John Silver. Mitchum or Lancaster could have done it proud; Tommy Lee Jones or Nick Nolte would carry it out now. The movie is very much Wayne's world, though, bringing out the peculiarly musical qualities of his voice, and his gift for understatement and low comedy. Director Henry Hathaway and photographer Lucien Ballard's cameras went to just about the noblest quadrant of the country to film it, Mammoth Lakes in California and Montrose Country, Colorado in the west side of the Continental Divide: high country, lit by the golden shimmer of aspen leaves.
The book is more down and dirty, specific to the river towns, and set in the foothills of the Ozarks and the Ouichita mountains in southeastern Oklahoma. I hate remakes in principal, but there's an anti-western that could be made out of this fine book someday, and it would look a little something like The Assassination of Jesse James...; certainly Rooster's uneasy past as one of Quantrill's men demonstrates that Rooster was a graduate of the same riding academy as Jesse. The Arkansas federal marshal, profane, old, fat and given to whiskey either out of the jug or the bottle, is recruited by one Mattie Ross (Kim Darby). The farm girl's father was killed by a career criminal who was taking some time off, posing as a hired hand. Cogburn is reluctant to go across the border from Ft. Smith, Arkansas into the Indian Nation (later Oklahoma).
Mattie motivates the old man with a $50 reward to bring the villain back alive. While mulling over the offer, Cogburn meets up with a cocksure Texas ranger called LaBoeuf (the musician Glen Campbell), who has the same quarry as Mattie. LaBouef has too much gun, too much spurs and too much self confidence. Mattie insists on accompanying the lawmen into the Territory, despite every discouragement they can muster. The trio braces some squealers (one is Dennis Hopper) by smoking them out of their cabin. Now they're certain that the fugitive is one of the new henchmen of a robber called Lucky Ned Pepper (Robert Duvall), who has previously had his face rearranged by one of Rooster Cogburn's bullets. The ambushers are ambushed themselves, and it takes a gunfight and an ordeal in a skeleton-lined pit of rattlesnakes to set things right.
The terrific script by Marguerite Roberts gave Wayne what he called his favorite scene ever, when Rooster tells about his own drifting life running a restaurant up in Cairo, Illinois, in those days before the roughneck in him drove away his wife and his son. In the telling, there's sarcastic humor...and humor will never be respected as much as drama...presumably that's why this moment of Wayne at his finest isn't referred to in film lore, as often as similar moments in The Searchers. The scathing interplay between Rooster and LaBoeuf is true wit, too. It includes my all time favorite cinema warning against Texan self-esteem. After LaBoeuf tells of how real Texas Ranger sometimes have to drink water out of a muddy hoof-print, and be glad to have it, too, Rooster grunts "If ever I meet one of you Texas waddies that didn't drink out of a hoofprint, I'll shake his hand, or buy him a Dan'l Webster cigar." Against Wayne's aura of heroism is always a W. C. Fields like lightness that keeps this stirring film buoyant...as well as autumnal.
Considering the complexity of the emotions Wayne brings up, It's no surprise that his centenary last year went relatively unremarked. (A fine summing up of the actor is Garry Wills' loving yet unsparing biography.) This was true even in the American west, one place where they still revere Wayne with no mixed feelings. But there, the actor's image is often an icon of reactionaries. Images of Wayne's face, the face that in countless movies welcomed strangers to the west, is sometimes used to ward off outsiders. Wayne's legend isn't happily remembered by Native Americans, who quite rightly remember the way Indians were treated in his films. In the 1950s, Wayne fell in with a very bad crowd of politicians and commentators, the kind of spoilsmen and bullies who he once upon a time used to punch out in his movies.
The films Wayne made in the 1960s and 1970s were often dreadful, wearing down his audience. Wayne made True Grit in 1969, but he also made The Undefeated (recently released as part of a box set with the startlingly advanced 1930 Raoul Walsh western The Big Trail). The Undefeated is typical Wayne in decline, lummoxy work that grinds the political axes of its day; watching it in the midst of Vietnam War, it was pretty easy to decode a bit about a Civil War draft dodger getting busted in the mouth for not getting out on there on the firing line. Speaking of Vietnam, Wayne also spent his capital as an actor in The Green Berets: propaganda, and bad propaganda at that (here's New York Times critic Renata Adler hitting the film about as hard as it deserved). Considering Wayne's most careless public pronouncements, I'm not sorry that I enjoyed the Pogues anthem of disappointment "The Body of an American" ("Fare thee well, John Wayne, there's nothing left to say"), or the even far more furious MDC punk-rock tune "John Wayne Was a Nazi".
Because of that fury, I'll explain: What people cherished in Wayne is evident in the last moments of True Grit, where Rooster Cogburn is offered a space in Mattie's family graveyard. And the hero explains to Mattie gently that when she grows up, she'll want her husband and family buried next to her. In fact, both of them are a pair of outcasts about to separate for good. The novel was written from the point of view of an independent old single woman. This seems to have been part of the movie, because it seems unlikely, in this summing up, that Mattie will never met a man who could tolerate her own grit, except for one old rogue back in the 1880s.
I was watching this final scene at home with my wife, and we both became quite helpless with tears as Wayne rode away. We would both like to be simple, in the good sense of the word, and good in the simple sense of the word. We'd like to be open, direct and fearless people, but that's not going to happen. We're city dwellers, dealing on a daily basis with more snakes than you'd find in an Oklahoma cave. Straight shooting can't kill what we're up against. Rather, each new day requires more triangulation, and ever more elaborate trick shots. And Wayne's peculiar beauty and common sense appears to be gone forever, too, and we wept for that loss as well.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-03-2008 @ 11:15AM
Paul Kulik said...
Best review I've read in quite some time...you might say it had "true grit". Now I'll have to watch it yet again.
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 7:14AM
Argent said...
i liked 'true grit' quite a bit, but fwiw, i would consider 'the shootist' wayne's last great movie.
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 8:11AM
Gina said...
Good review (even though you couldn't quite resist dragging politics into it, as nearly every movie reviewer seems to feel obligated to do these days by hook or by crook). I love everything about this movie, and it's one of my dad's all-time favorites. I'm glad you gave it a spotlight.
I think Argent is right about "The Shootist," though.
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 8:46AM
Pucky said...
Excellent review. Most people I speak with who could give a damn about westerns ALWAYS have praise to say about Wayne and his performances. The man is untouchable (unless we discuss Ghengis Khan...).
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 11:27AM
Richard von Busack said...
Thanks very much for the kind comments, everyone, I really appreciate them...I did have to drag politics into it, because it's a real heartbreaker for Wayne fans. I'm certain a new generation is going to realize all that stuff is just ancient history, and come to watch Wayne movies fresh.
I thought about The Shootist when I was writing it, but to me its more of a curtain call than a last great movie, despite that sterling cast. I'll have another look at it.
Reply
6-03-2008 @ 8:27PM
Douglas Garwood said...
Beautifully written meditation on not only the movie, but the man as an icon. Deconstructing iconography is tricky business, but this is the best piece of its kind I've read since Pauline Kael was among us. Well done.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 8:56AM
justsalt said...
Your 'extra' paragraphs deconstructing JW's later films were also deconstructed here:
http://www.libertyfilmfestival.com/libertas/?p=10704
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 11:43AM
Tim said...
Frankly, this is an idiotic review in so many ways.
I'll stick to the main fact however, that John Wayne showed great respect for Native Americans in his films. He might have been fighting them, but they were always spoken of, has having reasons for what they were doing. They were never merely cardboard cutouts.
In the "The Searches," it's about Wayne's character's faults, his obsession, not the Indian rapists of his neice. And that might be a hard fact to swallow, but that was common practice among Indians who came in contact with white women. Just as it was common for white men to rape Native American women.
There are Indian Tribe Council Lodges that have an area set aside for John Wayne photos and other items from time he would spend with them while making his films.
Basically, you out of some knee-jerk liberal mindset had to attack Wayne because of his American Iconic status.
And anything truly pro-American is something that just makes people like you so trite.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 11:53AM
Richard von Busack said...
Tim, I'll agree that Wayne's rep as an Indian hater is exaggerated; there's a great line in The Big Trail about how much his character had learned from them. On the other hand, have a look at the drunk Indian scenes in The Comancheros and tell me about how respectful it is.
I don't suffer from restless leg syndrome, me, but I doubt if it's better when the right knee jerks, instead of the left knee.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 1:30PM
Campaspe said...
Excellent review of a movie I cherish. Delighted to see you discuss the Portis novel, which is even better.
From what I have read, Indian writers and activists such as Sherman Alexie and Louise Erdrich don't condemn Wayne out of hand, but they certainly express a lot of ambivalence about the meaning of his image and legacy. Which is in keeping with Wayne's status as a unique symbol of Americana, right and wrong. I hope some of the people reading here go on to read Wills' book, which explores Wayne's art as an actor so beautifully.
If Wayne has an image problem, a lot of it can be traced back to an interview he did with Playboy in the early 70s. The most infamous remark there came when he said "I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility," but he also spoke about Indians, referring to their "selfishly" wanting to keep their land for themselves. Whatever his characters may have expressed from time to time in his movies, that doesn't suggest Wayne himself had a very profound personal engagement with Indian issues.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 1:55PM
Wade said...
For those of you interested Dirty Harry has a great response to this at http://www.libertyfilmfestival.com/libertas/?p=10704
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 10:53AM
Grant Canyon said...
Wade,
Why would anyone care what that coward of a fool thinks? He's a loser nobody who lashes out at the powerful and talented because he has neither, but is barely intelligent enough to realize it and it is burning him up.
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 4:28PM
Wade said...
Grant Canyon keep your head in the sand and keep drinking the kool-aid, you could be a poster boy for the moonbats out there with that insipid comment. And by no means ever read a different point of view from your moonbat friends (cause after all you don't want facts to get in the way of your beliefs).
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 4:43PM
Richard von Busack said...
Personally, I'd love to read an intelligently-written conservative blog on the subject of film. I do believe there are other sides to a story.
But I'm not going back to that blog to fight those mudslingers. They're not interested in meeting people half-way. Sometimes, the rhetoric gets so high-pitched that you wonder if they're afraid the facts aren't on their side.
Reply
6-07-2008 @ 10:59AM
WasatchMan said...
"JohnWayneWasA Nazi"? Is that really your tag at the end of this column? What a despicable thing to write, and it invalidates anything good you pretend to say about the man.
Reply
6-06-2008 @ 3:56PM
Richard von Busack said...
Seriously, do you think I'm calling John Wayne a Nazi?!
I'm mentioning the song to demonstrate what a controversial figure Wayne was, but now I fully expect to see a posting at the Liberty Film Festival site now: "Whinging Liberal Calls Wayne a Nazi! What do you think of this outrage, citizens!"
Reply
6-06-2008 @ 5:22PM
Richard von Busack said...
And that's exactly what happened, because that's how they roll over there.
6-07-2008 @ 12:36AM
Dirty Harry said...
It's interesting how you bring up the smallest of subplots in "The Undefeated" to criticize Wayne but fail to mention that Wayne's character in the film has an adopted son he raised from a child who just happens to be a full-blooded Indian. He's so devoted to the boy that when he's late returning from the field Wayne's former Civil War Colonel can't even function.
You choose the smallest of subplots from "The Undefeated" to focus on and yet ignore the major subplot involving an inter-racial romance between that Indian boy and a white girl -- that Wayne's character approves of.
And the overall politics of "The Undefeated" are extremely complicated. If there are any bad guys at all it's the U.S. govt.
The dishonesty you employed in this piece is stunning.
Reply
6-07-2008 @ 10:58AM
WasatchMan said...
"No I didn't call Wayne A Nazi. I merely cited a song that did."
Well, of course that makes it so much better.
Maybe you should go ahead and quote the rest of the lyrics, and we'll see who is being uncivil here:
John Wayne wore an army uniform
Didn’t like us reds and fags that didn’t conform
Great white hero had so much nerve
Lived much longer than he deserved
He was a Nazi
But not anymore
He was a Nazi
Life evens the score
Late show Indian or Mexican dies
Klan propaganda legitimized
Hypocrite coward never fought a real fight
When I see John I’m ashamed to be white
Death bed Christian of this you avowed
If God’s alive, you’re roastin’ now
Well John, we got no regrets
As long as you died a long and painful death
Reply
6-07-2008 @ 11:15AM
Richard von Busack said...
The lyrics of that extreme song demonstrate what I was saying, that Wayne was a controversial and sometimes hated figure. At your site, you were claiming this was not the case so I'm actually glad I provided an example.
There was a time in my life a few decades ago when I was so angry at Wayne's politics that I sympathized with some of the sentiments of that song, but I'd never get any pleasure out of someone's death of cancer (I've lost people close to me, as I'm sure you people have, also).(Although, considering some of the commentators at your blog, there's probably been some high-fiving over the diagnosis of Ted Kennedy, yes?...not that two wrongs makes a right.)
And I certainly don't agree with the lyrics of the song now. I don't think he was a Nazi, I never called him a racist, I never said he hated Indians, he doesn't make me ashamed to be white. OK?
You've been harassing me to say "some intellectuals and Indian activists" were opposed to Wayne instead of the mainstream Native American. I don't mind making that qualification.
Reply