Review: The X-Files: I Want To Believe
Filed under: Horror, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Mystery & Suspense, Theatrical Reviews, 20th Century Fox, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

The X-Files: I Want to Believe offers the viewer many mysteries to contemplate -- and only one of them is on-screen; as David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson return to roles and a franchise that last graced our TV screens in 2002 (and was last on the big screen in 1998), your mind swirls around the behind-the-scenes facts as fiercely as it does around the events playing out before your eyes. As reclusive, retired ex-FBI agents Fox Mulder and Dana Scully (Duchovny and Anderson) help the FBI with an abduction case, you're not following the plot as such; instead, you're thinking things like Hey, didn't this show get canceled six years ago? Haven't Duchovny and Chris Carter, the star and director of this film, both sued the studio behind it? Who, out in the movie going audience, is really clamoring for this movie? If you're an X-Files fan, is this film's freestanding creepy tale, with no link to the weird and convoluted mythos Carter came up with for the show, going to satisfy whatever itch you may still have for the franchise? And if you're not an X-Files fan, is the idea that this film stands alone enough reason to come to the franchise now?
When The X-Files debuted in 1993, Clinton was in the White House, Miley Cyrus was in diapers, and Jurassic Park was in theaters; times, obviously, have changed. The X-Files: I Want to Believe begins with the abduction of a female FBI agent, cross-cut with a FBI search of a snowy field. Agents Whitney (Amanda Peet) and Drummy (Alvin "Xzibit" Joiner) are led by psychic Father Joseph Crissman (Billy Connolly) to a severed male arm buried in the snow. Whitney tracks down Dana Scully, now working as a doctor at a Catholic hospital, in the hopes that Scully can connect the FBI with Mulder; Mulder is disgraced and even wanted by the FBI, but the suggestion is that Mulder's past work in the bizarre and unusual cases known as the "X Files" will give him an insight into working with a psychic. The FBI doesn't really trust Crissman, and with good reason -- he's a convicted pedophile who's been exiled from the church for years.
Bearded and brusque, Mulder reluctantly comes in from the cold; Scully also comes along for the ride, even though she's dealing with a young patient with a terminal illness who may have a chance at survival with a radical experimental stem cell therapy. As other women disappear, Mulder and Scully work the case alongside Whitney and Drummy, uncovering a bizarre conspiracy that's kidnapping very specific people for a very specific cause. ...
And watching The X-Files: I Want to Believe, I kept thinking: Really? This is all you have? Co-written by series creator Chris Carter and Frank Spotnitz, the film doesn't even attain the loopy, inspired bizarreness of old-school episodes like "Squeeze" or "The Host" or "Jose Chung's From Outer Space"; when the big plot is revealed, it seems almost pedestrian, as if Stephen King had given a re-write pass to a CSI episode to slick the procedural up with a little gore to make it shinier.
Duchovny, as Mulder, is fairly wasted -- or, rather, not given much room to move in the constraints of the plot. (It's sad when the biggest moment given to an actor in his character's arc for a film is when he shaves.) Anderson's arc as Scully seems specifically crafted to let her brood and nurture as opposed to run about in pursuit of the bad guys, possibly to keep Anderson from looking too bored on-screen. Connolly's work is certainly engaged -- you never fail to believe in his character -- but it's never really engaging. (Did Carter and Spotnitz, looking for a plot device to cast doubt on their film's psychic, really have to make Connolly's character a pedophile? Aren't there subtler, more intriguing ways of doing the same thing?)
The X-Files: I Want to Believe is also marred by bad guys who are simultaneously smart enough to engineer a multi-person kidnapping ring but dumb enough to make traditional movie villain errors like not checking to see if the person they've tried to kill is actually dead, or running a few errands while the person they want dead is lying there unconscious. (And again, do Carter and Spotnitz have to mention that the two male lead suspects in the kidnappings are "... married in Massachusetts"? It's as if someone suggested "Kidnapping and dismemberment isn't creepy enough; let's make them gay kidnappers!") Screen time devoted to the traditional back-and-forth between Mulder and Scully -- his hunt for truth in the darkness against her need to find faith in the light, and all of that stuff -- is screen time that could have been used to make the villains of the piece more compelling, or, at the very least, more interesting.
Carter, Duchovny and Anderson have all said they'd be willing to do another X-Files movie; whether audiences want that as much as they (and their business managers) do remains to be seen. Considering that Fox settled out-of-court when both Duchovny and Carter sued over allegations of price fixing for the syndication sale of the series, the idea that Fox, Carter and Duchovny went from litigation to production is another great demonstration of how truly insane modern franchise-mad big Hollywood seems to be. There are questions about faith and ethics and redemption in The X-Files: I Want to Believe, and plenty of chases and grisly visions of crazed pseudoscience. Carter and his team want to give us reasons to believe; I just don't think they gave us any reason to care.









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
7-24-2008 @ 5:18PM
Gary said...
Cheers James.
I was trying to decide whether or not to go see this tomorrow night. I was already assuming this is one that would be better renting when it came out on DVD now I am sure it is.
I loved the X-Files when I was younger, it was a great show. But that aint enough for me to pay to watch it in the Cinema when really all it seems to be is an average movie.
Average movies are OK, nothing wrong with them, but only on my TV set.
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 9:50PM
lauren said...
Seriously, if you're gonna let a reviewer make up your mind for you... If you're a fan of the X-Files and Mulder and Scully this film is well worth seeing!!
7-24-2008 @ 5:31PM
Mary Powell said...
No, Mr. Rocchi, that is NOT what I am thinking. Regardless of all the behind-the-scenes palace intrigue you seem to be obsessed with (Carter, Spotnitz, gay marriage, etc.) Mulder and Scully will always be Mulder and Scully, and any X-Files story is better than "Step Brothers" or a "Hairspray" sequel.
Reply
7-24-2008 @ 9:18PM
mezzanine said...
Bummer, but not surprising.
Reply
7-24-2008 @ 9:31PM
jake said...
I truly believe that if you were ever a fan of the xfiles that you should go out and support this movie and see it in the theaters, preferably this weekend. This movie took so long to actually get greenlit and if you aren't happy with this one, at least there is a possibility that they will get it right the next time if this is a success.
Seeing Mulder and Scully again is worth the price of admission alone.
Reply
7-24-2008 @ 11:19PM
Miguel said...
I think I'll go see Dark Knight again.
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 12:58AM
Arp said...
^ Agreed.
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 5:19AM
Dark Knight said...
Save your money. I think Carter spent the last 6 years forgetting everything that made the x-files fun and spooky and left you with nothing but "David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson star in A MOVIE!". I really never felt that I was actually watching Mulder and Scully so much as two actors playing roles poorly. The actors spent the movie looking almost as bored as I was. I have no faith in them to produce something worthwhile to put under the X-files title again. There's plenty more wrong with the flick, but it was more reminiscent of a George Lucas milk-fest than the X-files. Spend your hard earned money on another trip to see The Dark Knight again. Even Space Chimps would be a better choice than this.
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 9:28PM
lily said...
I saw both TXFIWTB and Dark Knight today and while I would say Dark Knight was a superiour film, to compare them is pointless. Yap Yap Yap about the Dark Knight. Chris Carter gave us fantastic characters we grew to love and he kept it going for nine years and two movies. That's an achievement. Dark Knight was a good movie but by no means a masterpiece. Seems to me if you like the Dark Knight so much you should be commenting ON the Dark Knight review instead of lurking on the X-Files review board.
7-25-2008 @ 8:10AM
filmsuki said...
What the frak happened to the alien invasion? I loved watching the X-Files, but the overarching plot was a big letdown. Another show, Alias, suffered from the same problem. Convoluted (albeit interesting) plot on top of convoluted plot, so much so that it became impossible to produce a satisfying resolution.
Do writers see the complete story arc before beginning a show, or just toss a lot of bizarre stories together and hope that somehow it'll all work out?
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 4:28PM
Jaycie said...
I agree with Dark Knight. Chris Cater has completely lost sight of what The X-Files is truly about at it's heart of hearts: alien conspiracy. The shows villains were of three types, extraterrestrials, monsters and madmen. This movie was of the third tier, but it wasn't even as creepy or suspenseful as some of the t.v. drama's villains, like Eugene Victor Toombs! I went into the movie expecting it to be something more along the lines of alien abduction, the black oil and the syndicate... anything besides another serial killer mystery. What happened to the passion, the drive, the obsession? Where's the suspense? And the fiery romance we were all waiting for? Forget it! And what a heck is Scully's problem anyways? She doesn't want to revisit her past in the FBI? HAS EVERYONE FORGOTTEN THAT THE DATE FOR ALIEN INVASION IS SET?!? I am a die-hard X-Files super geeky freak and this movie was a letdown in every way. I think the creators and writers focused too much on the average Joe being able to walk off the street, see the movie and understand it. They completely ignored the wants and needs of X-Files true fans, the ones who have poured over every episode for the last six years waiting in agony for the release of this film, only to leave empty handed. I sincerely "want to believe" that others thought better of this performance than me so that there can still be a chance at another sequel. Maybe the plot line will be picked up back where it left off in the final episode of the series and we can get some real questions answered. The last line of the entire show still lingers my memory... "Maybe there's hope." - Mulder
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 4:41PM
konsta said...
I'm definitely going this weekend, despite this review. I agree with the comment that it will be worth the price of admission to see Mulder and Scully together. I'll provide my assessment after seeing it for myself.
Reply
7-25-2008 @ 11:06PM
Rosemary Storaska said...
As a frequent viewer of Independent film outside the regular theater circuit, I have seen the good, the bad, and the ugly over many years and have come to appreciate film as a form of art. 'Art in motion' is how I reference a good flick and it is scrutinized in much the same way as the composition of a fine piece of artwork found in either a DC or London Museum. In short, I look to what the film is meant to do and how it accomplishes its task. I am not an X-filly by any means and decided to pick an odd time of 11:30 AM, in an off the radar theater, to view this X-file's resurrection. I went into this flick without any expectations other than avoiding what comes with the teeny theater crowd. Noisy talking and cell phone usage. Well, to my surprise this is a really well written script, true to both the X-files series (I have seen some episodes over the years) and to the state where the main characters, Mulder and Scully, would likely be, given where they were placed at the series end, and where they might stand in current time. The relationship storyline flows like a straight line through a complex mixture without getting lost in the muck, so to speak.
A fragile balancing act at best was merged into a suspenseful (although not scary) mesh of subplots along with translating into human reality the tensions of two individuals surviving the darkness of their past. Both Anderson and Duchovny got the chemistry back tirelessly and it showed within some very special scenes where their facial expressions were almost cut from a captured piece of film in an X-files season episode. That is good acting people and you were fortunate if able to recognize it. As a stand alone, no X-file experience is necessary.
This film is no Dark Knight and the action might not be as extreme, but the Batman flick is not worth the effort except for viewing Heath Ledger's performance which, for me, is the make all of that film. The difference between this suspenseful X-file and the Dark Knight is that it is a relationship story that sets it apart as much more. It is a tribute in a sense to two fine characters named Mulder and Scully. If your patient through all the credits you will visualize a final scenario that will make you both smile and think that it could end right there if fate would have it that way! Entertaining and I came away with a smile on my face! That is art! Go see it without expectations and simply enjoy it.
Reply
7-26-2008 @ 12:06AM
MTL said...
Just saw the movie and I enjoyed watching Scully and Mulder (plus Skinner) back together again. The storylines were good enough to keep my interest, and there were some funny moments. Keep your eyes open for the book to the left of Scully's head when she can't fall asleep! Also, stay thru the credits...it's like they're saying "bye"!! Overall, not a bad way to spend $8.50 and a couple of hours. Go see it.
Reply
7-26-2008 @ 1:05AM
m said...
I agree that you should support this movie and go see it if you are a longtime fan. I wasn't completely satisfied with the phenomenal aspect of the movie and I really think that they have more potential than what was displayed. But the characters, in my opinion, were summed up in a way that I was happy just knowing what they had been doing for the past years and what their lives were like now. The kiss. The love and admiration that these two people have for each other is so evident that I have just been waiting for them to be in the same room and not denying their love for each other.
If you didn't stay for the credits there was a little bit at the end. Not much but enough for me to be sure that there won't be a sequel, at least not involving them, anytime soon.
Other than that I would say go see it and judge for yourself. But it defiantly did not live up to it's full potential! Sorry Chris Carter, try again.
Reply
7-27-2008 @ 2:36AM
Jeri said...
Hey m, just thought you'd like to know that both Gillian and David have been very open to the idea of a 3rd film...regardless of what happens in the credits. This might've been a very understated "stepping" stone without saying it was for sure. Lets hope, right?
7-26-2008 @ 9:36AM
Xfilenut said...
Everyone is missing something. There is another and final movie planned. It will end everything once and for all. This was simply a stepping stone to that in character developement. It was made for the diehard fans to enjoy. This was to get back into the characters without inundating us with the massive mythology story to worry about. It was an outstanding addition to a show that meant and means a lot to so many people. If your not a fan dont see it. Go see Stepbrother where it only takes two brain cells to rub together to get your enjoyment.
Reply
7-29-2008 @ 1:11AM
DG said...
agree!
8-17-2008 @ 8:00PM
Andrea said...
Hey
I like the way you have summed this up. i am a diehard fan i loved the mulder and scully moments but was a little dissappointed with the film.
But having now read your explanation makes me feel better about, it did seem to me like a big screen xfiles episode!
Can't wait for the final film !!!
7-26-2008 @ 9:32PM
Lmickler said...
i liked it alright, i just want to know what happened to the little boy.
Reply