Where is Warner Bros Going With Superman?

I'm not sure if you have to do either/or here. Singers Superman isn't pigeonholed into a set storyline for the next movie. For example, imagine that Batman Begins had been terrible (I know its a stretch, but go with me on this). If that had been the case they would have been trapped for the sequel because it HAD to have the Joker in it due to the way they ended the movie. Superman Returns had no such foreshadowing, so they can take the franchise wherever they want. They've established the main players and they're relationship to one another, so now they just need to have a movie with a little bit more action to it and a little less nostalgia. Having said that, if they do decide to go in another direction I wouldn't expect to see anyone crying over the news.

Reply

Reboot.

Singer's film was not a bad movie for the Superman series, it was a bad movie period.

Reply

Start from scratch, boys. Cast *adults* as Superman and Lois, this time, and no super-babies, please. Thank you.

@Kevin: I disagree about a follow-up to SR not being pigeonholed. What about the kid? No way to do a sequel to that film without spending an awful lot of time on Kal-El's baby-daddy issues. Emphasis on "awful".

Reply

Singer's movie wasn't the "be all end all" reboot that was first reported. All he did was update Superman The Motion Picture for today's audience. The scene where Superman rescues the airplane was the only true scene that reflected the Superman from the comics and the newer animated series (S:TAS and Justice League). The rest of the movie made Superman into Hancock minus the drinking. Reboot the plot but still have a wink or two back at the Donner films. Smallville has some plot issues but overall they captured Lex Luthor perfectly. Don't make him the main bad guy but allow him to be the hidden factor behind the robberies or attacks toward Superman. As for actors, keep BR as he nailed being both Clark Kent and Superman.

Reply

I would rather they forget the first movie and go with a reboot. I don't see how it could go into any direction worth talking about. Specially since it's Superman, and we don't need no stinkin' origin story. Although, scratch that, an origin would be better than trying to tie up that stuff in SR.

Reply

Only way this can work is if studios stop treating us like we never
heard of Superman before. We know he came from Krypton, that he isaffected by Kryptonite, that he already beat the one and only LexLuthor, Gene Hackman. Enough with the foster parents and Kansas, let us havesome Doom vs. Superman over Metropolis and a cool love affair withLoise. Is that too much to ask?

Reply

"Start from scratch, boys. Cast *adults* as Superman and Lois,"

Agreed. Brandon Routh was okay - he did capture a fair amount of Christopher Reeve, but Kate Bosworth was just plain awful. And the plotting/screenplay was also terrible. Give us a Superman film to be proud of, not the trumped-up turkey we were given. New director!

Reply

Reboot, sort of. Everyone knows Superman's origins, so they just need to remove him from the Donner/Singer universe and establish him in another. I think they could use this new start for more mature Superman stories and also as a launch for a JLA film. I'd like to see them adapt "The Death of Superman" as a JLA film, which would introduce an established JLA team fighting alongside Superman and dealing with the aftermath of his death. Then have a Superman Reborn or Man of Steel movie to bring Superman back. Plus, I think they should use Tom Welling.

Reply

Agreed. Reboot the franchise. The entire range of Superman's heroics in "Superman Returns" consisted of catching or lifting things. Yawn. (although catching the airplane WAS awesome). He needs to fight someone who is his equal.

Plus, the only thing more boring than "The Phantom Menace" being a fight over trade routes was Lex Luthor's big plan (again) to be about a real estate deal. I'm worried a Singer sequel would be about investments. "Kneel before the power of my 401K!"

However, I did really like Brandon Routh. I'd keep him if it could be done without being confusing to the public. But a true reboot will need yet another Super-actor to go with the fifty or so that have played him over the past two decades.

Reply

I still like my idea of rebooting/re-introducing Superman by making him the antagonist in Batman 3.

Have him come to Gotham to help hunt down the "villainous" Batman. They get their stuff sorted out by the end, but until then, it's a tense game of cat and mouse as Batman has to stay one step ahead of Superman using all of his knowledge of Gotham City, while at the same time trying to learn all he can about Superman and discovering his weaknesses, if any. A "Dark Knight Returns" -style ending with a Kryptonite-bathed fistfight would be awesome.

Then you can send Superman back to Metropolis as the star of his own film.

Can you think of any better way to re-introduce a new Superman than by putting him in the sequel to the second-biggest movie of all time. After this, people will be hungering for a new Superman film, which will have to be titled "Man of Steel"

Reply

I liked the Singer version, from the opening credits on I felt like I was a kid again. Yah, Bosworth was a poor Lois, and the kid was more of a "well, they had sex in 2, and there could be a kid, and he'd be half Kryptonian" thought process instead of "if they have a kid, where do I go from there?"

I think Singer should helm a sequel. Look how he improved X-Men 2 over the first in that series. The guy knows how to fix his mistakes.

Besides, I fear for a reboot. Remember how long it took to get Returns made? Remember the possible changes? Black suit? Robot? Superman's mid-life crisis with Nick Cage as the man of steel???? You just KNOW Brett Ratner, Michael Bay, or Roland Emmerich would want in and destroy the film.

That or they'd go "dark" with it, thinking "it worked for Batman!" Which would be so very wrong for Supes.

Reply

Reboot.

Here's the recipe I like:

1) Don't even hire anyone who's seen any other Superman movies. As a matter of fact, don't hire anyone who's ever seen any Richard Donner or Bryan Singer movie. Ignorance will = viewer (and box office) bliss.

2) Follow Christopher Nolan's belief of substance over style. Think about it, without the Tumbler or the Batpod both films would work just fine. If you build real characters (not 2D Bryan Singer cutouts) and put them in real (but extraordinary) situations, you'll create real drama and something that people will actually watch. Superman 3.0's writers, producers and directors should read Joseph Conrad instead of watching Brett Ratner.

3) Don't try to make the end-all, be-all comic book movie. In fact, don't even try to make a comic book movie. Don't try to be the #1 summer film or a shoe-in at the Oscars. Focus on making the best film you can. Don't get caught in the hype. Just try to make a good movie. Hire a some European or Asian filmmakers who don't understand hype and don't give give a fuck about "Hollywood" to make your movie. These are people who have broken the golden triangle, they can make movies Fast, Cheap AND Good.

Okay, I'm starting to get carried away, and this had become a rant.

I apologize.

Reply