The Smurfs Are Headed for the Big Screen
Filed under: Animation, Classics, Deals, Sony, Family Films, Newsstand
The retro revivals just keep coming. Variety reports that Columbia Pictures and Sony Animation are bringing The Smurfs to the big screen. David Stem and David Weiss, the authors behind the last two installments of Shrek, are in talks to pen the screenplay. No word yet on director, release date, or plot outline. A Smurfs movie has actually been in the works since 2002 at Paramount/Nickelodeon (we first reported on it back in 2005), but producer Jordan Kerner has brought the rights over to Sony. The original plan was to make it a 3-D CGI feature which, frankly, sounds terrifying to me. Sony Animation plans to make it a combination of live action and CGI, like Alvin and the Chipmunks. I'm unsettled by the idea of seeing them in CGI, as I think their charm primarily comes from their classic animation. Chipmunks can be (relatively) cute in CGI, but Smurfs?
But you know what this means? Some poor actor out there is destined to play Gargamel! It's funny, there was always someone he reminded me of as a kid, but the memory is long gone. Probably for the best. Start naming actors who you want to see in the patchy black robe.
Columbia aims for the movie to reintroduce the beloved Smurfs to a whole new audience, as the cartoon stopped regularly airing on NBC in 1990. That means there are really kids who have never seen or heard of the Smurfs, which is pretty shocking. I don't know if it is worth a big-screen movie, but then I was never much of a fan. However,
let me take this chance to suggest that Sony animators add a few new girl Smurfs. One Smurfette just isn't going to fly anymore.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-10-2008 @ 8:35AM
Christopher Campbell said...
Abe Vigoda should play Gargamel!
Reply
6-10-2008 @ 11:29AM
irongiant said...
i think Michael Emerson would be perfect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Linus
Reply
6-10-2008 @ 5:06PM
V.M.L. said...
Shoot! I'd SOOOOO watch the movie if Michael Emerson was in it! Other than that, I won't watch it.
I'm also wondering if the movie will add more female Smurfs or explain why Smurfette is the only girl in town.
6-10-2008 @ 5:11PM
Elisabeth said...
That is genius. I wish I had a prize to give you!
6-11-2008 @ 7:54PM
AJ Wiley said...
Michael Emerson is a genius suggestion.
I was gonna say that it would be funny were Gary Oldman to play Gargamel, but I could actually see it working (which is a scary thought in and of itself) were Emerson to be cast. I loves me some crazy, deceptive bug-eyed mastermind.
6-10-2008 @ 1:17PM
Paul Arnette said...
You're crazy, clearly this should be all live action, except Gargamel, who should CGI. ;)
Reply
6-10-2008 @ 2:18PM
Robin said...
Wow, this is insane.
Reply
6-10-2008 @ 10:53PM
teenagertc said...
Michael Ausiello is going to have a heart attack...
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 8:09AM
FluXulF said...
I disagree BIG TIME with all the above comments.
If any comicbook-turned-into-movie ever should be pure CGI it's definitely the Smurfs. And let's get that straight first of all it was originally a series of COMICBOOKS ... NOT cartoons. The cartoons were cheesy beyond description and not very true to the originals. I suspect a lot of people here think of those cartoons and not the comics and that's just plain wrong.
Also I think a lot of people miss the reference to hallucinogens and especially the magic mushroom kind... Smurfs are BLUE and wear WHITE caps which is a very obvious reference to Liberty Caps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psilocybe_semilanceata) which has white "caps" and a stem turned blue from the active ingredience: Psilocybin... AND they live in Fly Agaric houses goddammit! ;) And both Gargamel and the Smurfs experiment with potions of all kinds! So in that way it's not unlike Alice in Wonderland which might just seem like a children's story to some, but those-in-the-know will recognize all the obvious references.
If anything the Smurfs should be pure CGI to give that sharp, crisp psychedelic look to it ;) As for mixing it with "real" live action... maybe it could work if only the humans like Gargamel is played by actors, but nothing else incl. the surroundings should be "real" ... think "Arthur and the Minimoys" ;)
Reply
6-14-2008 @ 10:00PM
Thad Garrison said...
I think they'll look really fantastic in 3D - provided the animators don't try to over-texture them (e.g. Shrek.) If they are treated as cartoon characters and stylized accordingly (e.g. The Incredibles, Horton, Ice Age) it could really work.
Found this post that supposedly shows early CG models. Very close, if not identical to the 2D representation:
http://www.mushroomvillage.com/shroomroom/showthread.php?t=807
Mixing in live action, on the other hand, could turn everything horrific.
Reply