Fan Rant: Charlie Chaplin's Talkies Deserve More Respect
Filed under: Classics, Comedy, Fandom, Fan Rant
.jpg)
As a fresh 35mm print of Charlie Chaplin's quintessential 1947 thriller Monsieur Verdoux begins circulating through revival houses around the country, it seems like a good time to remind people that while the late actor is mainly known as a star of the silent screen, he definitely didn't die with it. Although the greatest slapstick artist of all time initially rejected the development of sound film, mocking it with hilariously exaggerated voices in City Lights, he eventually adopted it after realizing that resistance was futile. However, he refused to simply throw in a few lines of dialogue to accompany his beloved tramp shtick, choosing instead to take his career in a fresh direction. While Chaplin made many sound films over the course of several decades, only two of them really qualify as classic talkies (except for Limelight, which deserves a category of its own). Late flops like A King of New York don't really hold together, but Chaplin's initial forays into the world of sound film display his talent as a composer of distinctive prose.
His first work of this era, The Great Dictator, remains a masterpiece that broadened the potential of his tramp character with a modified Prince and the Pauper tale applied to World War II, and Chaplin doing double duty playing both a Jewish barber and an exaggerated Adolf Hitler (or "Hinkel," rather). Monsieur Verdoux, in which he plays a frustrated man whose losses during the Great Depression lead to a twisted scheme where he marries, murders and robs rich women, represented something else altogether: Chaplin's only brooding melodrama, the occasional laughs are almost incidental.
The movie didn't get much acclaim when it first came out (quite the opposite, actually), and built up a cult following over the years, but it has yet to be appreciated by the masses as an essential part of Chaplin's career. Film critic Pauline Kael complained that, once Chaplin started talking, he "became a deeply unfunny man; if he had found the street language to match his lowlife, tramp movements, he might have been something like Richard Pryor."
She makes a wise observation, but Chaplin had little interest in translating the Tramp into a chatterbox. Verdoux shows how Chaplin utilized dialogue in subtler ways. When we first hear the character talking about "liquidating members of the opposite sex as a strictly business enterprise," he delivers the line with such relish that it rightly gives you the chills. Later, Verdoux explains why he refuses to feel sorry for himself. "Despair is a narcotic," he says. "It lulls the mind into indifference." The statement has beautifully haunting repercussions. Eventually, Verdoux allows himself to get caught, and remains collected throughout the climactic trial. Like The Great Dictactor, the movie ends with Chaplin delivering a harsh declaration of principles.
After thanking the prosecutor for admitting Verdoux has brains, the killer launches into a justification of his actions. "As for being a mass killer, does not the world encourage it?" he asks. "Is not building weapons of destruction done for the sole purpose of mass killing? Has it not blown unsuspecting women and children to pieces -- and done it very scientifically?" He pauses for an eerie laugh. "As a mass killer," he adds, "I'm an amateur by comparison." In final analysis, then, Verdoux isn't satire; it's a summary of apocalyptic dread.
Watching the film now, one can only imagine how he might have expanded on this bleak sentiment in the unfilmed project about the Tramp surviving a nuclear holocaust, an idea he had developed with film critic James Agee (a major outspoken advocate of Verdoux). We can see here that Chaplin's interests went deeper -- and darker -- than slapstick humor could take him. "I am at peace with god," Verdoux says when a priest tries to bless him before he's executed. "My conflict is with man." And those of us appreciative of the insight put forth in Verdoux, which remains potent to this day, feel his pain.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-17-2008 @ 10:38PM
Argent said...
great article. i've always had a soft spot for 'the great dictator', but 'verdoux' is a film i recommend to a lot of people. they might not necessarily like it, but few movies have had a more darkly cynical main character and it's well worth looking at just for that.
the one talkie not mentioned here that REALLY deserves a lot more attention (imo) is 'limelight', which i think of as chaplin's final masterpiece.
Reply
6-18-2008 @ 12:12AM
Eric Kohn said...
Thanks. I completely agree with you about Limelight -- it deserve its own analysis, and a new print to boot. Bruce Goldstein, are you listening?
6-18-2008 @ 12:37AM
Ray said...
Holy crap. I remember seeing this movie when I was a kid, and the title has always escaped my memory.
Reply
6-18-2008 @ 9:17PM
Stacia said...
Excellent essay, and I could not agree more. I think Chaplin's talkies were way ahead of their time and I'm so glad Verdoux is getting attention lately with the new print. Today as younger people (including me, 30) reach back to Chaplin's work, I think we naturally gravitate to the talkies because they are easier for us. If you look around at forums, reviews and IMDB, you'll see almost all of the positive accounts are from people under, say, 50. Many are teenagers. People older than that have a bias toward Chaplin, and can't stand that he evolved the way he did. We don't have that bias.
I hope A King in New York is next on the Chaplin revitalization circuit. I think it's just as good as Verdoux.
I must correct you though. Chaplin did not work with Agee on the post-atomic bomb script. Agee worked on it alone and although they became friends, Chaplin was not interested in making the film, mostly because he was too old to play the Tramp. See John Wranovics's "Tramp and Agee".
Reply
6-20-2008 @ 5:54AM
Gerard said...
As a huge Chaplin fan myself, I see your point about the merits of Monsier Verdoux, as I find the Chaplin's performance and his screenplay to be perfect and the scenes with Chaplin and Martha Raye to be hilarious.
The real issue with Chaplin's talkies are not the content or how serious or funny the issues are but that they reveal his limitations as a director. His style of directing consisted of demonstrating to other actors what to do and having them mimic his actions completely. This style of directing worked (very) well with the silent films but is faulty with sound films. Apart from Chaplin and Raye the entire cast of Monsiour Verdoux are like amateur theatre players. Only expressing dialogue and movement the way they have been told. There is nothing natural about any of the performances. This weakens the movie entirely. It is a pity because as all ready stated I think the screenplay with its mixture of eternally important world issues, black humour and quite a lot of heart, is briliant - but the production of the film(including Chaplin's clunky editing) are almost embarrassing to witness at times.
If Chaplin could have expanded his skills as a director to casting more actors with independent skill(instead of inexperienced, untalented people like Marilyn Nash) and trusted them with their abilities to interpret his scripts and ideas (or even handed the directing job to Orson Welles, who had the original Verdoux idea) this film would rank as one of the best ever.
These faults in Chaplin's direction are evident in all of his sound films, but in The Great Dictator and Limelight the strengths of the films far out weigh the weaknessess.
Reply
6-20-2008 @ 11:06AM
nfcall45 said...
Limelight is worth the watch just to see Chaplin and Keaton together for the only time.
Reply
6-20-2008 @ 1:02PM
mike said...
I will point out that the character in "The Great Dictator" was named "*Adenoid* Hinkel", not "Adolf Hinkel"...
Reply
6-29-2008 @ 12:58PM
Mira Hashmi said...
Excellent piece. As for Pauline Kael's contention that the talking Tramp should have been a Richard Pryor type - I quite disagree. I think she overlooked the fact that the Tramp, even being a vagabond, always had the manners and bearing of a gentleman.
Reply