Did You Know 'The Transporter' Was Gay? Well, He Isn't Anymore
Filed under: Action, RumorMonger, Fandom, Comic/Superhero/Geek
Fans of the Transporter films aren't usually looking for a lot of subtlety and nuance, not unless those are codewords for "butt-kicking" and "car crashes." But Louis Leterrier, the whimsical Frenchman who directed the second film and co-directed the first one, said in 2005 that he had a subtext in mind for Jason Statham's title character: He was gay.Chris Lee writes at the Los Angeles Times' fanboy blog that three years ago, when Transporter 2 came out, well, so did Frank Martin. According to Lee, Leterrier pointed to the scene where Frank turns down a romantic advance from Amber Valletta by saying, "It's because of who I am." Leterrier said, "That's him coming out!"
"If you watch the movie and you know he's gay, it becomes so much more fun," Lee quotes Leterrier as saying in 2005. "It's so great -- the first gay action movie hero! ... Action fans in general are pretty homophobic. You see these tough guys who say, 'The Transporter, that's such a great movie!' If they only knew they're really cheering for a new kind of action hero."
Statham didn't pay much attention to his director's comments, telling Lee in 2005, "It's just Lou-Lou trying to be funny. Although he did say, 'In Part 2, you will become the gay icon.'" That part might have come true, as Statham's many shirtless scenes made him popular in certain quarters, even if the character himself wasn't overtly gay.
Olivier Megaton, the fake-name-using, franchise-ruining director of the abysmal new Transporter 3, apparently didn't get the memo at all. His film has Frank hooking up with a petulant, morose, highly irritating Russian woman, so Lee asked Leterrier for his reaction. (Maybe it's just a phase! Maybe it's only to get his mother off his back!) Leterrier seemed to recant on his original vision. "I was sick over the weekend and my two Transporters were on, so I watched them, and in fact they aren't that gay," Leterrier wrote in an e-mail to Lee. "But it makes for fun movie legends."
As Dumbledore fans can tell you, outing a character after the fact doesn't count, and it counts even less when the outing is followed by a de-outing. Besides, playing a joke on homophobes by making them love a gay hero only works if the character is actually gay, not just gay in your imagination. Until such a character emerges, proponents of gay heroes will have to content themselves with their Harvey Milk action figures.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-02-2008 @ 9:54AM
Yatrix said...
I really, really, really am getting sick of this gay garbage. How is it "so cool" that he's gay? Gimme a break. Being gay has no bearing on the movie, so let's just let that crap stay in the closet where it belongs.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:05AM
Ryan said...
Ok, I'm lost. Didn't he sleep with the girl in the first movie? How is he gay?
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 1:02PM
DylanG said...
Yeah, that makes no sense. He was never gay. I noticed he was always akward around women, but really there was nothing to suggest he was gay. In the first film he slept with the Asian girl and in the second film he seemed incredibly close to going after that woman at the end of the film. Sure, he turned her down once, but doesn't Leterrier remember that whole ending scene with the flowers? If he was gay, why was that scene in the movie.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:27PM
monstermac said...
Just to be a jackass about this : I figure you could have people sleeping around with girls all the time, and they'd STILL be gay. I mean, didn't Top Gun ( and Tom Cruise ) and reality show us that ?
I'm a lot more wary about them overstimulated, horny macho pricks. They're more than likely psychologically to ' try some ', as it usually happens. Especially nowadays, with the emasculation in these times; that things like ' No Country For Old Men ', and ' The Dark Knight ' and Rambo 4 stand as stern, welcome backlash . And vote for something Proposition 8 . Yeech.
Its shit like this and Frank Miller's 300 that's ruining action films for everyone ( and proper machismo, for that matter ). They come at stuff like that from the most wrong of places - that of propped-up,sissy-ass ' Freudian ' chauvinism as will-to-power, thus tend to reduce it all to a ' penile ' thing. Well, here's news to you, Mark Foley shits : it's NOT about dick, scrawny pussies ! it's about brutally shooting, and maiming, beating up the bad guys and standing up for the principles. And blowing shit up. Stuff that makes real men, and REAL PEOPLE. Dumbfucks.
Look at the current purveyors of this stuff : Zach Snyder, Frank Miller, Lev Grossman. Silly little nerds playing ' jocks ' , and hating on their own for not being ' jock ' enough like them neo-con big shots. These weasels couldn't hold a candle to people like Howard Hawks, John McTiernan - and even Kathryn Bigelow ! Why the fuck they even fucking bother ?!?
Shame for Louise Letterier to spout crap like that, after having rescued the Hulk from navel-gazing, Brokeback Mountain effete mess. That shit ain't right. But then again, it was 2005....
__
If you are not of the temperament of Death Wish, then you ought to fucking leave.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:35PM
monstermac said...
Sam Peckinpah would have punched him in the mouth . I'm sayin', don't be so too damn reckless.
Reply
12-03-2008 @ 11:17AM
Thom said...
"Yatrix said...
I really, really, really am getting sick of this gay garbage. How is it "so cool" that he's gay? Gimme a break. Being gay has no bearing on the movie, so let's just let that crap stay in the closet where it belongs."
If it has no bearing on the movie, why do you care about it staying in the closet where it 'belongs?'
I mean, other than the fact that you're a homophobic dipshit with the logical reasoning skills of a goldfish after a stroke.
Reply
12-03-2008 @ 7:59PM
K said...
What Dumbledore fans are these?
Reply