Review: Valkyrie
Filed under: Action, Drama, Thrillers, MGM, Theatrical Reviews, War

My main (and only big) problem with Bryan Singer's Valkyrie is the same problem I have with "movie stars" in general. For example, I believe that Tom Cruise is a very fine actor, or at least a generally underrated one, but since he's a Movie Star before he's an Actor (and yes, he is), I find it almost impossible to LOSE him in a role. Sean Penn gets lost in a role. He just vanishes! Johnny Depp does it a lot, too. (Or at least he used to before the Pirate flicks came along.) Julia Roberts as a Victorian Queen is still Julia Roberts to me, which is why I prefer those chameleon-ish character players like Gary Oldman and John Malkovich.
In other words, I never once (for a second) "bought" Tom Cruise as a grizzled, burnt-out, one-armed German army officer in the new wartime thriller Valkyrie -- but because he's a movie star who knows how to carry a flick, he still anchors the tale with a strong and crisp screen presence. And while, yeah, it is a little distracting to hear high-ranking German soldiers speaking with American, British and Irish accents, the simple fact is that Valkyrie is a very slick old-school-style adventure movie. In some ways it feels like a perfectly enjoyable mid-'50s war movie that's been re-made with only the finest in modern cinematic technology. The plot is pure potboiler, but the look is grade-A Hollywood.
The story is basic enough, although the execution is kind of convoluted: Seems that a large number of high-ranking German soldiers are sickened by what Adolf Hitler has done to their homeland, and they're intent on taking the lunatic down before things get even worse. To that end, a colonel called Van Stauffenberg (Cruise) is enlisted by a secret group of dissenters, and together they hatch a plan to blow Hitler up with a miniature bomb.
Although based on actual events, Valkyrie feels more like a slick and modern remake of some forgotten 1944 war flick than a fact-centric bio-pic -- but I for one found it fascinating (and reassuring) to learn that LOTS of Hitler's soldiers were disgusted by the man's brutality. Love Valkyrie or hate it, I think it's very cool that a new movie can remind us, hey, not all wartime Germans were Nazis, y'know.
The film is at its best when it's focused on the elaborate bombing scheme, a handful of unexpected detours, and its few tasty moments of tension and stress -- and not as strong when, for example, we're forced to spend time with Stauffenberg and his doe-eyed wife. These bits feel like extra character development that the flick simply doesn't need. Thanks to strong (if strange) casting, we have no problem buying these characters as desperate, angry, and willing to murder their own leader -- which makes the family bits feel like little more than push-button filler. And they actually work against the flick a little bit, as I think we should be accepting the Colonel as a desperate, ruthless assassin -- and not as a sweet, doting husband.
Another problem is that of the editing, pacing, call it what you like. One suspects that Valkyrie dealt with some late-minute editorial alterations, which halfway explains why, for example, Kenneth Branagh shows up early in the film, seemingly prepared to deliver a substantial role. His character then vanishes until late in the third act, which only serves to make us wonder where the guy's BEEN for the last 75 minutes. But hey, extra snips in one department can sometimes yield fruit in another. So while Valkyrie might have once been an overlong epic of some sorts, it's now been streamlined into a perfectly slick matinee-style war thriller. Singer still delivers shots, scenes, and sequences that indicate a whole lot of talent, and I'm betting that sometime soon he delivers his first true masterpiece. (X2 was close!)
As far as Tom Cruise goes, this one's pretty much win-win. If you hate the guy, you'll find enough in Valkyrie that you can poke fun of. If, however, you have no problem with the superstar, then you'll find his performance workmanlike, interesting, passable ... but hardly his finest stuff. I say it's worth seeing for its irresistible ensemble of character actors, a handful of really well-crafted sequences, and a truth-based story that simply deserves to be repeated.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
12-26-2008 @ 11:39AM
Jmchez said...
"Not all wartime German soldiers were Nazis." How old is the reviewer?
The Von Stauffenberg story is rather well known. Von Stauffenberg may have been desperate but he was not a ruthless hit-man. I don't know if the movie shows this (apparently not) but the Colonel was a practicing Catholic that came to believe that Hitler was the Anti-Christ or, at least, as close as anyone could get (he had lots of evidence for that).
I'm not giving anything away by saying that Hitler survived and these men suffered horribly for their assassination attempt. In real life, true heroes don't always win.
Reply
12-26-2008 @ 2:22PM
Chromey said...
Just let the Tom Cruise thing go already. It is beyond tired. Keep in mind this movie probably wouldn't even exist if it weren't for his presence in it.
Reply
12-26-2008 @ 2:41PM
Matt said...
Are you stupid? You do know that there are a lot of great movies that don't star him, don't you? I think his involvement in a pic tends to bring the overall quality of the film down. He overacts in just about everything he does. I can think of several films that would have been much better if another actor had been cast in his role instead and I am sure that this film in no different.
12-28-2008 @ 10:00PM
Valerie said...
Tom Cruise seems more like a robotic actor these days. I find his acting boring and play like.He never changes..he has a look at me I am Tom Cruise type of attitude and because of that I can't seem to finish watching his films anymore. I agree that actors like Sean Penn and Johnny Depp lose themselves in the roles which draw you into the movie. To me a great actor is one that can reinvent themselves as the character not just memorize lines from a script.
1-21-2009 @ 7:32PM
moviefanatic said...
For a fact-based movie, they shouldn't make the movie in the first place. I think it is bad taste to trample on another country history and to think that they can make it better. I thought "Mary Antoinette" was enough to make Hollywood realized that.
12-26-2008 @ 2:39PM
Mr. R said...
And if the movie didn't exist, life would go on just fine.
I agree with what you say on the actors that loose themselves but I honestly find Malcovich always John Malcovich.
Reply
12-26-2008 @ 3:33PM
Aniber said...
The problem with this movie is that it has Tom Cruise in it. It's just another Tom Cruise movie; he's trying to save the world. I agree that whenever you see him in a movie, you see him and not the character and that's because he can't play anyone other than himself. I mean couldn't he at least try to do a German accent? Or maybe that's just too far for him to reach as an actor. I am very familiar with the story of the assassination attempt on Hitler, but I won't go see this movie because (in addition to Cruise being in the movie) I'm sure that it's been Hollywoodized. Too many people will watch it and then think that it represents the truth (ala Pearl Harbor). There's other movies out there that won't waste my time.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 2:17AM
wolf said...
I have a rather simple question.....
If anyone should be sinking in the meaning of the movie, it should be someone with no prejudice against any actor, with no personal problems or emotional struggles with the subject of the movie, or the nation it represents.
so, evidently, no one's review is totally objective and worth condering before going to see the movie.
12-28-2008 @ 2:45AM
Aniber said...
Okay, but where's your question? I wasn't reviewing the movie, because I'm not going to go see it. I was reviewing the actor. You don't have to agree with me, that's fine.
12-26-2008 @ 11:34PM
YouFaceTheTick said...
Should the actors speak english with idiotic german accents? What sense would that make? If they're not speaking in german, then use whatever accent you want as long as it's not german. Nothing is more annoying that movies showing people in another country and they all speak english with accents of that country.
FWIW, the film looks awful and Cruise is a movie star. He does not become characters...he simply pretends to be them while every cruise mannerism seeps through.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 11:08AM
Kenny Cahill said...
I really enjoyed the movie. I'm not one to add my opinions in this manner, but I enjoy studying WWII and was intrigued by all the negative hype. I was pleasantly surprised. I'm not a huge Cruise fan but I thought he did a good job. The supporting cast is superb. I will recommend this film.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 7:54AM
Walter+Phyllis said...
"...and I'm betting that sometime soon he delivers his first true masterpiece. (X2 was close!)"
I may be a fangirl of "The Usual Suspects", but I think Singer created a masterpiece with that one. At least much closer than "X-Men" or "X2".
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 1:17PM
gary said...
The movie was very entertaining - the whole cast did a very good job! The pace was kept very quick, I never got bored, and there were plenty of times, I felt "at the edge of my seat". I'd recommend seeing it. I don't even get what the controversy about the accents was about, I seriously don't even understand what the big deal is - I noticed absolutely nothing unusual about the way people spoke in the movie.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 1:59PM
Billie said...
I agree about John Malkovich to me he always looks and sounds like John Malkovich.
I don't understand why you would say that about Johnny he always disappears into his roles and he most certainly does in all the Pirate movies. To me Mr. Depp and Captain Jack Sparrow are two completely different entities.
I liked Tom Cruise in The 4th of July and The Rainman I probably will not see this as I do not like war movies but it looks good.
Reply
12-27-2008 @ 6:45PM
dommvp said...
Just saw Valkyrie this afternoon. It was a tossup between seeing this and Doubt and because Singer directed it I chose to watch it. And though I was apprehensive at the start of the movie I didn't end up regretting it. Although you know what's going to happen the suspense and mystery Singer builds up to keeps you thoroughly entertained. Even Tom Cruise surprised me and put on a helluva performance. The moments when the main character meets or is even in the same room as Adolf Hitler send chills down your spine.
Support indie filmmakers:
https://www.fundable.com/groupactions/groupaction.2008-12-24.1007641270
Reply
12-28-2008 @ 10:03AM
Another Matt said...
I agree: Cruise stays Cruising through the flick, and I do wish I'd seen more Branagh. But the supporting cast was great anyway (even with their diverse accents). I especially liked the actually-German actor who was the major/general/whateverguy of the Reserve Army. He was in the Pianist (and maybe King Kong?).
Reply
1-01-2009 @ 11:07PM
Adam said...
Saw the movie a couple days ago and was gonna reply to the "tick" guy's asinine review, but apparently he didn't even see it so his comments are basically irrelevant (see the movie if you're gonna write a review seriously)...but those of you that actually saw it didn't have a problem w/Cruise NOT having a German accent??? Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't he playing a Nazi in Germany?!?! If you're not gonna have the actors speak in German w/English subtitles (which can get old and hard to follow sometimes I'll admit), AT LEAST have them speak w/a German accent!!!
For the record, I'm not a huge Cruise fan, nor am I a Cruise hater...he's had his good movies and bad like anyone. But if you're portraying a Nazi in Germany during WWII you need to SPEAK W/A GERMAN ACCENT!!! Maybe they didn't pay him enough or he was just too arrogant to learn one, who knows. Or maybe it was Singer's idea not to have him speak w/an accent, although some had British accents...what was that all about??? Either way, it completely took away from the authenticity of the movie for me and made most of the characters highly unbelievable esp Cruise as the main guy. The only one halfway believable was the guy playing Hitler who not only looked the part but also sounded German b/c he SPOKE W/A GERMAN ACCENT!!! Singer has directed some movies I enjoyed like X-men 2, but this was definitely not one of them...save your money!!!
Reply
1-04-2009 @ 10:00AM
Dorv said...
I completely disagree with this arguement to the point that I think its utter bunk. I think I have to suspend just as much belief listening to them speak English with (usually bad) German accents than I would to hear the speak English with any accent.
For them to be authentic, it would have to be subtitled, which you yourself said is something would get old (A point I wholeheartedly disagree with).
Furthermore, wasn't the whole point of the movie to show that there were dissenters, that not everyone was a Nazi, specifically not the "main guy." If you're going to take the time to critique a film as forcefully as you have, don't you think its appropriate to take the time to get the details right?
1-06-2009 @ 6:15PM
Kathy said...
I for one think that everyone is much too hard on Tom Cruise. I find him to be an excellent actor who gets into his character just as much as most fine actors. Maybe his personal antics make people feel the way that they do about him, but I try to judge a performance not be the actor but by the believability of the actor in his role.
I found this movie to be very well made. I especially liked that there was not a lot of personal information on the men involved, but instead the movie portrayed what they DID. I also think that actors all portraying German dialects would have distracted from the story. But I liked the way that initial dialogue began in German and morphed into English.
For those of you who have not seen this film, you should not prejudge. For those of you who have seen the film, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But, I for one, give the movie a glowing review.
Reply
1-06-2009 @ 3:47PM
vfg said...
cruise just played the role well. he doesn't respond to criticism. he could have glowed his way through the movie which he is the best at doing but chose to just play the role which was risky but it worked. he knew obviously that a nazi movie at christmas wouldn't blow the doors off the world. the pattern i see in cruise is that he makes great movies every time and is not concerned about timing or setting precedents, but instead trusts that the overall body of his work will remain high quality.
Reply