From Page to Screen: 'The Curious Case of Benjamin Button'
Filed under: Brad Pitt, From Page to Screen

The cover for the spiffy new movie edition of F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Curious Case of Benjamin Button reads: "the inspiration for the upcoming major motion picture." Anyone who reads the famous 1922 short story, about a man who is mysteriously born a septuagenarian and begins to age backwards, will immediately realize that it can't be any more than that. My copy is about fifty small, large-print pages, and it takes no more than twenty minutes to read. There are only about four characters of any note, and each of their relationships is bitter and hollow; the whole thing is a quick, moody burst of melancholy, a high concept on which Fitzgerald had no interest in lingering.
The anxiously awaited movie is directed by David Fincher – his follow-up to Zodiac -- and written by Eric Roth (the IMDb doesn't list a credit for Fitzgerald), whose resume includes Forrest Gump, The Insider, and Munich. Compared to the source material, the film has virtually a cast of thousands. Benjamin's love interest is renamed Daisy – the story's "Hildegarde" just doesn't have the same ring to it – and is played by Cate Blanchett. "Daisy age 6" is played by Elle Fanning (a.k.a. Little Dakota), though it's hard to imagine what use the film will have for a Daisy age 6: do she and Benjamin now meet while the latter is an "old man" and she a toddler? President Theodore Roosevelt shows up, for some reason. And, at least according to this Ain't It Cool test screening review, the current incarnation of the movie clocks in at three hours.
Fascinating. Of course, the notion of a movie borrowing a short story's concept and vastly expanding its plot is nothing new: it has happened with almost every movie based on a story by Philip K. Dick, for example, as well as stuff like A Sound of Thunder, etc. But expanded short stories are rarely the sorts of expensive arthouse gambles that Benjamin Button is turning out to be: the reported $100 million budget no doubt has Paramount revving its Oscar campaign engines, and hectoring Fincher to get that running time down down down.
It's hard not to get excited. Fitzgerald was content to deliver a fairly simple allegory about our attitudes toward aging, but the idea at the center of Benjamin Button is rich with thematic possibilities. Fincher is nothing if not ambitious, and all of his movies have interesting things going on under the surface. Even in the story, Benjamin (now played by Brad Pitt) had the makings of a tragic figure; I imagine Fincher and Roth will flesh that out, make his chilling fate really hit home. Just the notion of a love story where one person grows old while the other grows young is incredibly potent, and one that Fitzgerald treats glibly. There's a lot of room to work.
And indeed, the trailer suggests something epic and larger-than-life, something resembling Forrest Gump in scale. Benjamin apparently globe-hops, since parts seem set in Russia. Fincher has conceptualized Benjamin's anti-aging in a way that makes some visual sense: he's born baby-sized but shriveled, becomes a diminutive old man, then finally begins to resemble Brad Pitt. (In the story, Benjamin apparently pops out of his mother fully grown.) The romance has obviously become the heart of the story.
Maybe the right way to look at this isn't to say that the movie takes Fitzgerald's short story and adds all sorts of extraneous material to make it fill a feature film. Maybe the answer, instead, is that Fincher and Roth will truly explore an idea that Fitzgerald was content to merely toy with. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is a fun little read that only hints at some moving, disturbing implications, but the movie looks like it will actually realize them. In that sense, the short story will truly be the "inspiration" for the film. More adaptations should take that approach.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-14-2008 @ 2:39AM
ryan said...
Wonderful piece. I'm a huge fan of Fitzgerald, Pitt, and Fincher, clearly I'm excited. The film looks beautiful!
Reply
8-14-2008 @ 4:35PM
Juan Carlo said...
Wow, now you're not even waiting for the movie to come out! And yet you're so fair, so balanced! I agree with you whol-heartedly, this movie looks excellent. I have my copy of the story waiting to be read; I'll then enjoy Fincher's take on it.
Reply
8-14-2008 @ 9:15PM
Gary said...
Really looking forward to this, Brad Pitt seems set for a big 12 months ahead of him with this, Burn after Reading, Malick's Tree of Life and Inglorious Bastards all on their way. If Fincher can pull it off then this movie could be excellent, maybe even Oscar potential for Pitt who I think is finally coming into his own and turning into one of the greatest, if not the greatest actor around today.
I love going to the cinema on Boxing day and as long as they don't mess with the release dates in Australia I will be looking forward to Christmas this year more than ever!
Reply
8-17-2008 @ 2:32AM
bigpattylee2008 said...
Wonderful piece. I'm a huge fan of Fitzgerald, Pitt, and Fincher, clearly I'm excited. The film looks beautiful!
i saw pitt's dating profile on __KissBBW.c o m__ it is a celebrity plus-size people dating site for BBW, BHM SSBBW,big beautiful women with big breats, big boobs, big butt, BBW hot and sexy videos, BBW hot pics and their admirers to interact each other!!
Reply
8-25-2008 @ 4:04AM
Lono said...
"[...] Pitt who I think is finally coming into his own and turning into one of the greatest, if not the greatest actor around today."
Are you serious? The man is still as bland and vacuous as an Ikea hatstand. He may have a full slate of interesting projects lined up; but he is still little more than a one-note goofy pyscho/stoner persona (see his transparent and box-ticking turn as Jesse James for the former).
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a 'Brangelina' hater (though I do hate that bastardization of grammar); I'm sure they are as generous, nice and benevolent as they are beautiful (and as the world wants to believe). But they are both suited best for each other when measured by their acting talents - limited, shallow and with a tiresome repartee of tics and pouts that they exhibit in every part they have tailored to and catered for them.
George Clooney has surprised me since his head-cocking ER days. Brad Pitt is still treading the same water he has since Johnny Handsome. Just because the roles have become more prestigious and his status more revered, does not mean he has developed as a performer.
Reply
8-25-2008 @ 8:50AM
Sarah O. said...
Yeah, this one will be epic. It'll be Fincher's greatest triumph since "Fight Club", and that is saying something. I have read the script twice, and I must say it's also Eric Roth's best piece (at least the best that I've read). And in my opinion; the longer the better. The script is one that can't possibly all fit into 90-100 minutes. I would say that, at the very least, it must be 150 minutes.
Anyway, I'm counting down the days until it's releast!
Reply
8-25-2008 @ 8:52AM
Sarah said...
*oops*
I meant 'release'. ;)