From Page to Screen: 'The Road'
Filed under: Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Columns, From Page to Screen

One of my concerns when I started doing this column was that each forthcoming adaptation I covered would equate to a new movie losing the ability to surprise me. What more effective way to strip oneself of the thrill of cinematic discovery, I thought, than to pore over the source material before watching? Ultimately I decided that the prospect of literary discovery along with the chance to write the column more than compensated for that risk, but here's some evidence that maybe I shouldn't have worried at all: having read Cormac McCarthy's The Road, I'm more excited to see John Hillcoat's adaptation – coming this November -- than I ever would have been otherwise.
It's not that I consider The Road to be a great book; it's more that I think it's a very good book that could make a great film. At its core is something deeply profound: a father-son relationship of such truth and purity that it keeps the characters – known only as "the man" and "the boy" -- alive when there would seem to be nothing to do but wish for death. It's an epic struggle between love and despair, taking the form of an adventure story set in a vivid, horrifying post-apocalyptic America, and it's riveting and heartbreaking.
On the other hand, I seem to be the only person in the world who's not enamored of Cormac McCarthy (No Country for Old Men) as a prose stylist, at least here: Some of his passages are downright obscurantist, and his attempts to make his writing resemble the barren landscapes of his story often give it an awkward, affected feel. (Also, as a newcomer to McCarthy, I gotta ask: what does the man have against quotation marks?)
The movie represents, to me, an opportunity to magnify the novel's triumphs and diminish its failures. Director John Hillcoat (The Proposition) and his crew have reportedly been putting in painstaking effort to bring the bleakness and emptiness of McCarthy's universe to the screen. Looking at the still on top of this page sends a chill down my spine: the desperation in Viggo Mortensen's eyes, the utter shell-shock on Kodi Smit-McPhee's face, the grime and dust and ash that cover them, all make it apparent that the movie isn't going to spare us any of the novel's emotional wallop, at least not intentionally. The book has been hailed as a masterpiece of raw, devastating simplicity, but stripping it of some of McCarthy's stylistic flourishes could make it stronger still.
And in truth, there's no way to make the movie remotely faithful to the book and have it be anything other than a total emotional beat down. I mentioned that The Road is an "adventure story," and in many ways it is, but it has few of the genre's conventional peaks and valleys; while there are moments of heart-stopping suspense (a dramatic escape from a coven of cannibals, for example), for most of the novel's 280 pages, victory means staving off death for one more day by finding a can of peaches. Our heroes' most formidable enemies aren't cannibals, but starvation, the cold, and the ever-present urge to put an end to the hopeless struggle. The pair wanders through a wasteland, trying to survive on the rapidly dwindling remnants of a world one of them has never seen and the other barely remembers. The question the novel asks is: What reason can there possibly be to get up in the morning and slog through the ash and rain for another day? It's one thing to read through this over the course of several days, as I did, and quite another to condense it all into a two-hour film. It promises to be a wrenching experience.
The performances will be crucial. McCarthy doesn't give a lot to work with, and Joe Penhall's faithful screenplay reportedly doesn't add much, other than enlarging the role of the Man's wife (Charlize Theron) who, in the book, opts for suicide long before the Man and the Boy reach their current state. Mortensen and Smit-McPhee have a difficult task: Their acting has to embody the profound, elemental bond between the father and son, and the characters' determination to go on despite lacking an apparent reason to do so. Mortensen has long mastered noble stoicism, but will need to add a crucial vulnerability into the mix, something he ably began to do in A History of Violence. Smit-McPhee, a 12-year old Australian, is supposed to be a phenom, which, coincidentally, is what it will take to convincingly portray the Boy's constant inner battle between mortal fear and basic goodness.
I agree with everyone else that Hillcoat was the perfect choice to direct The Road on the strength of his merciless The Proposition. Visually, at least, the landscape of McCarthy's post-apocalyptic America is not too far removed from the nineteenth century back-country Australia on display in that film. I would just add that, along the same lines as Mortensen, Hillcoat may need to soften his harsh m.o. around the edges to accommodate McCarthy's essential humanism.
Ideally, we'll be able to peer through the outward brutality of the story to see the quivering core of faith and love and desperate humanity that it conceals. Maybe it's heresy to say, but I think the movie could potentially allow us to do that more lucidly and powerfully than Cormac McCarthy's occasionally irritating prose (I emphasize again that I am in the minority – if not alone – on this point.) Either way, I'm glad I read the novel first. It's a wonderful story that could become a masterpiece.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-04-2008 @ 9:23PM
Jordan said...
when i first started reading mccarthy, his prose kind of bothered me, but after reading all of his work, i find it amazing. i have no idea where the switchover happened, but it did. i read the road all in one sitting and was in tears by the end, even though i had no idea what the ending meant, and still don't really. i will agree that it's not his best (suttree, by far), but i still think it's an incredibly beautiful piece of work that will hopefully make an incredible film.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 10:32PM
remf3 said...
First---thanks for introducing me to the word "obscurantist." I've never seen that word before and, after looking it up, I like it.
I read "The Road" shortly after it came out and read it in one sitting. I found it utterly gripping, and like the previous poster, I ended up in tears at the end. Like the author of this post, I found the lack of punctuation, the short words and the "obscurantism (I probably just used that wrong) to be a bit on the irritating side at first but soon fell in love with it. I was quite pleased with the choice of Viggo as the role of the man. I felt that McCarthy gave a lot of depth to his characters, despite the sparse writing, and Viggo seems to be the perfect actor to do this character justice.
As an aside, I just started reading "No Country For Old Men," before I see the movie, and McCarthy writes it the same way. It seems a lot easier to pick up the second time.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 10:47PM
NP said...
While I agree with the post author that sometimes McCarthy's prose comes off as affectation, I would argue that he uses words as physical beings quite skillfully (even when it does seem an affectation). Also, The Road is, in general, a quite cinematic novel, drawing vivid pictures of the American wasteland that the boy and man encounter on their journey to the coast. There are a couple of plot points I am worried might be changed, and I admit I'm a bit concerned about what they're going to do with the expanded role of the wife, but overall I feel pretty confident it's going to be a great film.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 11:48PM
Eugene Novikov said...
I wonder if you could give an example of McCarthy's use of words as "physical beings."
6-04-2008 @ 10:48PM
mezzanine said...
Funny this is mentioned, I actually have to read the book over the summer for English next year.
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 11:44PM
cubitfox said...
I just got done reading The Road today, and I think its better than NCFOM, so I think this movie has a lot of potential. The dialog and interactions between the man and son are the heart of the story, and if that can be transfered on screen, this film could end up amazing.
I agree that McCarthy's prose can get a tad irritating, especially in The Road, but if you really want to read his best novel, read Blood Meridian. Its near perfect in my opinion, and is also very cinematic as well.
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 2:36AM
prayforwinter said...
I just finished this novel two days ago after reading an article in the Times about the process of shooting the upcoming film. I am very excited for it.
Just like yourself, I thought McCarthy's prose gimmicky at first, but I was eventually swayed. Not including any punctuation for quotations (not even a Joycean dash) blurs thought, speech and action. I had to reread passages to determine what character was speaking, but in the end this type of prose really does contribute to his subject matter--a bleak world where everything is stripped down. McCarthy does have random paragraphs pondering and asking tough questions, but it blends so well with the topic at hand. It is a prose style that is in the minority of contemporary fiction.
I started Blood Meridian yesterday, and even in the first 15 pages it is stunning. Looking forward to reading that. Thanks for the post, very fascinating.
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 6:58AM
NP said...
"I wonder if you could give an example of McCarthy's use of words as 'physical beings.'"
One example that springs immediately to mind is the repetition of speech used between father and son. Numerous times one will speak and the other will repeat his words verbatim. Sometimes this is done as question and response, but many times it is not, effectively creating an echo on the page, simultaneously underscoring both how alone the two are in the world, and how tightly they are bonded to one another.
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 10:03AM
juicerino said...
Nice write up.
I'm stoked about this adaptation.
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 10:08AM
mike said...
Just about done with the book, I started on Monday and read a little each night and should be done tonight. I love it so far and am excited for this movie. I liked NCFOM as a book better, going to finally read Blood Meridian next.
I do love his prose though, it so refreshing and easy to read, I love everything about his writing style...
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 11:38AM
rex said...
Euegene-
Your assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to read up on the McCarthy catalog.
I might recommend starting with the Orchard Keeper, as it is a bit shorter and you get an opportunity to see him develop his literary style.
If you feel up to it try Blood Meridian. It's commonly referred to as a modern day masterpiece. It's savage and brutal, but brilliantly written. After that take a break and slowly work through his Border trilogy. Pace yourself to avoid depression.
Other things you will notice. He doesn't translate Spanish. It's rather Treasure of the Sierra Madre and you will wish you paid better attention in Spanish class.
Also, The Road is probably the closest thing to a happy ending in any of his books.
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 8:31PM
ldtmann said...
I read All the Pretty Horses years ago and was really underwhelmed.
However, I'm a big fan of post-apocalyptic fiction, think The Road is a terrific novel and love how real the setting is. So much fiction of this nature has given the protagonist some sort of major out - they manage to live reasonably well after the world around them has fallen apart. McCarthy didn't choose that route. It makes the book extraordinarily compelling.
Western Pennsylvania in winter was pretty bleak (no dead kudzu, however, as the book was apparently set a little further south). We had little bits of snow and general dreary weather in February and March (the movie was shot here from late February through early May). The film crew had to put up with some surprisingly sunny, warm days in April though!
Laurie Mann
The Road Rumors
http://www.theroadrumors.com
6-05-2008 @ 11:00PM
EatingPie said...
Book Spoilers here...
The Road was the bleakest novel I've ever read. Everything is dead. Everything. And the only way to get food is to find a random can here or there... remember, everything is dead.
I see the theme of love over desperation. But ultimately, the book offers no hope. Everything is dead. Once the cans are gone, humans will be too.
How do you make this into a movie? It's impossible without major changes. And I fear a lot will be lost, particularly the horrifying deadness of the world.
-Pie
Reply
6-17-2008 @ 4:55AM
TampopoMan said...
I don't know if anyone is still reading this thread now, but my $.02...
I just finished reading "The Road" today, and I have to say that stylistically it was tons easier to read than the similarly dialogue prose-challenged "Blindness," by Jose Saramago.
I can live without quotation marks and apostrophes. At least I knew who was speaking what line in "The Road." But "Blindness?" Yeesh! *That* book must've been a beast to turn into a screenplay.
Reply
8-13-2008 @ 1:51AM
Cookie said...
I have recently finished reading the Road and i have to say it is a great piece of work I love the father figure it is not very common to see the father as the good guy and it was nice to see that for a change and I do think Mortensen will do a great job of playing the father.
Reply