TIFF Review: The Lucky Ones
Filed under: Comedy, Drama, New Releases, Theatrical Reviews, Festival Reports, Toronto International Film Festival

Many films have sought to portray the terrible damage inflicted by war against a soldier's mental and physical health, but The Lucky Ones takes this concept to new depths by depicting a trio of Army personnel who have been messed up only in amusing, sitcom-y ways. It has three strangers with nothing in common but their uniforms driving cross-country to get everyone home, and if that sounds like an ill-conceived cross between Stop-Loss and Planes, Trains & Automobiles, you're right on the money. Especially on the "ill-conceived" part.
Sgt. T.K. Poole (Michael Peña) is a horny young man who's been rendered impotent -- hilarious! -- by shrapnel from an IED. He can't bear to tell his fiancee, though, because without sex, "we got nothing to talk about." Pvt. Colee Dunn (Rachel McAdams) is taking a guitar that belonged to her boyfriend, who was killed in action, to his family in Las Vegas, deluding herself into thinking they'll take her into their home, too, as she has no family of her own. T.K. and Colee are on 30-day leaves; Sgt. Fred Cheever (Tim Robbins), a career Army man from St. Louis, is heading home for good, having injured his back in combat. Well, OK, a porta-potty fell on him. But still, he's retiring.
A blackout at JFK Airport suspends all flights indefinitely, so Cheever opts to rent a car and drive to Missouri. T.K. and Colee tag along, figuring they'll fly out of St. Louis, but the three wind up sticking together after T.K. and Colee witness Cheever's home life falling apart the very minute he arrives. Don't worry if that sounds sad -- the film's jaunty, light musical score, played in nearly every scene, serves to keep you feeling upbeat.
What ensues is a series of contrived, unimaginative comic and serio-comic scenarios. Cheever needs $20,000 to send his son to college -- and whaddaya know, that guitar of Colee's, having once belonged to Elvis, might fetch just that much at auction! The three stumble upon a church service in the Midwest, leaving the devout Colee to have the pastor pray vocally for T.K.'s wounded private parts. They picnic in the Rocky Mountains and happen to encounter a group of hookers in a neighboring campground, one of whom is more than willing to help T.K. overcome his problem.
Some of this is occasionally funny enough to induce a chuckle, mostly because of McAdams' naive exuberance and Robbins' general excellence as an actor. An aw-shucks Midwestern Army man might seem like an odd fit for the famously liberal Robbins, but he pulls it off just fine. (Besides, remember him in The Hudsucker Proxy?) And while T.K. isn't as memorable a character as the other two, Peña is a likable, unassuming actor.
But for the most part, the film is astonishingly wrong-headed. Directed by Neil Burger (The Illusionist) and written by him and Dirk Wittenborn (Fierce People), its light tone is at odds with the characters' serious problems, and its implausible story conflicts with the vein of realism that lies beneath it. The movie wants us to remember that there really is a war, and that the Army really is having trouble recruiting new soldiers. The thing is, we do remember -- and we know those soldiers deserve a better tribute than this trite, phony dreck.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-10-2008 @ 9:26AM
Marty J said...
"An aw-shucks Midwestern Army man might seem like an odd fit for the famously liberal Robbins, but he pulls it off just fine. (Besides, remember him in The Hudsucker Proxy?)"
Yes and what was uber-leftist, Ed Asner, doing playing a hard line conservative in JFK. I mean, how dare actors with liberal views play characters with conservative views. Next you'll be telling me that republican Robert Duvall starred in some of the most subversive movies of the 70's like THX-1138, Network and Apocalypse now?? As if that would ever happen.
Reply
9-10-2008 @ 10:38AM
animeman_59 said...
Of course a liberal like Robbins would play in a movie that makes fun of the real problems that military people have to deal with. He has no respect for the military or anything which he deems conservative. So instead of making the case to bring soldiers home to prevent the problems listed in the film, he decides to make fun of them.
This is on par with how liberal Hollywood is so out of touch with military men and women. No film they make gives proper respect or show the truth about what real war is like, or even the motivations of why soldiers continue to serve and fight.
We all have our opinions of the current conflicts we're engaged in, but let me make one thing clear. We sacrifice nothing. We can protest or support all we want, but the only people who are losing anything is the soldier. We still wake up every morning without worrying about losing our lives. Most of us can still walk the streets without fear of being shot or blown up. Soldiers are the only people who are risking their lives with this conflict. Not us. Hollywood should just shut the hell up and let the soldier tell the story when they're ready.
Reply
9-10-2008 @ 1:27PM
Joyce said...
"We all have our opinions of the current conflicts we're engaged in, but let me make one thing clear. We sacrifice nothing. We can protest or support all we want, but the only people who are losing anything is the soldier. We still wake up every morning without worrying about losing our lives. Most of us can still walk the streets without fear of being shot or blown up. Soldiers are the only people who are risking their lives with this conflict. Not us. Hollywood should just shut the hell up and let the soldier tell the story when they're ready. "
That's exactly what the movie is about, you silly person! Why don't you try watching the movie before spouting off?
And as for the "review," this critic did not understand the movie.
9-27-2008 @ 11:27AM
Shoni said...
I am a soldier and I am a veteran of both Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom and the only thing I can say is that you are dead wrong. It make sound cliche, but when life throws you lemons, you make lemonade and just because someone isn't depicting a "We Were Soldiers" or "Saving Private Ryan" depiction of soldiers doesn't mean it can't have just as much validity. Sometimes when life is tragic, the only thing left to do is laugh and that is what they are doing. War is serious, sure, but I guarantee you those soldiers on the ground and on those ships are finding ways to laugh everyday because laughter is really the only cure. This film is not making a mockery of soldiers it is showing a different way of dealing with and approaching catastrophe. I am neither offended nor angered by this film.
9-11-2008 @ 6:09PM
Steve Rankine said...
My wife and I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. Due to some negative comments I had heard from some "reviews," I was expecting a mediocre level of entertainment. However, what I witnessed was good photography, a well written story, very good acting and many good bits of appropriate comedy that had the majority of people laughing out loud over and over again.
Don't take anyone seriously who tries to spout negatively about this movie. This is a well-crafted picture that provides good entertainment.
Reply