Note to Lionsgate: 'Dance of the Dead' is a Really Good Movie
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Horror, Independent, Thrillers, SXSW, Fandom, Fan Rant

When the brilliant French horror flick Inside went straight to DVD, I thought "Well, yeah. It's hardcore horror and it's in French. It probably scared the arthouses and it would never play multiplexes. Bring on the DVD already." When I heard that the very awesome [REC] was going directly to home video, I thought "Yeah, Sony did an English-language remake, so no big shock there." But when I heard that Gregg Bishop's Dance of the Dead was not only going straight to video -- but it was also being released alongside seven other horror titles on the same damn day -- I got just a little bit irritated.
I mean no disrespect to the fine folks at Lionsgate, because they spend a lot more money on horror movies than I do (and I spend a lot), but Dance of the Dead is a whole lot better than just another "DVD drop" flick -- and it sure as hell doesn't deserve to be
Kids didn't show up to see freakin' Prom Night for Brittany Snow. They went because the trailer hooked 'em in, and teenagers will go see ANYTHING about other teenagers -- provided you hook 'em with a good trailer. Dance of the Dead has enough good stuff to fill five good trailers. (Kind of a strange compliment, but you get the point.) If one of the Dance stars (say the lovely Greyson Chadwick) had just popped up on a hot new Fox series, then "The Gate" would be holding Dance of the Dead in a vault for a few extra months -- just until Greyson's star was rising -- and just as prom season was getting closer. And if you think I'm just blindly backing a horror flick because I dig it, but I know little about which films truly play with an audience ... think again. Dance of the Dead is as "accessible" as anything out there. Call it "Dawn of the Dead meets John Hughes" if you must, but if that sort of description would get your ass into a cineplex seat, then that's the marketing hook I'd use.
And there's probably no way that Dance of the Dead could be suitably trimmed for a PG-13 rating, which means it's high time we all make one giant confession and have done with it: Ratings mean nothing. It was boys aged 14 and up who made 300 such a smash, and they did the same thing for Rob Zombie's Halloween. The R rating is not a deterrent to teenagers. It's a magnet. Quadruply so if you deliver a good movie that gets the Hot Topic crowd buzzing. And if this crowd tolerated freakin' Prom Night enough to drop nine bucks, I say they'll dig Dance enough to maybe wear the T-shirt. On the other hand, if your 14-year-old can't handle a little cleavage, a little cursing, and a little carnage, OK fair enough: You shouldn't let him go see Dance of the Dead. Me, I was obsessed with Kubrick and Cronenberg at age 14, and I'm only on medication three weeks a month.
Call it a silly little crusade of mine, but I can visualize a packed theater having a ball with Dance of the Dead. (I can probably visualize it because I experienced it (twice) during the last SXSW Film Festival.) And to those savvy marketing execs who would wag their fingers and say "Now, now, that's a festival audience. Plus they serve beer at the Alamo," I would respond with "Good point, so go screen this movie for 25 audiences, age 18 to 30. If those crowds don't eat the thing up, I promise to never play Movie Marketing Exec again." But I'm just one mild-mannered blogger, and nobody really cares what I think. (Aside from my mom, of course, but she doesn't like horror movies.) So I thought I'd get in touch with Dance of the Dead director Gregg Bishop to see how he feels about his baby's upcoming release plans. Here's how that particular conversation went down:
---
Scott: "When you made the deal with Lionsgate, was a theatrical release part of those plans?"
Gregg: "No theatrical release plans were offered from Lionsgate / Ghosthouse, only DVD. We had several other offers on the table, including some offers for theatrical from some smaller companies -- but we all felt that the movie would just get lost in anyone else's hands. When a filmmaker makes a movie, they want it to reach the widest audience possible. When it comes to genre marketing and distribution, there is no one better than Lionsgate. Ghosthouse / Lionsgate is, without a doubt, the best home for this movie. But the response this movie has received thus far has blown away all my expectations, and has led me to believe that a potential theatrical run would be a good idea to explore. Every time it is screened in a theater, it is like a rock concert ... and not just festival screenings: We screened it at USC as part of their Alumni Screening series and the college kids (totally unrelated to us) were going nuts!"
Scott: "It was recently announced that Dance would hit DVD on 10/14 alongside seven other Ghost House / Lionsgate title (mostly imports). No disrespect intended to these other movies (none of which I've seen yet), but is it safe to say that "one of eight" isn't exactly the DVD debut you were expecting?
Gregg: "I haven't seen any of them yet either, but I've heard some good things... No, it's safe to say I wasn't expecting Dance to be part on an "eight-pack" release."
Scott: "But, I mean ... you're the director of the movie. Of course you'd love to get a theatrical run for your own film. I'm playing devil's advocate here, but what makes YOUR movie so darn special?"
Gregg: "No, that's a fair question. You ask any director if they'd rather their movie go straight-to-DVD or to theaters and they'll say "theaters" every time. I think a few test screenings would be a great idea. That way, the people who make these decisions can see how it plays in a packed house. I'm not asking them to listen to me, I'm asking them to listen to the audience."
Scott: "Hell, for starters, just show it to a bunch of the secretaries' (older) kids at a private screening with free pepsi & popcorn. Ask those kids what they think. Anything to indicate that this particular movie might be just a little more noteworthy than your run-of-the-mill DVD horror title."
Gregg: "Sure, just knowing that someone's giving it an extra look. Look, I couldn't be more happier with the team that is distributing this movie and either way I'm thrilled that the movie is getting out there. But you're right ... what if this movie could do a little bit more than that? This movie was always designed as a theatrical experience. Every time we screen the movie, the audience roars! I'd say the same thing if someone else made it. I just think that if you put the right decision-makers and a good audience in front of this movie, a lot more people would agree with us."
At that point Gregg hung up because it was well after 1am and we'd already finished talking about how awesome The Dark Knight was.
---
And just to show you that the film certainly does appeal to a wide array of demographics, I thought I'd ask one simple question of the Cinematical staff members who saw Dance of the Dead at SXSW last March. The question is this: "With the proper marketing angle, the right release date, and a smart (limited) release pattern, do you think that Dance of the Dead could prove to be a relative hit among the younger audiences?"
"Yes, absolutely. It's a terrific film -- funny and hip (without overdoing it) and full of the cool stuff that makes zombie movies fun without completely drowning the audience in blood 'n' guts. I saw it twice at SXSW, and I look forward to seeing it on the big screen again when (if?) it gets released. " -- Eric Snider
"I think slow-burn cult status kind of like what Donnie Darko eventually achieved might be possible, though maybe not quite to the same extent. It's a smart, funny movie -- I think people who see it will like it." -- Eugene Novikov
"If it was marketed properly (and it's a Lionsgate title, so that shouldn't be a problem), I think it could definitely reach beyond the hardcore horror buffs." -- Peter Martin
"Damn right if could. We saw a pair of raucous screenings at a festival, sure, but the movie was doing all the work. Austin movie crowds don't hoot, holler and stamp their feet unless a flick deserves it." -- William Goss
"It's smart, funny horror. Even if we're talking about teens with short attention spans, what's not to like? I'm not even a big horror fan, and I liked it well enough to see it twice within the space of a few days at SXSW. I never see films twice at festivals. I had to see it again just for the graveyard scene." -- Kim Voynar
"It's like Revenge of the Nerds meets Dawn of the Dead. If you're 18 and that doesn't sound appealing, you deserve to be eaten by zombies. In fact, I'd eat you myself ... with ketchup. And love it!" -- Erik Davis
And since the point I'm trying to make is that Dance of the Dead is NOT necessarily a niche film, I'll spare you the rave reviews from AICN, eFilmCritic, Bloody-Disgusting, Twitch, Film School Rejects, FirstShowing.net, Rotten Tomatoes, that massive gore geek over at FEARnet, and Cinematical's own Peter Martin -- and I'll make one final request: Show the movie to Sam Raimi. It's partially a Ghost House property at this point, so it shouldn't be too tough to get Mr. Raimi an early copy of the DVD. Ask him to watch Dance of the Dead with the idea of a packed (mostly youthful) crowd sitting behind him, and then see if he thinks I'm crazy.
And on the Lionsgate side of things, well, I expect a little more of an adventuresome spirit from the company that bought a scrappy little horror flick from Australia for a million bucks and then turned it into Jigsaw's House of Mega-Profit. Bottom line is that MOST of Lionsgate's cheaper genre pick-ups are more than deserving of a "direct to DVD release." The problem here is that, unlike most of the others, Dance of the Dead is a really good film -- and one that could be a hell of a lot more successful than just another DVD flick -- if someone just bothered to look a little more closely.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-31-2008 @ 3:30AM
William Goss said...
Preach it, brother!
This reminds me how The Signal seemed to flinch from an release last October because of Saw (although that still might've been the whole music rights business, I'm not sure), only to go coldly greeted this past February. If that were rolled out from late September on, steadily expanded across several markets, I'm sure it would've caught on. I'd like to think that Dance could do the same. Wasn't it just 2004 when Shaun of the Dead managed to come out the last week of September that year and last precisely through Halloween weekend?
Heck, push come to shove, they could pull a Feast and show it in a handful of cities as a big fat plug for the DVD coming out mere weeks (not months) later. It's not like word of mouth is going to hurt rentals and sales or anything, especially not on a film this fun.
Between this ploy and the situation with Midnight Meat Train's release this weekend (only second-run houses?!), you would think that Lionsgate is almost afraid to give a good horror movie the chance it deserves. Don't worry, guys: the Saw sequels and After Dark leftovers will still be around when quality becomes priority two.
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 5:26AM
Brad Miska said...
Great article, and I couldnt agree more. xoxo Bloody-Disgusting.com
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 8:04AM
Ross Miller said...
There is already a horror film (albeit a SHORT film) called Dance of the Dead. It's part of the Masters of Horror series and is directed by Tobe Hopper.
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 8:55AM
JackGonzo said...
With this news and the Punisher news, is there actually anyone over at Lionsgate who knows what they're doing other then giving their studio a very bad name?
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 9:45AM
Peter Hall said...
Alright, looks like my longer comment got lost in the ether, so I'll crass it back it up shorthand. If it shows up, delete this one.
I don't blame Lionsgate. Their FY08 saw a cumulative negative net income of $70 million, mainly from the first half of the year. The second half finally saw profitablity, but only after putting most of their weight behind DVD and TV distribution. Their stock is up very slightly for the year, but is much closer to its year low than its year high. Some hedge funds have already begun dumping large volume of LGF, their next big Lionsgate financed productions both have troubled outlook (Midnight Meat and Punisher 2) and their only profitable sector is home distribution.
From their end, they cannot afford to take a risk that Dance of the Dead may or may not make a return on the cost of marketing and the striking of film prints, when it already has the home market served up on a platter.
None of this is to say that Dance of the Dead does not deserve to be seen in a theater, just that LGF cannot afford to take that bet. Not until FY09, when they have successfully limited their theatrical risk exposure and are back in black for operating income due to their DVD and TV arms. For every Saw, Lionsgate owns 6 House of the Dead 2s. Their business model has reached the point to which quantity is trumping quality. Their stock price, which has been down trending for over a month now, demands that be the case for the time being.
It sucks, but they can't risk it. If this means in a year they can start to get back to the risks that made them a name, I'm willing to sacrifice a few flicks that probably wouldn't have played in my market anyway.
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 10:12AM
Tim Anderson said...
Alright Scott....I agree 100%. So...what are we going to do about it.
What this film really needed was exposure at Comic-Con.
Has a Lionsgate rep even seen this with an audience?
Great article buddy....more to come on this subject.
Tim Anderson
www.bloody-disgusting.com
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 4:08PM
Laura said...
At least The Signal got a theatrical release. I'm sorry for Gregg Bishop and impressed with the good attitude he has. I think he's a director to watch (along with the Signal guys). I thought his first feature, The Other Side, though a little rough around the edges, was ambitious and got more right than wrong. I could see then that he was only going to get better and that he was capable of making movies with mainstream appeal. I'll certainly rent Dance of the Dead. And keep supporting Atlanta's home-grown talent.
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 4:37PM
Jonathan Maberry said...
I can't wait to see this flick. It sounds like my sort of movie.
Jonathan Maberry
Bram Stoker Award Winning author of
ZOMBIE CSU: The Forensics of the Living Dead
Citadel Press
Available Everywhere September 1
Reply
7-31-2008 @ 4:42PM
James Jarrett said...
This is one of the most fantastic blogs I've read in a while! And I totally agree, but I have a vested interest. You see, I play "Gravedigger" in the film as well as being Production Designer (I will provide proof as needed and you have my email) and we worked our guts out and I think it came out on the screen.
I do have to say that a release, in any form, is exciting and I was glad to hear we got a deal. But in my heart of hearts I asked, "But didn't they see it first? Didn't they see the potential?" Look back at "Friday the 13th" and "Halloween." They weren't on the radar at first and then "BAM!" It is not my intent to make a comparison because "Dance" is not like those movies (which I love) but to point out the potential of the film. It has all the tools! Let it work! Help it work! Just like magic which it is full of!
Thank you for the blog and for stepping up and saying, "Wait a minute! What about the theater?" Questions I have quietly wondered about myself. Have a great day and thank you for the push. I am now right beside you.
James Jarrett
"Gravedigger"
Reply
8-01-2008 @ 12:50PM
Gary Wade said...
From previous reviews I have seen concerning this movie, it compares to "Shawn of the Dead" and as we all know that movie was a big hit. "Dance of the Dead" should be allowed to make its history as well and be brought to theaters for all to see.
A friend of mine has a role in it and also is the production designer, so I guess I have more than just a simple "would like to see it" attitude. I would like to see it do well. My friend has worked very hard for a long time to get a role and some recognition. I believe once this movie gets to the theaters it would become a major hit and have a solid cult fan base.
This is one of those movies that 20 years from now you would say "hey, do you remember that?" And they would!
Lets get this into the theaters!!
Gary
Reply
8-01-2008 @ 12:55PM
Jenn Brown said...
Agreed! I wouldn't have waited all three nights at SXSW to try to see it if the buzz wasn't so good. I finally was able to make it the last night it screened, and it was well worth if.
If a little film about a high school dork like Napoleon Dynamite can find it's legs in theatres, so can a horror comedy about high school dorks and zombies. Just for the opening sequence, it's worth it.
I'm still crossing my fingers that Fantastic Fest may screen it. It's a damned shame it's not being given a chance. While I'll jump at the chance to buy the DVD on release day, I'd really prefer to see it again (and probably a third time) in a theatre, with a good Austin Alamo crowd. (;P Goss)
Reply
8-10-2008 @ 9:40PM
MartyFly said...
I saw DoD AT sxsw and it was a breath of fresh air,not only to horror flicks but to movies in general. No Disrespect to lionsgate but im tired of seeing remakes and nothing original. Do yourself a favor a take a chance on this film.
Reply
8-11-2008 @ 2:52PM
justin welborn said...
Thank you for saying so much of what NEEDS to be said, when some of us can't. Good ideas and from your words to Yahwehs burning ears. Right?
Reply
10-05-2008 @ 12:38PM
Jenny said...
Great article. I've watched this one, and although it might seem negative to call it "cute," that's exactly what it is. Almost all of the other movies this came packaged with in Ghost House Underground, were total dreck, especially "Brotherhood of Blood," which was awful despite having some "bigger names" like Sid Haig and Ken Foree. "Dance of the Dead" was funny, smart and had some really likeable actors.
Reply