The Geek Beat: Solo Supervillains
Filed under: Scripts, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, The Geek Beat

Happy day! Today, we get to talk about the Master of Magnetism and his origin movie! Or, at least, we get to discuss it via the script reviews, as two have popped up online, courtesy of Sal's Scripts and the Coventry Telegraph. A special thanks goes out to io9 for alerting me, and for their ever interesting commenters who spurred me into writing.
You see, without getting into the spoilery aspects of the script reviews, a few people took issue with X-Men's archvillain being made sympathetic. To make a long review short and spoiler-free, Magneto's origin story will center on his time in Auschwitz. Once free, he spends his adulthood hunting down the Nazis who tortured and experimented on him. The movie will be less about Magneto's issues with homo sapiens, and more about his quest for justice. Professor Xavier pops up in it as a friend, but it doesn't look like this film will delve into their break or diverging philosophies.
The thing is, David S. Goyer's script doesn't stray too far from Magneto's comic book origins. (Though hopefully smarter heads will prevail and the origin of his powers is tossed into the trash can. Honestly – it takes away the whole point of his character if they're bestowed rather than genetic.) As a Holocaust survivor, he experienced firsthand the worst man can inflict on man – and it made him who he was. He suffered for being a Jew, and he'll be damned if he's going to suffer again for being a mutant. It's what makes him frustrating and maddeningly sympathetic within the X-Men storylines. This isn't a villain like the Joker or Lex Luthor – you can see Magneto's point of view. It's difficult to root against him sometimes, especially in his movie incarnation. I think we all feel a slight contempt for Professor X and his superhero team for constantly going back for more abuse at the hands of humanity.
Ultimately, it's Magneto's embrace of violence that makes him a villain. He's willing to embrace nothing less than human genocide, but there's even tragedy in that. Having experienced the horror of the Holocaust, he should be sensitive to embracing that level of evil. He should be able to rise above it, and prove that he won't stoop to the level humanity has. But he can't, or won't – which amounts to about the same thing, really. In the comics, his violence against ordinary humans can verge on the physically revolting. (Grant Morrison's New X-Men is probably the ultimate example of that in the comics; X2 toyed with it when he re-routed Stryker's Cerebro knock-off.) In that sense, Goyer's script does look to be sidestepping the ugliest side of Magneto. No one is easier to root for than a Nazi killer! But this is also his early days, a story that reportedly ends with Senator Kelly making his proclamation against "the mutant threat." Giving him a sympathetic bent in his origins isn't rewriting comic book history; it's following a mythic storyline – monsters are often made, not born.
But, Magneto's origin story could make for an interesting franchise, should a director have the guts to do it. I think it would be downright remarkable to see a movie entirely from Erik Lensherr's unvarnished point of view. But that leads to a pretty big question: is there room out there for a supervillain movie? One where the bad guy is front and center, unapologetically beating up the good guys? Could X-Men Origins: Magneto spawn a sequel in which he splits with Professor X, forms the Brotherhood of Mutants, and wages war on humans? I actually think there could be. It would depend on the script, Ian McKellen's participation, and the level of nastiness – Grant Morrison's New X-Men may be too repulsive to play on the big screen, but Fatal Attractions might, just for sheer "Holy crap!" factor. (How wrong is it that I want to see Wolverine get his admantium ripped out? Wait, don't answer that.)
The way I see it, a movie with a supervillain at the center is only one step away from the numerous movies, including those from the comic pages, that embrace the anti-hero. What we like most about the Punisher, Elektra, and Wolverine is that they are half-bad, and it takes only one nudge to make them shoot or slash up perfectly nice people. I'm on Elektra's side even when she's gutting agents of SHIELD, just because it's cool. My morals (such as they are, heh) go out the window. I know what she's doing isn't good, but I'll be damned if I care. And we all do it. We all wait for that moment when they go bad, and we relish it. And I don't think it's because deep down, I know Wolverine has a heart of gold. It's the element of surprise, the line being crossed into total immorality. Maybe it's even simpler than that -- perhaps we just become endeared to who's in the front and center, the guy or girl with the really great lines. Reservoir Dogs is a perfect example – are you really rooting for Mr. Orange to survive, or do you want to see Mr. Pink and Mr. White make off with the diamonds?
That's the element that, I think, could make a supervillain movie work. No apologies, no gray area. Just the bad guy doing whatever it takes to achieve his or her own ends. Magneto has the edge of slight sympathy which lends him complexity – but with the right villain, would you need even that much? I'd watch two hours of Catwoman robbing from whoever she damn well pleased, Batman be damned. It would be fun, and an interesting change of pace to see Superman or the X-Men scrambling in the backseat. Maybe it would work only because you know the good guys will win one way or another – but isn't half the fun when the bad guy escapes to fight another day? Give the supervillains their franchised due. The moral absolutists may see it as the death of good old-fashioned values and a glorification of wickedness -- but you can't glorify those unless someone is getting their adamantium skeleton ripped out.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-08-2008 @ 2:30PM
kevjohn said...
As a person who grew up rooting for Darth Vader to choke out more of his bumbling subordinates, I'm not fully understanding where you're coming from with this whole 'moral objections to rooting for the bad guy' thing. It's very rare that I DON'T root for an enigmatic bad guy, whether it's Hannibal Lecter, Clubber Lang, or Dracula.
It should also be noted that some of the latest iterations of Lex Luthor show that he is opposed to Superman, an alien from another planet after all, being held up more or less as the planet's savior. He's more interested in bringing the Man of Steel down than in the cheesy land grab schemes as depicted in the movies. He has principles, or sorts.
Reply
7-08-2008 @ 2:40PM
AJ Wiley said...
A supervillain is the protagonist of Joss Whedon's soon-to-be-released Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog!
Though, of course, that takes a comedic route, even though from what I've seen (as well as the eight-page comic book story), they use Nathan Fillion's Captain Hammer to wickedly satirize the "noble" superheroes.
Reply
7-08-2008 @ 2:44PM
ML said...
Personally, I think that a supervillain movie could work, but I'm not sure it would be an easy sell. My favorite villains are definitely ones like Magneto who have a POV that we can see and sympathize with; after all, what villain doesn't see himself as the hero of his own story? It's the ones who proclaim that they're evil that make little sense.
In the larger sense, this is why I find franchises like X-Men more interesting than, say, Superman. It's easy to take a point of view that non-mutants started the fight and mutants have every right to fight back. There's two sides to this and there's wrong on both of them. Superman paints a simpler, black and white picture of good and evil. I seem to be told that Lex Luthor is a genius, but I hardly ever see him portrayed as anything much more than a thug (disclaimer: I was prohibited from reading comics as a child, so my exposure is mainly adaptations ... I've missed a lot!), which is a little disappointing for me.
As far as Magneto goes, I'm not sure it's worthwhile to go into his story unless you delve into the darker issues (such as his emulating his worst enemy's worst aspects). And, I agree, if his powers are "bestowed" rather than genetic: WTF?! The geeks will rise up.
As far as "rooting for the bad guy": it's easy to do that when the villain is sympathetic or the hero is boring or lame (as in "Kill him now, he's too stupid to live!"). Often the villain is the best role in the piece and the only one that stands out at all (particularly in horror films).
Reply
7-08-2008 @ 4:12PM
Moo said...
ML, I agree wholeheartedly. I like a villian that is somewhat sympathetic...or at least relatable to the audience. Some moral gray area is much more interesting to me than the stereotypical black hat. I think Magneto could fit brilliantly into that mold.
That said, he still has to be EVIL...y'know? I want to feel BAD for rooting for him. Whathisname above may have no moral issues with enjoying watching Vader choke out Admiral Ozzle, but as much as I LOVE those scenes, I always felt a little bad about it. Here, I fear that they may take the easier road and, instead of making Magneto a relatable villian, they may make him an anti-hero. It's a very fine line, but the line is there. At the end of the day it's what you do that defines you (thanks D.A. Dawes!) and Magneto's ACTIONS are reprehensible, regardless of his motivations. But it takes, at the end of the day, an evil man to follow-through with those actions and I hope that they don't lose that in an attempt to make Magneto audience-friendly.
Take a chance Marvel (or whomever is making this now, Fox?)! Make his motivations understandable....but his actions truly evil all the same. Don't wimp out.
Reply
7-08-2008 @ 5:21PM
Batzarro said...
I guess Magneto's story should be about a crossroads of sorts. See, he's the Che Guevara that fights against a great injustice. But will he end up becoming the very thing he wanted to fight? Or will he set up a new version of what he was fighting? The X-Men favor diplomacy between both sides(when they'r enot buissy fighting Onslaught or Apocalypse, that is). What happens if Magneto and his Brotherhood wins? Do the coin flips and the humans become the "good guys?"
I remember the first movie his plan made kind of sense. Turning all world leaders into Mutants made many forms of sense. The only thing that made it evil is that Rogue had to die and that the machine was potentially deadly to those it affected. In X2 he became willing to sacrifice his "friend" to kill every human in the planet(Hey, dude, he told you you should have killed. That's the thinking of revolutionaries. That's why Cuban leaders go on about revolution, because as soon as revolution becomes establishment, all romanticism is lost. Because his view is that the humans and mutants ARE at war, and the war won't end until one side is fully subjugated or obliterated. Thus, this view leads to a "I'd rather kill than be killed" line of thinking.
Or something.
So I think if the Magneto is treated as a "revolutionary" that has to choose if he is willing to go as far, or farther, than those he is fighting, or if he'll have ethics in his fight.
Signing off.
Reply
7-09-2008 @ 6:18AM
Zuby said...
Sounds annoyling similar to the decidedly underwhelming "Hannibal Rising."
Reply
7-09-2008 @ 6:22AM
Bear said...
A good point was made about the first x-men movie, where the battle is very ambiguous (especially if the machine worked) and is sumed up in wolverines line
'if you really believed what you were saying it'd be you in that machine not her'
which suggest that the x-men don't necessary disagree with magneto's ideals just his way of doing it, and really sums up the moral line that divides their slightly different goals.
However this prequel sounds alot like a revenge movie, similar to the rubbish hannibal prequel, and isn't going to touch on the much more interesting chism that develops between Xavier and magneto.
Reply
7-09-2008 @ 10:16AM
thegoldfishpool said...
I think that a Magnito film, would work and be a brilliant look at the dark side in all of us, if handled correctly...
...unfortunately it'll probably not be handled correctly and will be a sucky piece of tripe with too much CGI like X3.
Reply
7-09-2008 @ 12:25PM
Moo said...
that's EXACTLY what i'm afraid of, goldfish.
The more time i have to look back at X3, the more i truly, truly hate that film.
7-09-2008 @ 4:48PM
CharlesFosterClemenza said...
If the inherent desire here is to make a decent film whose plot is, essentially, "here is how Iconic Villiain got that way", the writers/director/etc. have a very simple bit of homework to do. They should go home and screen, over and over again until they see exactly how to do it, the best film ever made using this general plot: The Godfather, Part II.
Magneto, we're bigger than US Steel.
Reply
7-09-2008 @ 9:16PM
Barb said...
I'd love to see a movie about Magneto. In the original X-men, he did bad things, yes, but he had reasons, and even though I didn't agree with the things that he did, I never saw him as a full blown super villain, either. The real villains in the movie were the people who couldn't accept mutants as people.
Barb
http://www.queenvintage.com
Reply
7-10-2008 @ 6:07PM
v720 said...
A magneto film could be great but will not be made, as long as every movie has to appeal to the widest audience you will never get the truly dark and cruel nature of a villian the joker in " a death in the family" beating Robin with a crow bar to a pulp, Vanth Dreadstar pulverizing someone with a chain even Sym the demon killing wolverine and using his claws as toothpicks or even the Dark knight's confrontation with superpoop. Would make geat cinema but not going to happen
Reply
7-14-2008 @ 6:52PM
SINGH said...
this website has the script to the movie and also has the wolverine script! go to: www.pdfscripts.weebly.com
Reply