Review: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
Filed under: Drama, Romance, Paramount, Theatrical Reviews, Brad Pitt, Oscar Watch
.jpg)
I saw The Curious Case of Benjamin Button weeks ago, and yet every time I tried to think about it -- whether it was to contemplate a decision in David Fincher's direction, a deviation from F. Scott Fitzgerald's story, a moment in Eric Roth's script or a note in the performances of Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett -- I would soon find myself, invariably, distracted from the large-scale visions and moments of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button and instead contemplating the smaller-scale moments of my own life. This was at best annoying; what did it say about the film that I couldn't hold it in my attention? What did it say about my attention that I couldn't even focus it on a film? But Zen gives us the parable of the master who points to the moon, and the student who looks at the master's finger. Fincher, Roth, Pitt and Blanchett have all, in their way, made a film of true sincerity and (ironically enough in light of its technical achievements) real simplicity; resting your gaze on the film, without directing it onto the things it encourages you to look at, seems like staring at the pointing finger.
Fitzgerald's tale is a brief fantasia, the story of Benjamin Button, a man who, born old, ages backward; at the same time, the slenderest books often become the best films, the lush drapery of moviemaking lending their slight grace weight, the stark simplicity of the plot a place for a director's vision to find purchase and grow. Within moments -- as an old woman lies dying in a modern New Orleans hospital, slate-gray rain battering the windows, her daughter (Julia Ormond) paging through her diaries and scrapbooks as the old woman fades in and out of consciousness, flickering between past memory and present reality -- we know we're not in the world established in Fitzgerald's 1922 short story. The woman's diaries are not just hers, and as the daughter reads, we learn about the birth and exile of Benjamin Button, born old in New Orleans in 1918 just after the Great War. ...
Benjamin is abandoned by his father (Jason Flemyng), left on the steps of an old folk's home; Queenie (Taraji P. Henson) takes him in, as her own. Benjamin grows into a bizarrely wizened body, but does not want for love; he fits in with the home's elderly residents, but his restless mind and spirit make his circumstances a cage. He wants to play, to learn; his body betrays him, until, as time passes, it does not. Much has been made of the technical tricks brought to bear to turn Brad Pitt into a shrunken old man -- with some suggesting that the trickery seems more important to Fincher than the task of building Benjamin as a real, emotional character -- but it should be said that while the special effects tricks are impressive, they would also be meaningless without an actual performance under them, which Pitt provides even burdened with makeup and pixels.
It has also been said that The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is 'cold,' a charge I categorically reject; the tone and restraint that these detractors fault is one of the best things about the film. (In fact, I found the film's most overt device -- a signifying hummingbird who pops up as needed like busy, buzzy punctuation -- so 'warm' as to be molten and shapeless.) Benjamin Button is being called 'cold' but, really, what that means is that it does not leap into your lap like an untrained puppy and squirm around begging you to love it. If you would like to see a film that isn't 'cold,' rent Million Dollar Baby, with its comical White trash stereotypes and foolish contrivances and the one-two punch of Morgan Freeman's narration and a droning, mournful saxophone telling you exactly how you should feel at any given moment on the off chance you were not sure. I tend to prefer a movie that treats me as if I am a grownup, and found that The Curious Case of Benjamin Button was content for the most part to let me think and feel for myself, even with its plucky hummingbird and a moment that pretty much looks like the propaganda films we will be forced to watch after Ralph Lauren seizes power where our casually well-dressed lovers take out their sailboat and witness a NASA rocket steaming overhead.
Old Benjamin becomes friends with young Daisy (Elle Fanning) and then younger Benjamin meets the older Daisy (Blanchett) and, for a time, they're lovers. And while Benjamin's life is improbable, it seems no more improbable than love; for all of the sum-it-up-in-a-sentence strangeness of the story's central idea, Benjamin's backwards life is entirely like our own. He's born defenseless, grows to need help and guidance, has a few years of vitality that are soon tempered by the sense of time drawing to an end, falls into helplessness and childlike confusion. It's not so far from what we get, if we're lucky. As Queenie notes, we're all going the same place; " ... we just take different paths to get there." Others have found Pitt's Button to be 'passive,' but I think its simply that he's ordinary -- he's not possessed of any special wisdom or Gump-esque insight; on occasion he's selfish and he's sad, and at other times he's generous and glad. The fact Pitt doesn't over-play the part should tell you how good he is. Blanchett -- dancing in moonlight mist as a young girl, pain-wracked and still on her deathbed -- has a similarly sweeping part, but never pushes the drama into melodrama.
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is less concerned with flights of fancy than the real pleasures of this mortal coil; a soft kiss, a stiff drink, a good friend, a sympathetic ear. And it knows the things that surround and confound us; the horrors of war, the dimming of love, the loss of those around us, the way the unstoppable circuit of the second hand sweeps everything in its path to the trash heap or the grave. Life gives us things; life takes things. And so it goes. Fincher's direction has a sense of warmth and play here that his other films have sorely lacked; as one of Benjamin's fellow rest home residents says throughout the film, "Did I ever tell you I was struck by lightning seven times?" -- and we glimpse each incident as he recounts the specifics -- you realize that other Fincher films have had running cops and running killers, but rarely running jokes (even if Fight Club is perversely hilarious) and they have never been this human, this warm.
Mark Twain said that he left home at 18 because his father was a fool, and that when he returned at 25, he was amazed at how much the old man had learned while he was away; watching The Curious Case of Benjamin Button at the far edge of my 30's, I appreciated, enjoyed and admired it, and I can't wait to see what it has to tell me (if I'm lucky, as it also points out) 10, 20, 30 years down the line. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button isn't about a man who lives backwards or a woman who lives forwards; that's just looking at the finger. Get past the plot, the pitch, and the technique, and you can see it as a reminder that all we can do is live now.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-23-2008 @ 8:51PM
Eric said...
And you didn't find ONE parallel to Forrest Gump? No? The child born different from other kids who falls for a girl in his childhood who is the only one his age who accepts him as he is? No? The experiences on boat? Losing a dear friend in a war? Inheriting a business? Relying heavily on special effects to alter appearances of characters? Telling a life story in flashback? None? Same screenwriter? Coincidence? Well, I'm glad you enjoyed the movie. I've seen this one before. I just want my 2 hours and 40 minutes back.
Oh, and way to spoil the running gag. The crowd I saw it with roared everytime it popped up.
Reply
12-24-2008 @ 12:50AM
Mr. R said...
F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote his story "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" in 1922 while Winston Groom wrote his novel Forrest Gump in 1986. Wouldn't this make the Fincher story a little more original even if the movie was made later? I haven't seen it yet, maybe it's a rip off but so was Star Wars from Akira Kurosawa's Hidden Fortress...
12-23-2008 @ 9:28PM
Carsten said...
So you did write a review after all. Happy Holidays, James! Was great seeing you again.
@Eric: You must have hated The Wrestler quite a bit. How does that work out for you if you only like to see the same sort of story structure once in a lifetime? Even if it's done with skill. There will be hardly any movie coming out that you will like...
Reply
12-23-2008 @ 10:56PM
e3m88 said...
@eric
thanks for the info...
Reply
12-24-2008 @ 2:51PM
Eric said...
@Mr. R: Thank you. You're actually illustrating my point even better than I did. In terms of Hidden Fortress/Star Wars, George Lucas will be the first to admit that's the inspiration. But they are two VERY different films that were released a generation apart. However, both yourself and Carsten are focusing on auteur thinking. If you make it about Fincher vs. Zemeckis and what the two brought to the table, then, yes, Button and Gump are as different as Kurosawa and Lucas' films. But Hidden Fortress and Star Wars didn't have the same person writing the script. I thought the problem with Benjamin Button was simply the lazy screenwriting. I'm all for going green, but I'd prefer if Eric Roth didn't recycle his own stuff.
Just think for a moment. It's not like this film bears any real resemblance to the short story other than the title and that it's about a guy who ages backwards. Beyond that, there's no similarities at all between the two. There's no old people's home in the book. No life on a boat. No affair in Russia. His father doesn't abandon him. So Eric Roth is making up the story on his own. Any similarity is not a coincidence between F. Scott Fitzgerald and Winston Groom, but what came out of Eric Roth's own mind. Consider this: In the original story of Button, Benjamin doesn't meet Hildegard (Daisy in the movie) until college. Roth changed it to childhood around the same age that Gump meets Jenny. Both Gump and Button travel to see their childhood loves only to find out they are with someone else. Both childhood loves suffer setbacks in health that reunite them. I can go on, but I'll spare you. It's not Fincher's fault. He crafted a fine film. What's wrong with this film, and it's about the only thing that is wrong, lies solely in the script. If George Lucas had written the Hidden Fortress and the went on to write Star Wars, he would be ridiculed for it. Eric Roth deserves the same.
It also should be noted that, according to Wikipedia, this film has been in development since the summer of 1994, around the time of Forrest Gump's release.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 8:31PM
SOS said...
A man ageing backwards was written about by Mark Twain (Sam Clemens) while he was alive; Twain died in 1910.
I don't think F. Scott Fitzgerald (or others) deserve any credit at all for extending a Twain concept.
Reply
12-31-2008 @ 4:06PM
ness said...
It did remind me of Forrest Gump, but it didn't stop me from loving the film. It simply is just fantastic and while it may have some similarities to Forrest Gump, I think it stood pretty well on its own.
Reply
1-01-2009 @ 6:04AM
Jenni Mathews said...
Brad Pitt is great and so is the script. If you remember The Aviator you may not forget Kate Blanchett's oscar winning performance. This is better than that.
While going through Smarten Your English through Movies, I came across an interesting statement . "To make sacrifice in big things is easy, but to make sacrifices in little things is what we are seldom capable of".
Reply
1-02-2009 @ 12:52AM
Leila said...
I totally got that message from the film. Live your life today, not for tomorrow. Nice review.
Reply
2-05-2009 @ 1:13AM
kon4mitee said...
I actually just posted something really similar on my blog (http://kon4mitee.wordpress.com/2009/02/05/the-curious-case-of-benjamin-button/). I'm glad to see someone else got it. :)
Reply