Fan Rant: No One Can Hear You Screen
Filed under: Comedy, Drama, Independent, Distribution, The Weinstein Co., Fan Rant

"If a film fell in the multiplex, and no one was there to see it..."
Limited release: such a simple phrase, and yet two words that all but indicate to a majority of moviegoers that whatever it is they want to see may or may not escape the confines of a NY/LA run before the film in question comes to them by way of Netflix mere months later.
Meanwhile, screens upon screens across the nation are filled by the likes of the same stars and the same stories, with the same special effects and the same happy endings, leaving the smaller films, the different films, the better films to slip through the distribution cracks, as it were.
Among their number falls The Promotion, a film which we've admittedly supported ad nauseum to the oh-so-ironic tune of $365,928 on a grand total of 81 screens. It opened just this past weekend in my market, Orlando, Fla., on a single screen, for a whopping four days, with a grand total of eight showings, before being shuffled off to make room for that other Jason Bateman co-starring comedy-drama hybrid.
It was the first day of July, and the last night for the film. Having enjoyed it twice before and driven by - I don't know - a sense of romantic futility, I turned out for that final showing. Lo and behold, I wasn't alone...
I'm not sure what could've drawn those two other men to that auditorium. After all, there was at least one remaining showing for Hancock, and surely others for other films. The theater in question, the Regal Oviedo Marketplace, has not so much as a poster for any film with which to lure interest, not to mention it's located on the relative outskirts of town and rarely serves as a venue for any number of one-week indie runs in town (that would be the Regal Winter Park Village).
I had seen the slapstick-skewing trailer attached to no prints whatsoever, and I seriously doubt that there had ever been so much as a TV spot for it in any market. The daily paper's review was a half-hearted three stars out of five, my condensed rave hadn't even run in print for our college paper that week, the general critical consensus nationwide had been lukewarm, and some of the biggest reviews had managed to be, well... downright asinine (example 1) (example 2).
And yet, here they were against all odds, these two individuals, mere rows away but there nonetheless. Within a matter of months, I'd gone from seeing it with a packed and quite responsive house at its SXSW premiere, to a sparsely attended and relatively quiet press screening, to a public showing that was halved on all counts. The trailers attached beforehand indicated an equally indifferent appeal: Australia, Journey to the Center of the Earth, Meet Dave, and The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor. (Given that this same theater had once started playing The Fog instead of the family-filled Saturday night sneak of Zathura that was scheduled, I began to wonder whether or not we were likewise about to be subjected to Prince Caspian instead.)
No, we were indeed offered The Promotion for our viewing pleasure - having sat back and center, I overheard the begrudging remarks of our 'projectionist' about how of course there had to be someone in there - and as it unspooled, it got some modest laughs between the three of us. The credits rolled, the lights went up, and we filed out, going in our separate directions. I almost wanted to ask either or both of them why they had picked this film, why tonight. I had also considered asking the manager on duty just how many tickets they sold over the eight showings. But it all just seemed that much more pointless.
I'm not saying that we're talking about a film that demands any sort of grand big-screen presentation in order to be appreciated. If anything, the low-key nature of the humor might be best appreciated at home. However, knowing that Winter Park had managed to give In Bruges, The Visitor, and The Fall a couple of weeks a piece to work their charms, I couldn't help but wonder what kind of chance The Promotion might've stood had it been given a full week, whether in Oviedo or Winter Park, had the Weinstein Company and its various off-shoots had committed to a set weekend for its wide release and arranged a modest push including at least one word-of-mouth screening or maybe weekend-before sneaks. It's admittedly failed them in the past - The Hunting Party went similarly underseen and underappreciated - but it could claim that there was something resembling an effort to put it out there.
But now it's gone, off into the ever-passive ether of public interest. There are surely few tragedies in the grand scheme of things more trivial than having small films and the greater theatrical experience of discovering them taken for granted so easily, but WALL-E and Willy will still be there in four days; the same can't be said for Doug Stauber and Richard Welhner.
So, please, if you're still reading this, do me a favor, do yourself a favor, and seek something out this weekend. Go see Baghead, or Kabluey, or The Wackness, or Son of Rambow, or The Foot Fist Way, or Mongol, or Operation Filmmaker, or When Did You Last See Your Father?, or yes, even The Promotion (for a select few still, it appears), and make it worth your while. It's a film about making the most of opportunity, and in its own way, there couldn't be a pursuit more fitting. Here's to movies that care, and to caring about movies.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
7-02-2008 @ 8:56PM
Scott Weinberg said...
Very well said, sir. And it's not about THE PROMOTION specifically. It's about supporting the smaller films once in a while. I love blockbusters as much as anyone, but sometimes the little guys deserve some extra attention.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 1:03PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
I know it's not MEANT to about "The Promotion" specifically, but it definitely sounds like it.
I haven't seen the movie. Maybe I'll love it.
While I can understand the anger at the two "reviews," the way the film was marketed and handled isn't different than so many other movies of equal or lesser value.
Incidentally, it sounds more like you're blaming the theater when the studio/marketing team should really be at fault.
Again, I agree with the sentiment, so don't take this the wrong way.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 1:12PM
William Goss said...
"I know it's not MEANT to about "The Promotion" specifically, but it definitely sounds like it."
It will, because it's about the film I saw that night. It could've been any of the films listed at the end, and I would've been equally impassioned about their manner of distribution, if not about their individual quality. As Scott said, it's about any and all of the little guys.
"I haven't seen the movie. Maybe I'll love it."
And maybe you won't, to be honest. We're not out to make The Promotion sound like the best thing since sliced bread -- that would be Huey Lewis' "Pineapple Express" theme song -- but when we've all seen and enjoyed this film, it makes it that much harder for us to sit by and see it handled so poorly.
"Incidentally, it sounds more like you're blaming the theater when the studio/marketing team should really be at fault."
I'm not, because I'm fairly certain that the theater had not nearly as much bearing on it as the distributor. So Winter Park didn't want to spare one of their Hancock or WALL-E showings for this film. This alternate theater just turned out to be one that could only afford it every-other showings, happened to have no posters around (it's in a mall), and would only be able to play it until the big boys rolled around, not on July 4th, of course, but actually, the 2nd.
It's just more of a perfect storm of poor planning. On the one hand, I should be grateful the film played in my town at all. On the other, I find it hard to believe that this was the best they could arrange for it.
7-03-2008 @ 1:11PM
Mark said...
The same could be said for The Foot Fist Way. 1 theater in all of Arizona played it for 4 days with 2 screenings per day. 8:50pm and 11:00pm
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 1:14PM
William Goss said...
See, this is the same deal. I wasn't as hot on The Foot Fist Way as others were, but surely, if they've got a potential state-wide audience for this film, they could've done better than that.
A matter of principle, is all...
7-03-2008 @ 3:12PM
Nick said...
Exactly. It's a film that infinitely funnier than Napoleon Dynamite, and it easily could have been some kind of hit if they pushed it a little more. It played in one theater in Chicago for two weeks, and I was lucky enough to get down before it closed. Shotgun Stories was playing at another theater near by and for an even shorter time and so I got to see that theatrically aswell.
I agree with your assessment of The Promotion, and I think the same thing about The Fall.
I'm surprised The Visitor turned into the modest hit it has, but even then it was marketed far better than either The Promotion or The Fall were.
7-03-2008 @ 2:50PM
jgodsey said...
this is one of the best written blog posts i have read in ages. truly on any topic. I applaud you.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 2:53PM
William Goss said...
Wow. I really can't tell you how tremendously flattering that is.
Thank you.
7-03-2008 @ 3:47PM
Jenn Brown said...
Now I know I don't just like you for the snark. :D
Seriously, though, you've nailed my pet peeve; not allowing films to find their legs, only to have the multiplexes have multiple screens to show the same generic story with the same generic stars.
Luckily, most theaters around here will give films seven days, but the 'art' houses and 'art' films don't often last longer than the first week. A hectic life may not allow a soul to catch films they want to see, because there's just too much going on, and I'd never catch them without netflix, which is a shame.
Thankfully, we have the blessed Alamo, which really supports "small" films.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 4:10PM
James said...
I miss the Enzian theater in Winter Park!
Went there for the first time to watch "Good Bye, Lenin!" and couldn't stop from going back to watch Indie films.
Sorry, had to be a little nostalgic to the area.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 4:12PM
William Goss said...
Hey, the Enzian's still doing their part, although one could argue that their programming selections of late have been more motivated by playing it $afe than making room for whatever will otherwise go ignored.
7-03-2008 @ 4:10PM
Peter Martin said...
Very good article, Will. I live in Dallas right now, which has three arthouse multiplexes. I've missed at least a dozen films so far this year that played just one week -- with little or no publicity, and often many weeks after their NY/LA debut -- before being whisked away.
I understand, to a fair degree, the economics involved for the distributors. Budgets for prints and advertising have plummeted because the distribs -- many of which are struggling as well -- don't see the return on the dollar. Then it becomes a case of the tail chasing the cat: people don't come out because they don't know about it, and by the time they do, the print's already been shipped to the next town.
It's a thorny issue. I think one of the basic issues is that there are so many films getting distribution nowadays, there simply is not enough room in the theatrical marketplace for all of them to get noticed.
We try to do our part by telling people about the movies we love -- I really liked "The Promotion" too -- but it's very hard with major studios raining down so many prints of so many below-average movies that bespeak nothing special yet soak up so many screens.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 4:21PM
bob said...
Or see Mike Judge's Animation Show. Cmon Cinematical. There are indie's even you're not giving love to.
This is what the St. Louis Post-Dispatch had to say about the film today:
Publication: Post-Dispatch (DAILY PRINT)
Issue Date: Friday, 7/4/08
Reviewer: Joe Williams
# of stars or grade: B+
Bottom line: Sampler draws from the best animation in the world.
Hot-Link to the actual review:
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/entertainment/reviews.nsf/movie/story/A1BEF52FB936A0C28625747B0060F2C0?OpenDocument
World's best 'toons range from crude to lovely
By Joe Williams
POST-DISPATCH FILM CRITIC
Friday, Jul. 04 2008
Director Mike Judge has given us the cartoon series "King of the Hill" and
"Beavis and Butt-Head," as well as the live-action movies "Office Space" and
the far-sighted "Idiocracy." To that list of successes, we can add Volume 4 of
"The Animation Show," the latest in the fine anthology series he formerly
co-curated with Don Hertzfeldt.
Judge's tastes seem to skew in a subversive direction, but these 20-some short
films are not generally crude in temperament — or style. Some of them are
downright lovely, such as "Jeu," an Escher-like dance of perspectives set to
the music of Prokofiev.
The best eye candy is in the stop-motion "Western Spaghetti," which is like a
sunny-side-up cooking demonstration by the Brothers Quay.
A droll but poignant short that has played between movies on the Sundance
channel is "Forgetfulness," a poem and photo collage about the erasure of
memory.
Computer animation is represented by "Burn Safari" in which a tour group of
malevolent WALL-E's harass an ape in the jungle.
Two dry British 'toons stand out, one in which a polar bear visits his penguin
girlfriend for tea and apologizes, and one in which a young chap telephones God
to ask him a very puzzling question.
Equally conversational if less polite is "Angry Unpaid Hooker," a crudely
scrawled scene of embarrassment between a sassy street walker, a slacker in
denial and his home-too-soon significant other.
In the same transgressive vein is "Mr. Schwartz, Mr. Hazen and Mr. Horlocker,"
a Tarantino-esque 'toon from Germany about drug dealers and a sadomasochistic
cop who live in the same apartment building.
Nearest to Judge's heart seems to be three episodes of "Psychotown," an
Australian version of the vile Terrance and Phillip on "South Park" who
themselves are a version of "Beavis and Butt-Head." But it's to Judge's credit
that his curatorial choices encompass a world of wonders.
(At the Tivoli.)
Publication: Riverfront Times (Alt Weekly PRINT)
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 4:38PM
William Goss said...
C'mon yourself, Bob. I named nine out of some ninety indie titles that get the shaft every year, and you nag me for excluding yours. I can't help it if I don't recall The Animation Show making the rounds in my neck of the woods, at least not this time around.
Lucky for you, it just so happens that one of our other writers has a review for this waiting in the wings.
7-03-2008 @ 5:24PM
Gary said...
William, nice piece.
I think though it is a bit hard to blame the cinema too much, after all they are here to turn a profit and margins are getting lower. I am an independant film fan, I rarely have the desire to go and watch the blockbusters. But if it were my business I probably too would fill every screen with Hancock if that is where the audience is going.
Film ciritcs take much of the blame here. Of course I am not talking about anybody to contributes to this great site, but the popular names in the media have a big role in choosing what movies are the must see's for this week and nine times out of ten they only talk about the big Hollywood movies of the week.
Cinematical is a great site but the type of people that would be drawn to this site are film fans anyway, it is a bit like preaching to the converted (not that you are preaching btw). What we need is better film critics in the mass media who are willing to take a chance and talk about better films and not just the ones with the biggest stars. In this celebrity obsessed culture we live in it seems that most of our mainstream critics are nothing more that celebrity gossip reporters.
I would like to give kudos to a certain Mark Kermode though, he is a critic for the BBC and has a weekly podcast that I would reccomend to anyone. Go to iTunes and search for Mark Kermode, or google him. This is the man who made me realise that there is so much more out there if you go look for it. Much like this site helps to do now.
Reply
7-03-2008 @ 6:45PM
Linda said...
Living in a small market and a small state, I have seen wonderful films with equally small audiences. A few weeks ago I had a private screening of Son of Rambow. Kind of wondered if the projectionist was cursing me. When the film was over, I wanted to go to the adjoining strip mall and tell strangers what charming film was showing right here ... for only 2 weeks ... hurry! Yeah, that would have worked *sigh* BTW loved Mongol (took my parents) and Baghead, good suggestions. Nice post!
Reply
7-04-2008 @ 1:19AM
Chad said...
Believe me, I sympathize with your sentiment, but I've seen Baghead, The Wackness and Son of Rambow and the sad fact is that they aren't good films. If I were to advise someone to seek out a film this weekend it would be Wall-E.
Reply
7-04-2008 @ 1:22AM
William Goss said...
I disagree on Baghead and Rambow, but to each, his own. We'll always have WALL-E...
7-04-2008 @ 1:59PM
Steven Ungaro said...
It's funny to see this article because less than ten minutes ago I was talking to some friends about The Wackness and The Promotion and nobody knew what I was talking about. Everybody says "Let's see a comedy" and we already saw Hancock, Get Smart, and nobody wants to touch Love Guru, so I had the perfect solution. I always hope that when a film says "limited release", I'll still have a chance to see it somewhere downtown. So I was a bit disappointed to find neither of these movies is playing at any theater in the Chicagoland area. I get all psyched for these indie films (and not just the comedies) that I read about on the site nearly everyday, and then the release date comes and I'm left having to wait for it on Netflix. Then of course I rent the movie and show it to everyone and they all want to know why it wasn't in theaters.
To call it a LIMITED release is an overstatement. When movies are being released in nearly 4000 theaters, and I can't find an indie to watch in the THIRD largest city in the country with countless multiplexes, 6 or 7 screens isn't limited. It's hardly a release at all.
Reply
7-05-2008 @ 4:00PM
Beanie said...
Hey William!
I didn't realize I've been reading reviews of a fellow Central Floridian this whole time.. I now live in Washington, DC where there is plenty of indie cred, (Can you say AFI Silver Theater?) But, The Promotion still just ran here for a few days at the Landmark downtown. I really miss the Enzian though, I think it'd be a hard thing to find around here, that same atmosphere. Keep it up. Go knights.
Reply