Ten Things You Should Know About 'Star Trek'
Filed under: Action, Classics, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Paramount, Fandom, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

(Note: This evening, Cinematical screened a whole bunch of footage from J.J. Abrams' Star Trek in New York City. We'll have a breakdown of scenes screened, our thoughts and some words from Abrams himself real soon. In the meantime, here's a little Trek guide for you newbies out there.)
By now, you've probably seen the leaked trailer for J.J. Abrams' reinvention of Star Trek. Hopefully, as you're reading this, you will probably have seen a shiny official version. This is supposed to be Trek for a new generation, a movie that reintroduces the original characters of Kirk and Spock to people who have only seen Trek through watered down sequels and spin-offs. As impossible as it seems, there are people who find all things Trek a mystery -- and when our beloved editor, Erik Davis, asked me to put together a guide, I found myself in a bit of a panic. I began asking my Trekkie friends what they would tell a newbie -- and since we all arrived at roughly these same ten facts, I feel less silly sharing them. If you're new to the final frontier, read on. If you've been wearing your Spock ears since preschool, just go watch the trailer again.
Fact #1: Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry modeled the show on Gulliver's Travels, wanting each episode to be both an exciting adventure and a social parable. The show tackled all kinds of 60s social issues -- feminism, racism, ecology, religion, the Cold War, and Vietnam. Perhaps the biggest hurdle facing Abrams' film is whether or not it can attain that same level of social awareness. Will the new Trek film make a commentary on anything, or will it be nothing but empty action in the name of rebooting?
Continued after the jump...
Fact #1: Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry modeled the show on Gulliver's Travels, wanting each episode to be both an exciting adventure and a social parable. The show tackled all kinds of 60s social issues -- feminism, racism, ecology, religion, the Cold War, and Vietnam. Perhaps the biggest hurdle facing Abrams' film is whether or not it can attain that same level of social awareness. Will the new Trek film make a commentary on anything, or will it be nothing but empty action in the name of rebooting?
Continued after the jump...
Fact #2: The cast was a television landmark, with a black woman and Asian man in prominent roles -- and it featured the first interracial kiss in history between that black woman, Lt. Uhura, and Captain Kirk. The ongoing message of the show was that humanity would overcome racial and social barriers to reach the stars. It's a message that's still relevant today, a positivity that keeps legions of fans (many of them outcasts of some sort) telling each other to "Live long and prosper." While it's no longer shocking to see interracial couples or Asian characters, television and film still lack strong roles for women and minorities. I'm hoping that while Abrams brought the Trek miniskirt back, he remembers to give Uhura some badass moments.
Fact #3: Captain Kirk was not the original captain of the U.S.S. Enterprise. That honor fell to Captain Christopher Pike (played by Jeffery Hunter), who appeared in the pilot episode. However, Hunter was uninterested in continuing the series, and a new character was introduced in his place. And thus, the world became richer for having known Captain James Tiberius Kirk -- and Star Trek mythology used a casting change to create some interesting storylines, something that Abrams seems to really run with. The voice you hear suggesting that Kirk contemplate Starfleet is that of Pike, a story decision that is bound to rile continuity fans.
Fact # 4: Kirk was based on C.S. Forester's Horatio Hornblower, I would argue that the unhappy Napoleonic captain ended up having far less of an impact on Kirk's character than the Kobayashi Maru test did. This was a Starfleet test that all cadets were doomed to fail, presenting an unwinnable scenario that tested them on the content of their character rather than their tactical decisions. After taking it three times, Kirk rewired the computer in order to win ... and was rewarded for it. It's moves like this that make him the youngest Starfleet captain, and win him all the ladies. We know Pike and Kobayashi Maru both figure in Abrams' movie -- and either could be why Spock isn't too keen on Kirk in the trailer.
Fact #5: Though famed for his cool logic and unflappable cool, Spock was actually a rebel and an outcast. He's half Vulcan and half human, a lineage which earned him no end of harassment in childhood. While Abrams' trailer begins with a young Kirk breaking the rules, in the series, it was Spock who had the wayward childhood. (He did worse than wrecking a car -- he lost his childhood pet!) While losing his childhood pet inspired him to follow the Vulcan path of logic and emotional self control, his human side flares up in a talent for occasional lying and exaggerating. Zachary Quinto certainly looks the part, but will he get to tackle the complexities of Spock's character? Will he be too emotional? Too stiff and Vulcan? We shall see.
Fact #6: Star Trek never demonizes its enemies. The Enterprise crew may not have liked their adversaries, but Trek lacked a bloodthirsty side, and there was never talk of an "axis of evil" or annihilation. Kirk felt admiration for and grief at the death of a Romulan captain in one episode, "Balance of Terror," and the Romulan captain shared the sentiment with his final words. "In a different reality, I could have called you friend." The Trek crew even worked with the Klingons to defeat an alien entity. Will the new Star Trek feel a similar compassion for Eric Bana's sinister Nero? Or will this enlightenment be abandoned in favor of having a clear cut villain?
Fact #7: Trek was never about technology -- despite its beaming technology and warp drive, the original series generally insisted that it was the human values like loyalty, compassion and love of freedom that would have the most influence. Kirk even talked computers into the equivalent of a nervous breakdown, proving logic alone could not meet human needs. In one episode, the capacity for self-sacrifice to save others determined the survival of a race. And technological breakdowns often moved the plots, suggesting that technology made a good servant, but a poor master. Will the i-Bridge keep up that tradition, or will sleek technology rule Abrams Trek?
Fact #8: At first glance, the trailer seems to suggest that the recast Enterprise crew are a bunch of rebellious and wacky characters who will be forced to come together -- an image at odds with their peaceful and orderly 60s versions. But really, the Enterprise crew was always willing to go against authority, particularly in the later movies where they stole the Enterprise and broke all kinds of Starfleet rules.
Fact #9: And speaking of rules -- the guiding rule of Star Trek is the Prime Directive, which dictates that there can be no interference with the internal affairs of other civilizations. Special care is supposed to be taken with civilizations that haven't developed interstellar space flight, for fear of messing up their natural development. Of course, the Prime Directive is violated all the freaking time. Often, this serves as a poignant reminder that lesser civilizations are inevitably destroyed when they come in contact with advanced technology. Other times, it just shows how badass and rule-bending the crew of the Enterprise is.
Fact #10: Trek invented geekdom. Without Star Trek, I really believe there would be no geeks. Sure, people would still dig sci-fi and read comic books, but the fanaticism and dedication that marks true nerdery was born when fans were challenged to boldly go where no man had gone before. Is it possible to reinvent something that spawned an entire culture?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-17-2008 @ 10:30PM
Kevin said...
This movie is going to ROCK!!! I just looked at the Star Trek IMDB and found out that the son of the original Scotty, Chris Doohan has a role in the movie. How cool is that!!
Reply
11-17-2008 @ 11:14PM
chris said...
Great post Elizabeth. Just a couple things. Actually, we also have NBC to thank for James T. Kirk because when the network saw the original first pilot of Star Trek, called "The Cage", which starred Jeffery Hunter and Susan Oliver, they didn't like it much. So, they ordered a second pilot which eventually became 'Where No Man Has Gone Before" and starred William Shatner as Kirk and featured Leonard Nimoy as Spock, one of only two cast members from "The Cage" to make it to the series -- he other being Majel Barrett.
Later, the footage from "The Cage" was used as part of the two part episode "The Menagerie" wherin Spock, out of loyalty to Captain Pike, his first Captain, steals the Enterprise to take Pike to a planet Starfleet forbids people to go to, and faces a court martial for doing so.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 3:29PM
brian said...
I personally don't think it will be any good. I never liked the Next Generation or the drivel that followed. To me Trek ended with the animated series. A lot of people who grew up with the Next Generation have been totally brainwashed. I've always thought Farscape should have gotten more respect than it did. It was new, exciting and most of all original. That aside I must confess to being a rabid BattleStar Galactica fan. That's one makeover I really approve of.
This new Trek should be so lucky.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 1:39AM
Julie said...
I know how you sweated this article. Good job! Now if the new movie will deliver as well.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 3:36AM
boborci said...
10 great points. Agree with them all.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 9:01AM
Reedo said...
Great article. I just feel compelled to mention that C.S. Forester wrote "Horatio Hornblower," not E.M. Forster.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 9:04AM
Elisabeth said...
Ah, crap. I'd like to defend myself and say it's because I'm sick and haven't slept in days, but there's no excuse...I have Hornblower sitting on my bookshelf right next to my desk. I love that series, but had to go and insult C.S. Forester!
11-18-2008 @ 9:09AM
Reedo said...
Well, you get points for writing a perceptive take on "Star Trek." Still, you did do a double-whammy, attributing C.S. Forester's work to E.M. Forster while spelling E.M. Forster's name wrong...tsk.
I only wonder how important it is that the film have some social commentary (#1). As a rule, the show definitely did, but the films always were more about fun. I mean, yes, they had some light environmental overtones in II-IV, and VI was very of Cold War politics, but nothing revolutionary.
11-18-2008 @ 10:04AM
Xander said...
It was my understanding that Trek was based more on WAGON TRAIL than GULLIVER, but it could be a mashup of both. I'm less concerned with the film making the cast to be young rebels -- they were old rebels in the movies -- than the logistics of having a group of recent Starfleet grads being allowed to run the fleet's prize ship. There are also other continuity quibbles -- it was made pretty clear that Spock was the only Kirk crewmember to have served with Pike, and it was also heavily hinted that Pike was the SECOND captain of the Enterprise, preceded by Robert April (who actually only appeared in an episode of the short-lived animated series, but was referenced in most ST approved guides and such). And, not to dork out too much, but how does an ensign (or, a lieutenant, if that's Kirk's entry rank) leap over a number of senior officers to become first officer and eventually captain? Just seems a bit random. Still, these are minor concerns as long as the movie kicks ass.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 12:26PM
Moo said...
excellent post, Elisabeth. Couldn't agree more. And on number 10...I never really thought of it that way, but you're right. Talk about a load of pressure on Abrams' shoulders...
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 12:46PM
Cincinnati Mike said...
I'm not a big Roddenberry fan, but he did have a knack for challenging contemporary norms by way of a futuristic premise. But he knew the limits, too. So, while he did show the first interracial kiss, he was careful to have it forced upon Kirk and Uhura by evil, mind-controlling aliens.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 3:22PM
Bryan Price said...
I thought Hunter was dropped because he got killed falling down stairs in France before the second pilot could be shot?
It's been awhile, so I may have the timing wrong. As as you know, timing is everything.
And remember Spock actually smiling in "The Cage"?
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 6:52PM
Charles H. Root, III said...
How would filmakers JJ, Orci and Kurtzman like it if we messed up their timeline by introducing their parents to birth control?
And c’mon guys… Captain Kirk drinks Budweiser? Are they wearing Rolex watches, Nike Space Marine combat boots and Microsoft Zune tricorders? Is there a McDonald’s space station with drive-thru docking port too?
Sorry, but not digging the new Enterprise inside or out. And what’s up with the exposed plexiglass printed circuit board looking things on the bridge? You would never do that with a mission critical system. It’s like putting the motherboard on the outside of your PowerBook, duh. It looks cheesier than the Lost In Space remake. Or Galaxy Quest.
I bet these guys would make the actors work in front of a green screen to do their scenes with CG’d tribbles that, oh by the way, now have a single eye that extends from an ocular pouch that we didn’t know about until now.
It’s also interesting to note how they’ve circled the wagons in an attempt to bolster credibility and appear as nice guys by enlisting Nimoy, James Cawley and the late Dr. Randy Pausch.
Which reminds me of the old Abraham Lincoln story:
Abraham Lincoln posed this question: “How many legs does a dog have?” The reply of course was four.
Lincoln asked, “If we call the tail a leg, then how many legs does a dog have?” The reply: Five.
“No,” Lincoln said, “Just because you call a tail a leg doesn’t make it so.”
Well guys, just because you call it Star Trek doesn’t make it so.
I wish JJ would open up that damn silly Mystery Box he’s always spewing about. Perhaps he’ll find a clue inside.
Otherwise, the box of really, really dead Sea Monkeys in there deserve a proper burial.
Reply
11-18-2008 @ 10:30PM
LA_Takedown said...
" Often, this serves as a poignant reminder that lesser civilizations are inevitably destroyed when they come in contact with advanced technology. "
Doesn't seem to be working for America nowadays, does it ?
Reply