BREAKING: Warner Bros Confirms Superman Reboot!
Filed under: Action, Warner Brothers, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
So much for Warner Bros really taking their time deciding what to do with the Man of Steel! Group President Jeff Robinov confirmed to The Wall Street Journal that they plan on rebooting the franchise, a'la The Incredible Hulk. "Superman [Returns] didn't quite work as a film in the way that we wanted it to," says Robinov. "It didn't position the character the way he needed to be positioned. Had Superman worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009. But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman without regard to a Batman and Superman movie at all." The plan is to release four comic book movies in the next three years -- including a third Batman (no word on whether Nolan is returning), a new Superman, and two other unnamed DC characters. Robinov also confirmed that Warner Bros plans to adopt the Marvel route of a single film for each character, and then building on those origin films to create crossover stories, rather than just jumping into the deep end of the Justice League pool. The only worrying part about Warner Bros new plan is that they are still drunk on The Dark Knight, and want their superhero films to follow that mold. Robinov feels that "exploring the evil side to characters" is the way to approach all the DC characters. "We're going to try to go dark to the extent that the characters allow it." Including Superman.
As most of you noted in the comments, and as anyone distantly familiar with the character knows, a gritty approach is really not the one to take with Superman. He's the good old boy, an American icon, the complete opposite of Batman. He's also, arguably, one of the easiest characters to make into a family friendly comic book film. Superman is ideal for kids because he lacks the moral gray areas Batman revels in -- or should. I'm glad they're rebooting, but I'm wary of the dark direction they plan on taking.
[via SuperheroHype.com and thanks to Eli Gutierrez]










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
8-22-2008 @ 1:16PM
Sam said...
If they screw this up, will there be a re-re-reboot of Superman?
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:16PM
Sam said...
If they screw this up, will there be a re-re-reboot of Superman?
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:24PM
Thomas Corhern said...
I loved the previous Superman films, but I am glad that they've decided to reboot the series.
But dark? No. Superman's not a dark character. He's the balance to Batman. I think this idea is going to be cast away pretty quickly once they start the script process.
But this is great news because now the modern forms of the characters — especially Lex Luthor — can be brought into play.
I don't think you need an elaborate retelling of Superman's origin though. Keep it concise and get to the story quickly.
A passing mention of Batman or any of the other characters would be cool, but not necessary.
(Bah, and don't worry about the typos. I'm used to working on a deadline and when news breaks, mistakes can happen. That's why there's editing tools.)
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:23PM
Eric said...
NO NO NO! Look Returns was light on action that's the one major complaint. They reestablished the world. Why reboot? do a sequel to Returns just bring the action. This is so silly. Honestly there was nothing wrong with the characters in returns just recast Lois and let superman get into a fish fight its not hard to fix what is really not that broken.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:23PM
Eric said...
NO NO NO! Look Returns was light on action that's the one major complaint. They reestablished the world. Why reboot? do a sequel to Returns just bring the action. This is so silly. Honestly there was nothing wrong with the characters in returns just recast Lois and let superman get into a fish fight its not hard to fix what is really not that broken.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 3:18PM
Batzarro said...
Fish fights are for Aquaman.
8-22-2008 @ 1:24PM
Cliff Kline said...
I too am concerned about a darker Superman. Hopefully they will realize that he has his own personae and build on that.
As for grammar, I think it is important to take a minute and review your report before it goes out, as mistakes detract from the story.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:29PM
JimeneX said...
The only way to replicate the Batman success is to fully trust a capable director. Give the project to someone that knows what he's doing and you got yourself a hit.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:41PM
Astin said...
Exactly what I said I was afraid of in the last Supes post here.
Superman dark is rarely good. It CAN work, but only if he redeems himself by the end and becomes the boy scout again. The character being angry and grief-stricken in the first movie worked (the turning the world backwards to go back in time... not so much). The times in the comics where he's lost it have been temporary, and I think he's generally avoided actually DOING anything too dark.
Someone should sit WB down with Look, Up in the Sky so they can maybe understand the character.
Not that it matters, we'll end up with Nicholas Cage in a black and silver supersuit that has alien powers.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:45PM
Tash said...
Superman is my favorite character. Loved him as a child and have enjoyed each of the films to a certain degree. I think "Superman Returns" established the character again in a world that lends itself well to continuing stories.
I fear this reboot announcement is coming far too soon on the heels of "The Dark Knight" and it's mega-success. Batman is a naturally dark character. Superman is the exact opposite. There needs to be a balance, if anything, between the light and dark tones when crafting a Superman movie. If something is too heavy, it will throw the entire film off.
Like i said in another post, if this is a full on reboot, use the "Superman: Birthright" graphic novel as a stepping stone for this film. It is a great story with both light and dark tones that balance each other quite well.
If it is not a full reboot, they should seriously consider keeping Brandon Routh. He was a bright spot and would love to see him grow with the role. Anne Hathaway continues to be my vote for a new Lois Lane as well.
Please Warner Bros., don't mess this up.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 1:56PM
Jonathan said...
Elisabeth, take more time with important posts. Robinov said...
"exploring the evil side to characters" is the way to approach all the DC characters. "We're going to try to go dark to the extent that the characters allow it." Including Superman.
'To the extent that the characters allow it.' means just that. To say that Superman/Clark is all sugar and spice and the big blue friendly super hero is incorrect. He does have internal conflicts that come from his responsibility as the most powerful being on Earth - and the weight of being the sole survivor of his race and plant. The conflict from feeling like he doesn't really 'belong' anywhere. The turmoil over knowing he could enforce his will over the planet to correct a world of problems - but that he has to let people run their own lives.
Need I go on? Putting Superman in a gritty, real world is going to be a much better movie than the campy Donner world we got in the 70's and then again with the Singer homage.
You can be a good writer if you just slow down, proofread and then think about what you are writing before you hit 'publish'.
Now as to the announcement, I am all for it.
And I think Jon Hamm of Mad Men is perfect for the part of Superman/Clark Kent. He has the right look, is old enough and can play a character who is leading a dual identity life etc.
Reply
8-25-2008 @ 6:35PM
Moo said...
Jonathan- that is YOUR TAKE on what would work for a Superman movie. Elisabeth's take is different than yours, as mine is. I don't think that "going dark" is going to work for every character, and Supes is the perfect example. You need only go see Iron Man for an example of a film that was substantive and cool, yet lighter in tone.
Just because your vision of a good Supes movie doesn't jive with the writer's, that doesn't mean that the writer hasn't thought through the post. So cut the condescending crap and just state your point.
You can avoid coming off as an ass if you just slow down, proofread and then think about what you are writing before you hit 'Add Comment'.
8-22-2008 @ 2:03PM
Adam said...
Call me crazy, but I've never been a huge fan of Supes because I prefer the darker Batman types ... so I'd be curious to see a darker Superman. No idea if you could actually pull it off, though.
Of course, Superman himself doesn't necessarily have to be darker. The movie could be dark in tone, perhaps helped by a very dark villian (a la Joker).
As for your director comment, JimeneX, I would normally agree with you but I think that's what they thought they were doing with Bryan Singer and it didn't turn out the way they hoped.
By the way, wasn't Superman returns a reboot? As much as the last Hulk, anyway.
Reply
9-06-2008 @ 2:34AM
Jesse Gonzalez said...
I agree with you on a superman movie being dark, and keeping superman the same. As for superman returnes, it was more of a sequel from the first two films. I dont think it was a reboot.
8-22-2008 @ 2:21PM
Salero said...
What made batmman and the Dark Knight work wasn't that they were dark films. it was that they were films with real characters set in a realistic place. if u ditch the costumes u still have an awesome film. Thats what superman needs to be...Thats what made the first donner film so good...it was in New york (metropolis) the characters all felt like real people in extra ordinary circumstances. Just make a good Film and it will get a good response. Hopefully Warner figures this out before we see Superman in a Black Costume Fighting a Giant Spider and wrestling Polar Bears
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 2:52PM
Mystok said...
You don't have to make Supes dark to be good movie. Yes, de-power him, make more human in his emotions, and make him have to choice which person would have to die (though there would be nothing wrong with him choosing and still saving all). Keep Brandon, Anne Hathaway could be a good Lois, glaze over the origin story (maybe hint at TV Smallville), and give Supes a hard villain to battle (fist and all). You can still have the angst and the kid hero too.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 2:33PM
jake said...
i LOVED superman returns and instead of a reboot, they should just improve on what ever needs to be improved with it -- keep brandon routh -- he was great!
Reply
8-23-2008 @ 12:11AM
seth said...
I don't understand the reason for the reboot -- batman begins only made 166 million with the reboot -- Superman returns made 200 million. Why can't they give a superman 2 a shot and since many people caught it on dvd by now instead of going a different route.
superman returns rocked!
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 2:40PM
Tash said...
Salero, your post reminded me of one key element that needs to be removed from any and all further Superman/Batman/motion pictures in general from here on out....
John Peters.
Reply
8-22-2008 @ 2:41PM
Adam said...
If you want to do a Superman movie right, you have to include a Thagarian Snarebeast.
Reply