Guy Ritchie Directing 'Sherlock Holmes'
Filed under: Action, Classics, Deals, Mystery & Suspense, Warner Brothers, Scripts, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
Now this is a combination I would have never seen coming. Variety reports that Guy Ritchie will be helming Sherlock Holmes for Warner Bros. Yes, you heard that right. The iconic detective and his deerstalker cap are making a comeback -- and Ritchie is the man chosen to make it happen. It's nice to see him branching out ... I think.The movie will be based not on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's novels, which I find no end of shocking, but on the Lionel Wigram's upcoming comic book. Ritchie is currently rewriting the script, previously written by Tony Peckham. The movie is being slated for a 2010 release.
The details are being kept under tight wraps, so I can only venture a guess that it will remain in foggy Victorian England. On the other hand, Warners says they are aiming to "reinvent" Holmes and his sidekick, Dr. Watson, and focus on making him more "adventuresome." They will focus on his skills as a boxer and swordsman -- which, again, suggests a Victorian Holmes, but plenty of modern characters find excuses to break out a blade.
As an Anglophile, I am dying to see Holmes come back -- but I'm rather skeptical of a reinvention. It seems like he's been off the pop culture radar long enough for a traditional comeback to be very successful. Especially if it followed on the heels of The Wolfman remake, which I predict will inspire a renaissance of Gothic horror. But then again, I'm a nerd who likes costume pieces, and engages in wishful thinking. For some reason, I'm getting a Van Helsing vibe from all this vague reinvention talk, and I can't really explain why. I'm going to hope for the best, though. One of my very first sights in London was Baker Street and the Sherlock Holmes statue. When I went out to the country, I somehow managed to land near Hindhead, Doyle's old neighborhood. After doing a late night pub crawl, clutching my friend because I couldn't see for the dark and fog, I really understood where The Hound of the Baskervilles came from. So the mere idea of a movie conjures up all kinds of excitement for me. Please let this be good!









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-04-2008 @ 11:11AM
Gina said...
Ooh, how about Hugh Laurie as Holmes?? I'd give an arm and a leg to see that! (And they say his "House" character is based on Holmes in some ways anyway, so it fits!)
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 12:02PM
Jason Seaver said...
Actually, Laurie was going to be in a Holmes revival a couple years ago, but as Watson, with Stephen Fry playing Holmes. Not what you'd expect from their body types at all, but Fry is (among other things) a big-time Sherlockian and was planning to do this with their Jeeves & Wooster collaborator
6-04-2008 @ 3:08PM
Petro1734 said...
Any chance we can clone Jeremy Brett for this ?
He was awesome as Holmes : )
Reply
6-04-2008 @ 4:28PM
Liz Newcomb said...
Yes, Jeremy Brett *was* Holmes and those adaptations were the closest ones I've ever seen to the stories. They also showed Watson as he was in the tales - an intelligent man who was fit and in the prime of his life, not a flailing buffoon. Good luck to Richie to make something better than this series!
Reply
6-05-2008 @ 10:33PM
Monica Schmidt said...
Yes, Brett was brilliant (he is my favorite Holmes), but the fact that he passed on in September of 1995 puts a bit of a damper on casting him in this film.
This is the project that Neil Marshall was originally slated to direct...interesting that he either he dropped out or was replaced with Richie. Hopefully Guy is up to the task of allowing Holmes' more bohemian aspects to surface, while maintaining the integrity of the character.
Reply