Fan Rant: Give Sony Pictures Classics Some Credit
Filed under: New Releases, Fandom, Fan Rant
.jpg)
Back at this year's Sundance Film Festival, a bunch of folks were "losing it" over Jonathan Levine's The Wackness -- saying, to a certain extent, that it was the dopest flick of the fest. And that's cool. Support those films you love, right? Well, not long after the film premiered at Sundance, it was acquired by Sony Pictures Classics. Wonderful! A film a lot of people loved was picked up and would hit theaters at some point later in the year. Ah, but all was not well in blogger land -- see, a few bloggers were disgusted that SPC picked it up, going so far as to send an email around trying to get other people to either join their cause and/or write about it. Their reasoning was that SPC had a poor track record when it came to promoting indie films, and were afraid The Wackness would become yet another casualty. That it would disappear in limited release ... and be eaten by a Cabbage Patch Kid, or whatever.
And so it was. Some folks agreed with their cause, while others couldn't understand why they'd be upset when, in reality, their favorite film WOULD eventually hit theaters. You can't say that about every Sundance film, or festival film for that matter, and so the simple act of being picked up for distribution is, well, kind of a big deal. After a flurry of posts from a few different blogs which attacked the deal, attacked the teaser poster and then attacked the first teaser trailer, it all seemed to fizzle out. From that point on, SPC continued to poor on the Wackness marketing: We got roughly four or five different trailers, a poster, a viral campaign, a dope website, TV spots and a slick soundtrack.
Was SPC botching it all up? Hardly ... but then came the film's box office debut this past weekend ...
... and it absolutely knocked the ball out of the park. On a total of six screens, The Wackness averaged $24,166. For an indie film opening in two cities on six screens, those numbers are pretty frickin' awesome. To give you an example, Hancock averaged $16,645 per screen (though it opened on thousands of more screens). Still, that's a pretty impressive opening, and, honestly, you have to owe a lot of that to Sony Pictures Classics. They advertised the hell out of this little flick (you can see ads for it on our site and other sites) and their choosing to screen at both the Tribeca Film Festival and The Los Angeles Film Festival was wicked smaht. Not only did it raise awareness in both NYC and LA (the two cities the film was opening up in), but it also created the initial buzz which ultimately lead to a very rewarding opening weekend.
And where are those bloggers now? They're still writing about The Wackness and how it enjoyed such an awesome opening weekend. Are they congratulating SPC on a job well done? Nope. Not at all. SPC gets little to no mention on any of those other sites. But we want to congratulate SPC on a job well done. Because without their aggressive marketing campaign, this film might have disappeared. God knows if The Wackness didn't open big, those other blogs would've come out with their knives sharpened and pointed directly at Sony Classics. Since it did open big, it's only right to salute the folks who made smart decisions and took a chance on a small film during a time usually reserved for movies with ginormous budgets and big, shiny special effects.
God job Sony Pictures Classics! Here's hoping The Wackness is just as successful when it expands to the following cities throughout the month ...
July 11th:
San Francisco
Washington DC
Philadelphia
Boston
San Diego
Chicago
Seattle
July 18th:
Dallas
Minneapolis
Phoenix
Portland
July 25th:
Houston
Austin
Denver
Atlanta
Providence
Raleigh / Durham / Chapel Hill
Charlotte
Cleveland
San Antonio
Albuquerque
Santa Fe
Detroit
Ann Arbor
Miami / Ft. Lauderdale / West Palm
Kansas City
Honolulu
Mau
Milwaukee
Madison
Salt Lake City
Sacramento
Fresno
Monterey
Reno
Eugene
Salem
Tacoma
Olympia
Bellingham
Anchorage
St. Louis
Baltimore
Annapolis
Richmond









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-07-2008 @ 4:30PM
Alex (FirstShowing.net) said...
Being one of those "bloggers" who is outed here in your article, I felt it was necessary to respond. The reason why I haven't given SPC any credit YET is for a few reasons: first, it hasn't hit big enough for me to call it a success, second, they continue to ignore us "bloggers" that were the ones who started the buzz and made it successful.
First things first, if it starts expanding and just snowballs into a huge indie hit (like Juno), then I will be congratulating SPC. My point all along was that it had the potential to be as big of a hit as Juno, but the SPC heads even openly stated that they don't care if it gets to that point (what?!).
Secondly, there's no denying that it was us "bloggers" that began the buzz at Sundance and have continued to endlessly promote every last trailer, photo, and tidbit of news to come out about the film. Yet they ignore us with ads (on the site, which could be strategic, I admit) and with contests that everyone BUT us ran... It's like we got under the skin and they don't want to recognize us. But if my first point does come true and this turns into the Juno of 2008, my article will talk about how SPC *did* do a good job AND how it wouldn't have gotten their without our own support.
Reply
7-07-2008 @ 5:26PM
Erik Davis said...
Alex,
How is SPC ignoring "bloggers" exactly? And who is "us"? First Showing ... or are you lumping in FSR and Slashfilm too? Are FSR not giving away copies of the film's soundtrack right now? (granted, I don't know if SPC gave them those soundtracks to give away or if they bought them). Did Slashfilm not interview Jonathan Levine? I could've swore Peter talked to him. SPC must've granted him permission to do so.
And, not for nothing, but if I took a shit on your company, I wouldn't exactly expect you to come knocking on my door with all sorts of "cool contests."
It seems like you want to pat yourself on the back for the film's opening weekend, and that's cool -- go ahead and do so. However, SPC knew what they were doing, they knew how to take advantage of the blogosphere, they knew not to blow their load all in one shot, they knew that they needed to get the film in a big NY festival and a big LA festival prior to opening in order to get that word of mouth in those cities ... and so, yes, I do believe they deserve a little credit for that.
And I don't want to wait "to see what happens," because they had a successful opening weekend, they worked their asses off to promote the film and someone should say, "Good job to you." I mean, what are you waiting for? Are you secretly hoping the film won't make any money in Idaho, so you can run back and say, "Aha, SPC f**ked it all up! We were right!"
Also, The Wackness is not the next Juno -- partly because it's rated R and partly because it's, well, just not as good as Juno. So to hold it to those sort of standards right off the bat is just not fair.
Reply
7-07-2008 @ 6:09PM
Pecker said...
I don't think that Sony Picture Classics is the worst distributor. That would be "The Weinsteins Co."
The Weinteins don't promote anything at all, and some of the movies they pick up are hardly release. I don't really see the big deal with SPC.
After all... a distribution is a distribution, right?
Reply
7-07-2008 @ 11:37PM
Winston said...
Well, that's a whole lot better than Sony is doing with its "innovative" Baghead strategy:
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=baghead.htm
Reply