What New Revelations Lie Within the 'Dark City' Director's Cut???
Filed under: Classics, Drama, Horror, Romance, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Thrillers, Noir, Mystery & Suspense, Fandom, Home Entertainment, Comic/Superhero/Geek

What is the appropriate reaction to have when a movie you love, adore, and cherish is somehow ... improved? I know, it's a strange feeling. I happen to think my all-time favorite film (A L I E N) is much better in its theatrical version than in its extended -- but where Aliens is concerned, I much prefer the longer version! It's something you have to approach on a case-by-case basis, of course, and it's the sort of movie-nerd activity that should be attempted only by those with a lot of free time -- or someone who gets paid to write about this sort of stuff. (Fortunately I am both.)
So it was with MUCH enthusiasm that I sat down with the brand-new Director's Cut of Dark City, a film that I absolutely love a whole lot -- and I know I'm not nearly alone when I say that. Like many of the finest sci-fi films, Dark City was pretty much overlooked for a good long while -- put once it hit DVD and heavy rotation on the cable channels, the sci-fi freaks found a film worth watching and re-watching, to say nothing of analyzing, deconstructing, and debating. And so I happily continue that trend by explaining what the fans will find in New Line's very impressive new Dark City package...
First off, the cover is much cooler. Just adds a little extra value if you ask me. (Oh, and I picked the DVD up at a very common retailer for about $15, so it's a deal either way.) If you're itching for a blow-by-blow description on every single change that was made to the film, I'm sorry but I can't help you there. I spotted most of the "new stuff," but guess what? Roger Ebert is on board to help you out! Yes, the king of all critics (and avid supporter of Dark City) has recorded NEW commentary material just to help you keep up to speed on the new material. (OK, I'll answer the most obvious question: YES! The very lame opening narration has been removed! First Blade Runner, now this! Yes! Let's hear it for smart people and science fiction!
The Director's Cut is approximately ten minutes longer than Dark City's previous incarnation, although many of the changes are small, subtle, and very slick indeed. Best of all, we get a little more time with the character of Emma, and since Emma is played by Ms. Jennifer Connelly ... well, obviously that's a good thing. If you want a few clues on where to pay extra attention, here's a few: Watch Murdoch when he gets out of the tub, poke around the prostitute's apartment a little more, keep your eyes on our hero's fingertips, and listen carefully when Emma sings. Oh, and a lot of the "sleeping & tuning" material has been tweaked, shuffled, and switched around. And get this: Proyas' changes actually make the film better. Better than Dark City (1998), I mean! Impressive stuff.
In the extras department, we're in for some real treats. We have three audio commentaries -- one with director Alex Proyas, one with screenwriters Lem Dobbs and David Goyer, and a third with Dark City cheerleader Roger Ebert -- and a pair of featurettes: The 42-minute Memories of Shell Beach and the 32-minute Architecture of Dreams, both of which appeared on the original Dark City DVD. Definitely some fantastic supplemental viewing for Dark City fans both new and seasoned, but yeah -- they're from the original DVD.
That's what you'll get on the standard DVD Director's Cut. If you go for the Blu-Ray version, you'll also receive the original theatrical cut (which also comes with a pair of old commentaries and a "director's fact track"), and a few extra bells and whistles. Both versions also include a new introduction to the film from Proyas, Ebert, and other cast & crew members.
Best of all, the movie's (almost) a new experience, what with the great new footage and an audio-visual display that really captures the consistently (wonderfully) schizophrenic moods of the film. This is not a case of someone slapping a bunch of deleted footage back into a completed film just to snag a few extra bucks from the movie fans. This is a very special release that will absolutely delight the thousands who've discovered Dark City over the past several years. I won't be tossing my old Dark City DVD into the trash -- but I sure don't think I'll be needing it anymore.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-02-2008 @ 3:56PM
eugene said...
sweet, going to pick this up.. I loved Dark City, I'm just happy it's finally getting a good transfer.
Reply
8-02-2008 @ 4:14PM
YouFaceTheTick said...
Many forget this film got buried by the Matrix. While one was plodding, simple and filled with cartoonish action, the other is just a fan-freaking-tastic film - more Twlight Zone at 2 hours. I can't wait to see this version.
Reply
8-02-2008 @ 4:30PM
totoro said...
Looking forward to seeing this again-I only saw it once when it first came out in the theatres, but still remember it well.
Reply
8-02-2008 @ 5:56PM
flowers said...
One of the most impressive things about Dark City is that it was produced for $25m. A bargain for VFX heavy sci/fi films. I think it's a good model on "how to" make a sci/fi studio films on the cheap (if you think $25m is cheap!).
I do believe that Kiefer Sutherland redeemed himself with this film.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 2:53PM
Rich Drees said...
Last year, I thought that the Director's Cut of the great, if underrated, THAT THING YOU DO was going to be a disaster, but wound up being pleasantly surprised.
I hold DARK CITY in a similar light- it is a great, but criminally underrated film. Glad to hear that its new DC is similarly up to par.
Reply
8-02-2008 @ 7:29PM
Victor said...
Glad to hear about the narration being eliminated!
Now if only they can come out with director's cuts of "Fight Club", "American Beauty" and "A Christmas Story" without all that stupid narration. We don't need all that crap. We get it!
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 12:11PM
Tucker said...
The narration in Fight Club is kind of central to the plot and story. It's meant to be told from the first-person perspective, and it's one of the few things in the film that really excels at capturing Palahniuk's voice. Check out the novel, you may wind up appreciating Fincher's adaptation more.
8-04-2008 @ 12:11PM
Tucker said...
D'oh, that should read "...central to the plot and style."
8-02-2008 @ 7:38PM
eugene said...
Have you read Fight Club? The narration is part of the narrative.
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 12:12PM
Tucker said...
Gah, I got all hot and bothered and replied before I saw you already took care of it!
8-02-2008 @ 9:02PM
doa766 said...
if you ever get the blu ray, then you'll fell like tossing your old dark city dvd and the new director's cut dvd both into the thrash
once you get used to blu ray, going back to dvd is the same as going back to VHS when you first bought a dvd player, it makes it absolutly obsolete
Reply
8-02-2008 @ 10:00PM
Jordan M. said...
i will definitely be picking up the blu-ray. for a second i thought this was DVD only and was like "maaan they missed a good opportunity..."
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 7:44PM
EatingPie said...
I guess I'm the only who thought Kiefer Sutherland was absolutely idiotic in this movie. Well I can give it another try on Blu-Ray.
I do want to point out something on Alien. The theatrical cut IS the Director's Cut. Scott himself says so, and he just did the extended version for the heck (money) of it.
When I saw the deleted scene where Dallas is still alive and begs to be killed, I was blown away and wondered HOW that could be removed. Scott's commentary on that scene was that it slowed the pacing down too much. When I saw the extended edition, where the scene was put back, I couldn't believe it but he was right!
-Pie
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 8:03PM
Chelsea said...
You're not the only one. Sutherland's performance turned me off to the film in a big, big way. They needed a stronger actor who could make that character believable instead of a pile of tics and a hammy bad accent. This is not to say that Sutherland is bad, but the film and the poor direction of actors and performances revealled many of his shortcomings as an actor.
The other massive nail in the coffin for me was the terrible, terrible editing. I can understand a small handful of scenes being cut in two-second increments, but there was no. earthly. reason why EVERY SINGLE SCENE needed that kind of shoot-for-the-edit bullshit. Does Proyas mention in the commentary whether he gave his editors cocaine, crack, or speed while they were cutting the film?
8-05-2008 @ 7:24PM
Mike T. said...
I'm surprised no one's asked this yet: new commentary by Roger Ebert? Um, he can't talk right now ... when did he record this new commentary?
Reply