The Geek Beat: Believing in Harvey Dent
Filed under: The Geek Beat

I had planned to do a column ranking the boys of summertime the way I had with the women – but as I've been plotting it out, I realized it wasn't going to work. The roles men are given are infinitely more heroic, interesting, and complex, and any ranking would quickly become a list of favorites rather than best. And it's predictable – Tony Stark, Wall E, Harvey Dent, end of story, and totally boring. The more I tried to make it less so, the more slippery the concept became, and I realized it was all a thinly veiled excuse to write about one of the characters in particular: Harvey Dent. And with Devin Faraci's call to analytical arms, it's like a sign from the movie gods to get into meatier territory.
The most highly anticipated element of The Dark Knight for me was also what ended up being the most disappointing – Harvey "Two-Face" Dent. In the afterglow of opening weekend, people looked askance at me when I voiced this aloud before half-heartedly defending Christopher Nolan's vision. But in all the is-he-isn't-he-dead debate of late, it's became apparent that more people agreed with me than not.
The most highly anticipated element of The Dark Knight for me was also what ended up being the most disappointing – Harvey "Two-Face" Dent. In the afterglow of opening weekend, people looked askance at me when I voiced this aloud before half-heartedly defending Christopher Nolan's vision. But in all the is-he-isn't-he-dead debate of late, it's became apparent that more people agreed with me than not.
Yet, despite the story flaws, Dent ranked high for me on the "best of summer" list. I'd be lying if I claimed it wasn't largely because of Aaron Eckhart, who not only is a consistently good performer, but who's golden looks mark him as the second coming of Viggo Mortensen. Eckhart is what makes Dent work at all. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized you could wrench a proper defense out of the character – starting with those looks, really. He's the epitome of purity and goodness, the White Knight of Gotham, a refugee of Camelot. The chirpy slogan, which slapped against anyone else's face, would be laughable. Eckhart's Dent is someone you believe in – and however rushed and incomplete his transformation, his fall remains bitterly tragic. It's that staple of Greek tragedy, hamartia, the character who intends to hit the mark but goes sadly astray. (Of course, that term opens its own can of debatable worms, let's just go with the quick and common definition of "fatal flaw and tragic consequences.")
Nolan really dug more into classic literature with Dent than comic books – I'm not sure if the credit goes to him or David S. Goyer, but the allusions are top notch. There's a lot of emphasis on knighthood and honor in The Dark Knight, and it's not nearly as glib and corny as it seems on first glance. Nor is it precisely a modern de-construction of what those labels mean, or what a hero is. If you go back into your medieval texts (stop snoring, this is important!), and read Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, the Morte d' Arthur, even Beowulf, you see a constant theme of imperfect and flawed knighthood. Arthur's knights were all like Harvey Dent – good men all, but with a fine crack just under the surface that gave when pushed enough, making them susceptible to all the baser sins. The chivalric quests a medieval knight faced were usually designed with the end of making him violate his oath somehow – and they were often concocted by otherworldly and dangerous individuals. If Dent borrows his white knighthood from somewhere literary, it's Sir Gawain, a knight who's greatest sin is his dedication to perfection, a false modesty that needs a lesson in humility. Unfortunately, for Dent, it comes at the hands of someone far nastier and more destructive than anything of Arthurian legend.
When you look at Dent's story from a smaller scale, as Greek tragedy or medieval romance, it becomes a little more acceptable. Dent is a tragedy you can see coming from a mile away, not because we know the story from the comic books, but because good men are inevitably destroyed. His quest for perfection, both personal and political, is destined to fail because we mortals never allow for those internal flaws. Even without the Joker, something would have pushed Dent over the edge because of that crack running under his surface. Call it righteous anger, call it a buried psychosis, it doesn't matter. He ignored it at his peril.
It's fittingly medieval, too, that Dent's collapse really comes about due to losing his lady fair – while I still give Rachel Dawes more credit than most viewers, she's placed in a generally thankless role of medieval damsel in distress. The White and Dark Knights both seek to earn her favor with greater deeds of civic prowess and in true chivalric fashion, she holds herself aloof. Dent takes her loss harder than Bruce Wayne does, and becomes monstrous in his grief. And frankly, he has our sympathy in it. Supposedly, that's what defines a true hamartia in drama – when a character's change can elicit the greatest fear and sympathy from its audience.
It's the level of villainy that, ultimately, disappointed us all. When Dent finally embraces the Two-Face persona, we expected a true split between Dent's humanity and his depravity, a psychotic indecision that went deeper than the need for a coin toss. The arc feels cut short. But if you pretend the comic character doesn't exist, it works better. Dent's desire to clean up the city via legal means becomes, in his inhuman state, a cold-blooded and unreasonable justice. He was always a man of moral absolutes who, when shoved, really has no room for a middle ground of schizophrenic indecision. He can either be the White Knight of Gotham, or true Dark one, but nothing in halves.
And what makes the story bitterly frustrating is that Dent doesn't get a moment of regret or redemption, like Boromir (arguably, a character closer to Nolan's Dent than anything of the comic pages) in Lord of the Rings. He dies despised, though pitied even by those he threatened. But in this, he's no different than those flawed knights before him – Gawain, Lancelot, Tristan, or all those Greek tyrants, and Shakespearean kings. You always want more, and you always want the ending to be different – and in this, Nolan remains stubbornly real world, where necks are broken, police inquiries must be satisfied, and a fragile Gotham needs a media scapegoat.
Whew. That was heavy, heavy stuff. It would have been so much easier to call him the dreamiest dude of 2008, but it was so much more than that. He broke my heart with all his anguish and ruined ideals, and that sort of punch is what allows Dent to take the summer prize. Given the bar I've now set for myself, I better get to work writing next year's piece – it's going to Wolverine, obviously, so I'll start comparing him to a Byronic hero pronto.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-26-2008 @ 5:27PM
Ryan said...
This was awesome. A very nice piece to read her on Cinematical.
I too was disappointed by the short end to Two-Face. I really expected a more psychotic break. But it worked for the movie. It worked very well. And it probably would have broken the movie to move any deeper into Dent's plunge.
The transition from Dent to Two-Face was done nicely, though. He had an almost obsessive desire for justice that he would take into his own hands, even before his fall. Then, when he felt he had nothing left to lose (and the Joker gave him a push), he finally tipped. I was left very satisfied up until his premature end. But even that let the movie wrap up nicely.
Everything had its place.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 5:29PM
Ryan said...
This was awesome. A very nice piece to read her on Cinematical.
I too was disappointed by the short end to Two-Face. I really expected a more psychotic break. But it worked for the movie. It worked very well. And it probably would have broken the movie to move any deeper into Dent's plunge.
The transition from Dent to Two-Face was done nicely, though. He had an almost obsessive desire for justice that he would take into his own hands, even before his fall. Then, when he felt he had nothing left to lose (and the Joker gave him a push), he finally tipped. I was left very satisfied up until his premature end. But even that let the movie wrap up nicely.
Everything had its place.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 5:28PM
Jordan M. said...
this was awesome. i was worried this was going to be another "is he dead, is he not?" but this was a very well written piece. though i have to say i wasn't disappointed by his transformation, because i thought the fact that you never really knew who he was at any moment was terrifying.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 5:35PM
Eric said...
I really do not understand all this "Dents fall not believable and rushed crap". The Love of his life was killed and he was horribly disfigured because of it. The man went though a lifetime of pain in 2 mins. I mean all he ever tried to do was the right thing and look where it got him. He was "saved" over Rachel in his eyes. Gordon's men betrayed him like he told Gordon they would. The man gave everything to justice system he believed in and all it did was hurt him and the ones he loves. I think his fall is very believable.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 5:41PM
Akbar Fazil said...
For me Eric, the issue with Dent's change was that it wasn't enough. There is so much more story with Dent that could have been told I was just a little dissapointed it being shoved into the movie. In the end, it totally worked. I just had wished it could have been saved for #3 and delved much more into it.
8-26-2008 @ 5:49PM
Nizar !! said...
Eric, I really enjoyed that about the movie too, but my problem was that I just wanted to see more Two-Face. Dent was a very smart and cunning man and I wanted to see him use his wit for evil. I felt deeply for both Dent and Wayne over their loss of Dawes and it is believable that he felt betrayed and fooled.
Many people wanted this film to be split into two films and I can understand that they would want a full Dent transformation to take place in the next film but I believe that just wouldn't have worked well for Warner Bros. This film would deserve the 100% rather than the 92% I gave if it ended with the Joker escaping from the cop car with the muffled, pulsing bass in the background (amazing, just incredible). But, that wouldn't have worked because this film needed both Dent closure and Joker closure because I think mainstream audiences would've felt betrayed if we had to wait for Two-Face in the next film.
8-26-2008 @ 5:40PM
Nizar !! said...
I agree with most of your argument Elisabeth. Both of the Nolan's and Goyer did successfully integrate a classic structure to our modern epic. I believe it was more a redefinition than a face-lift. My gripe, like with countless other critics, was with the pacing and presentation of the Two-Face persona. This film, in my opinion, brought "sorrow" and "depression" to the mainstream (much like METALGEARSOLID4 to video games).
I loved how even when we first get to see Two-Face in the hospital room, Nolan doesn't really show us until a few moments later (the quick cut to Gordon's reaction). Skip past Joker's monologue and Eric Robert's demise, we get Dent at the end of the film holding Gordon's family hostage. Yes, very quick, and yes, seemingly forced (I wonder if there was more on the cutting room floor).
My other issue with Dent's Two-Face was the direction Nolan gave. From previous exposition from Gordon at the hospital, we knew that Dent refused medication. Imagine how much more maniacal Two-Face would have seemed if he was in constant pain, especially in scenes where he screams? I immediately felt a little disconnected there with Dent's face seared, yet he really seemed only emotionally scarred.
I look forward to next year's article. Keep it up Elisabeth.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 5:48PM
Travis Tidmore said...
I really wish Dent's story had stopped at the hospital with him flipping the coin to decide whether or not to kill Joker. I think there when he finally becomes Two-Face would have been a nice place to end it, and then pick up a 3rd film with Two-Face as the villain.
Reply
8-27-2008 @ 2:29PM
John said...
Dent was orginally planned to be saved to be the focus of the third movie, just like what you said you wanted. However, I believe I read this on a Wikipedia article, Nolan didn't want to do that because Harvey had a great character arc. The Joker couldn't offer that; he was just so much of an absolute.
8-26-2008 @ 5:50PM
Beeslo said...
This is partly what makes me believe that Dent is not dead. With Batman on the run now, its quite obvious that the theme of the next film will be that of redemption and where the theme of the Dark Knight had a split meaning in The Dark Knight, I believe the theme of Redemption will be met with Batman coming back into favor with Gotham and Harvey Two-Face becoming the White Knight again.
It might be an Anakin Skywalker type of redemption where he dies in the end, but his image will have been redeemed by the end of the third movie.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 6:12PM
Scott Weinberg said...
I thought this was a very fine piece as I was doing my editorial duties. Glad to see you're all in agreement.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 6:06PM
Moo said...
Excellent column, Elisabeth, maybe your best so far. I tend to agree that Dent's transformation isn't given time to fully develop. It's cut short. And I'd have loved an opportunity to see him develop a more pronounced psychological break over time in a third film. As it stands, I think they handled his psychosis correctly. I'm not even CLOSE to a psychologist, but even in the face (no pun intended) of the trauma undergone by Dent in such a short period, both physical and emotional, I don't see him going from the White Knight to the coin flipping mad man over the course of a couple of days. First he's just ANGRY, and the psychotic split occurs over time. We got the "Angry", we didn't get to the split, unfortunately, before he was killed off.
Or, at least, probably killed off, heh.
Once fully developed, you could potentially pay it off with a moment of redemption...or at least regret, Boromir-style (great comparisons to characters of classic literature).
Very cool piece, Elisabeth, thanks.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 6:10PM
dtpollitt said...
Well written, thanks for the angle.
Dan
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 6:49PM
scotty said...
I have to say that I do think that Dent's transformation from good to bad happened too easily. It would have made the movie even longer, but I think it would have made more sense if Joker had taken Dent from the hospital and tortured/brainwashed him.
And he shouldn't have been killed off so quickly. They could have just put him into a coma from a severe head trauma he suffered from the fall. But Batman and Gordon could then conspire to say Dent is dead, in order to make him a martyr, and keep him in his comatose state locked away in Arkham. That way, the producers could revive and bring back Dent for either the next movie or the one after that.
They could still get away with doing the above, but it would be a total retcon, as both the screenplay and novelization state quite clearly that Dent is dead.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 8:25PM
Wayne said...
Don't forget that Dent kidnapped the "Rachel Dawes" cop, pointed a loaded gun at his head, and threatened to kill him. Dent's rage and hatred over the perceived threat on Rachel's life drove him to nearly commit murder. Yes, we know that the coin had two faces, but the victim did not. Also, the fact that the coin had two faces didn't make Dent's emotion any less real.
Like much of the movie, the foreshadowing was already in place. The script by Goyer and Nolan was superb. Harvey's pyschotic break wasn't the sudden and unexpected event that most of you make it out to be.
Reply
8-27-2008 @ 10:26AM
Kevin said...
I totally agree. It seems people are so caught up by his disfigurement that they forget about the foreshadowing that takes place throughout the entire rest of the movie. Even in his description of what is necessary in the defense and maintenance of justice while at dinner with Bruce and Natasha you can see a willingness to do whatever is necessary. Certainly the most subtle scene, but then you follow the plot to the scene with jokers accomplice in the attempted assasination of the mayor and you can see a man gradually losing faith in the ability of the system to handle crime and the corrupt. This was a man already sliding down the slippery slope and so I don't see anything rushed about him losing his mind after his fiancee is murdered right after he assured her she would be fine, and his own body is horribly mutiliated. Nolan and co. clearly spent a ton of time on this script, because if you examine the movie as a whole you see that each scene, line, moment, etc. is interconnected.
8-26-2008 @ 9:07PM
Mantisfists said...
I did not see Harvey Dent's transformation from White Knight to Two-Face as rushed. His transformation from Dent to Two-Face was in keeping with the feel of the movie. This was obviously not going to be Tommy Lee Jone's Two-Face... instead, Eckhart's face is rendered in a way that feels realistic, that the dualism of justice is embodied by both the former Dent's features and emotions on the right side, still intact and recognizable, and on the left, the toll of real loss, disenchantment, and fire burning your face off.
Dent might not get "redemption", but he lives on after the film ends as perhaps the most enduring, feasible symbol of justice and humanity.
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 10:24PM
Gina said...
Excellent analysis, Elisabeth!
Reply
8-26-2008 @ 10:35PM
AJ Wiley said...
I was never disappointed with Dent's transformation. Perhaps it's because I have no attachment to his comic book incarnation (I have always loved the Batman comics, but weirdly, I've read few involving Two-Face), but I thought that the arc as written worked perfectly for the film.
Reply
8-27-2008 @ 11:09AM
Petro1734 said...
This column is ABSOLUTELY....brillant.
Illuminating work, Liz ; )
Reply