'X-Files' Producer Blames 'Dark Knight' for Poor Performance
Filed under: Horror, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Box Office, Fandom, Newsstand, Remakes and Sequels
Silly us X-Files fans trying to rationalize why The X-Files: I Want to Believe crashed and burned so badly this summer. It was too thoughtful! Too character-driven! Too focused on giving fans emotional closure, and not enough on slam-bang summer excitement! Long-time franchise producer Frank Spotnitz has a much easier and quicker answer: It was The Dark Knight's fault.His theory goes thus: The X-Files opened a week after The Dark Knight broke all sorts of records and began its domination of the summer box office. What's more, the dark and brooding film was similar in tone to the caped juggernaut, and not the sort of counterprogramming that might nonetheless have had a chance in its wake. And so you get $21 million domestic.
Look, I'm probably as big a fan of I Want to Believe as you'll find around these parts; for fans of the show it was a lovely, moving conclusion. For fans of the show. The commercial problem with the film wasn't that it was too dark or that it followed The Dark Knight, but that it was too small, and its appeal too narrow. A bigger, flashier X-Files, with more explosions and flying saucers, would have done better, Batman notwithstanding. As it stood, people who didn't grow up on Mulder and Scully didn't see a reason to go. And -- speaking, again, as someone who loves the film -- they probably made the right choice. There wasn't much there for them.
Oh, and as to the possibility of another film that Spotnitz vaguely suggests: no thank you. This was a graceful, satisfying finale.
[via Movie City News]









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-02-2008 @ 10:30AM
techstar25 said...
Spotnitz talked with bloody-disgusting just the other day and gave much more information, and some real hope for another film. That Sun article you linked to was pretty light on the details.
See here:
http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/14465
For instance, regarding the future of the franchise he says:
"I think there very well could be more in the future," he reveals to Bloody-Disgusting. "The studio has not indicated another one yet, but there certainly is an audience for it. I think what happened this past summer was a function of bad luck and bad timing with the release. These movies cost a lot of money, not just to make but to market them as well. When the studio looks at the sales of the DVD that’s when they will really decide to see if its worth risking. There is still a lot of love with 20th Century Fox, as well as with the fans."
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:33AM
techstar25 said...
I'm going to reply to my own comment here....
It's important to not that he's not making excuses by mentioning TDK as the reason for X-Files lack of box office success. He's chalking it up to bad luck and bad timing. This is why studios are constantly moving release dates around. It seems like Fox should have moved X-Files further into the summer or even into the Fall or Winter.
12-02-2008 @ 10:30AM
Vincent Belfiore said...
How can you can yourself an X Files fan and not want to see the Alien Invasion? That don't sound right to me. This movie wasn't great, it was OK but X Files needs REAL closure with one more high explosive Alien invasion film.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:36AM
Brian said...
I was a BIG x-files fan, and I really didn't think this was any type of ending at all. In fact, I kept thinking to myself, this would be a great mystery movie, but it's not an x-files movie, outside of Mulder & Scully being in it. It was almost like they took a failed script & added Mulder & Scully, then sold it to Fox.
I also think they've killed any chance at a full conclusion to the story, and any chance to revisit the mythology that the series created.
Plus Scully isn't looking any younger, and seeing Gillian Anderson try to run around as a 50 year old is not my idea of fun.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:53AM
Kurt Munro said...
Gillian Anderson was 39'ish when this was made...
12-02-2008 @ 10:59AM
Brian said...
I know...I can't believe I'm going to spell out this joke for you.
The original X-files movie was made in 1998, the follow up, I want to believe was released in 2008. That's 10 years apart. By the time they get around to making a proper sequel it will be 2018, and Gillian will be 49.
I was trying to be funny, but I guess I can't be subtle on here.
12-02-2008 @ 10:49AM
Marty J said...
I blame George Lucas. Because it's cool to do so.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:51AM
Kurt Munro said...
The reason I didn't go and see it was because the story seemed to involve a psychic instead of aliens, and it was set in a freezing cold area DURING THE HEIGHT OF SUMMER!
I'm not a huge fan but I've every episode of S1 and S2.
If they were going to set it in a freezing cold area, I would've prefered something like The Thing, or something like that episode in S1 (?) where the blonde from Desperate Housewives appears.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 11:44AM
Kevin said...
I wouldn't say its TDK fault that X-Files did so poorly, but it certainly was one of the contributing factors. Its pretty hard to have a huge opening weekend when the movie your up against just broke the all time record for opening weekend BO. This movie was never going to be a huge money maker, but it would have made more money if it had been released during a slower season (Feb. for example).
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 12:05PM
Mr. R said...
If you take this long to make another movie, after the TV show ended ages ago, you have to do something out of this world to make it come to life. TDK would have never been that successful had Nolan not taken the right steps to it, Batman Begins was a solid start up. X-files needed something like that. Most people expect aliens and abductions, not an extended episode of season four. I think it was a good movie, but could have been way better and hoped for a smashing sequel, TDK style.
Reply
12-03-2008 @ 4:57AM
Jeff said...
You are so on the money with your first sentence... This film was approached from the wrong angle at the start. It needed to be HUGE. I don't mean that it neeed to follow the myth... have it be a stand-alone but make it about something interesting.... not a half-baked Frankenstein story with social commentary tossed in.
12-02-2008 @ 12:05PM
Diana said...
I think the fact that the movie was poor largely contributed to its failure. It was badly written, badly executed, and ignored any plot and character continuity that had been previously established. Mulder/Scully not being on the run, and Scully being a practicing surgeon were huge problems for me.
It really did feel like they threw Mulder and Scully into an Ashley Judd/Morgan Freeman movie. I understand that they largely ignored the alien mythology to try to appeal to a broader audience, but in doing so, they ended up taking out all things that made the X-Files, the X-Files.
I was a die hard fan eagerly anticipating 'I Want to Believe' but considering how badly it was executed, I have no interest in future endeavours.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 12:47PM
pete thomson said...
Nobody wanted to go an see a dreary story about sinister catholics, peadophile scottish comedians and a blatantly signposted killer eager to widen his exposure after a successful stint in tvs brilliant Battlestar Gallactica- I only went eventually because I love Gillian Anderson as an actress an think David Duchovny is a major shag an I was still bored!!!
In the next movie in 2008 they could hunt down the secret underground cult of elite disgraced Republicans, who sold America down the toilet 10 years earlier for a teeny bit of oil!!!
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 12:58PM
ML said...
Right ... and the fact that they waited forever and chose a rather boring, limited story had absolutely nothing to do with it. (But, then, I seem to be one of the few who watched The X-Files for something other than M/S ...)
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 1:18PM
Matthew said...
X-files has become a right of passage in my house: You want in, you watch. I had just finished the ninth season the day before "I Want To Believe" came out, and the film felt like such a cheap, cheap cash in. It was like they struggled so long to get the movie made, by the time it was greenlit they didn't have any ideas.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 3:17PM
malren said...
This movie did poorly because it sucked. Blaming luck, timing or the phase of the moon is nothing but an attempt to cover the fact that Carter & Co. made a badly directed, poorly scripted pile of fail.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 8:05PM
joits said...
blaming the dark knight? ridiculous. the movie sucked. i couldn't believe it was an x-files movie and the only supernatural thing about it was a mere psychic connection. how about continuing where the series left off... that is the impending alien invasion? to have a movie for this and just make it a regular storyline that belongs only on tv was just dumb. it deserved to fail and i cannot believe anderson and duchovny signed on to the movie after reading the script.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 11:20PM
Ross Carroll said...
At what point did the producers of the this movie say `wow, I bet people will be excited about the storyline of this movie!'
I don't think they ever did. If I'm wrong then they must have been heavily medicated at the time.
When the series was on air, my friends and I would speculate as to what an X Files movie would be like. We thought it would be something like `Seven' but with an occult/monster/scary alien/weird arsed, serial killing, mutant human angle. Take your pick. When I read that their was a new movie and it was greenlit with `monster of the week' plot I got excited.
Then I saw it.
Pass the Valium.
Note to Mr Spotnitz; Don't blame poor timing or another superior and far better film for your films failure. You indulged your lead actors with a thuddingly dull performance showcase and forgot about who your audience was and what they wanted to see. Showman's Rule number 1.
The X Files at it's best was spooky, suspenseful, funny and exciting. This movie was like waiting for a bus to arrive on a wet day.
Reply
12-03-2008 @ 8:17AM
bongo123 said...
"The X Files at it's best was spooky, suspenseful, funny and exciting. This movie was like waiting for a bus to arrive on a wet day"
couldnt really say it any better than that, unfortunately they wont get the budget to do what the fans want to see, i.e. the invasion!
Reply
12-10-2008 @ 6:48AM
sam said...
i was soooo excited about this movie coming out but, omigod, was i disappointed....im a huge x-files fanatic and would watch the series over and over....so i was really expecting this movie to blow me away, to have that butterfly feeling in your stomach when you watch the series and the 1st movie....but the plot really did not feel like the x-files....i was actually bored during parts of this movie, to my horror! David and Gillian were fantastic though...fair play to them....they really are great actors and work amazing well together, fantastic chemistry, which is the only good thing about "i want to believe"....if only chris & co had of brought what the audience wanted to see, this would have been huge! i would hope that a sequel will follow and justify this mistake, and give what the fans want.
Reply