From Page to Screen: 'Body of Lies'
Filed under: Thrillers, Mystery & Suspense, From Page to Screen

Realistic spy fiction is hard. On screen, it's almost never done. The tendency to romanticize espionage is so ingrained in us through decades of James Bond and Bourne and 24 that a warts-and-all depiction of the way intelligence agencies actually operate might not even make sense to much of the moviegoing public. Occasionally, someone will make a minor, based-on-a-true-story attempt – The Good Shepherd with the CIA, for example, or Breach with the FBI – but those are viewed as history lessons, not spy thrillers.
That makes sense. The CIA doesn't exactly have an open-door policy, so it's hard to say for sure, but by all accounts the work of a real-life agent isn't terribly dramatic, or ripe for genre film treatment. Much of it is a bureaucratic nightmare, and the jobs that we view as exotic and exciting – "secret agent," for example – are usually a tedious slog, consisting of years of building connections and forging allies in the hopes of a payoff in the indefinite future. Yeah: all else equal, I'd rather watch Jason Bourne kick some bad guys in the face while searching for his true identity.
David Ignatius, novelist and long-time foreign affairs columnist for the Washington Post, knows this well. With Body of Lies, currently being adapted by Ridley Scott and William Monahan, he tries a compromise: a thriller that keeps a plausibly realistic view of the CIA and looks elsewhere for drama. Specifically, Ignatius sticks with a gritty, convoluted, technical spy plot and supplements it with a treacly, sentimental, sometimes steamy romantic subplot that eventually collides with the A-story, culminating in a conventionally heartwrenching damsel-in-distress climax. The CIA may be boring, but that'll get their attention.
The novel's romance between intrepid CIA agent Roger Ferris and saintly humanitarian aid worker Alice Melville is so impossibly earnest, so sappy, that it cannot possibly make it to the screen unaltered – at least not if ultra-smart screenwriter William Monahan (Kingdom of Heaven, The Departed) has anything to say about it. And indeed, it's not even clear that Alice will be in the film, which is in post-production for an October release: the IMDb doesn't have an entry for the character, and there's been no casting news regarding her. By contrast, Roger's seductive, manipulative wife Gretchen is present and accounted for, to be played by Black Book's Carice Van Houten despite the role having been tailor-made for Angelina Jolie. Possibly Monahan decided to merge the characters (which would eliminate a nifty mid-novel interlude where Ferris faces a legal investigation thanks to Gretchen's blackmail), but if Alice has indeed been excised altogether, then the ending will have to be radically reworked.
The main plot concerns an ingenious plan by Ferris (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his CIA boss Ed Hoffman (Russell Crowe, rather than a stocky man in his late 50s as Ignatius wrote the character) to stymie a network of al Qaeda car bombers by making it appear as if the CIA has infiltrated it. (Hint: the title is a pun of sorts.) Until all hell breaks loose in the aforementioned climax, there's precious little in the way of action: the story moves forward via conversations, debates, the leveraging of resources and contacts. It's fascinating stuff if, like me, you enjoy process, but it's not terribly cinematic. Monahan showed a flair for this sort of thing with the cat-and-mouse elements of The Departed, but it will take some deft handling, not least because the characters' shadowy maneuverings get confusing even as they sit on the page, to say nothing of what could happen when they whiz by on the screen.
There's a twist ending I won't discuss, except to say that if the film pulls it off, it will earn itself some repeat viewings this fall. Ignatius does a nice job of telegraphing the revelation just enough that while it isn't quite guessable, it seems perfectly logical when you rewind the plot in your head. It's a tricky balance.
Politically, in case you're wondering, the story is pretty neutral, at least as Ignatius has it: terrorists are bad, the people trying to stop the terrorists are good, non-extremist Muslims are decent folk. It doesn't even glorify the CIA, which at the end of the day winds up looking pretty ineffectual. Ridley Scott was reportedly denied permission to shoot the film in the United Arab Emirates for political reasons (he went to Morocco instead), but there's nothing searing here.
Body of Lies, the novel, is pitched as a spy thriller informed by the author's extensive experience in the field and knowledge of the way the CIA really operates. (The back cover offers a fawning quote from former CIA director George Tenet, claiming that the book is "fiction but reads like fact.") It's certainly intelligent, plausible, and sometimes exciting. That Ignatius felt the need to pull his punch by throwing in a love story straight out of a Hollywood movie is understandable – as I say, the work of the CIA isn't always high drama – but regrettable. If Scott and Monahan can tighten Ignatius' plotting, the movie could become the genre's high-water mark.
Next week: A look back at Sean Penn's interpretation of Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-22-2008 @ 10:44AM
Elessar said...
The character of Alice has been excised entirely and has been replaced by Aisha, an Iranian nurse. According to those who've attended the advanced screening, Gretchen has been taken out completely. Also not listed on IMDb is Mark Strong (Mousawi from SYRIANA) as Hani Pasha, the Jordanian intelligence chief.
Having read most of Monohan's screenplay, I can say that it is A LOT more energetic than the book, with the same flair for dialogue. I didn't finish it yet, so I can't speek to the twist at the end, but what I've read thus far fills me with confidence. The action scenes (Leo busting a terrorist cell and the scene where his character is injured) were described very well. From what I read, the best thing I can say is that Body of Lies (or whatever they choose to call it) combines the best bits of The Departed with the best parts of Greengrass' Bourne films.
Reply
6-19-2008 @ 8:35AM
Mimi said...
I believe the 'final" name of the film will be A House of Lies. At one point, the title was to be "Penetration", which I rather liked.
Crowe apparently plays the CIA boss Hoffman fairly true to his descriptions in the book. From set pictures I've seen, Crowe is almost unrecognizable.
I trust Scott and Monohan's vision, and look forward to watching two of our finest actors bring the story to life. I think it will overcome any shortcomings of the book, which I enjoyed reading, obviously more so than Eugene in his comments. He seems to have a prejudice against romance and impatience with anything except non stop action. I rather enjoy an intelligent examination of procedure and the background and mindsets of operatives. I found, while reading, that it built tension. He thought it distracted. To each their own.
Reply
6-19-2008 @ 9:21AM
Jan Lebouref said...
I read that a Perth (Australia) based actor called Steve Innes is set to star alongside Mel Gibson in Edge of Darkness, due to begin filming in the fall.
Innes, who has actual Scot's heritage, first met up with Gibson while doing Braveheart about 13 years ago and have been friendly since.
Innes also looks to be in the running for the title role in G.I. Joe, a role apparently turned down by another(!) Perth actor called Sam Worthington, who just finished James Camerons Avatar and has gone straight onto the next Terminator film in the lead role (Marcus, not the terminator though).
Innes, a longtime friend and schoolmate of Worthington's was next on the list and is said to look and sound the part, having been an actual soldier himself for a number of years.
Well, now that Ledger's is gone I suppose actors from his part of the world are getting a better chance at work.
I wish them well.
Reply
6-19-2008 @ 9:29AM
Carl Manning said...
Who the hell is Steve Innes?
Whats with all these Aussie actors taking our work?
6-23-2008 @ 9:04PM
Mike Dorland said...
Avatar looks interesting on the face of it but I wonder what logic there is is casting an unknown Aussie in a lead role?
If he is not interesting then who will want to see the film?
If is was Russell Crowe then of course people will go.
Perhaps Cameron should have cast Steve Innes in Sam Worthingtons role in the first place.
Innes certainly has more presence and looks a better bet in the long run.
Reply
6-26-2008 @ 2:16AM
Lynn Grovedale said...
I saw Steve Innes on TV a few night ago on "The Bill" a police TV drama here in London.
I don't think he is as old as he looks and he doesn't sound Scottish at all.
Pretty sure I have seen him in a few films but not so much on TV but maybe he does more TV in Perth, Sydney or wherever.
Innes is a Scottish name so I guess he could be a real Scotsman.
Mel Gibson seems to think so, it would appear.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 1:46AM
Hoyt Curtin said...
Can't recall seeing Steve Innes in Braveheart but then I've not seen it in a long time.
One of the many Russell Crowe sites had a link to Innes's site or it maybe was his agent.
Comparing photo's they look pretty similar but Innes is a few years younger than Crowe I think.
Wonder if they are buddies?
Another website said Steve Innes is the younger cousin of Laura Innes from ER.
Reply
7-09-2008 @ 11:38PM
Toby Gillard said...
I'm in London Too. I see Steven Innes on TV quite often but not usually in shows I like to watch so I'm not sure how good he is.
He was good in a Dr Who episode a while ago but I cant say I have seen him in The Bill which I do like and watch often.
Reply
7-22-2008 @ 9:11PM
matt said...
I'm not quite clear about the plot, due to limited web-site info, this is a movie that should be hyped more to prevent getting lost in the shuffle of available entertainment, but it seems to have potential to be a great film! It'll probably be the last one I see before I re-enlist this fall. The content draws me in and the cast holds my interest, for me it's a "must see."
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 4:41AM
Martin said...
There can't be many actors left alive in Perth can there?
Heath Ledger dead, Steve Innes working overseas and Sam Worthington overseas also.
Who said Steve Innes is related to Hammond Innes and Laura Innes?
Reply
7-30-2008 @ 12:34AM
Freddy said...
Steve Innes is 3rd cousin to Laura Innes who is about 10 years older than he is.
Laura is from the side of the family that went to USA/Canada early in 1960's.
Steve is from the side that stayed in Scotland/UK and then went to Australia in early1970's.
Steve is a sort of great half nephew to Hammond as his dad Gragam was only half brother to Hammond who was about 25 years older than Graham Innes so Hammond is not Steven's Grandfather after all.
Hammond died 1998 and Graham died 2003.
Steve is still alive and well, married with kids and is about 38 now and lives in Perth, Australia when not filming in the US or elsewhere.
His agent is Martin bedford in Sydney, Australia and who was also Russell Crowes agent earlier on and who set him on the road to stardom.
Not sure who his Perth agent is.
Reply