Cinematical Seven: When Talking Animals Attack
Filed under: Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Family Films, Cinematical Seven, Remakes and Sequels, Lists

I grew up reading Charlotte's Web and watching Mister Ed and the Francis (the Talking Mule, with Donald O'Connor) movies on TV, so I have a very warm spot in my heart for talking animals. They can inspire wondrous flights of fantasy, lift the spirits with good-natured humor, and lead to a deep and abiding respect for nature and the environment.
Of course, watching the Yogi Bear cartoons once made me think I could take on a black bear foraging for food at our family's camping site in Yellowstone National Park -- I was six years old and had to be physically restrained -- so I can see the down side as well. Still, dozens of animated films have made it abundantly clear that it's possible to lend human voices to the animal kingdom without dumbing the material down to idiocy and, when done right (Babe, Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey, Joe's Apartment), live-action talking animals also deserve to be a treasured part of our cinematic heritage.
But not these. Here are seven (mostly) live-action movies featuring talking animals that attack our sense of what makes a movie good.
7. Underdog (2007)
When Hollywood screws around with my cherished childhood memories, I strain to give them the benefit of the doubt. There's no excuse, though, for this abomination of a movie. I realize that Wally Cox's dweeby voice would be impossible for someone else to replicate, but Jason Lee? Really?! A huge chunk of the original cartoon's charm was the very simple (cheap) animation, which relied upon the writers to come up with witty things for the actors to say. None of that was transplanted to the live-action movie and I can't imagine any children looking back fondly upon this version of Underdog in the future.
6. Garfield The Movie (2004)
Yes, I love Bill Murray, but no, I do not love him as Garfield. What seems like a natural fit -- Murray with his unhurried, lazy delivery of wisecracks that sting and percolate as an unhurried, lazy, wisecracking feline -- never jibes, in part because Garfield the animated cat looks, at best, like a weirdly-drawn fourth cousin of Garfield the beloved Jim Davis comic strip creation. The body is not bad, but the face is a cutie-pie disaster. Note to animators: do not mess around (or try to "innovate") with a character that millions of people visit on a daily basis.
5. Scooby-Doo (2002)
Oh, the agony! I only watched the original series on TV because there was little else to choose from on Saturday mornings in the pre-cable era. The movie made my head split. In this case, the live-action actors, especially Matthew Lillard as Shaggy, are fine, but the computerized Scooby-Doo is a disaster, a beast that lumbers rather than lopes, with none of the goofy insouciance that defined his leadership role in the original gang. Oh, Scooby-Doo, where did you go?
4. Howard the Duck (1986)
Poor Howard. It could be argued that he is not an animal, but rather an alien creature. The important thing is that he's a DUCK and the movie fails on every level. The movie set back the cause for actors in animal suits for generations to come, and made it impossible to imagine that Steve Gerber's original comic book character would ever again have the opportunity to shine on the big screen.
3. Hot to Trot (1988)
If Howard the Duck represented Lea Thompson's low point as an actress, then surely Virginia Madsen can be forgiven for appearing in this talking-horse turkey. Decades earlier, Francis the Talking Mule and Mister Ed set the standard for this type of movie, but, though John Candy does the best he can with what he's given as the stock-market wise equine, the creative talent here decided to take the low road (hello, Bobcat Goldthwait!), and the result is disturbingly unfunny, unless you've been smoking funny cigarettes. On the other hand, with the stock market crashing this week, maybe Don the talking horse can turn things around.
2. Dr. Seuss' The Cat in the Hat (2003)
"Scream and run," says the Cat at one point, and that's good advice for anyone contemplating watching this "movie." Many good, talented people worked on this film, so I'm not exactly sure how it turned out so badly. It may have been a case of the costumes and effects taking over the project, drowning out the magic at the heart of the Dr. Seuss tale. Or it could have been simple hubris, creative talent and/or executives imagining that they needed to modernize things to please "the kids." All the kids want is a good, funny, well-told story, man. Nobody likes to be patronized.
1. Dr. Dolittle (1998)
I just finished reading Mark Harris' marvelous book of Hollywood history, Pictures at a Revolution, which details the making of the 1967 version of Doctor Dolittle. Somehow that creaky, awful musical was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Picture (along with Bonnie and Clyde, The Graduate, In the Heat of the Night, and Guess Who's Coming for Dinner, whose behind-the-scenes stories are also told in Harris' book), an infamously unworthy honor that bypassed the remake by a country mile. It's not just that the 1998 version is witless and hackneyed and crude and insincerely preachy, it's also insulting to the memory of a bad original. With talking animals like this, who needs enemies?
Now it's your turn. Sound off in the comments section: which talking animals really get under your skin? Which should be banned from the big screen?









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-02-2008 @ 10:43PM
Smiggy said...
I still can't decide whether I absolutely hated, or loved Alvin and the Chipmunks. That would be the logical 8th on your list, I guess.
It's nice to see some love for Joe's Apartment, which is my favorite musical set in New York City. Which is about 90% of musicals, when you think about it...
Reply
10-03-2008 @ 2:46AM
Pat said...
re: garfield - note to animators? Animators would have nothing to do with the design of Garfield in the film as they (geuss what?) only animate. They are not involved with art direction, character modelling etc.
Reply
10-06-2008 @ 4:00AM
mike said...
Animators handle animating the CGI characters...
10-03-2008 @ 9:29AM
Emland said...
I have kids ranging in age from 18 to 7, so I have seen a lot of bad talking animal movies in my time.
Fly Me to the Moon that came out this summer takes the number 1 spot of Crappiest Movie of All Time for me. The character modeling was ridiculous and the story line too much to bear even for a kids animated flick.
Reply
10-03-2008 @ 10:00AM
Matt Brown said...
My 3yo absolutely loves this movie. I don't share her taste in movies.
Reply
10-03-2008 @ 10:09AM
Batzarro said...
I've always hated this sub-genre. But Babe and Homeward bound were good.
Reply
10-03-2008 @ 10:44AM
Kurt said...
The turtle in The Three Amigos. Freakin' hilarious.
And for irony junkies like myself: the voice of Bill Murray's Ghostbuster character, Peter Venkman, was voiced by Lorenzo Music in the Saturday-morning cartoon--the same voice-actor who did the voice of Garfield on the Garfield and Friends cartoon.
Thanks, I'll be here all week.
Reply
10-03-2008 @ 1:53PM
OsLord said...
Cat in the Hat is by far the worst offender here. I can honestly never remember have a more unpleasant theater-going experience than sitting through that shit pile.
Reply
10-06-2008 @ 5:01AM
Reggie said...
Teenage. Mutant. Ninja. Turtles.
.......Terrible.
Reply
10-06-2008 @ 5:01AM
Monotreme said...
Another glarin omission would be that atrocious The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle movie from 2000 which pretty much sealed Robert DeNiro's reputation as one of the most epic falls of one of the greatest actors of all time - from Raging Bull to this. I mean, they didn't even try to make the title characters look real, but they also don't look like cartoons, but rather some kind of weird in-between hybrid.
Reply
10-06-2008 @ 3:31PM
rk250 said...
I'm going to disagree with the fans of homeward bound (my apologies to those in that category). It may not be excruciatingly awful like to other flms on this list, but it falls way short of the beauty and emotion of the original Incredible Journey movie. Of course, the animals don't talk in the original and that may be the secret of its greatness. You feel that those loyal animals struggling to come home are real, just like your own pets and not cartoons (which most talking animals, even in good films, risk becoming). When Bodger comes running down the hill at the end, I still break into tears-I'm doing it right now even thinking about it!
Reply
10-07-2008 @ 8:22AM
missmolly said...
One glaring omission is Kangaroo Jack. It features a goddam marsupial rapping.
Reply
10-07-2008 @ 9:15AM
Chuck said...
Sure there may be talking animals that get under our skin, but none of them deserve to be banned. That would take away our freedom of choice.
Reply
10-07-2008 @ 4:00PM
Abby said...
My kids 3yo and 1yo love Underdog and Alvin and the Chipmunks. These movies aren't great, but trust me after you've seen them 20-30 times, they don't seem all that bad. I agree w/ another comment, the totally screwed up the ninja turtles when they made TMNT. Can't Hollywood leave well enough alone?
Reply