The Exhibitionist: Repeat Business
Filed under: Action, Magnolia, Warner Brothers, Box Office, Fandom, Exhibition, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Columns

Behold my 1000-plus words way of asking you this simple question: how many times have you seen The Dark Knight?
Here's a little story I probably tell too often (it's even in my "Meet the Team" bio): Long ago, at an art school that should remain nameless (I hated the place too much to give it any kind of credit), I studied film production, with the crazy notion that I would be the one to bridge the gap between Steven Spielberg and Quentin Tarantino (this was in the mid-90s, when all film students just wanted to be the latter). And while I wasn't any good at being the kind of leader necessary to be a great director, I thought I was on track to (at the very least) become an Oscar-winning screenwriter.
Then, in the middle of my freshman year, I went to see 12 Monkeys. And when it was over, I stayed in the theater and I watched it again. I believe this to be the moment when I decided that I no longer wanted to be a filmmaker and wanted to be a film watcher. But it would take me another year of school -- during which I changed the names in my dream from Spielberg and Tarantino to Gilliam and Hartley -- to realize that I could be a ... professional movie theater employee!
Years more would go by before I actually realized that I was better off writing about the movies than attempting to write for the movies, and fortunately all that time managing multiplexes gave me an extra niche to write about, as well. This week's column, however, despite its long-winded introduction, is not about how I came to write "The Exhibitionist." It's actually more specifically about that repeat screening of 12 Monkeys 12 years ago. Because thanks to The Dark Knight's box office success reportedly linked in part to repeat business, I've been thinking about the few movies that I've actually seen in the theater more than once.
Honestly, I can't remember there being any repeats prior to 12 Monkeys. And that situation was actually an accidental double viewing. I had arrived late for the movie and walked in after it had begun. Thinking I'd missed a lot, afterward I hid in a restroom until the ushers were gone, and I strolled back into the auditorium and watched to see the beginning. It turned out that I'd only missed about 30 seconds, but after the realization, I couldn't seem to tear myself away from the screen. I was too in love with the movie.
Of course, I didn't pay twice for 12 Monkeys, so the experience can't technically be considered "repeat business." Since that time, I've only paid to see a few films more than once in a theater. Yet even when I worked in a movie theater and didn't have to pay, I had better things to do with my time. With most of the movies I went to see twice, I did so because I was really excited about the movie (Being John Malkovich was one) and so I brought a friend, hoping to introduce him or her to it. Unfortunately, almost always the friend wasn't as excited as I was, and so I decided to stop dragging people to movies I'd already seen.
I guess I can understand how people in the suburbs might want to see The Dark Knight two or three times in two or three weeks. The local cinema probably doesn't offer a lot of better options. Here in New York City, it's a little different. I don't get why someone would want to see a repeat when there's so many other movies, new and old, playing nearby. Especially at $11-$18 a ticket, depending on whether it's a regular or IMAX ticket. But then, I don't even like to watch a lot of movies for a second time on video, because there's more than a century's worth of films I haven't seen and should see before spending another 2 ½ hours of my life with The Dark Knight, regardless of how good it is.
Tons of people definitely disagree with me, because there are apparently a lot of fans who are seeing The Dark Knight again and again and again. Perhaps they're the same people who are getting so riled up over negative reviews of the movie. Perhaps they're so obsessed with the film that it's become a religious experience for them. Is it possible that any of them are actually returning to the movie because they're dragging a friend to see it for the first time? Or could it be that people think the movie is so good (still #1 on IMDb good) that it's the only thing worth seeing, ever?
It doesn't have a lot of laughs nor does it have an interesting twist or puzzle, elements that normally warrant a movie to be enjoyed, or at least watched, over and over. If anything, I'd think too many repeat viewings of The Dark Knight would expose it as being not quite as good as it seemed the first time around -- maybe it's even easier to see during the second viewing how correct David Edelstein is about how poorly directed those action scenes are.
Am I against repeat business? Nah. Certainly it's good for the movie theatre business, though probably more so if you actually wait to make your return visit in the third or fourth weekend rather than in the first or second. Plus, I'm sure that I'll do it again someday. In fact, last week I went to see Man on Wire, and I wanted to immediately watch it again. Unlike 12 years ago, however, I don't have so much free time on my hands. Still, I've been recommending the documentary, which is by far my favorite film of this film so far, to everyone I know (it opens wider this Friday, August 8. Go if you live near any of the cinemas showing it). And more than simply trying to send people to the theater to see it, I want to tag along, too. I'd love to see the look on my non-cinephile friends' faces when they first discover how entertaining it actually is (in theory, a documentary about a tightrope walker doesn't sound all that exciting).
I probably won't actually see Man on Wire again in the theater (unless you're buying), because I still have to see Herzog's must-see-theatrically doc Encounters at the End of the World. Also, there's an Elliott Gould retrospective happening here this month, and I've never seen Altman's The Long Goodbye or California Split even once, so I might as well check them out on the big screen. But since I think Man on Wire is a much better film than The Dark Knight, I'm hoping that some people do find their way to seeing it more than once. Films like these can definitely use the business, let alone the repeat business.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-03-2008 @ 10:04AM
Claire said...
I rarely make it to the movies enough as it is, but I have once in my life seen a movie twice in the theater. I saw the Bourne Ultimatum twice opening weekend. Once the Friday it came out and then again Sunday night with a friend who hadn't seen it yet. it was worth the combined costs and dealing with a packed theater twice. but, i have never loved a film so much to see it more than twice on the big screen. I could never understand why some girls i knew saw Titanic 7 or 8 times. it wasn't that good.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 10:33AM
Kurt said...
Sometimes it's about the theatrical experience--some movies just have such a greater impact on the big screen that they're worth re-visiting before they hit the DVD rack. With The Dark Knight, my wife and I saw it on a regular screen the first time and then on an IMAX screen (mostly, so we could say we got to see it in IMAX).
And sometimes it's just fun to fanboy out--hell, I saw The Two Towers three times opening weekend.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 10:58AM
Jette said...
I see some good movies twice these days -- the first time at a press screening or film fest, and then the second time with my husband if he didn't go to the press screening with me. We also saw "Iron Man" twice because we wanted to see a movie one weekend and nothing else good was playing that we hadn't already seen, but the movie didn't give us anything extra on a second viewing, disappointingly.
In college, I saw "A Clockwork Orange" for the first time at the university's student-union theater, and loved it so much I went back the next night and saw it again.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 11:26AM
Matthew said...
I've slipped into watching movies at home because the price of the ticket is now about the same as waiting to buy the DVD. There I don't have to deal with people talking, obnoxious cell phones, or crying babies in rated R movies (seriously, WTF?). So I was amazed that each of the three times I've seen Dark Knight, I could hear a pin drop in the audience. Maybe this movie just brings out a different type of theater goer?
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 11:26AM
NP said...
I live in NYC, and I've seen Dark Knight twice, first on a regular screen and then on the IMAX (I will almost certainly see it again on the IMAX at least once). The reasons you bring up for not seeing movies in NYC multiple times (high ticket prices, many film options)... I understand where you're coming from, but I also see the flip side. With regard to how many films we have available to us here in New York, I'm loath to spend $11-13 on a movie that I may only enjoy marginally and one that I don't (personally) gain much from seeing in a large format. Dark Knight IS the kind of film I want to see in a large format (the larger the better), and one that I'm willing to pay NYC ticket prices to see (even multiple times because I enjoyed it that much). Many times I've gone to see a film in this city and thought "Yeah, I enjoyed that well enough, but I probably could have waited to watch it on DVD." Granted, sometimes there's a certain good feeling about simply having the option to see certain films in theaters here because you know it's a privilege of living in New York, that the film may not be playing in theaters anywhere else (aside from maybe Los Angeles), but sometimes I'd rather just save my $12.
With regard to the idea that multiple viewings may reveal the film's flaws, I found the exact opposite to be true. The action sequences seemed even better to me, the dense plot seemed more digestible. I imagine a third viewing will be sheer enjoyment.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 11:03PM
Ray said...
I agree. Saw it last night for the second time, and I noticed the action sequences seemed to be better filmed than before, and Nicky Katt's role was much less annoying. I haven't seen it in IMAX yet (probably next weekend). It looked like a lot of people in the theater last night hadn't seen it yet, given their reactions to things like the pencil gag, or the appearance of the Bat Pod. And it was packed. I'm not at all surprised it beat the Mummy this weekend; I'm actually surprised anyone thought it wouldn't.
8-03-2008 @ 11:49AM
BondsBabe said...
if i like a movie I will see it twice, maybe three times if I can.
I was so blown away by Casino Royale I saw it 8 times before its run ended.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 12:09PM
Wayne said...
I've seen a number of movies more than once in the theater. For me it's usually about the experience and how enjoyable the movie is on the big screen. Sometimes taking a friend or family member to see the movie if they haven't made it out yet is additional motivation for me to see a movie again.
The Dark Knight was so enjoyable, with such tension and raw emotion, that other movies (Step Brothers, Tropic Thunder, Pineapple Express to name three) don't seem as appealing right now.
I've seen TDK twice and I intend to see it IMAX as well.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 12:56PM
PST said...
I saw The Dark Knight twice, once on a regular screen at the earliest time that was convenient for me after it was released (which was midway through the next week; I'm busy), and a second time on the IMAX a week later, with somebody who hadn't seen the film yet. I doubt I'll be going to see it again, but I think seeing it on the IMAX made a second viewing worth it.
Of course, it did make it even clearer that the action scenes weren't particularly well-directed, but I think that there's a reason not many people are noticing this: the actual fights aren't very unimportant. Batman just seems to be beating people down as brutally and quickly as possible to get through to whatever he has to do next. It'd be nice if it were a little clearer, but it really doesn't need to be. Other flaws also reared their heads, but certain things that I hadn't decided about after a first viewing were resolved for me.
Sometimes I'll see a movie multiple times in theaters because I just plain like them, but that's fairly rare. I watch movies more than once in the theater if I'm trying to make up my mind about them (usually that's for films I don't, or almost, like), if I can go to some special even after having already seen it once (I saw The Fountain a second time because Aronofsky was at a screening at my school), if the first screening was marred by technical problems, etc. I very often go and see movies at revival theaters that I've already seen on DVD or VHS, especially if I think 35mm projection will reward. I'll often see a movie a second time to go with somebody else, either because I want to introduce them or because they want to go and see it and I wouldn't mind seeing it again and having this person to talk to about it.
In general I'll review any film that I thought was worth seeing the first time. Like I've already resigned myself to the fact that I'll never have the time to read every book I'd like to, I'm well used to the fact that I won't be able to see every film I'd like to. But I figure that the ones I do see that seem worthwhile to me should get multiple viewings: even if they're not screamingly funny or puzzle pictures, it takes a few viewings to get into the visual language of the film, and that's something I enjoy doing. It's just not something I feel I'll need to do with The Dark Knight.
But I think that in the case of a film like The Dark Knight, or Titanic, or any of those films that successfully become 'events' in the way that the earliest blockbusters were, it's just a matter of getting caught up in the general excitement surrounding the film. If the hype and word-of-mouth builds up high enough, the only release is to see it, and if it's built up as high as it is for these films, it might take multiple tries, in ever-larger groups, to get into it. And there's always the reward of the familiar and of ritual.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 1:37PM
Veronica said...
Most recently, I saw The Dark Knight twice, both times on IMAX, and I'll probably see it there again. I feel that once it leaves theaters, I would never have the chance to have that IMAX experience with TDK again, so I'll try to watch it at least once more.
The list of films I saw twice or more may contain some embarrasing titles since I tended to do that when I was younger. It includes:
Titanic (10 times, over 3 different continents)
Enemy of the State (twice)
Cruel Intentions (I think it was twice)
Moulin Rouge (twice)
Chicago (twice)
Kill Bill, vol 1 (twice)
Batman Begins (3 or 4 times)
There are probably more, but I can't think of any right now.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 3:09PM
totoro said...
I saw BladeRunner when it was first released, and was so blown away I sat there and watched the next showing as well. Then I went back the next weekend to see it again (fortunately, since it disappeared from the theatres not long after). Then I made it a habit of going to see it every time it showed up at the UC Theater (which played lots of cult movies).
Can't think of any other film that struck me that way. I think some films just strike a chord in you (it also helps when you are young and impressionable :p )
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 3:07PM
Con said...
There is a lot of space out there for complete criticism of movies whether or not the public pin-points it at masterpiece or failure. To many movies are complete fall-through and rather pointless when compared to other movies. Small time pictures really have their magic also, most times what big budget movies can't even buy.
BUT, what The Dark Knight has done is put every single crucial idea on the line. "most anticipated movie of the year"... hype out the ying-yang... death of major actor... and now possibly #1 OR #2 biggest movie of all time (by sales, of course)
I did love The Dark Knight and I do plan on seeing it again... and hopefully I can drag people along to see it with me because the film deserves the attention it is receiving.
The point of movies is to be entertained! If you can't get enough of it, then let it become your obsession... and if you weren't completely impressed, then move on as you must because there are so many other movies out there to marvel over and ridicule
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 3:27PM
doa766 said...
I've seen it three times but always for free since I get movie vouchers at work (they're not for IMAX)
if it weren't for that I would probably have seen it twice, once on IMAX, once on the multiplex two blocks from my apartment
but that's because I don't really enjoyed watching movies in theaters, and it's not about the money, it's because of the people
before this one the last one that I saw at theaters more that once was return of the king, but that was diferent because it was with different people every time (once with dad, once with girl, twice with separate group of friends)
this time I went alone on opening night because I couldn't wait, and alone again te following tuesday (to avoid people and see it in a more observant way, but the theater was packed anyway with people cheering so no luck) and then the sunday on the second weekend when my friends who never go to see movies at theaters but love them as much as me, realized this one is special and there's no point in waiting for the blu ray
when I'll have the blu ray I'll see it many times more
I was tempted to see iron man a second time on theaters when it came out but I decied to wait for the blu ray
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 5:56PM
Bob said...
LOL WUT!
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 6:15PM
Roy B said...
I watch a lot of movies in the theatres, quite a bit more than average (though perhaps not the cinematical reader average). Generally I see one or two movies a week. Sometimes more. It's not unusual for me to see a movie on opening day, then go back and see it with others. The one movie I saw most in the theatre was The Matrix. Perfect sci-fi movie that followed through on its premise and had plenty of eyecandy to boot. I ended up seeing that 7 times before it left the big screen. Still couldn't make up for watching sequels 2 & 3. Rocky Horror is of course in a class of its own, but even there the charm has faded. Its not a good movie on its own, it needs an involved audience. Unfortunately, I stopped watching it when the audience changed from intelligent and witty remarks to merely crass and vulgar eruptions.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 10:51PM
Broaden said...
... I've seen the DarkKnight 4 times. The first was on opening night, and the last three I caught a daytime show. Most movies even the ones I like I only see once. The matrix I viewed every weekend until it left the theaters. It was a revelation seeing a world without borders or boundaries, rules or regulations, where anything is possible. The Dark Knight was all about creating anarchy to upset the established order which begats chaos which in turn equals fear. That's a revelation. It applys so much to where this country and the world is headed. I'll probably buy the DVD and watch it until my brain starts putting me to sleep evertime I attempt to view it like the Matrix DVD's affect me now.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 6:45PM
matt said...
I've seen dark knight...and like most people, one regular, one imax (which i have to say, moving from nyc to portland oregon...the imax out here is not nearly as impressive as lincoln center. It's like a regular theatre that they crammed a imax screen in).
Just these last couple of months...
iron man x3 (8pm and midnight on opening day and 1 second run)
Forgetting sarah marshall x3
I think my record is the seven times i paid cash money to see episode 1. three of those times were in the first 24 hours. A midnight opening at the midway, a 1pm at the Ziegfeld and an 8 somewhere else in queens.
I find it alot easier to justify multiple viewings here in portland since it's cheaper...we have a lot of second run theaters...and since i dont like in ny anymore, i dont have to work a million hours a week...so i have the free time now.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 8:29PM
AJ Wiley said...
I've seen The Dark Knight three times. Once at a midnight showing with my family (an experience that cannot be duplicated), once again that day with my best friend, and then again with a friend who hadn't yet seen it when I visited him in San Diego for Comic-Con. Why have I seen it three times? Because it's a brilliant film, the best I've seen this year. I don't think that the action scenes are poorly directed at all, and in fact, it becomes stronger on repeat viewings, its moral complexities more and more engrossing. It's a masterpiece.
I've seen quite a few movies more than once at the theater, and only Men in Black II was one I wasn't actually itching to see again but ended up having to go anyway.
Reply
8-03-2008 @ 8:43PM
Ryan said...
I will see The Dark Knight twice. I've already seen it opening weekend because well I was already super excited to see it, so why wait? The next time I will see it will be on IMAX.
All the sold out IMAX screenings have made a few of us wait a bit longer for our second viewings. Plus with working and getting together a few of my friends together, well yeah. But I will see this movie a second time.
The only other movie I saw in theaters more than once was Serenity.
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 1:13AM
DylanG said...
I've seen The Dark Knight twice and plan on seeing it a third time once it hits a 2nd-run theatre by my house (I have 12 free tickets to the theatre that I need to use up). For me, I go to the theatre to be entertained. I enjoyed The Dark Knight so much that seeing it a third time is likely more entertaining than watching most of the other movies (i.e. Mummy 3, Pineapple Express, X-Files).
If I didn't go to the theatre as much as I do, I might not go for multiple viewings, but I'm going to get to see every movie I want to in theatres, so it's not like I'm missing out on other movies.
There's very few films I've seen more than once in the theatres and the reasons vary, but the films I have seen twice in theatres are The Dark Knight, Team America, and Eight Crazy Nights.
Reply