Cinematical Seven: Michael Crichton Movies
Filed under: Cinematical Seven
Mention the name Michael Crichton to a heavy reader, and they'll probably think of a very smart man who used real science as a springboard for some truly fantastic stories. Mention the name to a movie geek, and their reaction will probably depend on how old the movie geek is. First and foremost I believe Mr. Crichton will be remembered as the author of Jurassic Park, mainly because the book and the film were such massive hits all over the globe. But if you focus solely on the late Michael Crichton's cinematic output, you start to realize what a silly streak the smart man must have had.Looker (1981, screenwriter / director) -- Once again, a novel concept that's way past its expiration date in 2008, but it's about a plastic surgeon who slowly comes to discover a conspiracy involving computers, supermodels, and TV commercials.
Runaway (1984, screenwriter / director) -- What must have seemed like a futuristic techno-thriller at one point now looks like a hopelessly outdated piece of action-flick silliness. It's cyborg hunter Tom Selleck vs. Gene Simmons and his gang of robo-spiders! Crazy stuff. And MC was too smart a guy to not notice how goofy some of this stuff is...
The Great Train Robbery (1979, screenwriter / director) -- For my money this is (far and away) Crichton's finest directorial effort. (I rented the DVD from Netflix several years ago, sent it back, and bought a copy the next day. I love it.) It's a period piece, so the use of technology is of course limited, but that doesn't keep the movie from being smart, slick and quick. Plus Sean Connery and Donald Sutherland make a really entertaining team.
Coma (1978, writer / director) -- Adapted from the novel by Robin Cook, it's about a young doctor who slowly comes to discover a conspiracy involving surgeons, organs, and comas that shouldn't oughtta be happening. Like most of these movies, it feels more than a little dated, but still a fun enough med-thriller.
Westworld (1973, writer / director) -- Sort of like a very early version of Jurassic Park, only with a cowboy Yul Brynner instead of a cloned T. Rex. Richard Benjamin and James Brolin have to watch their keesters when a rogue robot targets them for demise. Crichton had little to do with the sequel (Futureworld), but did try to resurrect Westworld on TV in 1980. It didn't really take.
The 13th Warrior (1999, producer, novel, reshoots director) -- Call me crazy but I like this one. If you do as well, do yourself a favor and pick up Crichton's Eaters of the Dead, which is about 14 times better than this guilty pleasure of a Viking action flick.
The Terminal Man (1974, novel) -- Mike Hodges adapted and directed this version of Crichton's book, and (once again) it's a fascinating flick that suffers from the simple passage of a few decades. George Segal stars as a man with a strange mental imbalance who decides to let a microchip into his cranium. Not a great idea, obviously.
...and of course all sci-fi fans should check out Robert Wise's adaptation of Crichton's The Andromeda Strain, and of course you might want to skip the only flick that Crichton directed but didn't write. That would be the 1989 Burt Reynolds courtroom potboiler known as Physical Evidence. I know, it doesn't really fit in with most of Crichton's films. And the fact that I made it to the end of this piece without mentioning Twister, Congo, Disclosure, Sphere, Rising Sun, and Timeline is not an accident. Mainly because Michael Crichton didn't direct those films, but also because I don't like any of them. At all.
Again, everyone at Cinematical was truly bummed to hear about Mr. Crichton's passing at the age of 66. But hey, he left behind some solid films, a ton of books, and enough E/R episodes to fill a black hole. Rest in peace, sir.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-05-2008 @ 9:03PM
Cincinnati Mike said...
Man, I don't know why my parents let a 7-year-old (me) see Andromeda Strain, but that one messed me up! I haven't seen it in decades, and I wonder how it has held up. The premise (satellite falls to earth bringing freaky disease) is still plausible, I guess.
Reply
11-05-2008 @ 9:20PM
harry medved said...
classy post, Scott - nice to see folks remembering Crichton's work as a director! i fondly remember WESTWORLD and GREAT TRAIN ROBBERY...and thanks for holding off on mentioning those bad films adapted from his novels, as SPHERE and the others really weren't his fault...he will be missed by all movie buffs...
Reply
11-05-2008 @ 9:26PM
nick said...
I second 'the Great Train Robbery;' a terrific flick. On the DVD, Crichton gives one of the better commentaries I've heard. Very interesting and informative.
Reply
11-06-2008 @ 8:45AM
colby said...
I was actually a big fan of Congo.
Thought that Tim Curry, Ernie Hudson, Delroy Lindo, and specifically Joey Pants all turned in great performances.
Reply
11-06-2008 @ 9:08AM
Kevin said...
Agreed. Delroy Lindo especially. "Mr. Homolka, stop eating my sesame cake...STOP EATING MY SESAME CAKE!". Cracks me up everytime. Not a great movie, and certainly not as good as the book, but entertaining enough for what it was.
11-06-2008 @ 9:48AM
Ethan Rom said...
Runaway is a great cheesy movie. With those robot spiders shooting acid and the bullets that track people around corners.
Reply
11-06-2008 @ 10:47AM
EatingPie said...
What's interesting for me in this post is that I kept saying "THAT was Michael Crichton?!?"
I loved the Great Train Robbery as a kid, and had absolutely no idea it was Crichton. And while I didn't *love* Runaway, again no idea who it was -- though with Looker and Terminal man, it fits a mould.
I want to comment on Jurassic Park -- a movie and book whose *story* I hated, but whose book's *theme* is extremely timely and important. (SPOILERS FOR BOOK.)
Jurrasic Park is about the *lack of morality* in science. We pursue science for science sake, and put (almost) no moral or ethical boundaries upon it. We don't weigh the consequences. The "pooh-poohing" of the concerns about the Large Hadron Collider are a great case in point -- sure, there probably is no danger, but scientists don't *know* but scoff publicly at naysayers.
In the novel (the original only, not sequels), it was clear that this dabbling in biology we didn't understand -- for science! -- ultimately led to the end of the world.
Crichton worked at the Salk Institute when he wrote Andromeda, so he would be intimately aware of morality/ethics and science. And Jurassic Park makes the case *for* morality/ethics in science. (Human cloning is the *only* example of morality in science, but even then there are groups pursuing it anyway.)
We should not just pursue science for science sake; we need to weigh the consequences beforehand, and that should temper our pursuits. Wise advice, sadly ignored at large, even to this day.
-Pie
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 12:13PM
Jim said...
Timely? End of the world? What book did you read? Please, yes, like most Crichton's work, it was a statement against excess. But NOWHERE does the book suggest the end of the world. So please, make sure you read before you type...
11-07-2008 @ 12:22PM
EatingPie said...
I said "implied" the end of the world.
The dinosaurs have escaped the island, and after such a big deal being made of isolating them to protect the world's ecosystem and whatnot, we see what a disaster this is. Indeed, after the slaughter that occurred on the Island, we see what a disaster this is.
The book ends with hints of them spreading, and only beginning to cause havoc. The *implication* is that this is, as I said, only the beginning of a wider problem that will lead to the destruction of the world's current ecosystem, and possibly mankind with it.
Yeah, I read the book... and understood it too. Sheesh.
-Pie
11-06-2008 @ 11:30AM
Kurt said...
I enjoyed Congo and Sphere, although I acknowledge that they are lackluster cinema. But I loved the performances in Congo, particularly Ernie Hudson's.
Also, fun bit of trivia a la Trivial Pursuit: Crichton was originally hired to adapt The Terminal Man but was fired from the project because he departed from the novel too greatly.
Reply
11-06-2008 @ 11:31AM
Kurt said...
Oh yeah, and if you haven't read A Case of Need, do so. I've always thought it would make an excellent film.
Reply
11-06-2008 @ 11:48AM
TheFamousEccles said...
Actually, "A Case of Need" was adapted into "The Carey Treatment," which Blake Edwards directed.
Reply
11-06-2008 @ 1:12PM
Fortran said...
FYI, folks, "The Great Train Robbery" is up on Hulu. Woo! Who needs to work now!?
Reply
11-06-2008 @ 5:52PM
gottacook said...
It's kind of obscure, but if you can find it, there's a 1972 movie adaptation of Dealing: Or the Berkeley-to-Boston Forty-Brick Lost-Bag Blues, the early comic novel by Crichton and his brother Douglas writing as "Michael Douglas".
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 10:50AM
MC said...
I happen to like Twister. Yes, I know it's a bad movie, but it's one of the best bad movies there is.
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 9:33PM
David Hollingsworth said...
Call me crazy, but for some reason, I actually liked Runaway, plus, even though they were robotic, the spiders in that movie still scared me.
Anyway, God Bless You, Mr. Crichton, and you will definitely be missed.
Reply
11-08-2008 @ 1:30AM
Chris said...
I liked Runaway too. Was it cheesy? Sure... but in that fun 80's way. Also, any movie where Gene Simmons plays the bad guy can't be all bad!
Reply
11-08-2008 @ 1:52PM
Catherine said...
For the third time this year, an author has passed away while I was reading one of his books. I'm starting to feel creepy. I love many of MC's books and some of the films he was involved with in one way or another. It's a shame he passed away at a relatively young age.
Reply
11-11-2008 @ 2:24AM
Scott Weinberg said...
Thanks for all the feedback, folks.
Reply