Review: Miracle at St. Anna
Filed under: Drama, Disney, Theatrical Reviews, Celebrities and Controversy, War

(With Miracle at St. Anna opening this week, we at Cinematical are re-running our review from the 2008 Toronto International Film Festival.)
By James Rocchi
Spike Lee's films have always been fraught with the potential for greatness and disaster, shuddering with a nervy wire-walking energy that makes them superb when they stay on the narrow space between ambition and execution and gives you a long time to watch the fall when they don't. But that, of course, is what makes them worth watching; for but one example, the only thing more shocking than the realization that there was a musical number in Malcolm X was the realization of how superbly it worked; Lee's films are rarely undeniably perfect, but they are always undeniably his.
So it is with Miracle at St. Anna, a bold, sprawling, messy epic of war and faith set behind enemy lines in 1944, as a group of four African-American soldiers are trapped far from their fellow troops in German-occupied Italy. There are moments here where the film does not work, where you can feel the sharp needle of disbelief or dislocation puncture the film mercilessly, and there are other moments that are not only willing but indeed eager to look at big, challenging, relevant issues of race and power, war and justice, faith and failure. These moments -- and there are many of them -- not only speak to Lee's unwavering skill and commitment as a filmmaker, but also to the singular nature of his talent and will. When Miracle at St. Anna falters, it's in the moments that seem like they could have been crafted by any other film maker; when Miracle at St. Anna succeeds, it's in the moments that could only have been crafted by Lee.
Miracle at St. Anna begins in the near present, as a postal worker seems to recognize one of his customers -- and pulls a gun from his drawer and shoots the man dead. Searching the man's apartment, police find a purple heart -- and a priceless piece of Italian statuary. The murder, the medal, the masterwork; we flash back to 1944 to see where they all came from. Lee plunges us into the blood and thunder thick of battle, and if Sherman told us with undeniable conviction that "War is Hell," then Spielberg told us with similar conviction that, after Saving Private Ryan, war is not only Hell but also shot hand-held, undercranked and then run through a bleach-bypass color correction in post-production. Miracle at St. Anna looks like most modern war movies, yes, but that may be the only way it resembles its peers.
Four soldiers are cut off during a disastrous 1944 Allied advance -- natural leader Sgt. Stamps (Derek Luke), stalwart Corporal Negron (Laz Alonzo), cool-but-nervy Sgt. Cummings (Michael Ealy) and slow, colossal Pvt. Train (Omar Benson Miller). They make their way to the nearest village, where they meet up with the local citizenry and realize that they're in the best possible place to get intelligence about the German column aimed at the American troops. This seems like the sort of stuff of a thousand war films, but Lee (and James McBride's script, adapted from his own novel) carefully, subtly reframes the war not just as a clash between democracies and dictatorships but also as a clash between rulers and ruled. The Italians are suffering under the fascist government they eagerly brought to power; some of the Germans recognize a dislocation between their orders and their honor; the four American soldiers risk their lives in the name of a nation, and an army, that considers them second-class citizens.
This is not what you would expect in a war film from any other American director, and it comes as a welcome reminder that Lee is not like any other American director. Miracle at St. Anna, as the title suggests, is a haunted tale, full of ghosts and portents and visions and legends and prophecy, and Lee makes some of it work and there are parts of it that simply do not. Like Martin Scorsese, Lee is a social realist in love with the look of classic movies, an uneasy blend of sociologist and showman. (Do the Right Thing wasn't just a breakthrough for its unflinching look at the complexities of race in America; it was also because of the energy and vision that exploded out of every frame.) But asking Spike Lee to do magical realism -- spectral visitors materializing between the bullets -- is like asking a brain surgeon to give you blond highlights; not only is it beneath his accomplishments, it's not necessarily within his skill set, either.
There are other elements in Miracle at St. Anna that feel off to me, but I'm more than willing to accept how that may not be because of any failings on the part of Lee or McBride, but rather because I'm simply incapable of wrapping my mind around the brute enormity of war -- and racism -- in the 1940's from a remove of seven decades in time. Miller's Train is certainly from the same mold as Lenny in Of Mice and Men; I couldn't imagine a character so simple being able to serve, but, then again, I wasn't there. I could wrap my head around a scene set on the home front, where our four soldiers are denied counter service at a Southern ice cream parlor while German POW's sit out front, but not around the scene's denouement, which felt strained and stilted.
But then Lee follows that with a shot of our four heroes -- not protagonists, but heroes -- looking right into the camera, weary and wounded and tired: This is what we're willing to do; what are you willing to do to earn that? It's a question all soldiers, and especially these soldiers, have the right to ask; it's a question very few film makers would be willing to ask of us on their behalf. Terence Blanchard's score is haunting; Matthew Libatique's cinematography captures frenzy and grace, brutal slaughter and exhilarating life. The four leads are superb, as well -- each turning potential boiler-plate war movie caricatures into something richer and deeper while still maintaining the movie-style shimmer of archetype and affect. It's taken me a while to write a review of Miracle at St. Anna, probably because I kept thinking about it, turning it over in my head, challenged and confounded by certain scenes and inspired to contemplate and consider by others; in an age where some war movies (and, you could suggest, even some wars) are made to be briefly contemplated and then forgotten, that alone should tell you that Miracle at St. Anna is worth watching for yourself.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-27-2008 @ 2:48PM
Gene said...
Perhaps all the nay-sayer reviewers of this movie ought to "experience" it. They should cease trashing a movie which they obviously don't understand.
WWII had was the most destructive war in history. There were all types who suffered because of it, including those "types" brought to life in the movie. The story was not meant as a compendium of that era but an attempt to show the brutality of war and the alienation that results from it. Things like the turning of morality on its head where one is decorated for actions in one situtation that are severely punished in another, as shown in the Post Office scene.
Reply
9-28-2008 @ 10:47PM
Delta said...
I completely disagree with the negative reviews of Spike Lee's new joint...Miracle at St. Anna.
What are reviewers saying?...it's too complicated...it's not well developed...the black side/history is not well illustrated...it's disjointed...the characters don't drive the story plot...on so on and on...
I agree that there are various intricacies in plot and character development/character motivation elements that are not ironed out exactly how most movie-viewers would like (simple-minded movie-viewers, that is). Nevertheless, the problem with most film-goers is that they expect films to be like others...to have typical-circular plots,to yearn for predictability...and this movie was exactly the opposite and that's what makes it pretty phenomenal.
The fact that it had some odd bits and pieces left for some intrigue (for viewer to own) for exactly that, to discuss and stimulate thought well-after the film. Not everything has to be tied into one neat little package...Americans, we are so lazy, even when it comes to watching films.
Moreover, I think it was brilliant that he called the film Miracle at St. Anna...clearly, the boy was symbolic of hope, which is the miracle. Can you believe that there are people out there questioning why he would name the film as such? UGH.
I have to say that I am not an avid Spike Lee fan, some stuff I get, some stuff is so cliche, it hurts. However, this was totally unexpected not only for him, but in regards to the genre in general...it was not your typical WWII movie and it wasn't laden with "OMG, we're so oppressed, white people suck"...although there was a little of that...the movie was about the struggle of prejudice and racism as interpreted and felt within the spectrum of humanity via the black soldiers...the parallel stretched into the exact prejudice and struggle that existed between facist and partisan European people of the time and thier plight...this was brilliant!
I hope you consider my thoughts here and welcome your responses...think it, say it, write it, be it.
Reply
9-29-2008 @ 3:28PM
Michael said...
I would guess, by your comments, that I would be considered one of the lazy movie goers. When I go to a movie, I go to be entertained not to be educated in the errors of the past.
There was racism in the military in the 1940's. This is a sad fact in American history. There was racism for generations before that as well. It was and is wrong. But it is not entertainment.
I have, long since, grown tired of being told how horrible it is to be ..." white " ...since the white man is responsible for all the sins perpetrated on the poor ...black and red man. Selecting the portions of history you wish ...to illustrate one perspective is generally seen as revisionist history. For centuries...BEFORE...black or red men and women were abused and enslaved...we did it to ourselves...as did YOUR ancestors.
Spike Lee is one of the great directers of this or any age. That is a fact. His films, while socially relevent, are not always the most ... " entertaining " films out. I would love to see Mr. Lee direct a film that does not have an anti-white flavor to it. I would love to see him direct a film with a big budget...for a big box office...just to entertain. I doubt that it will happen however. You see...Mr. Lee, while one of the best directers in film...is black...and in the world of Hollywood...those movies...just aren't given to the Spike Lee's of the world...and THAT is racism in its ugliest form.
" Miricle..." is a fine film...not my normal fare...granted...But I like Mr. Lee's skills...and they are evident on the screen. I wish they were not quite so..." black ( ? ) " and a little more multi-racial...but such is life. The bad reviews it seems to be getting ...come from people without vision...My only complaint ...is I've had enough...I would rather see a movie...Life lessons ...? I get those every day...without help.
Thanks for writing a magnificent and well phrased note...and referring to it as ..." the latest Joint..." beautiful.
9-29-2008 @ 5:07PM
delta said...
Michael,
I appreciate your comments thoroughly.
I agree with you that racism has existed for many decades before this time period, and I don't believe I stated otherwise...as a matter of fact, I stated that I felt that it really was more about the humanism of what soldiers, and civilians go through. I don't believe that Spike Lee focused, as compared to his other films, on overtly "white-bashing" as you so eloquently put it earlier. Don't get me wrong, the black lens, was there...perhaps, I personally didn't focus on it...I was drawn more to the story as it transcended into the fusion of events between the black soldiers and the Italian village/people....I think these events embraced what people, regardless of race, will do (fight, defend, protect, love, care, nurture, empathize) for each other. This was the entertaining part for me...the connection between people...the sacrifice...so many movies attempt (but fail)to do this successfully, and I feel Spike Lee hit that mark with his joint for sure!!!
And yes, I can not see Spike Lee doing the next Ironman or Fantastic Four...and thank God for that!!! LOL. We seem to agree more than disagree, I feel.
Believe it or not, sometimes, I enjoy being a lazy American view-goer as well...but when I come across something as stimulating as this movie, I have to give credit where it is due. It's unfortunate that more people are not provoked to think anymore....it seems that more than our economy is faltering fast....
9-28-2008 @ 10:49PM
delta said...
I am with you Gene...dead on post!!!
Reply
9-29-2008 @ 12:54PM
Noni said...
The Movie was AWESOME. . . .
Reply
9-29-2008 @ 1:48PM
Tunneler said...
I for one think the movie looked ok in the trailer but the sheer fact its called a joint I will pass.
Reply
9-29-2008 @ 5:13PM
Delta said...
Tunneler...all of Spike's films are called that...it's a catch phrase....no parallel to smoking pot (weed, in urban terms), the movie has nothing to do with that...don't prejudge...check it out!
10-02-2008 @ 2:07AM
Bunnz said...
Whats interesting about this film?
One, the fact that Spike Lee took on a subject in history that transcends racial barriers, social injustice, and sexual perversion on a Nation wide level, and brought to us an experience of men who died for our freedom. Educational, and interesting.
Two, Spike was able to take on this material and still give it life to where we know that this is a Spike Lee joint. How so? The shots where the characters are looking directly in cam at a wide angle. The rapid cuts to straight on shots of army gear and images of art. Spike was able to brand his style into the fibers of the film.
Whats whack about this film?
I believe that the excessive use of religious symbolism was boring and unbelievable. I agree that the film was about faith and sacrifice which parallel the christian faith, but, at the same time, it seemed as though the use of O'Lord, and Jesus', made me wanna laugh more than anything, and I dont think that was the effect the filmmakers wanted. I did like the unifying sequence of all the people praying the same prayer during that crucial moment of execution. That was powerful! Also, the Sleeping Man shot, which to me, was the Mise En Cine, which captured Train choking the Captain and His face mirrored that of the Sleeping Man on the Mountain. Very effective.
These two served a larger purpose and gives the film life beyond the context of the film. The religious jargon in the language of the characters, seemed overacted and unnecessary to push the plot of the story forward.
Also, I felt that the film was not married to a specfic place. I understand that it was WW2, but there were times where I really didn't know where I was. I could have easily been in Italy, Germany, Russia, or any other European country for all we know. There were not enough shots that showed relation of character to environment. No landscape, mountain ranges, creeks, ponds, rivers, trees, wind, bugs, nothing. These different type of shots may seem petty and unnecessary, but experiencing these shots during the film makes us feel more connected and gives the characters more life.
Overall, the film definitely is a must see. Is not Spike's best piece by far. See all of his work and you'll understand. Spike gets mad props for this piece.
Reply
10-21-2008 @ 8:19AM
Lori said...
I have yet to see this movie so my comment is not based on whether or not I found the movie entertaining. My comment is based on a statement I read. Spike Lee stated, "I would not allow anybody to tell me how to make a film, be it a partisan or the president of the United States," Lee told a news conference in Florence on Wednesday after a preview screening, according to Italian media.
"This simply shows that in Italy the wound is still open. ... It is up to Italians to come to grips with their past, not up to me or James McBride or the film," he said.
This statement was made after some Italians were offended about how the movie portrays some Italians during that time of WWII by implying they were responsible for the murders of all those innocent people along with nazi soldiers. But, what really bothered me about the statement was when he said, "they need to come to grips with it." How would he like it if someone was to tell him that African- Americans should get over it, and let the past go. Slavery is something you just need to come to grips with. It would be a very disrespectful thing to say about such a terrible event that took place. And to be so callous about it, is just a very narrow-minded and ignorant statement to make. I think that he is a very racist person, director and I for one would never watch one of his films simply because of what he stands for. If anyone is offended by anything I have said then you need to take a close look at yourself.
Reply
10-17-2008 @ 11:12PM
Rosie B. said...
I'm an American of Italian ancestry. Nothing about this film offended me. I admit, a couple of Spike Lee's other films did. It seems he enjoys casting us Italians as all racists. This film did not do that, in fact, I was surprised to hear one of the black actors in the movie comment that he felt freer in this country (Italy) than in his own (America).
I think it's an excellent movie, the best I've seen in years.
Clint Eastwood's garbage earned him an Academy Award. Chariots of Fire, a very dull, stale movie got one. Believe me, this film deserves an Academy Award by a far greater margin than most of the films that earn them.
It's really too bad that people are flocking to see the garbage currently offered by other film makers instead of viewing this excellent movie.
Reply
10-22-2008 @ 5:15AM
Phillip said...
Lori, I understand your meaning but Mr. Lee's statement can't even compare to that which you make about black people "getting over it". Unlike the Italian partisans we African-Americans are still going through it. Racism in the work place,
education, and social status. Now I don't profess to talk in place of all African-Americans, but I have tried living the lie of "Get a degree you can write your own ticket". You can if you are given a chance. I not only have my degree, but I am also a veteran of this country, and I still can't seem to get a break. I haven't seen this picture yet myself but everytime I read or hear about it, I am informed that people love it. The Italian partisans can't tell me there were no cowards, irreputable ladies, etc during that time, these types exist even now. Sometimes people do what they have to to survive. If you haven't served its hard to understand that there are those who will do anything to stay alive. Even now there are deserters and people who are in our own military that are cowards. Thank God we still have mostly brave and determined soldiers that like the Buffalo Soldiers, and all other
veterans white, black, hispanic,asian, muslim, jewish, catholic,
and all others(not wanting to leave ANY group out) to go into harms way so you can be able to write what you want. Spike Lee is just one of those that has a vision and depicts it in the way his environment dictates his heart to do.
Reply