'Oldboy' Remake Regains Speed with Spielberg and Smith?!
Filed under: Drama, Foreign Language, Thrillers, Casting, Deals, Remakes and Sequels
Holy crap! Just when you think there's no chance... Back in January of 2007, Jessica posted about the woes of the impending Oldboy remake. Director Justin Lin was backing out of the project, and it looked like the whole thing would dissolve into development hell. And it did.But now it might be getting one hell of a Hollywood power-team behind it. Variety reports that Tinseltown bigwigs Steven Spielberg and Will Smith are circling the project. DreamWorks is working on getting the rights, Universal will distribute it, I imagine Spielberg will helm it, and Smith will play the lead ... if everything works out.
If you've missed the original by Chan-wook Park, Oldboy centers on a man who is kidnapped and imprisoned in a cell for 15 years with no explanation, until he is released one day and given a cell phone, money, and clothes. He then sets out to discover what happened and get his revenge.
It'll be great, meaty material for Smith, but I don't know if a big, mainstream project is the way to go. Then again, at least it will probably barely resemble the original. What do you think? Should the project have stayed in limbo, or are Spielberg and Smith the men to make it happen?









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-07-2008 @ 10:20AM
Harless? said...
Chan-Wook Parks original is a great movie and does not need a remake. I don't think Smith lends himself to the role (maybe if he give Hancock a sadistic streak) and I don't think Spielberg can handle the violence. Also, Senor Spielbergo has a tendency to change endings to be lighter and more hopeful; I would be interested to see what he does, but not hopeful about it being any good.
Stop remaking movies, and start making new ones.
For anyone who is interested and like Oldboy, it is part of a thematic trilogy about revenge. Both Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance and Lady Vengeance are both worth checking out. I greatly enjoyed Chan-Wook Parks style and directing.
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 10:35AM
Whyremake said...
I agree!!! Parks orginial would blow any American movie out of the water. To make an American remake would spell disaster for this movie and its overall concept. Hollywood would never allow the outcome of the orginial to be remade. It would not work for most American movie goers. I say let the movie stay in its orginial format and find something else to wreck. It is a shame that Hollywood must prey on foreign cinema or old time brilliant films in order to make movies in this day and time. How many movies have come out in the past two years that are remakes. Where is the originality in Hollywood???
12-03-2008 @ 2:51PM
Jeff said...
Thank you! I was so afraid that there wouldn't be anyone out there that enjoyed those movies as much as I did. I agree with everything you said. Also, J.S.A, I'm a Cyborg, great titles.
11-07-2008 @ 10:29AM
Herff said...
I consider this a horrible idea.
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 11:12AM
ML said...
WHAT?!
This should be interesting ... Yeah, when I saw Oldboy, I thought, "This material deserves the Spielberg touch!"
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 11:43AM
ICON! said...
WHAT!!...WHAT!!! JESUSSSSSS NOOOOO!!!! *tears*..not Chan wook-parks work! why lord must we be torchered with remakes....The Vengance trilogy was utterly amazing, and needs no rework in anyway, shape, or form. This just makes me sick, To top it all off you are going to put Speilberg at the helm and then have that pile of crap Smith play the lead!! WHAT!! have they not seen the original, this totally does not work! ML your a loser " Speilberg touch"...what? HOLLYWOOD HAS OFFICIALLY SOLD ITS SOUL TO THE DEVIL!! harless? and whyremake, both got it right!! preying on great foriegn cinema.....everything is a remake today...evrything.
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 12:17PM
J Bryant said...
ICON, I'm pretty sure that ML was being sarcastic with his "Spielberg touch" comment.
I consider OLDBOY to be one of the most visceral, emotionally exhausting, and amazing films ever made.
So, the only way, and I mean the only way, this remake would work is if they go 100% with it. I mean, remake OLDBOY completely. Don't water it down for American audiences, don't change the plot around. Do a straight remake with Will Smith and Spielberg behind the camera. Leave the finale in tact (tounge cutting and all the plot twists), have Will eat a live octopus and rip peoples teeth out with a hammer.Think about it. Think about all the nice middle Americans who would go and see this flick expecting a nice Spielbergian/Mr 4th Of July summer blockbuster, and then get hit with OLDBOY. Somehow, the thought of a straight-up remake with those two and the poor unsuspecting audiences watching it makes me smile.
But, if they're gonna just water it down then why bother? It'd be a waste of time.
11-07-2008 @ 12:30PM
Kevin said...
Just out of curiousity, but how does a remake tarnish the original? I mean, if the original is great, then how does making another one make that a lesser movie? Rocky was a great film, and while the 3rd and 4th were certainly lesser films that doesn't make the first one worse. A remake is an entirely different movie, with no relationship to the original besides being based of its premises. I would agree that this would ruin the first one if they went back and rounded up all the copies of the original and re-edited it so that you could never see it. But if this movie sucks than just throw the original on your DVD and re-recognize the greatness of it. Great remakes allow you to appreciate the stories timelessness, crappy ones make you appreciate how truly special the original was, but great/good/or horrible they do nothing to to the original.
Having said that, I do wish Hollywood could come up with some new ideas just so there'd be more originality on the screen. All I'm saying is that don't worry about how remakes affect the movies they're based on, because they really don't.
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 2:00PM
Harless? said...
Kevin, while I agree it doesn't directly affect the original movie, remakes can have some negative consequences. When remaking modern foreign movies, studios tend not to promote the source material and allow people to think it is an original. They don't plagiarize, but they are slow to acknowledge it's a remake. For example, when "the Departed" came out a lot of people I talked to had no idea it was a remake. My copy of "Infernal Affairs" never got so much play, as I tried to show everyone the original movie. Also, in the case of "The Departed," they completely changed the tone of the movie and the ending. While this worked for their movie, it forces people who have not seen the original to look at that movie differently. I am sadden to think a bunch of naive film goers will see the American "Oldboy" and not be able to experience the Korean version with fresh eyes (i.e. without already knowing Speilbergs interpretation). A remake doesn't ruin the original movie for those who have seen it, but it could ruin the movie for people who haven't.
I would so much rather see Speilberg support and promote Asian cinema than continue to pilfer it for ideas. Instead of remaking "Oldboy" why not pay for it to have a wider rerelease. Get people to expand their horizons.
Just tired of Hollywood remaking my favorite movies and then having to defend the originals to casual film fans.
11-07-2008 @ 2:44PM
Kevin said...
Excellent points. However, I would contend that while the remake may color others interpretations of the original if they haven't seen it yet any other life experience would do the same. For example, I can't watch the matrix without thinking of the terminator. Does that make the matrix less of a great film? No, they stand on their own despite their similarities. So while a remake may be a reimagining of the same story, it is still a seperate entity that should be judged on its own merits alone. One thing that I would argue is great about remakes (perhaps the only thing...again, I'm not a fan of remaking movies, just arguing that it doesn't tarnish the original) is that it brings attention to often unknown films. Take your example of the departed. I'm sure that a large number of fans of that movie were so jazzed up about it that they went out and ordered/rented/bought Infernal Affairs, thereby opening that movie up to a market that had never even heard of it and never would have. While they may view it in a different light then you due to their different background with the plot, the fact remains that they will still view it. As with Oldboy, I had never heard of this movie. But I'm intrigued, and will try to track down a copy of it. I NEVER would have heard of this movie if it wasn't for the rumors of a remake, so the movie actually stands to gain considerably due to this exposure. Some of the classic sci fi movies that cinematical has talked about that are being remade will get the same treatment.
Lastly, just wanted to commend the cinematical readers for being so awesome. The forums on here are (almost) always extremely respectful and lead to interesting discussions. I only mention that because I just commented on a clip on youtube, and looking at the behavior of people on that site is pretty shocking. Way to go fellow readers, keep it up!
11-07-2008 @ 12:32PM
jonathan said...
i do not think there is anyway to get the awesome hysteria from the first one within a remake.
I dont think spielberg or smith can do anything but fuck it up. Spielberg will do something stupid to it, like try and make it a normal story. Smith will act it out, but never go the down the path of the original.
Spielberg needs to work on something original right now. No remakes. Smith is one of those actors who would never go this far for a film. He wants a family to see his films.
If they both go for it, balls to the wall, saying fuck you to hollywood - i still think its a bad idea. it's unsafe, and while everyone should be risky, these hollywood moguls may never regain the comfort they usually hold within this industry.
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 1:01PM
Adam said...
I just vomited. In other news this movie may be ok. After "The Departed" I'm gonna have faith that this remake may work. If they make it more a an Americanized interpretation rather than a straight up remake it should be ok. They probably will have to do that anyway because calling the subject matter taboo in america would be a vast understatement. As long as they keep the surreal visuals and the side scrolling long take I'll check it out
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 1:35PM
kyle s said...
THERE GONNA RAPE HIM!
Reply
11-07-2008 @ 3:06PM
Chris Nolan.ca said...
I wonder if it'll be more faithful to the original material? Not Park's film, but the manga by Garon Tsuchiya and Nobuaki Minegishi?
http://apps.facebook.com/comicbooks/titles/old-boy-tp-2006
Reply
11-11-2008 @ 2:09PM
mrsticky005 said...
Alright!
Someone who knows about the manga too.
I hope they base it off the manga and NOT the movie.
The manga is way better than the movie.
I'm not just saying that because the manga came first
but because the manga actually has some plot.
The movie was totally just a kill-fest, let's see how many people
we can kill in this film? The movie isn't terrible but it's not the
great piece of art that some claim it is.
The manga is believe it or not not nearly as violent but it doesn't
need to be. The intelligence of plot is what makes the original
Oldboy (that would be the manga) so great, it doesn't need
a bunch of senseless violence. Not that having violence in a movie is bad, and sometimes senseless violence is good
but most of the time there should be some kind of point to
the violence--and not just one from the tip of the knife.
The Oldboy film reminds me of the manga Ichi the Killer.
At first it seems interesting and that it's not one of those stupid politically correct movies. But then after a while the violence gets repetitive and even boring. If I want a few hours of senseless violence I'll play some violent video game or
something. If I'm watching a movie I want some actual plot.
and all those people thinking that Oh Dae Su fucking
his daughter or whatever as art--it's not.
First of all, in the manga, that does NOT happen
(if it does and I'm wrong feel free to correct me)
What happens in the manga is this-
Shinichi Goto (which is Oldboy's REAL name--not "Oh Dae Su" or what should be called "Oh Damn Shit!")
meets some random chick soon after being released from his secret prison. Goto had an old girlfriend but since he has been locked up for 15 years--she probably thinks he's dead.
So anywho it's not very long before the random girl
is like "Hi, nice to meet you, let's have sex" (not exactly like that but it might as well been) and of course Shinichi agrees.
Then after they do it, we find out that the girl was a virgin
and just was really desperate. Really there was no point
to the whole scene, and it was incredibly unrealistic.
The scene was only done because--it's a seinen manga.
Adult males are reading it and apparently sex sells.
Same thing with the film, my guess is that the film director
thought having Oh Dae Su sleep with his daughter be even
more "controversial" but really it's just pointless and dumb.
In conclusion Oh Dae Su is totally inferior to Shinichi Goto.
11-07-2008 @ 5:25PM
Michael said...
what are we worrying about here people!, the movie has a HAPPY ending!
Reply
11-08-2008 @ 2:15AM
Nighthawk said...
The remake won't top the classic original.
Reply
11-08-2008 @ 3:38AM
YouFaceTheTick said...
So I guess I'm the only one who found Oldboy to be odious, tedious and interminable? No matter how charming Smith is, this is hard to believe. They're not gonna re-make a movie with mutilation, incest and savagery.
Someone brought up The Departed and it's a darn good point. The American remake of Infernal Affairs was a lesser film in every single way - lacking any sense, emotional impact or quality. The Departed stands as a film that sucks from beginning to end, even without knowledge of the superior Infernal Affairs.
Reply
11-08-2008 @ 8:45AM
polotek99 said...
The original film was really disturbing. I can't see Will Smith being attached to something like that. Which means he and Spielberg will probably remove the teeth from the film. So it'll look really interesting but the payoff will greatly disappoint.
Reply
11-08-2008 @ 10:04AM
Beeslo said...
This movie will be very watered down for censors. Kinda surprised the original managed a "R" from the MPAA when it go its limited release here, but there is no way we will see horrific "amateur dentistry with a hammer" scene followed by the "absolutely obliterating people in a cramped hallway with said hammer" scene in an American version...directed by Spielberg.
Reply