Cinematical Seven: Best Sequel Replacement Actors
Filed under: Cinematical Seven, Harry Potter, Remakes and Sequels, Lists

I'm hoping that Ray Stevenson will dominate the screen completely as Frank Castle, setting wrongs to right and creating utter mayhem, in Lexi Alexander's Punisher: War Zone, which opens wide tomorrow. I loved Stevenson as Titus Pullo in HBO's Rome, an atypical brute with a little boy's heart and a joyous young man's full-bodied embrace of life. At the very least, he should erase memories of Thomas Jane, who glowered and scowled without ever embodying the role in 2004's The Punisher.
With so many sequels being made, it's inevitable that some actors will not reprise their original role. (Just think of all the fuss kicked up by Don Cheadle taking over the part of War Machine from Terence Howard, in the Iron Man sequel.) Whether it's death, Broadway, pregnancy, caring for a family member, money, or the realization that the sequel will suck, sequel replacement actors face the daunting task of replacing a familiar face in the role of a beloved character.
History has not been kind, and while it would be easier to list the worst, we thought we'd be positive and list the best sequel replacement actors. (James Bond and superheroes need a separate list.) We're also noting the role and the actor that was replaced.
1. Anthony Hopkins as Hannibal Lecter (Brian Cox)
Brian Cox played the flesh-hungry Dr. Lecter in Michael Mann's Manhunter (1986) effectively, but Hopkins added a whole new layer when he took over the role five years later in The Silence of the Lambs. Hopkins pushed Lecter right to the edge of camp ("fava beans and a nice kee-anti") yet kept him firmly rooted at the edge of humanity with his probing eyes and ultra-controlled body language.
2. Michael Gambon as Albus Dumbledore (Richard Harris)
It took me a while to warm up to the Harry Potter series on film, which is probably why I prefer Michael Gambon in the role of Professor Dumbledore. Harris tended toward a grand theatricality in his performances, while Gambon crosses easily between good and evil and all the shades of gray in between. That made him especially suited to the menacing moodiness (morphing into gentle kindness) in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.
3. Harrison Ford as Jack Ryan (Alec Baldwin)
I loved Alec Baldwin as the insecure, desk bound analyst Jack Ryan, reluctantly thrust into action when a Russian submarine goes renegade. So I initially resisted Ford in the role in Patriot Games, though that probably had more to do with the film's simplistic view of "the troubles" than with Ford's performance itself. Clear and Present Danger actually played a bit with the idea of moral ambiguity, so Ford's stolid bluffness was actually an asset and made Jack Ryan seem once again like a sympathetic adult dealing with a bad situation.
4. Elisabeth Shue as Jennifer Parker (Claudia Wells)
No knock on Claudia Wells, whose Jennifer was limited to a traditional 1985 girlfriend, but Shue made it abundantly clear, even in a small part, that she was brimming with dynamic, infectious energy, with personality to burn. She made me wish that the Back to the Future sequels spent more time with Jennifer than with ol' Marty McFly.
5. Maria Bello as Evelyn O'Connell (Rachel Weisz)
If it's difficult for a replacement actor to make a positive impression in a good movie, imagine how much more difficult it is in a bad, nay, horrible flick like this summer's The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor. Mario Bello had to pretend to be in love with Brendan Fraser, be a mother to a startlingly quick-aging teenage son, and engage in all manner of derring-do. I felt bad to see talented performers like Jet Li, Michelle Yeoh, Wu Jing, Anthony Wong, and Russell Wong go entirely to waste, but I must give kudos to Ms. Bello and say that she maintained her class throughout this disaster.
6. Julianne Moore as Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster)
Thomas Harris' novel drove me batty, but even my low expectations were not met by the banalities of Ridley Scott's Hannibal. Stepping into the shoes of an Academy Award winner, as an indeliby damaged yet incredibly determined and strong character, would be sufficiently daunting for any actor. Tie that to the nuttiness of the story, and Julianne Moore was bound to come out the loser. Somehow she survived, and if she was unable to erase the memory of Foster, she bravely blazed her own trail to register her own take on Clarice, years later and still scarred.
7. Kane Hodder as Jason Voorhees (C.J. Graham)
I can't resist paying tribute to my favorite Jason, who inhabited the masked serial killer from 1998's Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood through 2001's Jason X. Hodder's lumbering, though still agile, almost balletic, physicality really does make a difference and helps explain his enduring appeal.
Now it's your turn to sound off in the comments section. Let's try and be positive, folks, and talk about our favorite sequel replacement actors. Who and why?










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
12-04-2008 @ 10:21PM
Mark Zielinski said...
How about, on a technicality, Sean Connery replacing George Lazenby in Diamonds are Forever?
Reply
12-04-2008 @ 11:54PM
jfarley said...
Couple of quick ones
Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel Dawes (Katie Holmes)
Enough has been written about this one. But you can also add:
Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent (Billy Dee Williams)
Was hoping they might have given BDW a chance but Eck was great
Bo Svenson as Buford Pusser (Joe Don Baker)
I remember liking Bo better as Buford, but that might have to do with liking his part in American Graffitti also.
Brandon Routh as Clark Kent/Superman (Christopher Reeves)
The movie wasn't what I was hoping for but as an imitation of the Reeves take on the character, Routh performed.
Reply
12-09-2008 @ 8:42AM
Tom said...
"but I must give kudos to Ms. Bello and say that she maintained her class throughout this disaster."
You must be kidding right? Maria Bello was the worse part of the new mummy film. She did not hold a candle to Rachel Weisz and her accent was horrid.
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 11:32AM
dlh said...
Thank you! Maria Bello Can. Not. Act.
12-08-2008 @ 7:40PM
Samantha said...
Completely agree. Rachel Weisz should never have been replaced. The movie would have been better if the writers made up some story about her being on a "Dig" somewhere.
12-04-2008 @ 10:43PM
Mr. R said...
How about Heath Ledger taking over anyone who ever played The Joker and giving the character the true evil, criminal nature it deserved instead of just some clown with a plan to take over the world.
Reply
12-08-2008 @ 7:00PM
Z! said...
"James Bond and superheroes need a separate list." pay attention.
So worst replacement has to be Stuart Townsend as Lestat de Lioncourt (Tom Cruise)
What more is there to say?
12-04-2008 @ 10:56PM
rhea said...
you forgot Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel in The Dark Knight - a stellar performance, compared to that boring turn from Katie Holmes....
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 7:10AM
Herff said...
Good call.
12-04-2008 @ 11:07PM
Chase said...
i completely agree with rhea and Tom, and i can't believe you included the new dumbledore. you added that he goes between good and evil, thats specifically why i don't like him. it may have more to do with the writers and the directors, but he is way to serious and sometimes downright mean. dumbledore never seemed to take anything to seriously, he was very easy going in the books, and i thought the original dumbledore captured that perfectly
Reply
12-04-2008 @ 11:18PM
Chase said...
o, and i'd like to add that i thought the first punisher was well done and that this reboot was uneccessary and that Thomas Jane did a great job
12-08-2008 @ 1:54PM
Parsec said...
Technically the "first Punisher" was Dolph Lundgren - Thomas Jane was the first reboot.
12-04-2008 @ 11:25PM
Travis Tidmore said...
Richard Harris was by far a much better Dumbledore. He's just so whimsical and strange. While Gambon is an ok replacement, I wish that Harris had lived to finish the series.
Reply
12-04-2008 @ 11:58PM
Matt said...
Wow, this list is terrible. Quite a few of them were such insignificant roles that I really couldn't care less. Anyway...
Do prequels count? If so how about Ewan MacGregor (sp?) as Obiwan Kenobi it wasn't great but a decent casting there. I do think there should be a Bond listing in there some where, I don't want to debate the different Bonds, so how about John Cleese as the new Q?
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 2:24AM
ElysiumBliss said...
Actually Friday The 13th VII: The New Blood was made in 1988. Most of this list is laughable. Maria Bello better than Rachel Wiesz? Are you serious or just plastered? Michael Gambon a better Dumbledore? More proof I think this list was written while drinking heavily!!! Julianne Moore was dull and boring as Clarice, lacking the fire and spunk Jodie Foster gave to the character... this list needs work, and preferably written sober!!!
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 2:35AM
yani said...
Are you nuts? Michael Gambon as Albus Dumbledore doesn't hold a candle to the stellar performance of Richard Harris... Harris' Dumbledore was sweet and charming and graceful and seemed genuinely wise and concerned... Gambon has this creepy edge to the character that's so far beyond wrong it's not funny.
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 3:02AM
Douglass said...
Re-read the article. The article is the author's opinions about the best replacement casting in sequels, not sequels that had better performances. The article is the author's opinions about when recasting was done as well as possible. He also states that Bond and superhero movies were excluded, comments on those topics are irrelevant.
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 4:53AM
Zaakirabduljabarr said...
Maria Bello in The Mummy 3? Auf cawse all English women tork like that.
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 6:18AM
Marvin said...
Robert De Niro in Cape Fear(1991)replacing Robert Mitchum's Max Cady from Cape Fear(1962).
Another one that although may not best its original but does take it to new levels and dimensions. The 1962 version seemed to really concentrate on the Gregory Peck character, while the latter had dynamics that kept everyone wanting to see more and more of De Niro. In the spirit of being positive I volunteer this into the fodder.
Reply
12-05-2008 @ 2:46PM
sean dailey said...
the article is about sequels, not remakes.
read more.