Review: Tropic Thunder
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Paramount, Theatrical Reviews

Tropic Thunder, starring Ben Stiller as one of a group of runaway actors whose work on a big-budget Vietnam epic goes horribly awry, is a funny, far-fetched mockery of modern Hollywood; the laughs don't maintain anything like a coherent intensity, but when they come, they're big enough to get you through the spaces between them. Some will mistakenly call Tropic Thunder a satire, but Tropic Thunder is in fact an example of satire's boisterous, bumbling sibling, the spoof. A satire's held with a light but precise grip, so the point can slice and the blade can cut; a spoof's more of a club, landing with blunt force and broad impact.
Star and director Stiller attacked the celebrity-industrial complex before, in 2001's Zoolander, and Tropic Thunder has more in common with that film than you might think; Stiller manages to mock action and thrills while also delivering them, and he's got a fine grasp of coarse celebrity behavior. Stiller seems drawn to characters whose self-centered arrogance is mixed in equal measure with self-loathing insecurity. We see an interview clip where Stiller's character, box office star Tugg Speedman, is informed by an interviewer how "Someone close to you said 'One more flop and it's over for him.'" Speedman pauses, and then asks his follow-up: "Somebody said they were close to me?"
Speedman's not the only flawed thespian flailing through the jungle on the set of the Vietnam epic Tropic Thunder, though. We also meet Jeff Portnoy (Jack Black), the star of several makeup-and-fatsuit blockbusters who's hoping to add some heft to his resume, even though shooting a war drama has him far from both his comfort zone and his heroin dealer. There's also Kirk Lazarus (Robert Downey, Jr.), an Australian five-time Oscar winner whose eagerness to take on a centerpiece role in Tropic Thunder has led him to have his skin darkened with an experimental medical procedure so he can play an African-American sergeant. With a rapper-turned-actor, Alpa Chino (Brandon T. Jackson), and eager young actor Kevin Sandusky (Jay Barcuhel) rounding out the cast, the Thailand production of Tropic Thunder is overblown, over budget and nowhere near over. Director Damien Cockburn (Steve Coogan) doesn't know how to put things right, and studio head Les Grossman (Tom Cruise, uncredited and nearly unidentifiable) is furious. But John "Four Leaf" Tayback (Nick Nolte), the real soldier and author Speedman's playing in the film, convinces Cockburn to get real, get raw -- and plunk the actors in the middle of the jungle, surrounded by hidden cameras, so they might break away from big-set conveniences and privileges to truly live, act and feel as these characters. It's a bad idea, and it gets far worse.
It's worth noting, though, that Tropic Thunder is what it mocks: Tropic Thunder's director of photography is John Toll, who's previously lensed Braveheart and The Last Samurai; production designer Jeff Mann has previously created big-budget eye-candy like Mr. & Mrs. Smith and Transformers. As a director, Stiller's crafted a big, shiny comedy, and the scale is, for the most part, matched by the laughs. There are nice side-notes from the supporting cast, like Danny McBride's short-fused explosives expert, or Matthew McConaughey's craven, cajoling agent, and Baruchel and Jackson get some nice moments in, also giving Stiller and Downey something to bounce off of. (Jackson and Downey have an exchange involving Lazarus taking offense at a perceived racial slight, followed by Chino taking offense at Lazarus's offense; it's brief, brisk and brilliant.)
And yet, the film belongs to its leading trio. Stiller's Speedman is an absolute idiot, but successful enough that his whims are law, and close enough to the edge of failure that there's a chance he'll topple over. Black's Portnoy, trapped in the throes of heroin withdrawal, is shameless and pathetic. Downey, though, outshines both his fellow leading men. Much has been made of Downey's playing a character in, essentially, blackface, but it's the rational irrational extension of every performer who's lost weight, gained weight or undergone some other radical transformation to play a role; it's not so much that there's a method to Lazarus's madness, but rather that his madness springs from method acting. As events spiral out of control, Speedman pleads with Lazarus to quit playing a part, even for a second. Lazarus's reply -- "I don't break character until I'm done recording the DVD commentary ..." -- is as inside as it is hilarious. It should be pointed out, though, that even with Tropic Thunder's many highly-charged elements -- Lazarus's dyed, bewigged transformation; the discussion between Lazarus and Speedman about how there's only a certain level of developmental disability the Academy will reward with an Oscar, and how Speedman crossed the line with his film Simple Jack when he "went full retard"; even the Vietnam War setting of the film within the film-- that Tropic Thunder is not making fun of race or retardation or the Vietnam War themselves, but rather the way a money-mad, success-chasing film industry turns every human challenge or historical tragedy into more grist for its mill.
Eventually, though, Tropic Thunder goes into action mode, with our cast stumbling across a heroin dealer's lair in the jungle. And Tropic Thunder stays funny, but I can't help but think that, as noted above, Tropic Thunder is what it mocks -- a huge, star-studded movie with explosions to hide the silences that occur when there's nothing else to say. Stiller, Justin Theroux and Etan Coen wrote a high-concept comedy, and at a certain point, the film's transformation to a high-concept action film is inevitable, as if someone thought that there needed to be a little loud noise and comedic violence to counter the deadpan quiet of the film's showbiz jokes and jabs. There are also plenty of logic holes in the film, too, but you're not going to look for them any more than you'd read the nutritional information on one of those fake canisters of nuts that has a fake spring-loaded snake coiled inside. I liked Tropic Thunder; I laughed, I wandered out happy -- but I had a vague, mild feeling of unease about it that crystallized a few days later when I read the Entertainment Weekly interview with Black, Stiller and Downey that closed with Stiller noting " ... you can't really do a sequel to (Tropic Thunder)" and Downey offering "Hold on. Let's see the numbers. If the numbers come in like we're expecting, we can at least talk about it." Tropic Thunder wants to make big money mocking big-money movie making, and the only thing that detracts from the fun and comedy is how, even while you're watching it, you can't help but notice the order those priorities come in.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-13-2008 @ 12:51AM
Statikus said...
Tropic Thunder starts off with sheer brilliance. And by brilliance, I meant to imply funny and a very unpredictable start. The sort that makes you sit up and say, "Hey this promises to be good after all!" It fuses elements from every war movie ever made. The plot is funny, the characters are funny, the jokes are funny and, well you see where I am going with this. It's a funny movie and it does bring out many laughs from the start to the end. Then why did I feel a tad bit tiresome with the funny all around me? Tropic Thunder is one of those movies where you know its funny and the feeling becomes all too predictable. You know it will make you laugh and somewhere down the road, the element of surprise gives away. The ending is the real cherry on the top for Tropic Thunder. Might seem a bit over the top but an awesome closure nonetheless.
Tom Cruise as a fat, balding, screaming and ranting studio executive and Matthew McConaughey as Ben Stiller's agent were wonderful to watch. Theirs can undoubtedly be the cameo roles of the year!
Reminded me a lot of M*A*S*H though. Or is it just me?
Reply
8-13-2008 @ 1:37PM
Jonni said...
I saw this movie on Monday with a sneak preview pass, and I have to say, for the average moviegoer, this is one of the funniest movies ive seen all year (I'm sure I've seen about every major comedy so far).
The punchlines are still ringing in my head, an contrary to what was said above, I never found a dull moment, or emptiness. Yes there are a few plot holes (like hands??) but it's a ben stiller "spoof" so that's to be expected.
Regardless, the film did what it set out to do, make people laugh. The entire audience was rollin' the whole time.
I and many others walked out of there saying "this was waaaaaaaay funnier than I expected."
I think I'm going back with my wife this weekend to see it again.
From the booty sweat ads to the final credits, it was great.
Robert Downey played an excellent "character" within a character.
Highly recommended. (a little vulgar, almost on the level of step brothers)
Reply
8-13-2008 @ 4:59PM
Matt said...
I thought it was freakin hilarious. Saw an Advanced Screening and will probably go again so my g/f can see it.
Reply
8-13-2008 @ 5:59PM
Conrad Quilty-Harper said...
Saw the film for the second time last night at The Grove, hilarious movie! So many great cameos and comedic performances. Tom Cruise would almost steal the movie if it wasn't for Downey Jr.'s crazy showing.
We got some fan reviews from a pre-screening at Comic-Con http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yup8YUAKiBA and interviewed Jack Black at the Red Carpet Premiere http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkcmQlDJaNM
Hope you like the videos!
Cheers,
Conrad
Reply
8-18-2008 @ 5:18PM
Leasy said...
Ok to all those who think this amazing movie is poking fun at those with disbilities, YOUR FUCKING STUPID! This movie is so damn funny and well put together and IN NO WAY, SHAPE OR FORM is it targeting those folks. Ok yeah, maybe it did mention the R word alot but this movie is also rated "RESTRICTED" meaning anyone who sees it should be over 18 MEANING everyone 18 and older should be mature enough to see this as a comedic movie and that it should be taken as nothing more than light humor. Its not like the whole movie was about people with disabilities. & the scene where matthew mccaughnehay is like "Well, at least you get to chose yours, and im stuck with mine" , that was MAYBE alittle on the edge but everyone laughed the asses off and you all should do the same. Its not right to make this movie look like its targetting those with disabilities because its not fair to those who have kids like that and want to see this movie but feel guilty because of what they are hearing in the media. SO STAY HOME IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS FUNNY ASS MOVIE AND GET A FUCKING LIFE INSTEAD OF BRINGING DOWN TROPIC THUNDER! SHIT!
8-14-2008 @ 9:08AM
Filmdrunk said...
Loved the movie, but Tom Cuise suuuuuucked.
Reply
8-15-2008 @ 2:22PM
Donald Gallegos said...
I know many of you think that making fun of kids (yes, these are kids too) with disabilities is funny, and that those of us who are offended just need to get a sense of humor.I've heard complaints that this is just another extension of censorship, let them make their movie and if you don't want to see it then stay home.I would just ask you to step back and try to see a more macro view of this issue.If you just take a few minutes it is not hard to empathize with a parent who has a child like this, or that child, his sibling or their friend to realize that there is no honor in this kind of humor.The trouble is Ben Stiller is a very funny guy and a LOT of people will see this movie.And it is running right at the end of summer right before these kids go back to school.I know it's rated R but don't fool yourself into thinking that kids won't see it.And if they don't see the whole movie, clips of the "funnier scenes" will manage to permeate into our culture through YouTube or various other media over the internet. And imagine them going to school for the first time, just a few weeks from now, excited, enthusiastic and a little scared.This kind or BLOCKBUSTER comedy where the likes of Stiller, Downey, etc have actually made a movie that makes these kids the butt of their jokes is nothing less than sad.You don't have to be a kid with a disability to identify with cruelty or humiliation, you just have to think back to being a kid. It wasn't right then and it isn't right now.I was raised to stand up and defend the little and weaker folks.That's all I'm asking of the adults of my community.Don’t support a film like this whose main thrust is to poke fun at these kids.For those of us who know these kids, have them as members of our family or work with them, we know the truth, that they are special and offer a unique and refreshing view of the world.When we laugh at them behind their backs we become less than human ourselves, and that is not really funny at all.
Reply
8-19-2008 @ 7:57PM
Eddie said...
I watched this movie with a cousin of mine, whose brother (also my first cousin) has down syndrome and is severely mentally disabled.
We had a great time, and we were able to laugh at the parts we each found funny and didn't take offense that others laughed at parts we found to be in bad taste. It's called America, and it's beautiful. Sure, we were mildly offended at some of the jokes, but no one made us laugh or enjoy those parts. We simply set them aside like we would parts of a meal we don't care for, and MOVED ON.
No, our inner child wasn't touched in his special place by the 'bad man', we weren't traumatized, and we certainly didn't go around screaming like lunatics because someone dared make a joke at the expense of my cousin (and his brother).
We need to grow a thicker skin as Americans and put all aside all of our careful pre-emptive offense at even the most benign of slights, lest our efforts to shield everyone from even the slightest bit of embarrassment or emotional discomfort, especially against their will, begins to resemble the very thing it is trying to prevent.
I appreciate and laud where you are coming from, but I would ask that you redirect your feelings and take action against the real threats to the quality of the lives of the children all over the world, such as chemicals in our air, food and water that contribute to making our children's disabilities in the first place, or the bombs our nations drop on unsuspecting innocents that inflict suffering on a whole different level than being mildly offended at the jokes of a commercial product that has missed its target.
And, as to the "poisonous media" aspect of your argument, I would argue that parenting is the only solution to the problem, real parenting that transcends the pressures to conform to this society's ridiculous lack of protection for our children's eyes, ears and hearts. Having been raised by parents who did not tolerate this influence in my life before they deemed it was appropriate, I can tell you it is possible, beneficial, and even necessary in today's media soaked landscape.
Good luck.
8-15-2008 @ 11:17PM
Bill said...
It was one of the only films I ever walked out of and in fact, we were not the only ones. It was so over done, crude, predictable, excessive, loud, and just stupid. I wanted to see it because the previews made it look funny, especially Robert Down Jr. I always loved comedies that were on the tacky side, a little vulgar, and silly, but Tropic Thunder was just too much! Also, I have laughed at politically incorrect humor at the expense of others, but this movie crossed the line in using the word retard. It wasn't intelligent enough to be a satire which would have made plausible to poke fun at sensitive topics. Thanks Ben Stiller for contributing to the decline of the American movie comedy!!!!
Reply
8-15-2008 @ 11:22PM
bill said...
The fact that parents would let their kids see this movie is frightening. There was one white-trash lady who sat there with her 7 or 8 year old. Nothing like exposing your child to constant swearing, making fun of retards, and making killing funny. Movies, regardless if they make lots of money, are starting to really suck!
Reply
8-18-2008 @ 9:53AM
Jo said...
We would have stayed home and saved our money if we had known just how vulgar and crude this movie was. We watched the interviews on TV and thought it was going to be funny but I think "funny" is a thing of the past. They used to rely on talent and humor to make us laugh NOW all the movie makers want to do is to be very crude, about all bodly functions, which is NOT funny to us, nor is the use of a lot of profanity. It is really a shame that this is what we are teaching our children today. It's sad that you can seldom find a clean funny movie anymore. The above is what offended us not the use of the "R" or "N" word which people take to personally.
We enjoying going to the movies but if this is all they are going to have out there and they let us know ahead of time, we'll be staying home.
Reply