Cinematical's 25 Lamest of 2008!

What good would a 25 Hottest of 2008 list be without a 25 Lamest of 2008 list to complement it? That's right, in addition to scouring all the year's news for what was hot, we did the same for what was not ... hot. What irritated us to no end? Who had a horrible year at the movies? What person, place or thing would we happily ship off to a galaxy far, far away? Chipping it to help dissect 2008 were Cinematical's Erik Davis, Scott Weinberg, Eric D. Snider, Monika Bartyzel, Jessica Barnes, Eugine Novikov, William Goss, Jette Kernion and Peter Martin. In a year that saw George Lucas take a fan beating, Harry Potter get pushed around and M. Night Shyamalan attempt an R-rating, who (or what) would go down as the lamest of 2008? Click through the gallery below to find out ...
The 25 Lamest Things in Movies
25. The New 'At the Movies'
In an effort to revitalize the former 'Siskel & Ebert' show, producers managed to cast the two dolts that would make anyone miss Richard Roeper. And you know what? I don't even want to stick it to Ben Mankiewicz nearly as much as critical void and star-sucker extraordinaire Ben Lyons. I Am Legend is one of the greatest movies ever made? You love women, but not The Women? Yeesh. It's guys like you that give guys like me a bad name. -- WG
Getty Images
24. Pushing 'Harry Potter' to 2009
All the online petitions in the world aren't going to rescue everyone's favorite boy wizard from being banished to Warner Brothers' tentpole-lacking 2009 summer (thanks, writer's strike). Me? I just wish Harry had been around to wave his wand on all the fans who would go out to shell it out for Twilight in its stead. -- WG
Warner Bros.
23. Far-From-Funny Fellatio
The saying goes that great minds think alike, but I'm afraid that those minds may also have a monopoly on good taste, as the writers of November's Soul Men and December's Yes Man each came up with and brought to the screen identical gags (pun intended) involving oral pleasure given sans dentures to respective leads Bernie Mac and Jim Carrey. And they say modern comedy is toothless ... -- WG
Warner Bros.
22. Weinstein Co. Hoarding Good Movies
Harvey Weinstein admitted over the summer that his Third Rail Releasing arm was simply for the films they didn't believe in. That's why you didn't see the decent Rogue and Eden Lake, the damn good Inside or The Promotion or the allegedly alright Death Defying Acts. And what did they see fit to give the widest releases? The pitiful likes of Diary of the Dead and Hell Ride. Talk about picking all the wrong battles. -- WG
Weinstein Co.
21. Tyler Perry
Tyler Perry is the Uwe Boll of uplifting relationship dramedies, tacking on yet another duo of poorly-reviewed movies in 2008 (Meet the Browns, The Family That Preys) to a resume full of one waste of time after another. Will the cross-dressing Madea character continue to bail him out, or will Hollywood squash his rotten stench once and for all? -- ED
Lionsgate
20. Uwe Boll
Like a hyperactive child, Dr. Boll only makes loud noises when people are giving him attention. So let's stop. If his movies were half as entertaining as Boll's non-sensical ravings, Boll would be the next Joe Dante. But they're not. And he's not. -- SW
Freestyle
19. Iraq Movies
Hollywood keeps cranking out movies stemmed from the current conflict in Iraq -- both good (Stop-Loss) and pretty bad (The Lucky Ones) -- and audiences keep on ignoring them (Stop-Loss' domestic gross: $10m, The Lucky Ones: $267k). War, huh, good God, y'all. What is it good for? Not box office receipts, that's for sure. -- WG
Paramount
18. Diane Lane & Richard Gere, Together Again
After being Unfaithful in 2002, Diane Lane and Richard Gere got especially faithful on each other's ass during a North Carolina hurricane. But of course, this being a Nicholas Sparks deal, one of them has something to atone for, one of them is going to bite it, and horses are going to run wild and majestic on the beach regardless of which tears fate decides to jerk. -- WG
Warner Bros.
17. 'Australia'
I hate to say it, but Baz Luhrmann got greedy. Australia should have been a slam dunk; Jackman at his roguish and shirtless best, Kidman doing her adorably uptight routine, and one of the most inventive directors working today at the wheel. But, Mr. Luhrmann just couldn't help himself, and rather than keep it light, he just had to go for Oscar gold and ruin all the outback fun. Crikey. -- JB
20th Century Fox
16. 'The Spirit'
When Robert Rodriguez runs with Frank Miller's work, it's awesome. When Zack Snyder runs with Frank Miller's work, it's pretty cool. When Frank Miller runs with Will Eisner's work -- well, it's just downright embarrassing. Samuel L. Jackson alone seems to realize just how ridiculous this comic book adaptation was once when they handed Miller the reins, and he alone makes The Spirit the most fascinating trainwreck in ages. Seriously, folks: this thing is so over-the-top, it practically orbits the moon. -- WG
Lionsgate









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-29-2008 @ 10:33PM
Brice_J said...
The fact that "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" shows that George Lucas is trashing his own legacy shouldn't be the reason it's on this list, but the fact that it was made into a film at all. The kid that asked "what happened, daddy?" probably got a better feel of what the movie should have been when he/she seen more episodes at home: not a very good movie, but a darn good tv show.
Reply
12-29-2008 @ 10:54PM
MCW said...
Pretty good picks. I would have had similar ones. At The Movies... god, at the movies. I really miss Richard Roeper. I still DVR the episodes. I don't take anything they say seriously, because their reviews are almost always off-base, but I guess I watch because it is one of the few shows on TV that reviews movies. Dailies on Reelz Channel does it better, because they bring in all kinds of people to review movies, plus they even catch people coming out of the movie and ask them what they thought.
Who cares what two stuck-up rich guys think about movies? One of them claims to be from the AMC channel, for gosh sakes! Who knew that you could have a JOB at AMC? All they do there is run 50 year old movies non-stop. Wow, you really know everything there is to know to review movies released this year MancaWitzbold. I hate you guys At The Movies. Biggest mistake ever.
Next up, Harry Potter. It isn't so much that the date was moved... it was the reasoning behind the move that infuriated me and so many others. Doing it just for monetary gain, when your movie has HARRY POTTER in the title is the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life. Warner Brothers continues to show that they are out of touch completely.
And... Thank god everyone else hates Tyler Perry as much as I do. Please, go away, you have your money... here, here - take my wallet Tyler Perry, now just leave us alone!!
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 3:48AM
Brian said...
I could not agree more...especially on Uwe Boll, Shia LaBarf, the oh so retarded and not scary "horror" flicks, and the stupid just unbelievably not funny BS pictures they keep coming out with (Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer). It's nice to finally meet someone who shares the same hatred for untalented, unfunny, ridiculously stupid pieces of crap they call film these days.
Also at MCW's comment.....not defending the AMC staff member, but rather the films it plays...
Those 50 year old films are superb....especially in comparison to what is considered good film these days. Back in the day they needed to have talent and they actually made good films! Very rarely do you see a modern day North By Northwest or Psycho or epic film that changes the way we look at film (and don't say The Dark Knight because that was garbage)
1-02-2009 @ 12:41PM
dale neice said...
tyler perry...............pure garbage .........who likes this failed attempt at any type of humor............why is his shows still on tv ?
12-30-2008 @ 1:34AM
Jen said...
Number 26 - M.Night Shyamalan betraying every minority kid in America and whitewashing the entire core cast of the "Airbender" movie. Jesse McCartney as Zuko DOES NOT COMPUTE.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 5:39AM
Larry Donaldson said...
RE: Siskel and Ebert.
I always figured when they gave a flick "2 thumbs up" there was reason to be suspect. I never trusted thier reviews it seemed that they always gave positive reviews and to movies that seemed to really suck. I stopped watching and reading thier stuff LONG before he died!! And never went back!
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 6:03AM
SOS said...
I tend to agree with the “Ben-Ben” duo assessment expressed by others. Who the hell are they: Ben-Ben? What experiences are their‘s? The Ben-Ben opinion is so fresh (naive) it tends to amount to, something like, a Suri Cruise compare and contrast of the greatest moments in Muhammad Ali fights segment.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 9:01AM
Gordy said...
Tyler Perry needs to be stopped.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 9:34AM
Kurt Munro said...
I don't get what you mean by "what happened?" with regards to Mark Wahlberg. The fact that everyone was pushing him for best supporting actor was embarrassing.
Shia LaBeouf just plays himself in every single movie he's in. The fact that he combed his hair in Indy was the only thing that made that character seem different from all his others. Unfortunately this is the recipe for leading man superstar status.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 11:50AM
dlh said...
Can we please add Jessica Alba to the list? She is not funny, she cannot act and she drags down every single movie she is in. I swear the only reason she still has a career is some producer still thinks he can be the one who convinces her to go topless.
Reply
1-01-2009 @ 2:22PM
P Dakin said...
People need to stop going to see movies with Will Smith. He's the same in every movie. Whenever I see him I always think Fresh Prince. All he needs to do is team up with Tyler Perry.
Reply
1-02-2009 @ 9:57AM
Batzarro said...
Hey, lot's of great actors are the same in every movie they're/we're in.
1-02-2009 @ 1:51PM
jlt said...
"The Lucky Ones" was a fine, entertaining movie in the tradition of Ashby's "The Last Detail." You guys ever heard of that movie? If not, you should check it out. It's a classic.
You bloggers with your knee-jerk reactions to any film that has "soldiers" and "Iraq war" in the synopsis make me sick. So does Lionsgate, who chickened out and didn't spend a dime to advertise it.
Fortunately, not all the critics are as predictably blinkered as you.
Reply
1-02-2009 @ 4:37PM
vegimorph said...
i definetely agree with you about number one. ugh, those guys are pathetic
Reply
1-02-2009 @ 10:01PM
krissy said...
omg, i can't believe they didn't like twilight! it was so good! the fight seen was decent, and the plot was great too! he (or is it a she?) has NO TASTE IN MOVIES!!!!!
Reply
1-03-2009 @ 12:31AM
Angel said...
You confuse "girls" with "Americans."
Other people have no problem with reading subtitles, but it looks as though it is somewhat harder for Americans. "Like, words!" as you say.
I enjoyed both Twilight and Låt Den Rätta Komma In, and I didn't need subtitles for either! :O
Damn us Europeans and our multi language skills.
Reply
1-04-2009 @ 12:37PM
garfinkel said...
Please don't discredit the breed because of lame celebrity trends, and kiddie movies.
Yes, sometimes they are like children with 'special needs' but we've had one for 9 years, and he is the greatest
Reply
1-06-2009 @ 12:49PM
Jenna said...
OMG
Please! do not blame all "Ladies" for the minor success of that crap they call "Twlight."
It's such an embarrassment.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 4:48PM
Diana said...
I am a lady... and I wouldn't touch Twilight, aka that overglorified fanfiction, with a 10 foot pole. I totally agree that Let the Right One In deserved more attention than it received. It was one of the best films of the year, and it was buried under the Twilight juggernaut. God, I'm ashamed of what my fellow ladies are reading/watching these days.
PS Agree with all the picks.
Reply
1-17-2009 @ 7:50AM
stuart said...
What, no Eddie Murphy and the super lame Meet Dave? 2008 was all the lamer because of it.
Reply