Review: The Spirit
Filed under: Action, Drama, Noir, Lionsgate Films, Theatrical Reviews, Comic/Superhero/Geek

With all due respect to the monumentally talented Frank Miller, I'm just going to lay it out clear: I don't think the man is cut out to direct movies. At all. I've always suspected that Mr. Miller earned a co-director credit on Sin City because A) it's his baby, B) having Miller involved helps the film come release time, and C) Robert Rodriguez is a classy dude. But have you ever wondered what Sin City would look like if Rodriguez was out of the picture? Wonder no more, comic fans: Frank Miller has directed a film all by himself ... and it really isn't good.
Looking for slick-looking white-on-black panorama shots of a square-jawed hero as he leaps across the city rooftops? Anxious to get a lot of hot young actresses into sexy outfits? Into highly-stylized pulp dialog that sounds like outtakes from a Dick Tracy comic? Then apparently Frank Miller is your man. Taken as a series of unrelated sequences that sure LOOK cool, The Spirit might just float your boat. If, however, you like your films to include stuff like good sense, character development, internal logic, and a smooth-flowing story ... well, all I can say is that someone should have gotten Robert Rodriguez on the phone.
Based on the classic comic by the late Will Eisner, The Spirit is about an immortal crime-fighter who flips all over Central City and beats down all the evildoers. Unfortunately, The Spirit has an equally immortal arch-enemy called The Octopus, and it's this central idea -- two unkillable beings trying to kill one another -- that Miller spends 105 minutes avoiding. In place of a potentially fascinating battle between Unstoppable Force and Immovable Object, we're treated to swooning dames, dime-store chit-chat, gratingly repetitive dialog, and a whole lot of over-ripe silliness. (Plus, think about it: How interesting is a brawl between two invincible beings? I'd say ... not very.)
Wait, did I mention "dames"? Hell yes I did! As a matter of fact, here's a potentially fun way to watch The Spirit: Wait till the DVD comes out, pop it in and hit mute, and then listen to your favorite music as the pretty pictures flit across your TV screen. (Feel free to peek at the subtitles if you must, but I wouldn't recommend it.) And for a movie with so little going for it, The Spirit sure does pack a fine female wallop. Prop your eyelids open and get some coffee, because you'll definitely want to see the gals in this movie. They all come across just as silly as The Spirit (Gabriel Macht, doing the best he can in a goofy role), but MAN do they look great: Scarlett Johansson, Eva Mendes, Jamie King, Paz Vega, Sarah Paulson. He might not be a great director, but nobody can knock Frank Miller's taste where the ladies are concerned.
As the title character, Macht gives you just enough layers to make you wish that he had more than, say, two. In a different movie, Gabriel Macht could be a grade-A, tough-guy, hero type. Let's hope that he gets a chance to prove it. And as the villainous Octopus, I'd like to say we have "Samuel L. Jackson at his over-the-top best," but instead we have the usual Jackson: Wild-eyed, amusing, and certainly fun to watch -- but he never once comes across as a villain we should actually fear / dislike / hiss. And if it was, as he claims, Miller's goal to pay homage to Eisner's old comic, then why is his adaptation stuck using words like "bling" and phrases like "You'll believe a man can't fly."? Yikes.
Miller's biggest shortcoming as a director is that he favors isolated moments over the big picture. Scenes in The Spirit don't flow together as much as they pile up, one behind the other, with little in the way of story structure or narrative sense. The result is a movie that's both plotless and confusing, and man is THAT an irritating combination to deal with. Whenever the main story becomes too sketchy (which is often), we're jolted back into another flashback. One that uses all the same visual gimmickry that's found in the rest of the flick.
And then there are the words. Yes, I get and even respect that the goal here was to pay homage to the hardest of the hard-boiled and the pulpiest of fiction. But some things just work better on the page than they do on a screen -- and of all the results Miller was expecting from his rat-a-tat and redundant banter, I bet muffled giggling wasn't one of them. And truth be told: I knew this movie would be savaged and therefore I entered the theater actively trying to swim against the tide. As much as I'd love a tasty combo of film noir and superheroics, The Spirit is simply an empty vessel. It's a bunch of cool-looking visuals that should be looking for a half-decent plot, but are just too damn happy being cool-looking visuals.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-26-2008 @ 5:51PM
Angry Fangirl said...
Big fan of the Spirit NOT THE MOVIE!
Over the past year I have said " Gee you know what would be great? A spirit movie!" Then I sag my shoulders and say " Oh yeah right there is one..."
I have no idea what comic books Frank's been reading but he hasn't been reading old Will's!
*The Spirit is not immortal, he is still flesh and blood and can die- he is still human and knows who and what he is, a Good Guy ( who likes to stay one step ahead of marriage to "good girl" Ellen, who keeps him grounded.) Eisner himself said that The Spirit was never meant to be a Vigilante super hero, and has NO SUPER POWERS. He was suppose to be the answer to that.
* The Octopus is a master of disguise who was only a pair of gloves we wanted to know what he looked like but Dear God NOT Samuel L Jackson!!!!
* The Spirit never killed anyone, never intended to do any fatal harm. In Eisner's allegory-like stories Villains died by their own greedy fates, by their own hands or their own weapons, Never by the Spirit.
* Eisner left behind a rich collection of stories all of which could have been used to write a million wonderful screen plays, and he still could have included side kicks Ebony or Sammy.
* The Spirit wears Blue! The only reason he was remade to look like a member of an emo band was because of the use of special effects to make it look like Sin City 2.
* Silken Floss was never a villainess- if anything Miller lost prime opportunity to have used "Slip Claws" the heartless mob lawyer.
* And the Spirit needed to be a Huge Hunk o' man too.. BTW.( I am A woman y'know!)
I only thank the Good Lord Almighty that Frank didn't ruin Silk Satin and Hildie!
I only hope other Spirit fans saw that this was not their hero, and yeah I know "get a life Geek!" but when I see something that so badly tarnishes a great pure thing I have to get mad and defend it. There was nothing wrong with the Spirit as Eisner left it. It was around way before Frank Miller and it will be around long after him too.
Reply
12-26-2008 @ 5:54PM
C.A. said...
Pretty much what I was afraid of. I might go see it for the laughs I guess...
Reply
12-26-2008 @ 10:16PM
rich said...
Angry Fangirl, your comments are spot-on. Marry me.
(kidding)
Reply
12-26-2008 @ 11:12PM
Douglass Abramson said...
The "man can't fly" line is amusing, not funny, but amusing if you know who delivers it. The "actor" is Paul Levitz, the publisher at DC Comics. Home of a certain superhero, whose first movie had the tag line "You'll believe that a man can fly." Not funny, but amusing, as was the liberal use of comic book creator and executive names in the film. The Spirit isn't horrible, but it could have been so much more in better hands.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 12:19AM
tposam said...
Maybe it's because I am not a fan of comics in general or The Spirit comic, specifically, but I rather enjoyed this film. I feel like everyone has such high expectations. . . It was good entertainment. It was stylized and dark and corny at times but at this time of year when every other movie just wants us to cry our eyes out, it was entertaining and obviously did not take itself too seriously. I think it was an homage to the era in general and did that quite well. I think the women were great and the handsome Macht was a likeable and believable hero.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 3:57PM
FutureColumnist said...
Agreed. I don't know the source material terribly well, and perhaps that's why I enjoyed it, but I felt like the movie was just a popcorn-comic-book-fun type of movie. I sat and enjoyed the silliness, much like I might reading through corny lines and crazy plot movement your everyday comic book. Now, I'm sure the original was much better than a normal comic book, and all that, but regardless - it was a fun, enjoyable movie.
12-27-2008 @ 9:37PM
tposam said...
Amen. Another voice of reason. I wish people would read less of the criticism, be less critical and more open to just having a good time. Did you read all of the different t-shirt words on Sam Jackson's bald trio. They were HILARIOUS!
12-27-2008 @ 2:24AM
Serge G said...
I'd like inform you that Scarlett Johansson (actress)actually is a clone from original person,who has nothing with acting career.Clone was created illegally using stolen biomaterial.Original Scarlett Galabekian last name is nice, CHRISTIAN young lady.I'll tell more,those clones(it's not only 1)made in GERMANY-world leader manufacturer of humans clones,it's in Ludwigshafen am Rhein,Rhineland-Palatinate,Mr.Helmut Kohl home town.You can't even imaging the scale of the cloning activity.But warning,H.Kohl staff strictly controlling their clones spreading around the world,they're NAZI type disciplined and mind controlled,be careful get close with clones you will be controlled too.Original family didn't authorize any activity with stolen biomaterials,no matter what form it was created in,it's all need to be back to original family control in Cedars-Sinai MedicalCenter in LA.Controlling clones is US military operation.Original Scarlett never was engaged,by the way
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 7:42AM
C.A. said...
Wow. That's probably the best comment I've ever read on the internet.
12-27-2008 @ 9:20AM
cheviot said...
Oh wow... you can't make this stuff up!
12-27-2008 @ 4:58PM
HalJordanLives said...
I'm a comics guy, and I'm a movie guy. I am not a die hard fan of the original Spirit comics, but I enjoyed them and greatly respect Eisner's work and influence on the industry and several future comic characters that I am die hard fan of (namely DC Comic's The Question).
As a film lover and a comic enthusiast, I say without doubt or regret that Frank Miller is one of the worst writers today. On par with Todd Macfarlane- two men who HAD A PEAK early in their career and use that as a springboard to contribute garbage. Thankfully, the latter took a hint and retired.
Miller is responsible for some great works of fiction during his peak, particularly to the Batman franchise (The Dark Knight Returns and Year One, which served as primary influence for Batman Begins) as well as Sin City and Ronin. But this was 15-20 years ago. And he still has a tendency to want to add this troubled adolescent vantage point to every movie/book. When you get to something like The Spirit, whose source material is the polar opposite of everything Miller understands, the end result is, well, god awful. Here's some more Millerness:
-Miller wrote the script for Robocop 2, essentially wanting to make the film into a noir horror/sci fi film. Orion Pictures told him no and rewrote the script heavily while keeping his name attached to reflect the things they did keep (a foul mouthed 11 year old drug dealer with a laptop gun who is murdered by Robocop 2- a robot addicted to narcotics. Oh I'm dead serious, folks.)
-As mentioned in the review, alot of Sin City's cohesiveness stemmed from Robert Rodriguez- a REAL director. The film used flashbacks, flashforwards, and character story blends perfectly. Unfortunately, Rodriguez favors more of the stylized noir (ie. cult films. See: Grindhouse) vs. Miller's favoring of a gritty 'f**k society and f**k standards' mantra that works well on a 50 page comic book you can read in 10 minutes, but not a 2 hour film.
-Three words: 'The Goddamn Batman'. Batman Begins' success and research into its creation sparked a surge in sales of Miller's timeless classics of a more 'rough around the edges' Batman. This prompted DC to offer Miller a run of comics vs. another graphic novel. The result? All-Star Batman and Robin, a tale regarded by many critics as being 'more Miller than society is supposed to handle'. Batman is portrayed as a gruff, apathetic alcoholic who verbally (and sometimes physically) abuses Alfred and Robin all while evading the Gotham PD the best way he knows how: violence. Insensitive to his family and even teammates (invites Green Lantern to the Batcave to discuss his behavior, only for Jordan to find the entire cave and even Bats himself painted yellow- GL's one weakness- just to piss him off). The stories play similar to the Spirit film in that nothing flows together, stuff just happens randomly. Its cult status was marked by having a character in every issue refer to him as 'the goddamn Batman', only further securing Miller's ridiculous nature (blowing up six city blocks to catch the Penguin, for example).
I can understand those that enjoyed The Spirit without expectations, but even shutting my brain off it's still just a mess. Not one of the worst movies out there, but by no means the best.
For the record, Miller calling this an honage to Eisner is essentially just to help him sleep at night. This isn't The Spirit. This is Sin City 2.
Reply
1-05-2009 @ 12:57PM
Michael F. Hopkins said...
The chief problem with Miller's SPIRIT film isn't whether or not a given viewer is familiar with Will Eisner's original material. The problem is that the film is just badly put together, period. One doesn't have to know the original BATMAN stories by Bill Finger and Bob Kane, for instance, to know that the Adam West BATMAN series was a lousy show; a sad attempt to do Gilbert & Sullivan in day-glo & tights.
Of course, the irony is that much of Miller's best efforts over the years owe a great deal to Eisner's pioneering work. To do a SPIRIT film in this manner is a slap in Miller's own face, whether he realizes it or not. As such, it comes off as a somber version of the silliness Warren Beatty perpetrated as a supposed DICK TRACY film some years ago.
Seems that there's two Frank Millers at work here. There's one who pushes gritty noir narratives (Sin City), speculative potboilers (Ronin) and wry historical twisters (300) which compels strong interest and nurtures the Sequential field.
The other's the Frank Miller who persistently savages the costumed hero genre which brought him his initial fame some 25 years ago.
Hitting his stride first on Marvel's DAREDEVIL, then with THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS for DC, Miller's original variations on the genre have long since turned into stale megabuck hackstabbings of the entire superhero idiom. His BATMAN tales since YEAR ONE (DARK KNIGHT STRIKES AGAIN and ALL STAR BATMAN) bear this out, and his SPIRIT film displays his utter lack of imagination where this field of storytelling is concerned. Damned shame.
Reply
1-10-2009 @ 7:30PM
Chelsey said...
Omfg, I see you like typing there everyone. lol. My Comment (which is in very BAD grammer) : I loves the Spirit! YAY!
Reply
2-26-2009 @ 1:29AM
nik said...
I love all kinds of movies, Shindler's List, A Clockwork Orange, Casino Royale, Blade Runner, Children of Men, The Mist, The Dark Knight, The Virgin Suicides... the list goes on.
BUT
I must be one of a small niche of people who liked The Spirit as much as I liked the movies of Dick Tracey, The Phantom and The Shadow.
I loved The Spirit. It was a very refreshing step away from the enormous amount of deep, realistic, serious and cerebral films that hog the silver screen. I miss having fun at the cinemas.
I'm also a huge fan of Sin City, and the Grindhouse films -Planet Terror and Death Proof and the works of Rodriguez and Tarantino. Also, Army of Darkness is another overthetop romp I love to death.
Rodriguez called Tarantino, Miller and himself as being the 'three amigos' 'cause of the highly unique vision and interests that they share. I'd love to meet all three of them just to let them know how grateful I am for them to be making the type of films I absolutely crave more and more of everyday.
Reply