Jennifer Connelly and Paul Bettany Debate 'Creation'
Filed under: Drama, Independent, Casting, Deals, Celebrities and Controversy, Scripts, Newsstand, Religious
Acting couple Paul Bettany and Jennifer Connelly must have decided that life would be too calm after November 2008 -- so they have signed to play Charles and Emma Darwin in Creation. Yes, the Darwins. According to The Hollywood Reporter, the film will be directed by Jon Amiel, from a script penned by John Collee, and based on Randal Keynes' book Annie's Box. (Keynes is Darwin's great-great grandson.) The film will portray Charles Darwin as a man torn between his love for his deeply religious wife, and his growing belief in a world where God has no place. I hope that they explore Darwin's personal struggles and belief more deeply than the plot description suggests. To sell him as an athiest smacks of wanting to stir up controversy -- Darwin always called himself an agonostic, and his rejection of Christianity stemmed as much from the tragic death of his daughter, Annie, as his research. It's a complex and fascinating biography, one that, as a lover of science and the history of it, I would love to see done with real justice.
The cast is certainly more than capable -- Bettany and Connelly are both wonderful, and they'll be joined by Jeremy Northam, Toby Jones, and Benedict Cumberbatch. Annie Darwin has yet to be cast. (I can't help but be amused by the fact that Bettany and Northam have played Darwin-inspired characters before, in Master and Commander and Possession, respectively. Pet interest, perhaps?)
I know the merest mention of Charles Darwin is enough to cause an epic flame war in the comments. If it's possible, try to keep discussion only to the film, the actors, the book, and Darwin's biography. That may be too much to hope for, but I beg you to remain respectful and tolerant of one another.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-05-2008 @ 2:08PM
Liz Newcomb said...
I recently saw an hour-long bio of Charles Darwin and it was more interesting than I'd expected! I had had no idea about anything in his personal life. I'll keep this film on my radar, especially since Paul Bettany is starring.
Reply
9-05-2008 @ 2:09PM
Maria Stahl said...
Oh no! Does that mean I can't pick at you for a spelling error? :o)
It's "atheist," actually.
Reply
9-05-2008 @ 2:54PM
John said...
A comment that has nothing to do about science or Darwin's intelligence but. . . the man was one ugly SOB. That forehead ridge of his seemed incredibly appropriate in making him look like a missing link to gorillas. Bettany is no Brad Pitt but, is he going to give himself that ape-like forehead for the movie?
Reply
9-07-2008 @ 7:40PM
John Collee said...
OK as the screenwriter I can answer some of these.
Yes we're going agnostic rather than atheist. Clearly darwin was somewhat tortured by the contradictions between faith and science. He never sought to explain where life originated, only how species developed . Paul Bettany is actually pretty similar to darwin in physique - tall and lanky - and if you check out pics of Darwin as a young man (Google Images: Darwin portrait by George Richmond 1840) he was a pretty good looking guy before the sunken eyes and slightly hunched stature gave him that simian look the caricaturists so enjoyed.
Reply
9-08-2008 @ 3:05AM
Scott Weinberg said...
Hey John, thanks for stopping in to share your thoughts.
See that, folks? Be civil or the freakin' screenwriters will show up to correct you! ;-)
-sw
9-20-2008 @ 1:59PM
Isabella said...
Yahoo! Jeremy Nortahm is is this as well...I'll be first in line.
Reply
10-11-2008 @ 4:52PM
em said...
First pictures of Paul Bettany as Darwin.
http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/10/10/paul
Reply