'Tintin' Getting Only Two Films?
Filed under: Classics, Foreign Language, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Deals, Paramount, Sony, Universal, Celebrities and Controversy, Distribution, Family Films, DIY/Filmmaking, Newsstand, Dreamworks, Steven Spielberg, Peter Jackson, Movie Marketing, Comic/Superhero/Geek
You might remember that at the end of September, word came that Steven Spielberg was having trouble financing his Tintin trilogy. Universal Studios had passed on the film, leaving Spielberg and co-director Peter Jackson without a major backer. According to Variety, they've found one. Sony and Paramount Studios are in talks to co-finance the franchise, with Sony handling the foreign release, and Paramount overseeing the domestic. DreamWorks will have no association with the film whatsoever.The news that Tintin will still go ahead is good for fans -- but as always, there's a catch. Under the deal currently being negotiated, it looks as though there will only be two Tintin films. Considering that a director was never assigned, or a script written, this may have been decided long before the financing fell through. Perhaps a third film hinges on the success of the first two installments, and its a project Spielberg and Jackson plan to return to. It's going to be a hard sell here in North America, where Tintin is largely unknown, and I wouldn't be surprised if Sony and Paramount are hedging their bets a little.
It's also unclear when this film will ever start shooting. When the deal fell apart with Universal, Spielberg lost the participation of his lead actor, Thomas Sangster. They're going to need another Tintin -- and fast, as the first film is still expected to make its 2010 release.
This is a passion project for Spielberg and Jackson -- and at this point, it's going to take every ounce of that enthusiasm to ever get a motion-capture Tintin on the big screen.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-02-2008 @ 7:39AM
Jim said...
A passion project? Really? Here are two directors I totally respect, committing a ton of time and resources to a cartoon most people here in the U.S. have never even heard of. I'm not dissing or discounting the international audience, but usually a property like this that has not one but two huge directors attached....well, you'd think it was something more people were familiar with like, gee, I don't know, The Lord of the Rings or something. I wonder if Peter Jackson is now wishing he didn't put Tintin on his plate so he could direct The Hobbit himself.
Reply
11-03-2008 @ 9:28AM
Bill said...
I admire it when directors do passion projects. That is when they do their best work (like Tim Burton's Ed Wood). If I were Jackson I'd be sick of Hobbits and do what I want. Likewise I'm sure Spielberg has no regrets. The guy can do anything he wants. Now I'm curious about Tintin and based on what I've read at wikipedia I think a cool movie could be made. Enough Hobbits already.
Reply
11-03-2008 @ 9:35AM
Kevin said...
Is Tintin really not that well known? I remember reading the comic when I was growing up, and it seemed like most of my friends at the time were doing the same. I don't think that its as popular or well known as Batman or something like that, but I thought it was fairly popular with people of my generation (24-35 year olds).
Reply
11-03-2008 @ 9:29PM
V.M.L. said...
I was born in the late 80s and raised throughout the 90s and I knew about TINTIN! Heck, it was on TV and I was aware of the comic series as well.
Reply