Review: The Incredible Hulk
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Universal, Theatrical Reviews, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, War
-(2).jpg)
Here are a few statistics on the 2003 film Hulk:
- Directed by Oscar winner Ang Lee (Brokeback Mountain, Crouching Tiger)
- Written by Michael France (Cliffhanger), James Schamus (The Ice Storm), first-timer John Turman (and maybe 15 other screenwriters)
- Estimated budget: $137 million
- Worldwide box office: $245 million
- Rotten Tomatoes score: 61% positive
- IMDb user rating: 5.8 out of 10
So I ask you this: Are we talking about a failure ... or an underrated movie that's been unjustly labeled a failure? It matters not, I suppose, because the arrival of the all-new The Incredible Hulk, Marvel (and Universal) hopes to leave the first Hulk cowering in a dusty vault somewhere. (Until the next DVD re-release, of course.) So while I felt a strange bit of resentment towards this "forget that first movie, let's get a do-over" procedure, I felt pretty confident about the second Hulk's chances. Director Louis Leterrier has shown some skill with action flicks like Unleashed and Transporter 2, the new cast (which includes Edward Norton, Tim Roth, Liv Tyler and William Hurt) was pretty impressive, and (best of all) the producers were making one simple promise from the outset: More action.
Suffice to say those producers weren't lying. While it doesn't measure up to the lofty standard laid down by last month's Iron Man, this new Hulk flick is quite a bit better than the early skeptics would have you believe. You could retitle this flick The Hulk is Bourne, and it would be a perfectly appropriate description (albeit a really awful pun). Stripped-down, gritty, and bereft of any excess fat, The Incredible Hulk feels like a combination between high-end Marvel-ized mayhem, the "constant chase" dynamic of the Bourne series, and a modernized take on the Jekyll & Hyde story in which a perfectly nice guy lives with a raging beast beneath his skin.
The plot is a refreshingly simple affair: Bruce Banner has been hiding in Brazil, but a nasty U.S. general has discovered his whereabouts -- and this guy desperately wants the secret to The Hulk. Banner must hightail it into the jungle, find his way back to the States, retrieve some important DNA data, and locate a scientist who MIGHT be able to quell the green beast. And of course we have a love interest who tags along and an evil henchman who keeps injecting himself with bad medicine and chasing Banner all over the planet. Fun, simple stuff. (Unless of course you're a CGI technician, in which case you really earned your pay here. The ol' green guy -- and his massive new nemesis -- look simply, um, incredible.)
In many ways superior to Ang Lee's first Hulk tale, Movie 2 doesn't waste any time getting started. The opening credits sequence offers a nifty little "origin story flashback" that works really well because, let's face it, you either saw the first flick already, or by this point you're not all that interested in the old-school history of The Hulkt. You just want two hours of well-crafted and exciting craziness, with just a hint of actual humanity to make it all seem kinda ... real. And The Incredible Hulk delivers the goods in that department. Whereas Lee's Hulk was a fairly brooding and angst-y affair, Leterrier's take focuses more on action, tension, and a surprising amount of wit. Of course you'll get a fair dose of the excellent Edward Norton as he struggles with his inner demon, and there's a surprisingly effective love story that keeps the drama moving forward -- but this flick is at its best when it's doling out the dynamite.
Leads Edward Norton and Liv Tyler strike a really warm chemistry together (which I didn't expect), and this allows even the "talky bits" to work well, and hey get this: William Hurt is really excellent as a general with an evil plan. (Is William Hurt ever not good?) Tim Roth wisely underplays his bad-ass mega-commando character early on, which makes a lot of sense when you consider the "transformations" this villain undergoes before it's all over. Tim Blake Nelson provides a very welcome dose of witty exposition / comic relief as a helpful scientist, which is what I call character-actor icing on a big green cake.
So Marvel's own movie division is now two-for-two in the adaptation department. Iron Man was an unexpected home run from Jon Favreau and company, and The Incredible Hulk is a very powerful triple off the wall. I liked Ang Lee's version (with several reservations) because he tried to do something alternately smart and silly with the characters. I liked The Incredible Hulk even better because it brings us back towards the Banner we know from the comic books (and the beloved TV series from the 1970s), and it strikes a really impressive balance between the quiet and the riot.
Plus I think it's really cool that my favorite superhero warrants two massive movies in five years.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-11-2008 @ 4:59PM
Stacey said...
I was lucky enough to see a sneak preview of this film and have to say I really enjoyed it! Lots of action and quite a bit of humor. It is the kind of movie you will want to see on the big screen and while I agree it wasn't quite Iron Man, it is definatly worth the ticket price. See early on with a crowd...especially if they get all the references...you will have a much better time!
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 5:15PM
eli said...
I also saw The Incredible Hulk last Monday and thought it was great. True, it's no Iron Man, but it is better than both Fantastic Four movies, Spider-Man 3, Daredevil & X-Men 3. I may be biased though, I'm probably one of the few that liked the first Hulk movie too. I hope all the doubters and naysayers give it a chance, it's a really fun, action-filled movie, just what The Hulk should be.
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 6:51PM
Master X said...
Love the new look.
Was Captain America in it?
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 9:03PM
mike green said...
willaims hurt was not good on dune
Reply
6-11-2008 @ 10:10PM
Brock Johnson said...
Awesome. I am SO psyched for this!
Can't wait to bring all my friends to see how Incredible Hulk really should be, when done right!
Reply
6-12-2008 @ 11:58AM
Steve Gilpin said...
Scott,
As always, your reviews are awesome to read! Your review of The Incredible Hulk is no exception. Now I might have to go check out the movie.
Steve G.
Reply
6-13-2008 @ 3:29AM
Rik said...
Hulk or Superman?
I think the story failed because the Hulk is not vulnerable to anything - bullets, missiles, grenades, exploding helicopters. It was so stupid seeing him get hit by hundred of rounds with no effect. Where they went wrong was letting loose with all the firepower they had from the beginning - they blew their wad - he can't die at the beginning, so now you have established bullets have no effect on him and it only went down from there. There were two real disjointed sticking points as well - the fight on the campus, it just ended? -- he would've killed everyone in sight with all the invulnerability they had given him. I suspect they didn't know what to do at that point - cut to cave scene... The second real problem is the end - he didn't kill that thing and just left -- it would have gotten its 'wind' back and killed all those people after that. They should have shown the new monster morphing back to his human form at the very least.
What I enjoyed about the original tv series was the vulnerability of the Hulk, he was dumb and very emotional - often times frightened and running away. Loved the cameo, by the way.
I know it is a comic book fantasy, but this movie created a monster that was too powerful to fit into a story with any sense to it.
Reply
6-14-2008 @ 8:40AM
Y said...
really well said dude!
6-13-2008 @ 4:29PM
Pat said...
I have to admit that I didn't hate the first Hulk movie. The dog scene was very silly, but I'm sure it was an action scene they forced Lee to cram in there. "Why's he just talking to Betsy? Make him FIGHT SOMETHING!" "Uh, how about . . . a big poodle?"
But that scene where Hulk bites off the warhead of a missile and spits it back at the helicopter? Priceless. Worth the price of admission by itself.
Anyway, I'll see this new movie since it's getting such good reviews.
Reply
6-15-2008 @ 2:04PM
Kate said...
Loved the movie, just went to see it, to the reader who thought the Hulk was too powerful. Read the comics, Hulk get stronger them more you attack him, and his green skin is impervious to most bullets missles, etc. That is what makes him such a problem, he is virtually unstoppable. If you recall in the series he had advanced and almost instant healing to accomplish this. Liked the endingm can we say the Avengers boys and girls?
Reply
6-14-2008 @ 8:44AM
y said...
yea, i agree that hulk grows bigger as he gets angry but not in this film. in ang lee's version he did grow bigger as he gets angrier but in this 1, the producers make it clear that they are not going to do that. hulk is going to stay the same size.
6-15-2008 @ 2:09PM
Kate said...
Hulk doesn't get bigger, he gets stronger. His size should not change. I have been reading the comic since it's inception. I am 56 years old and could probably tell you the orgins of all Marvel Comic, was devoted to them for over 40 years. This film actually does a wonderful job of portraying the Hulk. Also Bruce Banner was a skinny scientific nerd. Eric Bana was too big and good looking for Bruce. Take time study the history, wikipedia does a good job. This was the film I waited for, a portrayal that was close to essence of what he should be.
Reply
6-16-2008 @ 1:26PM
Dave from Canada said...
SOOO GOOD! Lots of action, amazing graphics, great cast. Such a well done movie by comparison to the 2003 version. The Avenger build up is really exciting as well. If your a die-hard marvel fan who likes lots of action scenes and great classic marvel references (super soldier, project S.H.I.E.L.D., the avengers etc.) than you'll love this film. Great Job 5/5 stars in my books
Reply
6-20-2008 @ 1:57AM
Gary The Gone said...
i think they missed the mark again. this review sums it all up: http://eattheblinds.blogspot.com/
Reply
6-23-2008 @ 2:15PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
I thought the movie was acceptable. The Acceptable Hulk.
But I had a big problem with the military. Or rather, with General Ross' plans (or lack thereof).
He seemed really incompetent.
For further explanation: http://slowclapchildren.blogspot.com/2008/06/acceptable-hulk.html
Reply
6-27-2008 @ 7:07PM
bliss said...
Just watched this movie last Sunday.. I really enjoyed it! Don't believe the bad reviews.
Reply