Cinematical Seven: The Best Sci-Fi Remakes
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Cinematical Seven, Remakes and Sequels
.jpg)
With this weekend's The Day the Earth Stood Still, Hollywood continues its attempt to remake every remotely viable classic property it can get its hands on. (It also conjures up the perfect role for Keanu Reeves, but that's another post.) The science-fiction genre has been a particularly inviting target, which makes sense since the ability to use modern effects makes filmmakers think that they are improving on their source material regardless of whether that's actually true. But it hasn't been all bad. Hollywood still churns out some good sci-fi from time to time, and some of the remakes have hit their mark. Here's a list of seven that worked for me -- though I warn you that my tastes in genre films are somewhat idiosyncratic. I'm fond of some black sheep.
1. War of the Worlds (2005) - Some of you may want to get off the train right here. But I saw Spielberg's War of the Worlds before the bad buzz, and I found the first ninety minutes just ridiculously intense -- the realest alien invasion ever put on screen. This was Spielberg the wizard, the technician, in top form. Sure, he chose to play out his daddy issues instead of giving us a believable ending; everyone is right about that. But to me, that's barely a smudge on this movie's accomplishments.
2. The Fly (1986) - I put this on my "Best Horror Romances" list last month, where I wrote that it was my choice for Scariest Movie Ever -- which is true. But it's also the rare case of a first-class auteur putting his unmistakable stamp on science-fiction material. When people call something "Cronenbergian," they're talking about The Fly (though the likes of Dead Ringers and Naked Lunch would later supplement the term).
3. Vanilla Sky (2001) - Just because I put something on a "Best Remakes" list, doesn't necessarily mean I think it improves on its predecessor. Alejandro Amenabar's Open Your Eyes is far superior to Vanilla Sky -- scarier, tighter, and less concerned with showing off its director's record collection. If you haven't seen either, go rent that one (which also stars Penelope Cruz, by the way). But the plot Vanilla Sky borrows is so strong, and the third-act about-face is so potent, that it belongs on this list anyway.
4. Solaris (2002) - Here, on the other hand, is a remake I find far more satisfying than the classic original. It's blasphemy, but I was bored by Tarkovsky's 1972 Solaris, which frankly didn't give a damn about the science-fiction premise it takes from Stanislaw Lem's novel. This one doesn't do too much with the sci-fi either, but it's less pretentious and more personal. Still, it's not for all tastes.
5. Planet of the Apes (2001) - Getting a chance to publicly defend this film is my secret reason for signing up to make this list. I like the Charleton Heston Planet just fine. Is the Burton version better? I don't know. Maybe not. But it's imaginative, exciting and well-made. It transplants a very '60s premise -- the original's working title was Monkey Planet, for pete's sake! -- into the 21st century without (in my view) making it seem completely ridiculous. And the ending is cryptic in a good way, hewing closer to the Pierre Boulle novel from which both films are ostensibly adapted. This movie gets a bum rap.
6. 12 Monkeys (1995) -- A.k.a. the most intelligent treatment of time paradoxes in cinema. It still doesn't quite hold up. But it's the smartest and it comes the closest.
7. Village of the Damned (1995) -- Okay, I actually don't think John Carpenter's Village of the Damned is that terrific a movie; based purely on quality, The Thing would handily win the John Carpenter Sci-Fi/Horror Remake Contest. But this is my list, and I'm going with a sentimental favorite. I saw Village of the Damned in 1996, at 12 years old, and it scared the crap out of me. I still almost invariably find implacable child villains scary, to be honest. See, for example, Dark City's "Mr. Sleep."










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
12-11-2008 @ 10:41PM
MarkH said...
Burton's Apes? Seriously? Wow, that's on my personal list of the worst movies of the decade. How was the ending cryptic, other than being so transparently stupid that it made absolutely no sense?
Reply
12-11-2008 @ 10:49PM
Michael Byng said...
Great list. I agree with everything.
Reply
12-11-2008 @ 10:58PM
John said...
Thank you for giving some praise to Spielberg's War of the Worlds. I thought the movie was thrilling. Yes, the ending was weak but at least it went out with Morgan Freeman's divine voice.
Reply
12-12-2008 @ 7:09AM
mrc said...
"...at least it went out with Morgan Freeman's divine voice."
Could not have said it better myself.
12-11-2008 @ 11:23PM
Brian said...
I don't know how anyone can complain about the ending of War of the Worlds. The original Orson Welles radio broadcast ended exactly the same way.
Now he was shut down by the government, so it was a forced ending, but the remake movie stayed very true to the very first War of the Worlds.
I too think it was an incredibly well made film, and I loved every nail biting minute.
On the other hand, I didn't know 12 Monkeys was a remake. What move did they remake?? Isn't that a Terry Gilliam original??
Reply
12-11-2008 @ 11:34PM
John said...
I had problems with the ending because I didn't think that they needed to bring the son back and it almost seems like all the humans' efforts were in vain; the aliens were gonna die anyways because of the microorganisms of Earth. When Welles wrote the story in 1898, maybe it was a new idea that only creatures native to Earth can live on it. But now, it's just common knowledge.
Hope everyone who reads my comment here has already seen the movie or doesn't care about knowing about the ends of movies...
12-11-2008 @ 11:44PM
Brian said...
I hadn't thought about the son thing. It didn't really hit me when I watched it. I guess I was still hyperventilating from the action sequences to notice.
And on the note of the alien's dying, Welles actually had to come up with that on the spot. It was incredibly creative for him to have that idea in the time that he had to get the final script together and air it.
With a remake I usually feel better when they stick to the original's ideas, even of some of them have been disproven in today's day and age.
12-12-2008 @ 3:40AM
Michael said...
12 Monkeys is a remake of La Jetee (a far superior--and way shorter--film)
12-12-2008 @ 9:00AM
Kevin said...
I have to agree that the ending just seemed awful to me. The son coming back was predictable in a Spielberg movie, but ridiculous. There needed to be some sort of explanation as to how a single guy can run into a war zone where the US military is getting demolished, and then somehow ending up at his destination before the rest of his party that ran away from the fight. But that didn't bug me that much. What bugged me was the bacterial explanation. I know that when the radio broadcast was originally aired this seemed ground breaking and monumental, but by the time the movie came out it was just utterly preposterous. From what I recall of the movie (sorry, its been a while :)) the aliens deposited their Tripods thousands of years ago, and then launched the pilots into them through those lightning strikes, correct? So you're telling me that this wildly intelligent alien species didn't bother to make sure that there wasn't something toxic in the air of the planet they were invading in the years in between? C'mon now, its just a ridiculous way to kill them off. Why didn't they notice it thousands of years ago? I would have appreciated it if they had updated it somehow; I don't know, maybe saying that it must have been the new pollutants released in the last 100 years by mankinds growing industry, who knows. Just give me something that the aliens would not have to be totally moronic not to have noticed eons ago. Yes, the action sequences were brilliant, but that explanation for how we survived just ruined the movie for me.
12-15-2008 @ 8:50AM
balkaster said...
Brian, you need to get out more. Spielberg's WotW wasn't a remake of Orson Welles' radio show. Both were adaptations of the H.G. Wells novel. Twelve Monkeys was a "remake" (actually an expansion) of Chris Marker's award-winning short, La Jetee.
12-12-2008 @ 12:22AM
EatingPie said...
The Thing is the single best Science Fiction remake ever done. And it's not even on the list!
Very disappointing.
-Pie
Reply
12-12-2008 @ 12:25AM
Jasonbo said...
didn't know 12 monkeys was a remake. Also with exception of the fly and 12 monkeys this list is filled with films that aren't even close to being the best sci fi remakes
what about the thing, Dawn of the dead, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and I Am Legend and this is just of the top of my head.
Reply
12-12-2008 @ 9:26AM
chango said...
I was gonna give you props for your comment, until you said "I Am Legend", what a piece of steamy dog crap that movie was...COme on now. Last Man On Earth AND Omega Man were WAY better.
12-15-2008 @ 3:24AM
Swen said...
Agree that Thing is extremely good. That and American Werewolf in London stand out from my high school days. Jenny Agutter. Yum...
12-12-2008 @ 12:26AM
Mike D said...
Brian, "Twelve Monkeys" is more of a longform adaptation than a remake, of Chris Marker's "La Jetee". Marker is an American expatriate and "La Jetee" is a haunting short meditation on the ideas of childhood and memory and mankind's penchant for self-destruction. Gorgeous, black and white, and composed of stills and narration, its effect is devastating. As for "War of the Worlds", how do germs get inside presumably air-tight alien vehicles? That, to, me is where the bullshit comes in.
Also, this list is a travesty. "John Carpenter's The Thing", which is still sci-fi, should be at the top of the list, easily.
Reply
12-12-2008 @ 10:52AM
Batzarro said...
Aliens were shown to get out of those.
12-13-2008 @ 4:05PM
Mike said...
I am not trying to stick up for War of the Worlds being number one but you do realize that the Aliens got out of their ships and not to mention were using the humans as food. Both sufficent ways for them to be exposed to germs.
12-12-2008 @ 12:41AM
Andrew said...
12 Monkeys the best treatment of time paradoxes in cinema? Somebody didn't see Timecrimes or Primer.
Reply
12-12-2008 @ 2:41AM
Noble said...
PLANET OF THE APES? The ending was GOOD? No, it made no sense. None. Zero. There is no possible explanation for it outside of the writers climaxing in their acid trip as they hammered out the script for this godawful cinematic abortion. The movie itself was a shitpile with good makeup effects and godawful writing. It couldn't have been more ham handed if it had been fistfucking Ms. Piggy. Burton and Elfman phoned it in (along with most of the cast) and the film mercilessly rammed it's goddamned political and moral message up the audience's ass like a dirty cop's baton on a bad night. It was a miserable, rotten excuse for a film. It was not imaginative. It was not exciting. It was not well-made. With this in mind, I encourage you to stop watching movies now and never, ever watch another movie again as long as you live.
Reply
12-16-2008 @ 12:14AM
Baron said...
Burton ended "Planet of the Apes" much as the book ended.