Fan Rant: Steve Carell's Maxwell Smart and "The Principle of the Brick"
As a long time fan of the original TV show, and as a grown up version of the kid who used to memorize William Johnston's paperbacks ... as a former elementary school student who went in for as many tedious "Would you believe?" jokes as the legions of film critics writing about this week's box office success ... as all of these things, I'm not expecting anything more heart-breaking this summer than Get Smart. From the under-performing villain (the usually savory Terence Stamp) to the dull direction by Peter Segal, the film was a complete tick-off. Richard Schickel spelled out his own disappointment in the opening paragraph of his review in Time Magazine:
"A schlemiel may be, must be, grievously acted upon by the always malevolent world. But he can never be permitted to act effectively against that world. At the end of his adventures he must, somehow, triumph over the forces of darkness that surround him - but only accidentally so...In that spirit of genial fantasy, we permit out surrogate that utter self-confidence, that sublime sangfroid, with which with he cheerfully motors his way around and through disaster."
I suspect Schickel is alluding here to what critic James Agee, his predecessor at Time, described as "the principle of the brick". The principle comes from Frank Capra, who, as a silent comedy writer, used to write for the silent comedian Harry Langdon. According to Capra, Langdon's "only ally was God. Langdon might be saved by the brick falling on the cop, but it was verboten that he in any way motivate the brick's fall." The new Get Smart, deciding to make Agent 86 an ineptster suffering from an inner fat kid, makes him proactive in that old dreary screenwriting 101 way by having him learn his craft on the job until he triumphs.
Adams' Smart, by contrast, made it through 5 years in the role on TV through the blustering, sublime self-confidence of a man who was certain he was ahead of every plot twist ("Ah, the old false lips trick..."). Adams' Maxwell Smart knew God was going to drop that necessary brick when the time came.
The missing spy movie fatuousness in Get Smart (2008) was all over this year's best satire of the genre, a 2006 French import titled OSS 117: Cairo, Nest of Spies which finally got an art house release this spring. That French film trafficked in Don Adams' version of unshakable idiot debonairness. True, Jean Dujardin's Agent OSS 117 did throw the occasional brick, but he was more frequently hit by them. Have a look if you can, compare and contrast, and say which works better as a comedy...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-24-2008 @ 7:49PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
I've heard this argument a lot (that they severely changed the original material), and I obviously have to acknowledge that they did.
I loved the show as well, but I also enjoyed the movie.
For starters, I was happy to see Steve Carrell play a character that wasn't a complete idiot. He plays idiot well, but this was a nice turn.
Second, I have a different philosophy when it comes to adapting TV series into movies versus any other source material.
That is, I give more leeway to change made with TV series. For one, it's necessary. TV and movies just work differently.
Watching a "brick," as you called it, miraculously get out of things once or twice an episode is one thing. Watching him do it for nearly two hours in a progressing building story would be mind-numbingly frustrating.
Also, if one hates the new material and wants to relive the old standard, DVD makes that easy to do.
While the same argument could be made that the lover of a book could return to it if he or she hates the adaption, it's different because it's the first time the story has "come to life," so to speak.
That's just my take on it.
http://www.slowclapchildren.blogspot.com
Reply
6-24-2008 @ 10:24PM
Beeslo said...
I'm going to agree with Jon on this one. I also was a big fan of the show and still enjoyed the movie as did a friend of mine who also was a fan of the show. The sweet comedy was still present in its movie adaptation as were the characters were loved from the show. Agent 86 was the same goofball spy that still was able to get the job done and Agent 99 was played obviously with the original in mind as far as her seriousness and Max's ability to let her hair down.
Honestly adapting a 60's spy comedy 40 years later is no easy feat and I thought they did a wonderful job. Sure not every joke worked and camera work got wonky at times but its clear that the writers held the same admiration for the show that I did.
Reply
6-24-2008 @ 10:48PM
Sam said...
What I don't understand is why people don't realize a movie about a bumbling, inept spy has already been made. It's called The Pink Panther. If the movie version of Maxwell Smart was a bumbling, inept secret agent is the Don Adams mold, people would be comparing the two movies left and right. He HAD to be different.
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 2:25AM
uforeader said...
I have to agree with Richard. The appeal of the original Get Smart was in the miraculous fortunes of a bumbling, likeable guy. The movie version is simply not Get Smart.
That said, the movie COULD have been good anyway. You can make a good comedy without an idiot character. But the movie simply wasn't funny. The whole thing was one slap-stick moment after another tied together by poorly staged and unexciting action sequences.
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 11:40PM
Riley Freeman said...
i have yet to see the movie and the show i was a big fan even though i was born in 1983. but why cant we just enjoy even getting a movie. The show didnt last that long its very old and a lot of people that may have watched the show might not even be into going to theatres (older generation).
adaptions can very rarely be identical to the original otherwise it will fell like a 2hr long episode. Im glad we got a movie and I think we should appreciate it and just stop with such high expectations sometimes and just enjoy the art
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 1:55PM
madgamer said...
I liked the movie a lot and thought Carell did a good job with the role. That's just my 2 cents though.
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 11:39PM
Pat said...
You know, Get Smart wasn't great - and, except for all the catchphrases, wasn't a whole lot like the old show - but it wasn't as bad as most of the critics are saying. I thought it was a mildly enjoyable, often amusing summer movie, but I seem to be in the minority.
Reply
7-15-2008 @ 11:08AM
angela said...
Hi! I created a Birthday card for Steve Carell and I'd like you to sign it. Feel free to post on your site or just spread the word.
Here is a link to the GroupCard in progress:
http://www.groupcard.com/c/3R-CLdouCZM
Thank you for your help!!
Angela
Reply