Japanese Critics Angry About Nuclear Blast in 'Indiana Jones'
Filed under: Action, Paramount, Celebrities and Controversy, Steven Spielberg, Remakes and Sequels
A lot of us totally lost it while watching Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull when our hero hides inside of a refrigerator and survives government testing of a nuclear bomb. Some people went so far as to coin a new term, "nuke the fridge", which is akin to the now-well-known "jump the shark" term, only specifically for film series. It makes sense, though, that they'd be having even bigger issues with the scene over in Japan, where the movie opened mid-June. After all, the country did experience two atomic attacks at the end of WWII and probably understands the ramifications of such a blast better than any other part of the world. According to the website Japan Today, film critics Ken Terawaki and Hiroo Otaka have been the most outspoken. Otaka wrote against the use of the scene in the movie magazine Kinema Junpo, noting that the scene narratively serves no real purpose and complaining that Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) goes about his adventures unscathed. He also points out that children today -- in both Japan and the U.S. -- are unaware of the real damage caused by a nuclear blast. Other people have been expressing their disapproval on message boards, including one on the film's Japanese website. Not everyone is upset, however, and apparently some people are coming back with the "it's only a movie" retort.
Just to be accommodating, I think Steven Spielberg should include the short documentary Hiroshima Nagasaki August, 1945, which graphically shows the effects of at least an atomic bomb, as a supplement on the Japanese version of the DVD.
[via Fark.com]









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
8-04-2008 @ 6:00PM
Jack said...
Awesome! Maybe the Japanese could also include a documentary on the Nanking Massacre as a bonus in every film they release over there. OH WAIT! According to their diet, that never happened! Silly me!
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 6:20PM
Mike De Luca said...
Jack, the nuking of two cities full of innocent civilians was just collateral damage in your estimation? Fuck you.
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 6:40PM
dukrous said...
No...the nuking of two cities full of innocent civilians was more agreeable than a land invasion that would cost untold more lives on both sides. The sad part about war is no one wins...you only lose less than the other guy.
8-04-2008 @ 8:49PM
eugene said...
More people died during the fire bombings of the UK and Germany then died in Japan. You're also looking at the event given what we know about nuclear weapons today. You can't judge the ethics or morality of the past given modern sensibilities.
Given what we knew about nuclear weapons and their effects, given the ENORMOUS casualties (both military and civillian) a traditional war would have meant, given that Japan was the AGGRESSOR in the pacific theater, not just in attacking the United States but the attacking of her neighbors, the brutal treatment that those occupied territories were subjected to (everyone knows about what the Nazis and the Soviets did, but what the Japanese did was easily equal to anything done in Europe)... I think the Americans were justified in dropping the bombs.
And given the fact that the political and industrial leaders responsible for the war were let off by MacArthur... I really don't think the Japanese have anything to complain about.
If you want to know about the horrors of the effects of the nuclear blasts, ask the surviving Japanese and Koreans (Yes, there were Koreans living in Japan who were victims of the bombs) still living in Japan who are social outcasts and who are even abandoned by the Japanese government.
8-04-2008 @ 9:58PM
Jack said...
I don't think you even bothered to read my post. But that's okay. It's the internet and people usually don't get past the 3rd sentence before they make sweeping conclusions.
8-04-2008 @ 6:50PM
eugene said...
Tell you guys what, when Japan formerly (as in the emperor) apologizes for the occupation and attempted cultural destruction of Korea, apologizes for the forced protstitution of thousands of Korean, Chinese and Philipino women, apologizes for the plunder of countless religous and historical artifacts, when they apologize for all the war crimes, including "medical" experimentation on prisoners... when they do this, maybe I'll give a shit what the japanese think about WWII.
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 8:13PM
automagV said...
Exactly. The Rape of Nanking should be read by all who think they have an informed opinion about what happened in the Pacific during WWII. What the Japanese did is disgusting, horrible, perverted, and inhuman.
8-04-2008 @ 10:08PM
Jack said...
Go ahead and check out The Nanjing Massacre by Konda Katsuichi and A Plague Upon Humanity by Daniel Barenblatt. If you're not the reading type, check out that documentary 'Nanking' on DVD. If you're really up for a challenge, try and get a hold of 'Japanese Devils,' a Japanese-made documentary from 2001 that Japan has actively tried to muffle. Want a more cinematic flare to it all? Check out 'Devils at the Doorstep,' (it's a black comedy, YOU'LL LOVE IT)!
Let me paint it out for you. What Japan is doing now is the equivalent of Germany, as a country, publicly denying the Holocaust and the Hitler's decree for mass genocide. How would you feel if Germany erected a shrine to celebrate the bravery of Hitler? Hm? Well, Japan has a shrine celebrating their war heroes that were guilty of war crimes.
So yea, until Japan apologizes, who gives a shit what they have to say about refrigerators in Indy 4? Bringing up the monkey scene is a whole different story, though...
8-04-2008 @ 7:03PM
Rod said...
why do people hate the refrigerator scene do much? i love it
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 7:46PM
Ryan said...
>>as a supplement on the Japanese version of the DVD
Riiiiiight. Because it's the Japanese that need to learn about the effects of nuclear warfare.
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 10:05PM
YouFaceTheTick said...
Because it was totally Wily E. Coyote.
8-04-2008 @ 11:28PM
Christopher Campbell said...
I see where I erred in that suggestion, though I guess I meant it because of the guy who said Japanese kids don't know the reality of nuclear bombs either.
8-04-2008 @ 7:59PM
Eric D. Snider said...
The Japanese are just mad that they didn't think of the refrigerator idea as a way of saving themselves.
Reply
8-04-2008 @ 9:25PM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
That's terrible and hilarious.
8-04-2008 @ 10:26PM
William Goss said...
^ what he said ^
8-04-2008 @ 10:05PM
YouFaceTheTick said...
I mentioned this article to my wife. She just said about the scene: "I don't blame them. That scene was insultingly stupid. They acted like a refrigerator and bath is all he'd need."
Reply
8-05-2008 @ 1:13AM
eugene said...
Yes, that's the point. The world was very cavalier about the effects of radiation back then. They had x-ray machines in shoe stores you could stick your feet in to see how the shoe fit. People would sit on rooftops and watch nuclear tests with little more than sunglasses to protect themselves.
The whole POINT of that scene was to mock how naive and preposterous our notions of the atom were back then.
8-05-2008 @ 12:17AM
Batzarro said...
Because the Japanese don't have gratuitous nuclear explosions that people impossibly survive...right?
(If you've seen anime, you know what I'm talking about)
Reply
8-05-2008 @ 8:22AM
bongo123 said...
i pretty much agree with the whole Japan can shut the fuck up r.e. WW2, they where the aggressors and a right savage bunch at that, heck if i was in charge back then i would've nuked the whole island back to the dark ages seeing as that was the mentality displayed by the majority of their armed forces!
different state of affairs now, afterall they give us Akira :) but, they dont get a say in matters concerning the war.
Reply
8-05-2008 @ 9:17AM
Kevin said...
I totally agree with the majority opinion here about the things the Japanese need to recognize and apologize for before they have a right to complain about scenes in American films involving warfare and destruction. Having said that, they do have every right to complain about how stupid the scene was in general. One of the most ridiculous scenes in a movie I've ever witnessed, I was pretty embarrassed that Speilberg would resort to that crap. What a way to ruin a franchise.
Reply