'Cloverfield', 'Enchanted', 'Sweeney Todd' Win Saturn Awards
Filed under: Action, Horror, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Thrillers, Awards
Did you know the Saturn Awards were last night? I sure didn't! You'll remember the Saturn Awards as where William Shatner did his famous rendition of "Rocketman" back in 1978. The Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror Films has given them out to the best in genre cinema for 34 years now, and this year's picks are ... kind of strange.The prize for Best Fantasy Film went to Enchanted, which I think is silly in a category that also included Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix and Stardust, but okay. Then Sweeney Todd took Best Horror Film, which seems to me like a way to avoid giving an award to an actual horror film, like fellow competitors 30 Days of Night, 1408 and The Mist. I guess I can see why Sweeney Todd would be classified as "horror" -- a lot of throats get slit, after all -- but it's a stretch. Then the kicker: Cloverfield wins Best Science-Fiction Film, beating out, among others, Sunshine. The problem is that not only is Cloverfield not a science-fiction film, it's in some ways the opposite of a science-fiction film. Science-fiction entails some sort of larger cosmic context for the fantastic goings-on, which is precisely what Cloverfield refuses to provide. It's a monster movie in its purest form -- horror, not sci-fi.
The full list of winners is here. I'm sure some will flip out at choices like 300 for best action-adventure film -- I'm stunned at how many people hate that movie with a passion -- but that doesn't really bother me. A few awards are neither here nor there -- what's August Rush doing at the Saturn Awards? (Or any awards, for that matter.) Mostly, though, as someone who takes genre cinema seriously, I'm irked at how thoughtless a lot of the picks and designations seem to be. These movies -- and others that didn't make their cut -- deserve better, I think. But I guess the Saturns reward the best genre films of the year in the same way that the Oscars reward the best films of the year.
In other words: usually, not.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-25-2008 @ 8:22AM
bongo123 said...
REC is easily the best horror film in ages, can't wait to see how dumb as shit hollywood made the remake for all the idiots out there that can't read or point out spain on a map...
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 8:37AM
BondsBabe said...
At least Eastern Promises got some love, it is an excellent film.
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 9:37AM
GL said...
Cloverfield works for me as an option, but certainly not as a winner.
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 10:58AM
Claire said...
I'm really confused. how exactly does August Rush, No Country for Old Men and Ratatouille qualify as science fiction, fantasy, or horror? I mean I can sorta see how Enchanted and Sweeney Todd count but these others I don't get.
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 11:15AM
Peter Hall said...
I thought reading through the winners was bad. Then I saw the nominees.
Whoever comprises this "Academy" needs to be separated from critical society. Let them set up their own intellectually leprous colony else where, never to surface again, but to die a Darwinian fate at the hands of their insurmountable ignorance. What a fucking farce. I used to think the Saturn Awards were legit. Bunch of clowns.
Reply
6-25-2008 @ 9:24PM
AJ Wiley said...
The Saturns have ALWAYS been this confusing, frustrating, and pointless.
Reply
7-09-2008 @ 10:57AM
ML said...
Yes, I know I'm late to this, but ...
At http://www.saturnawards.org/, to the left:
Best Special Effects:
Scott Farrar, Scott Benza, Russell Earl,
John Frazier (Transformers)
To the right:
BEST SPECIAL EFFECTS:
JOHN KNOLL
HAL HICKEL
CHARLES GIBSON
JOHN FRAZIER
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End
Huh? Confusing is right.
Reply