Discuss: Making Video Game Movies That Work
Filed under: Action, Horror, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Thrillers, Mystery & Suspense, Fandom, 20th Century Fox, Peter Jackson, Games and Game Movies
As is often the case with the translation of any geek property to the screen, this Friday's release of Max Payne seems to elicit just as many hopes and doubts as one would expect from a big-screen adaptation of a popular video game (well, one not directed by Uwe Boll, that is). So, coming from a position of relative ignorance when it comes to most titles (trust me, my PS2 gathers more dust than yours does), what's the current reading from fans on a film proudly rated PG-13, although based on a series of M-rated games?
And for which upcoming projects are you most hopeful: Halo -- that is, with or without Peter Jackson? Gore Verbinski's BioShock? Jerry Bruckheimer's Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time? (And just when is The Rock's Spy Hunter coming out anyway? Do you care?) (Should I?)
As for my fellow ignorati: does this look to you like an appealing action movie regardless? Which video-game movies worked best despite your lack of familiarity with the source material? My vote goes to the first Resident Evil, with some moderate supporting love going to Silent Hill and Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within -- no great blasphemy intended.
Oh, and just to keep things jumping, any thoughts on the following titles, or any left out, are more than welcome: DOA: Dead or Alive, Doom, Double Dragon, Hitman, the Mortal Kombat films, Street Fighter, Super Mario Brothers, the Tomb Raider franchise, Wing Commander.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
10-14-2008 @ 12:36PM
ScreenRant.com said...
It seems really odd that it's so difficult to turn a video game with a plotline into a decent movie. I was hopeful for Max Payne (will be seeing it tomorrow) but I've already read one scathing review over at AICN.
Vic
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 12:38PM
Ronan said...
I am the guy who actually liked Wing Commander: The Movie.
Can't wait for Prince of Persia.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 12:48PM
Batzarro said...
I've always felt that the main scourge for Games-to-film has always been the talent(or lack thereof) involved. It's not that making a movie based on a game right is it's own thing and has it's own set of challenges, it's that the ones done so far have been thrown mostly as low budget films with no hope outside of a February release. Resident Evil and Doom are not harder concepts to sell than, say, Transformers. Only that it's never even Michael Bay the one to direct those.
As for Max Payne, I'm a bit lukewarm. I'll go see it with moderate expectations. I actually don't expect the rating of it to be a deterrent. As I recall, the Mortal Kombat movie was pretty good in spite of being based on a M rated game.
I'm actually quite hopefull for Prince of Persia. And I expect moderate thrills from Street Fighter: the Legend of Chun Li next year.
And I close by saying: How come np one's licensed Sonic to make a CG movie yet?
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 12:56PM
peter said...
I am only slightly ashamed to admit how much I thoroughly enjoyed Hitman. It was really just 90-100 minutes of fanservice. Things blew up. People died. The story was good enough to keep me entertained. (my full review: http://www.privatjokr.com/index.php/movies/2008/06/05/hitman)
I'm not sold on video game movies. After Hitman I didn't run out to see Doom, but Max Payne looks really good.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 1:52PM
GL said...
I enjoyed Hitman. It knew what it was trying to be and delivered it. Not to mention that there was Olga, which makes everything OK.
10-14-2008 @ 1:03PM
Adam said...
Hitman was extremely under-rated
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 1:03PM
William Goss said...
How so?
10-14-2008 @ 1:06PM
SM1L3Z said...
so you mention the spirits within but not advent children whats up with that
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 1:07PM
Adam said...
Good cast, decent action, many stylishly directed moments and a good aesthetic backbone. Not a classic by any stretch of the imagination, but there is a decent film waiting to break out amongst all the studio interference and pandering to the adolescent audience. A decent director's cut would make a lot of people think twice, though It'll never happen.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 1:08PM
Astin said...
I've been lukewarm on Max Payne since I saw the first trailer. Mark Wahlberg is just slightly wrong for Max, but Mila Kunis seems to be a good fit for Mona. Toss in the Valkyries and it starts to look odd...
I've been replaying the games and they're a decent hard-boiled noir cop story with some John-Woo style thrown in. Now, if John Woo had directed a movie based on a game inspired by his movies...
As for others - I'd say we're about 5-10 years from a truly great game-based movie. The problem is that the directors who "get" the games are generally inexperienced as directors, and the experienced directors are generally to old to "get" the games. Once we get a director who grew up with modern video games, we could have something great.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 10:32PM
Herff said...
...and Astin gets the cigar. Everyone listen to this guy he knows what he's talking about.
I don't know if it will be in the next 5-10 years or later, but we are stuck waiting for good directors, and good writers who grew up with videogames. Older directors just don't get it. Think about how long it has taken for super hero/comic book movies to reach the level they are at today. Now everyone is taking them seriously. It's just a matter of time. Until then we have to live with the painful experience of watching our favorite games turned into crappy movies.
Honestly the only videogame movie I can think of that I have enjoyed thus far would be Street Fighter with van damme. The movie completely made fun of itself, making it hilarious and very effective. Spirits Within was horrendous, but Advent Children wasn't too bad, although the plot was pretty thin.
And one more thing that Astin referenced that is worth mentioning is John Woo's "Hard Boiled." While cheesy at times, the action is amazing and completely reminds me of a movie version of the classic point and shoot arcade games. Baddies popping out from behind walls, avoiding shooting the hostages, "boss" fights, it might as well have been a video game turned movie. Ok, that's all from me.
10-14-2008 @ 2:22PM
Tash said...
Hitman was an overlooked film because it played to the strengths of the video game. It didn't take itself like it was the most intricate and plausible story; it just had fun doing what it could do very well. The action was great, the movie moved along at a steady pace and it was worth the price of admission.
I was watching cable the other night and Double Dragon came on. Now, I must say that I always take video game movies with a grain of salt because i know that video games in general (and especially around the time DD and Super Mario Bros. came out) were more of a youthful trend. Adults, although there were many, hadn't grasped the video game culture yet. And for what it is worth, Double Dragon is good, old fashioned 90's-camp fun! Funny in the wrong places, embarassingly funny in the meant-to-be-funny places and b-movie acting at its finest.
There will always be the Street Fighter's, Mortal Kombat: Anihilation's, and BloodRayne's in the world, but i think the genre is starting to turn the corner. Max Payne looks like a straight forward action/noir film and i'm excited to check it out. I hope i'm not wrong.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 2:24PM
Peter Hall said...
The problem with adapting video games into movies is that every attempt thus far has been for games popular because of their gameplay, not their narrative intuition. This fails and will always fail.
Silent Hill was perhaps the closest adaptation yet of a game whose story was on par with its play, but even then Silent Hill is a poor source material because the story was always second fiddle to simply navigating through dark corridors.
Max Payne, on the other hand, had a grrreat script. A strong narrative with a heartfelt story that was always fun as hell to play. The problem, evidence suggests, with the movie is that 'they' finally picked a game with a great story and still only chose to adapt the gameplay. That's like going to adapt a book and then filming a story based on the paper said book was printed on.
And yes, the PG-13 rating is an inherent flaw. Max Payne was heavy on drug usage: bad guys were always shooting up, Payne himself used pain relievers to restore health (yeah, remember when games had health points and one didn't just hide in the corner to heal?). Plus, ya know, he shot people in the face. A lot.
And double yes, Wahlberg is miscast. To make a game adaptation work you need to either pick something with a plot that can stand on its own or pick something where the gameplay gimmick will be just as enjoyable on the silver screen as it is on the game screen. This is why Prince of Persia will be a success. The story is solid, but the gameplay hook (rewinding time) will be just as cool to watch as it was to do.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 3:04PM
Frisco Baby Eating Late said...
I think the only movie that may have a chance is Bio-Shock. And i only say this because of the look of the Pirates movie is along the same lines. Max Payne had to be rated R to be good on any level but its not and i think its going to take away from everything the game was.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 3:59PM
Riley Freeman said...
the movie that has the most potential is kane and lynch. it wasnt a great game but the story leaves it open to be a decent movie.
mortal kombats problem aside from the crappy acting and terrible special effects was it was done too much child lake. now if they remake it into a rated r movie and dont shy away from the violence that mk is known for. mk has a chance but even at that the story is very loose so it would just be action and violence. same thing for street fighter.
halo has a chance too with alien invasion but its really no different than any other alien invasion movie.
Call of duty could be made into a decent movie but it has no character to attach itself to.
resistance could definitely make a movie even though its another alien invasion movie.
Reply
10-14-2008 @ 10:33PM
mezzanine said...
I'd like to see Max Payne, I think it might be pretty good, or at least the best video game movie ever.
Reply
10-15-2008 @ 7:56AM
Pat DC said...
Frisco not to be a pain but not sure how you can think that the pirates movies (ummm. pirates) have a similer look to bioshock (50s avent garde). I think Bioshock could make a great movie but then so could lots of other games.
Movies I'm most not looking forward to are God of War (all the Ratner haters online are on to something) and the Metal Gear Solid movie which will no doubt get rid of everythign that made the franchise great.
As for other movies I was looking forward to the only one would have been Halo directed by Neil Blomkamp (who unexperienced as he is with big features has some exciting work in the past and would have done some interesting things, his halo shorts show this). I don't agree with all the film fanboys wishing Peter Jackson would have directed as the halo story and Jackson wouldn't have gelled at all.
Reply
10-15-2008 @ 1:02PM
MDR said...
SNAAAAAKE!!!
Reply
10-15-2008 @ 4:26PM
pAT said...
I just hope the Max Payne movie incorporates the parts where Payne is tripping balls and has to run through the darkness on these thin strips of blood/pavement/whatever and then you have to keep restarting from your damn save point and it takes about 30 tries before you finally get to the room and you don't even get to shoot anyone!
Anyway, they should have that in the movie.
Reply
10-15-2008 @ 4:26PM
Eric said...
D.O.A. was a hoot from start to finish. Yes, the cheese factor was high, but I knew it would be going in. The chicks were, as the kids say, teh seks, and they kicked ass in an almost believable way. It's 89 minutes of brainless softcore bubblegum violence porn. Corey Yuen, people!
It's worth watching just to hear Jaime Pressly's reaction upon seeing Eric Roberts' evil mastermind office for the first time.
Reply