The Geek Beat: Elisabeth and Scott Discuss 'The Incredible Hulk'
Filed under: Fandom, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, The Geek Beat

Confession time – I didn't see The Incredible Hulk in theaters. I was short on funds and friends to go with, and before I knew it, it was gone. I know most of you out there are better geeks than I, and probably have seen it twice over already. But there's probably a bunch of people out there who had to wait around until last week's DVD release, and might like a chance to talk about it. Hulk out, if you will. To get you all going, Scott Weinberg and I held our own spirited discussion -- or as spirited as one can be at 2am. (4am his time -- he has more stamina than Emil Blonsky!)
Elisabeth: Well first, you need to tell me why Hulk is your favorite character -- because you are honestly the only Hulk fan I know.
Scott: Even as a kid I thought HULK was the most horror-ish of the Marvel superheroes. He's just Jekyll & Hyde, basically.
Elisabeth: Ah, that makes sense. Frankenstein's Monster, too. With a dash of King Kong.
Scott: Sure. Misunderstood beast. Plus he was the only Marvel hero who was trying to get RID of his powers. I thought that was cool.
Scott: Even as a kid I thought HULK was the most horror-ish of the Marvel superheroes. He's just Jekyll & Hyde, basically.
Elisabeth: Ah, that makes sense. Frankenstein's Monster, too. With a dash of King Kong.
Scott: Sure. Misunderstood beast. Plus he was the only Marvel hero who was trying to get RID of his powers. I thought that was cool.
Elisabeth: It IS unique. I think his "selfish" motivation (if you can call it that) is pretty appealing, a change of pace from the guys who are determined to be hero. Did you read the comics, or were you exposed to him through the show? Because a lot of people I know seem to think he was only a TV show, not a comic character.
Scott: Well a lot of people must be dumb. I was a fan of the comic before and during the TV show, which I never missed.
Elisabeth: Do you remember any of your favorite storylines? Is there something from his mythology you're dying to see onscreen?
Scott: Not really, I can barely remember what I had for breakfast today, and I don't read old comic books, although I should seek out an old-school Hulk omnibus.
Elisabeth: You should. It's kind of depressing though, the old stories are dorky, but they give you more bang for your buck.
Scott: I know Rhino battled Hulk and Spidey. I wouldn't mind seeing that nutjob in a movie.
Elisabeth: I think if Hulk ever gets a solo sequel, they should just go nutjob insane.
Scott: Some say they have.
Elisabeth: Well, of the two movies, I think Ang Lee's was actually the crazier one. And it is strange even saying that.
Scott: Less conventional, absolutely.
Elisabeth: It was the emotion that got me. Everyone was either in hysterics (in the Victorian sense) or suicidal. Watching Incredible, it was a relief. It was kind of relaxing just to have a few tears, and some anger. I thought the first 20 minutes, just the credit sequence, was so much better than the whole of Ang Lee's.
Scott: You think a credit sequence is better than the whole of Ang Lee's film? Ouch.
Elisabeth: Yeah, that'll get me flamed.
Scott: Hey who cares. If that's what you think, so be it. I think you're loopy for saying it, but oh well.
Elisabeth: It was just so much tighter, and truer to the character.
Scott: The credit sequence?
Elisabeth: The origin. That's what I mean, the origin story going on behind the sequence. :P
Scott: Ah yes. Well, that montage was put together from an intended sequence. I think they did a fine job by truncating it.
Elisabeth: It was funny, I was knitting and realized it wasn't just credits. I had to stop and pay attention.
Scott: Oh yeah, it definitely pays to look at the TV when a DVD is on.
Elisabeth: Hey, I knit and watch at the same time! But credit sequences are when I gather my pieces and go get caffeine.
Scott: Do you knit and write at the same time? No. Then you should just watch the movie.
Elisabeth: Well, writing requires my hands. Knitting doesn't require my eyes, I just do it by feel. It's like using the Force.
Scott: Curse you. We're digressing stupidly.
Elisabeth: I know. ANYWAY ... I'm exaggerating, I didn't really think just that montage was better than all of Ang Lee's Hulk.
Scott: I know. But it's that sort of off-hand hyperbole that runs rampant around Lee's film, which is full of good stuff, but perhaps too many conflicting ingredients. For example, I love the comic book frame transitions, but those belong in a lighter film.
Elisabeth: I do too! But, I do think Incredible Hulk was superior in most ways. I was surprised. I had low expectations and walked away thinking it was pretty darn good.
Scott: This is a pretty dark movie.
Elisabeth: Yes, and I honestly thought of the two, Incredible was smarter. Maybe I've been spoiled by The Dark Knight and Iron Man now -- but for being "intellectual," I think Lee's comes off as a lot more flippant than he was hoping.
Scott: I don't see flippancy in that film. Or any film in history, for that matter
Elisabeth: Come on, Hulk jumping around and into outer space? That's just being goofy. It's fun.
Scott: When does he jump into outer space?
Elisabeth: He bounces into the atmosphere when he's running around in the desert. That really long jump sequence.
Scott: He's not in space though. This ain't Jason X.
Elisabeth: It's that kind of stuff I found flippant -- and not in a bad sense of the word. I should have said whimsical.
Scott: I know from the books, I think, but do they ever SAY why bullets cant hurt him? Even if his muscles are that strong, he's still organic.
Elisabeth: His skin is really thick. It's something about the radiation, I guess, but nothing can penetrate his skin. Not even atomic bombs, or Wolverine's claws.
Scott: Or your mom's meatloaf.
Elisabeth: Hahahahaha. My mom's meatloaf is freakishly buttery so I would argue it would, because Hulk would stop for how delicious it is.
Scott: Hulk Diet.
Elisabeth: Gamma goodness. Ok, which of the two movies did you like better, or do you like them both, equally, for different reasons? I bet it's the latter.
Scott: No I prefer the second film a bit. It's looser and more fun. But the first one has some solid FX, a few very cool ideas, some decent action, and uhhhh Jennifer effin Connelly. I find it strange that Betty Ross has now been played by both of my big actress crush-girls.
Elisabeth: Betty Ross has really ended up being the prettiest of Marvel ladies...
Scott: Liv Tyler is so pretty it makes me want to smack a wall and howl like a wolf in a '30s cartoon
Elisabeth: She was my favorite Betty Ross. I love her. And I liked that she got Banner so hot and bothered -- that was sexy, and a fun scene. Poor Hulk can't get excited.
Scott: Yeah, no wonder he wants a cure.
Elisabeth: I know -- I don't remember that ever coming up in the comics, but if it didn't, it should have. Joe Fixit Hulk was super popular with ladies, though.
Scott: So like, what would happen if Hulk punched Superman right in the face?
Elisabeth: Good question. I think Superman would go flying, but he would be unharmed.
Scott: But Hulk is green, so he could cover himself with kryptonite.
Elisabeth: Think how big the pockets are on the pants. He could just put a huge chunk in his pocket and walk up to Superman.
Scott: Screw Superman. What a boring character he is. Can do anything and can never been hurt.
Zzzzzz.
Elisabeth: Some would say that of Hulk.
Scott: Well no. If Superman suddenly morphed into Clark Kent when he was bored, that's interesting.
Elisabeth: I don't disagree.
Scott: Does that mean you do agree, senator?
Elisabeth: My friends...let me put it to you this way. Honestly -- I think Hulk is more interesting than Superman, but that's because I like him as a secondary character. Like, when he pops up with Wolverine, or he makes trouble for the Avengers. Or he can star as a gladiator in his own series. He's flexible.
Scott: Unfortunately I think Hulk is too expensive a character to create to be a real side-character
Elisabeth: I was going to ask, do you think he's the kind of character to have a whole trilogy of stand alone films?
Scott: Well, he warranted two in 6 years. That says something.
Elisabeth: But they were both origin stories.
Scott: I wouldn't expect to see Hulk again for a while. But hopefully he'll be avenging.
Elisabeth: I'm glad they can cross him with Iron Man and Avengers. I wish they could bring Wolverine in -- you don't know how I geeked out seeing him in Canada at the end. I loved those little nods to Hulk's mythology. In fact, I thought the crossover stuff was handled really smoothly...I expected that to be so much clunkier. That was the one part my mom came in to watch -- Tony Stark! You should have heard her arguing about crossover potential.
Scott: Well, it is a bit clunky. In Hulk, it's the final scene. In Iron Man, it's after the credits, like they're hedging their bets.
Elisabeth: But they mentioned Stark Industries at the beginning, so I thought it felt like it was full circle, and worked within the plot.
Scott: True. And Iron Man did the SHIELD thing a few times, pretty cleverly.
Elisabeth: I didn't think it was as much of a nudge-nudge wink wink. I expected it to feel like they were whacking me over the head with an Avengers collection. And the little mentions here and there, the Nick Fury correspondence. I thought it felt like a nice little puzzle. If you saw both movies or were familiar with the comics, it was a treat. If not, it didn't bother you. Now, do you want to see Hulk as a bad guy? Because I do.
Scott: No, I don't. Because Banner is a good man, that's what makes Hulk a superhero.
Elisabeth: I never think of Hulk as heroic though, just tragic. He spends too much time fighting himself to fight a lot of bad guys. The show made him heroic which was cool -- I think that's the way you have to use him.
Scott: Banner jumps out of the helicopter to stop Abomination. Not Hulk.
Elisabeth: But ...they are talking about making Hulk the villain of Avengers. I don't want to see him be a bad guy, but that glance he gave the camera? What if the "cure" introduced something more unpredictable into his system? I could see that making a compelling movie, actually -- do you kill him, if you can, or do you try to save him?
At this point, Weinberg's super Cinematical serum kicked in, and he went rampaging across Philly before we got to discuss producer Gale Ann Hurd's sequel talk. Hurd (who loves Hulk as much as Weinberg) is dying to make an Incredible Hulk too -- and revealed Tim Blake Nelson was mutating into The Leader, her pick for the next villain. "When I think of all the many, many, many villains in the Hulk universe, we've now done the Abomination, so wouldn't it be great to tackle the Leader? It's a completely different type of cerebral villain, which would give the movie a terrific new take on the character."
The floor is yours, readers. Feel free to disagree the Ang Lee hyperbole, our mutual love of Lee's comic book panels, run with this Leader idea, or throw in your two cents on Hulk vs Superman. Let's have some fun this week!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-28-2008 @ 1:10PM
Eric said...
I hated the incredible Hulk. I found it contrite. I loved Ang Lee Hulk. I know i am in the minority but the film is fascinating. It's like a onion there are so many layers to it. The more you watch the more you see.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 1:18PM
Kevin said...
Was the "moms meatloaf" comment a shout out to Futurama and diamondilium? I'm at work, so I can't check my DVD, but as soon as you said nothing can penetrate it I immediately thought of The Beast with a Billion Backs.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 1:51PM
Clark Parker said...
I was facinated by Ang Lee's Hulk. I loved every minute of it.
That said, this newer film fits in line with what Marvel is doing right now a lot better, so I'm inclined to side with it, simply because it sets a better tone for a crossover franchise. Personally, I think they should go down the Avenger's road first. Hulk is a great character and Norton has done a great job with him but with all the other Heroes that Marvel needs to get rolling, I think it best to hold off on a sequel for now and they should indeed use him as an if not THE antagonist in the Avengers film. Yes, he is a hero but as the beautiful scene in the thunderstorm pointed out, the rage does get the best of him and Elizibeth's idea about the "cure" causing more harm then good is a solid one. It will be a difficult task, creating an original plotline out of it, as they already covered the Hulk vs The Avengers in that animated film but it's a really strong idea and with the right tone, it could introduce a cool new dynamic to Superhero films... Sure, Supes fought himself in a junkyard, Spidey did a little dance and Gotham was left hating Batman but we have not really dug into the meat of that Good Man Gone Bad concept that comes so naturally to such a Jekyll & Hyde themed character.
Plus, it's just going to look SO cool when Cap does a running jump up Hulk's back and lands a powerful but ultimately ineffectual blow with his shield, or when Iron Man unleashes the full force of his blasters, searing Banner's flesh but not slowing him down.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 1:55PM
DAVID F said...
I like both but still was hoping for Steve Buscemi to play Banner. Ah well.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 4:08PM
Mijo Honzales said...
I thought The Incredible Hulk was bad because i just thought he looked terrible. I understand there is no way to make the Hulk look "real" but at least everything else on screen has to be. If you watch every time he is on screen the back ground is all fake. The trees, the sky its all CG. Watch Ang Lees Hulk and every frame he is on screen is so much better looking than the new Hulk. When the background needs to be fake it moves to a closer shot. But the wider shots are real or at least real looking. And i dont get why he is shiny and wet looking. Also whats with the Hulk Smash and Hulk Clap at the end. So effin cheesy it ridiculous. Someone was taking notes from 11yo playing the video game.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 4:39PM
Clark Parker said...
Or... Perhaps they were taking notes from decades worth of Hulk Comics. You can call it cheesy all you want, you can say it just didn't translate that well to the screen but really at the end of the day, you can't write it off as video game nonsense. It's who the character is, the clap and the catch phrase are a popular part of his legacy.
10-28-2008 @ 6:06PM
Julie said...
My meatloaf is buttery? Hulk eat. Hulk yum yum. Hulk can't fit if purple pants.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 8:06PM
Herff said...
Thank you Elizabeth, thank you Scott. This is one of my favorite posts in the short time I have been reading Cinematical. I think you should do more like it. It's a lot of fun to hear your thought processes.
Also I really appreciate the positive words for the first Hulk film. So many people I would talk to just plain hated it. It's nice to hear people who actually understood the film talk about it. That said I have a couple quick thoughts to add to the discussion.
There are two huge things that the second film did better than the first. The Villain was handled much better and the end fight was awesome and much more in the spirit of the Hulk. The original Hulk film is one of my favorite movies, but the very ending sucked the life out of a perfectly great film.
The second thing done right was they actually made a comic book movie. I love the first Hulk as much as anyone, but it is NOT a comic book movie. The only thing they did that made it like a comic book movie was the mind-blowing editing techniques. The new Hulk film may not have had the beautiful edits, but it told a comic book's story, which over all is more important.
And I have to agree that the intro sequence was perfect. I really think writers/directors need to learn from this film. Not every super hero/comic book movie needs a ridiculously long origin story. Some origin stories simply can't be shortened without losing the character, but there are a fair share of stories out there that would benefit from an intro similar to the new Hulk.
So as far as which one's better, I don't think its fair to compare them. I really like both of them for what they are.
As far as Hulk as THE villain, I say no way. But if you were to tell me the Hulk was being manipulated by a villain or villains, than I would say go for it. Hulk may be easily set off, but like Scott said, at heart Hulk is a hero.
Thanks again guys.
Reply
10-28-2008 @ 11:34PM
Brandon Barbin said...
I agree totally, the only thing i would add is that Hulk was a comic book movie it just wasn't true to the source material. I think that most of the people who didn't like TIH don't get the source material. Hulk sometimes does heroic things but he is not a true hero, he's a man with the most powerful being in the world deep inside of him and it happens to be a simpleton who doesn't understand the harm he sometimes causes hence the "monster" label. Now I am bias b/c next to Superman Hulk is my favorite comic character but I love the reboot and as far as him being the villain in The Avengers I like the idea if he the villain for the first half of the movie only until he captured by The Avengers and then he "redeems" himself when he is called upon to help them defeat Ultron.
10-29-2008 @ 6:54AM
Elisabeth said...
You're welcome, Herff -- and thank you for the nice comment. :D I had fun discussing Hulk at 2am with Scott. I definitely want to do another sometime...I'm actually getting "Can I join in?!" requests, so who knows who I'll haul in. :P
10-29-2008 @ 1:50AM
AJ Wiley said...
Very nice discussion.
The Hulk must be the villain in The Avengers...just like he was in the very first issue of the comic book (and when he went totally BATSHIT INSANE in The Ultimates).
Reply
10-29-2008 @ 6:58AM
Elisabeth said...
Oh yeah, isn't that where Hulk was eating people ... and they had to go through his, er, excrement? I meant to bring tease Scott with that and forgot (it being 2am). I'm with you, I think that Hulk would be pretty demented and cool to see onscreen.
10-29-2008 @ 7:49PM
Marc Kandel said...
never gonna happen considering now he's one of the golden geese of Marvel's cinema universe, so having him as an allegory for the WTC attacks, eating people, and roaring about how getting hit by Thor's hammer makes him horny for Betty, well...
Let's face it, if TIH wouldn't air the original opening where Banner tries to commit suicide in the Arctic b/c it was "too dark", I think there's scant chance they'll be showing any of the above.
That said, I love TIH, and I don't understand why people find it any less cerebral than Ang Lee's, which, though introspective, degenerated into endless seconds of navel gazing far too long, to the detriment of the points it was trying to make. In addition, Bana plays such a hollowed out cypher, its impossible to really empathize the way you could with Norton, whose Brazil sequences in the film are marvelous, and his overall performance is, though a tribute to Bill Bixby, effective in providing a more compassionate, good man then Bana's rather cold oddity.
And I preferred the smaller grittier hulk to Lee's ginormous dayglo beast.
And yes, the Hulk's skin density can repel most bullets, but Wolverine's claws and other weapons can penetrate, napalm can sear him- the problem is, the Hulk's healing factor is such that wounds close almost as the damage is being done. Okay, nerd moment over.
Reply