Has Catherine Hardwicke Been Booted from the 'Twilight' Sequel?

sounds like they picked her so they wouldn't have to pay a big named director a ton of money.

I really think another women should do thesequel.

Reply

I thought Hardwicke did an ok job, but the camera angles and weird close ups of the actor's faces were just werid!
And sometimes the music was crap and cheezy. for example when Edward first smells Bella.
The next director needs to avoid making it cheezy like Hardwicke.
And also, Catherine obviously did NOT work well with Rob, they are waaay too different and had different ideas about Edward.

Reply

Bring on Kathryn Bigelow!

Reply

I sure hope so, this gives me so much more hope for the next films. hardwicke was horrible. enough said.

Reply

I really liked Twilight, but I wouldn't mind getting a new director, and a few changes... Jasper's hair and Jacob's friends especially.

Reply

I have also heard that the editor "really" saved this film. I'm not
the target audience but I found that the majority of the actors way over acted.

Reply

if true, the timing of this couldn't be any more shamefully inappropriate. for christ's sake, the movie just came out plus they're still doing press tours...

Hardwicke's being railroaded and Summit Entertainment deserves whatever backlash they incur.

Reply

Some of the camera angles and such in Twilight really annoyed me as well... like when they randomly pulled back and spun things around. Also, they need some new makeup and special effects people because yikes... I could see their foundation balling on their skin.

But Book 2 really has almost no action at all, so I don't think you could call it an action movie by any stretch.

Reply

The timing could not have been worse for this kind of an announcement as Ms. Hardwicke is still promoting the film. I don't know about insider information, but I find it hard to believe that the cinematographer and editor "saved" the film. As much criticism as there has been for the films problems, there has also been significant praise for Hardwicke's direction.

Whether the new director is male or female probably matters less in the long run than whether or not the next film will remain true to the book. Many of the problems associated with the film can also be attributed to the original story. On the other hand, if there is too much deviation from the story there is a great risk of alienating the core fans.

Catherine Hardwicke has made a very successful little film. I do not understand why she needs to be replaced.

Reply

its official now!!

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/12/07/twilight-director-catherine-hardwicke-will-not-direct-new-moon/

Reply

I love Catherine for adding Rob's music to the movie, and maybe even for the casting of him. For that I am eternally grateful. She brought great enthusiasm to the Twilight promo experience. Heart her! But I'm kinda glad as bad as that sounds. She has GREAT actors, she really needed to redirect several scenes better. THEN NEED A NEW SCREENPLAY WRITER! That's the one that needs to get fired.

Fire Niiki Reed too. Not pretty enough.

Get a badass director now!! Don't be CHEAP SUMMIT. Fork out the damn money.

Reply

I have to say, I saw this movie last night not expecting much, and it certainly lived up to it. I agree that the action sequences weren't up to par. Some of the effects seemed adolescent, and the acting seemed hackneyed. It's unfortunate that it has to come down to gender terms, and not strictly directing chops and talent, but it may prove to be the only logical answer to this mess of a film. If indeed they do replace Hardwicke (whom I thought did a wonderful job with Thirteen) they should pick someone who is best suited for the job regardless of gender.

Reply

Good riddance. I haven’t seen Twilight and don’t plan on it, but Hardwicke came across as both arrogant and ignorant in every interview I have read with her.

She harps on and on about sexism, complaining about why Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson got to direct Spiderman and LOTR, while studio bosses don’t give her any of these big films. News flash: Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson were both widely accomplished and successful directors before they took on those franchises. With Hardwickes dismal reviews for Twilight, I doubt she’s half the director either of them are. Sexism has nothing to do with it.

Second of all, she complained that studio heads dislike how she breaks down on set and cries, but accept male directors having affairs, yelling, being abusive, etc. While none of this is acceptable, a directors job is to guide the production. They cannot be breaking down on set and crying. They are supposed to be in charge. Crying is completely giving up control. It has nothing to do with whether you are a man or woman; that is not acceptable behavior for a director!

Reply

It's disappointing, but this doesn't mean the end for the franchise. I just hope that Summit realizes that a bigger budget is needed for the remaining stories in the Twilight series... The fans will NOT accept cheesy effects for the warewolves and the running sequences? Come on, now! Let's fire it up and do it right!

Suggestions for directors? Maybe Julie Taymor (Across the Universe, Broadway's The Lion King), or Sarah Polley (Away from Her, former child actor...) both are female's with a great understanding of relationships in films/plays...

Reply

I have to agree with replacing hardwicke, something was just a little off. More importantly I hope they allot a slightly bigger budget, you could just tell they had to skimp on so much stuff.
New Moon doesn't have as much "action" scenes but getting the transformation to wolves is gonna be tricky, I just hope they don't screw it up.

Reply

Alfonso Cuarón!
Alfonso Cuarón!
Hire him!

Reply

I think they need to get a new director. The book gave her soooo much great material and most of it was cut out and other junk(that didn't even fit) was put in its place. Some of the most well known and loved parts(stupid shiny volvo owner, THE meadow, sadie hawkins.... I could go on all day people! LOL) I think she took a beautiful peice of literature an turned it into a cheese-ball movie. I think a new director should go as close to the book as possible. Not twist and turn it so it is so "Hollywood"....sigh.... As for the actors, I think Rob is a really good Edward but you could tell he wasn't feeling some of the direction he was given. I imagined Bella would look somewhat like Kristen but her voice is annoying. Why does she always sound like she is whispering??? Carlisle was VERY WRONG! His makeup was AWEFUL! And in the book, he is very kind and loving. In the movie, he seems like a jerk. Esme didn't talk much so it didn't really matter. Renee was good and the actor who played Charlie was good, but that isn't how Charlie is in the books. Alice, in my book, was a good choice. She was very pixie-like and cute. Rosalie was wrong as well. She is supposed to be a goddess!! In the movies, she looks like the girl next door, someone you see every day. Emmett was ok, not really big like the book describes. Jasper was just weird... I understand he is in pain but he just looks like an idiot to me. Jacob was pretty good, but I don't know how he is gonna grow up quick like in the books! The other Quilete friends were a weird choice. I didn't like that James had long hair b/c it is supposed to be cropped. And Victoria is supposed to have flaming red hair, so why is it blonde?

I think the best thing that they could do is start over and make a new Twilight. Keep it close the book. Don't get mixed in with the hollywood crap! If they did this, I know it would outsell this movie, by far! The REAL TWILIGHTERS want something that is organic and raw, not tainted by what Hollywood thinks the book should be. Maybe Stephenie should advise more. I just think if they are going to get a better director for New Moon, they should go back and make a better Twilight...I know alot of the Twilighters feel the way I do. It was ok, but it could have been amazing!!!!!

Reply

You guys present a very poor argument about Catheirne Hardwicke's direction on this film. You claim there were cheesy close-ups of characters and the angles were weird. Correction: you are trying to justify what isn't there. Do you even realize what book you are talking about? 'Twilight'... the damn book is cheesy, did you not get that from the 1897 times you read it?

"His hair was dripping wet, disheveled-- even so, he looked like he'd just finished shooting a commerical for hair gel. "
Does that not scream cheesy to you? But Twilight was the great kind of cheesy, the kind none of us were afraid to admit because the same magic that enraptured us, enraptured everyone else.

But Hardwicke's production of this film was a direct reflection of everything that was represented in the book, if not, even more beautiful. I have talked to some people saying they were surprised and disappointed that it didn't come out big scale. Big scale?? I implore those who feel this way to go back to Twilight and realize that the book itself is simply one girl's infatuation with a godly other, S. Meyer's vicarious experience with one of the most genius male creations-- Edward Cullen. Hardwicke's take on 'Twilight' was unimaginably beautiful and personal--- just like the book. I implore those to do a little research, this film had a budget of 35 million... you wanted big- scale? then you should have donated. In the early search for the right script, the original one had Bella as a trackstar, and it was Hardwicke who presented a well-watched vision of the book and convinced execs to do it her way. This film could have been blown out of proportion, they could have made it into a damn musical if the same money-ambitious execs had reason to believe that a musical would have earned twice the budget.

Doesn't it smell a bit fishy that two weeks later, an incredible worldwide gross of 158 million, they boot the woman who interpreted 498 pgs of a beautiful book onscreen? Her production-designer experience was vital to this film, the fact that it was shot in such a way, in my opinion, was indeed personal... and that is exactly the point of the 'Twilight'. I give my utmost thanks to her for contributing to the film and the series, but I am thoroughly surprised and suspecting of the claims that the film had to be 'saved' by the cinematographer and editors. Just watch 'Thirteen' and you will see remarkable similarities, this was very much Catherine Hardwicke. When it comes down to it, 'Twilight' is a love story, not some action ambitious series parallel to the 'Matrix' films. So don't try to make it out to be. You need a much better argument than that.

Reply

The two main things I didn't like about the movie we're:

First, when Edward sparkles, the sparkles make sparkely sounds. I realize that's probably for the people who are a little slow to realize he's sparkeling, but still.

Second, I found they over used music in this movie. I mean, is a little silence going to kill anyone. I find some of the moments we're ment to be very intence, but some of the music didn't really have the effect they we're trying to portray.

Reply