TIFF Review: Me and Orson Welles
Filed under: Comedy, Drama, Theatrical Reviews, Festival Reports, Toronto International Film Festival

At any large film festival, it's easy to get caught up in the buzz and the biz of it - most of the time, the press screenings are really press and industry screenings, which means that the person sitting next to you is not some fellow ink-stained wretch who will watch the film and have to write a review but, rather, an acquisitions person who will watch the film and, perhaps, write a check. This doesn't just lead to seat-hopping and movie-jumping as the acquisitions people shrug No, not for us and leave so they can continue their quest; it also leads to getting caught up in an atmosphere where questions of commerce can come more readily to mind than questions of art.
So it was with the Toronto screening of Me and Orson Welles, where my feeling warmed and charmed by Richard Linklater's recreation of 1930's literary New York came on the heels of a much more pointed question -- namely, who the hell is going to see it? Starring Zac Efron as a young would-be actor who's recruited for a bit part in Orson Welles' 1937 Mercury Theater production of Julius Caesar, the film skews young in energy and execution, but unless teens are lured into caring about old-timey theater by Efron's name, it's unlikely they'll go; older audience members, who have the advantage of actually knowing, and caring, who Orson Welles is might be put off by the presence of Mr. Efron, who they know solely from their childrens' repeated viewing of High School Musical.
Therein lies the rub, as Shakespeare would say -- because Me and Orson Welles is actually a nicely-made, warmly-shaped story of life upon the wicked stage, as Efron's untested actor (when asked what theater he's done, Efron's Richard Samuels shrugs: "Mostly shows at school." Ha, ha ...) gets a bit part in a big show run by a big man, Orson Welles (played by Christian McKay, who's played Welles on-stage before). Welles is a bully, but a brilliant one; as his right-hand woman Sonja ("with a 'j" ...") Miles (Clare Danes) notes, "... In the hope of working with him, you forgive a lot of behavior." She should talk.
Linklater's managed to craft a believable world with minimal resources; lots of action takes place in he theater, but we do get several scenes in a lovingly recreated '30s Manhattan. As Richard climbs on board the vehicle of Welles' will only to be later thrown under the bus, he gets a quick, cruel course in why exactly there's no business like show business. Holly Gent Palmo adapts Robert Kaplow's novel for the screen, as Richard begins a romance with Sonja and watches Welles pull brilliant theater seemingly out of thin air. Welles is a brilliant artist, a top-notch bastard and a world-class skirt-chaser; if the 35-year-old McKay seems a little unbelievably baby faced, remember that at the time Welles was 22. (In another age, the 22-year old Welles would have put together a band and put a single out on Matador; in the '30s, he started a theater troupe. Same spirit, different times.) McKay's part seems a little broad and big until you realize just how well it reflects the way the real Welles was playing a part; several shots and lines of dialogue echo moments that would come later in Welles' life, but again, the movie going 15-24 demographic is not waiting expectantly to decide which film they should go to on the weekend based on the question of which film has the most, or best, references to The Third Man.
Efron's a perfectly charming leading man, even if he looks disconcertingly handsome; another actor may have been better, but you can't help but shake the feeling that Efron was cast not solely for his in the role in the film, but also for his role in the pre-production balance sheet. Danes is fine as a plucky striver with a heart of lead, while Linklater gets the tone of a behind-the-scenes comedy drama just right, the flurry of activity on-stage and the "noises off," the parts played when the lights are up and the roles played when the theater is empty. Welles commiserates with Richard late in the film: "If people can't find you, they can't dislike you." From almost any other film maker, you'd know what to expect, but Linklater's films (Slacker, Fast Food Nation, Dazed and Confused) have always understood that life is random - which is another way of saying life is not fair -- and he side-steps the easy sentiment another director would have tacked onto the film. Me and Orson Welles won't find a mass audience, but the audience that does will find it has a lot to recommend it.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-11-2008 @ 11:10AM
Brian Marino said...
gret review, makes me want to see it (the avclub one did not)
but one correction
this isn't from novel by Holly Gent Palmo, she wrote the screenplay. The novel is by a man named Robert Kaplow (whom i somewhat know, he lives in my area and visits the store I work in).
Very funny man and writer.
Just wanted dues to be paid!
keep up the great bloggin work
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 3:09PM
Mrs. Robinson said...
I don't understand the hesitancy about distributing this movie. I have read many favorable movie critic reviews from TIFF. Christian McKay has created a lot of buzz for a "Best Actor" Oscar nod. Adults will enjoy the Orson Welles depiction. Zac Efron has delivered a solid performance in his first significant dramatic movie role. So, it is a period piece about putting on a Shakespeare play. "Titanic" was a period piece. This is also a coming of age story and high school students still read Shakespeare.
Zac's fan sites have been buzzing about this movie for months, with many forum partipants (including this mom) reading the book in anticipation. Zac's fan base is world-wide! He is a very talented, smart, and personable actor who appreciates his fans. One longtime fansite, zefron.com, receives 26,000 hits a day from 185 countries. Neil Meron and Craig Zadan have been quoted as saying that their movie "Hairspray" earned repeat box office from Zac's fans. With a PG rating, families like mine will go see this movie.
Reply
9-11-2008 @ 4:25PM
penny03 said...
I am in total agreement with Mrs. Robinson. I don't understand why there is hesitation in distributing this movie. I have also read the book and loved it. I have been following the reveiws from the festival and have not read a bad one yet. I am really looking forward to seeing it.
I think Zac Efron is a very talented young actor and deserves recognition. I have seen other performances he has done (the autistic boy in Lifetimes "Miracle Run", the small independent movie "Derby Stallion and even thevTV series Summerland"). He has a big fan base from the "High School Musical's", but here we see another side to him, the serious actor side, a solid performance side.
I will definitely will see this movie and I know many other will also.
Bravo Zac!
Reply
9-12-2008 @ 12:58AM
Steph said...
I'm really excited, I want to see this movie.. mainly because of Zac Efron, but I'm not a teenager like everyone always claims his fans are. He reaches a larger audience, and his fanbase is getting older along with him.
Thanks for the review, I've let everyone on my website know about it..
Stephany
Zac-E.Com
Reply
9-12-2008 @ 2:12AM
Mrs. Robinson said...
Thanks for your support Penny03. These distribution guys just don't get it. (I use the term guys because if they were women we wouldn't need to have this discussion!) I distinctly remember when I discovered Tom Hanks in "Bosom Buddies," Mel Gibson in "The Year of Living Dangerously," Tom Cruise in "Risky Business," Brad Pitt in "Legends of the Fall," Gary Sinise in "Forest Gump," and Zac Efron in "High School Musical." I remember a young George Clooney in "The Facts of Life" because his father had been our news anchor in Cincinnati, but George didn't really stand out to me until he played Dr. Doug Ross on "ER." Zac's talent rates him in this company of actors.
Thanks to the internet, I was able to go back and see all of Zac's "Summerland" episodes after discovering him in "HSM". At age 15, Zac gave great dramatic performances in that series, especially the "Safe House" episode. And, he really captured the autistic child in "Miracle Run." HSM3 is going to shatter box office records for a musical big time. Maybe then they will get it!
Reply
9-12-2008 @ 9:35AM
gen said...
This movie will be amazing. and i know it!
haha. i cant wait to see zac do this role! He and movie looks great!
Reply
9-12-2008 @ 12:11PM
Lorraine said...
I can hardly wait to see this movie. Sometimes the "industry types" do not give the theatre going public enough credit. We are interested in good story lines and good performances and it sounds like "Me and Orson Welles" has both.
Reply
9-12-2008 @ 10:35PM
michelle said...
OMG i cant wait to see this movie. I love zac efron and cant wait to see him in this movie!!! Glad it got a good review!!!
Reply
9-13-2008 @ 6:13AM
Lisa said...
Woow! Great review, I'm getting more ecxited for the film everyday..
I really want to see Zac playing a more mature role..
Reply
9-13-2008 @ 11:58AM
MovieJay said...
I think the hesitancy on the distribution level is understandable because there is no clear demographic for this movie other than people who love the theatre and understand who Orson Welles is exactly. I was at the premiere, thought the movie was good, but not A-list Linklater, and a good deal of the crowd was filled with bored teenagers who were only there to see Zac Efron. A couple girls around me had to be shushed every 10 minutes, and they found it annoying every time people were chuckling over an Orson Welles reference.
The problem in terms of marketing this movie is that Christian McKay steals the show while Zac Efron, a performer not very familiar to me, just stands around like a poser for much of the film. He has a pretty and open face, but he's a piece of cardboard. The scenes that work best have everything to do with putting up a theatre play, and the weakest scenes involve the Efron and Danes courting scenes, which are pat and predictable. I also didn't much like the ending, which is so tacked on. Nevertheless, this movie has enough rewards to recommend it, but Zac Efron is going to begin to lose his tween fan base because of this picture, and that's probably why the marketing wizards aren't sure what to do about it.
This movie will be lucky to make $10 million at the box office. It's nice and warm movie, but one with a specialty audience in mind, not a mainstream audience of teens who haven't a clue who Orson Welles is.
Reply
9-13-2008 @ 9:00PM
Madison said...
Even though this movie is basically about Orson Welles and theater, it's got a gorgeous lead actor, romance, and comedy. Its marketing team should highlight these elements to sell the movie. Judging from a short video clip, Efron in it looks very mature and totally different from his High School Musical role. I don't think older audience will have a hard time separating him from HSM here.
Reply
9-14-2008 @ 11:57PM
penny03 said...
Perhaps Zac will begin to loose his tween fan base with this movie, but that is not exactly a bad thing. He was great in the HSM movies, but now that he is growing into a more mature actor, his talent will attract a more mature audience who will appreciate him not just his looks. (although he does have the more gorgeous eyes on the planet) I heard him say, on a TV interview, that as he grows up and matures, he hopes that his films will also grow and mature. I think that will begin here and hopefully continue with his future films.
Reply
9-15-2008 @ 11:53AM
Lucy008 said...
I think that Efron will be the best he could be in this film and i think he has matured into a very interesting young man and i would like to wish him the best in future movies. I think it will be hard to seperate him from his High School Musical movies but once we see the grown up side of him all of that will disapear. Good Luck to this talented young actor and hopefully his career in more mature movies will go far.
Good Luck Zac!
Reply
9-17-2008 @ 3:46PM
Jandy said...
You had me at "Richard Linklater." And then you followed it with "recreation of 1930s literary New York"? I want to see this now, Welles or no Welles, Efron or no Efron.
Reply
9-24-2008 @ 12:51PM
Zach B. said...
I, for one, an eighteen year-old, am very excited to see this film, because Richard Linklater is most definitely one of the better directors working out there today. Orson Welles is such a personality to be dealt with, such a big man, an ambitious man, but one who concocted some of the most brilliant spectacles ever seen by man's eyes. Also, this film may contain bits of a portrayal of Welles' Julius Ceasar, something I've always wished had been documented on film. If anyone accused me of seeing the film because of Zac Effron, the only thing I would be able to do is laugh.
Oh, and The Third mNa is brilliant. I, for one, would be willing to see how many of those references I could count.
Savvy
Reply
9-28-2008 @ 6:38PM
Ella said...
I'm 18, and I think Efron is a talented actor, and as penny03 said, his audience is growing up along with him. Don't accuse all of Efron's fans of only liking his looks, not his talent.
I want to see Me, and Orson Welles - it sounds like a good movie. Thanks for the review.
Reply
11-02-2008 @ 1:17AM
Mrs. Robinson said...
My earlier prediction was correct. HSM3 broke opening weekend box office records for a musical, bringing in $42 million in the US and another $40 million in 19 other countries. This is 68% higher than the past US record of $25 million for "Mama Mia." Not bad for a movie that cost $30 million to make. Too bad that there was no trailer shown for "Me and Orson Welles" at the US HSM3 showings. Zac's Spring '09 ("Seventeen Again") movie trailer was shown and there is now a lot of anticipation for that movie. Distributors, are you taking note???
Reply
11-29-2008 @ 1:11AM
Pam said...
First, let me say, I'm 49 -- not some starry-eyed teenager and I wish people would give Zac Efron his due. Yes, he's "disconcertingly "handsome, but so what? (So were Errol Flynn and Paul Newman in their day) More importantly. Zac Efron is a versatile, talented actor (which he proved long before the HSM franchise). Check out some of his earlier work. He's an "old soul" with really impressive range. His performance in "Miracle Run" was right up there with DiCaprio's in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape." (It's unfortunate that movies made for TV are somehow dismissed by "the powers that be.") And from what Linklater himself has said, he too recognizes Efron's talent. Few actors these days compare to the "triple threat" stars of years gone by but Efron is the real deal. I predict his career will be long and varied -- he'll be right up there with Johnny Depp and Daniel Day Lewis.
So c'mon distributors, get with the program! And while you're at it, feel free to send me a ticket to the NYC premiere. :-)
Reply