The Geek Beat: The Spirit of the Age
Filed under: Fandom, The Geek Beat

There are some things you must do in the name of the Geek Beat – and for me, it was seeing The Spirit. I knew that it wouldn't be good. I've known that since ComicCon. But seeing as some of the first pieces I did here on Cinematical were on this film, I had to see the journey to the bitter, bloody end.
There's nothing to say about it, really. It was too earnest to ever be a camp classic, and it was too campy to appeal to anyone. The frustrating thing was that it had potential. There were some moments, moments I can't really pinpoint now, where I thought: "This could have been a cool movie." Then the Octopus melted a kitten while wearing a Nazi uniform, so you know, I might have just been hallucinating some sanity where there was none. But the consensus among my gang was that if it had been directed by anyone other than Frank Miller, it could have been pretty good.
There's nothing to say about it, really. It was too earnest to ever be a camp classic, and it was too campy to appeal to anyone. The frustrating thing was that it had potential. There were some moments, moments I can't really pinpoint now, where I thought: "This could have been a cool movie." Then the Octopus melted a kitten while wearing a Nazi uniform, so you know, I might have just been hallucinating some sanity where there was none. But the consensus among my gang was that if it had been directed by anyone other than Frank Miller, it could have been pretty good.
I can't even muster up a lot of scathing criticism for Miller. He's not blameless obviously -- the T&A and Octopus get-ups were all his idea, but there's no way anyone should have allowed him to do it. Films aren't created in a vacuum. Surely someone retained enough taste and sanity to say "Can we rework this a bit? Do we really want to melt a kitten? Why should they wear Japanese kimonos here?" Even if they decided, hey, let him go crazy with this ... surely there was an assistant director who might have pointed out that film doesn't work like comic book panels. The camera has to move around. There have to be things like close-ups and angles. Miller may have been the "co-director" of Sin City, but he hasn't been to film school, and someone needed to take his hand. Couldn't any of the players at least point out a clunky line or two?
Now, I'm a fan of Miller. I don't subscribe to the screams of "Hack!" and "Sell-out!" that pervade message boards across our great Internet. He's done a lot of good work. 300, Elektra Lives Again, and his Wolverine stand out are among my favorite comics of all time. But I'm not slavishly devoted to him – he's done a lot of crap, too. Frankly, I don't get him or his love-hate relationship with his readers. On one hand, it's like he hates us, and wants to see what our breaking point is. At the same time, he seems to think he's catering to us – I felt like The Spirit was his equivalent of asking for a fanboy hug. "It's Eva Mendes' naked ass, boys. Never say Uncle Frank doesn't do anything for you!" (Perhaps Gabriel Macht's nude scene was the nod to the fangirls? By then I had seen so much lovely feminine flesh that a naked man felt strange and wrong.)
That immaturity was one of the most perplexing aspects of the film. This is the guy who helped usher in mature comics, after all, peppering them with sex, violence, and nudity. Toilets are not typically funny in Miller's deadpan world, nor are references to The Hard Goodbye or Superman. If you had asked me five years ago what a film helmed by him would be, I would have said Punisher: War Zone or even Batman Begins. (Read Batman: Year One again and tell me I'm merely idealistic.) I wouldn't have expected something on par with Batman and Robin. That's what makes the whole experiment so gorram tragic – Miller rescued Daredevil and Batman from that sort of flashy, junky storytelling only to send another comic icon there.
It's that tiny reason I chose to close out the year by discussing The Spirit. My first thought as the credits rolled was how easily Iron Man, Batman, the Hulk, or the X-Men could have received this treatment. Batman already has gotten it several times over, because this is how mainstream audiences view comic books – campy, childish, and unreal. That changed this year. 2008 will go down in history as the year of the geek, and the year of the comic book movie. Audiences have begun to realize this genre has some meat on its bones, and that compelling characters can and do exist inside those outlandish costumes. They can't get enough – after every movie or trailer, a newbie was asking me where they could find more Iron Man or what Watchmen was. (I watched my parents go from "Why the heck do you read those?" to "Where's my issue of The Stand?" in a single summer.)
It's a shame that such a fantastic year closed on such a low note – and that Will Eisner, the man who we owe this "wacky" concept of graphic novels and adult storylines, was brought to those same Dark Knight-loving audiences in a shabby way. But it's kind of a blessing too. The Spirit can serve as a template alongside Batman Forever and Batman and Robin as to how not to make a comic book movie – and judging from the box office, audiences just might agree. I'd like to think that the bar has been set, and woe to any movie that fails to meet it.
So, with that – Happy New Year, my dear readers. Thanks for coming to Cinematical day in and day out, week after week, and sharing your thoughts. I count myself lucky that I have a job here that involves gushing over Wolverine, Watchmen, and loose cannon cops – and even luckier that it's for such an enthusiastic audience. It's been a great year at the movies, and a pretty awesome year writing about them. See you in 2009!










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-30-2008 @ 1:36PM
Greg Holkan said...
Actually, based on anecdotes I've heard from people who've run into the man, Miller really does resent and despise his fans. Should it surprise anyone that he would churn something like this out when trying to pander to people he loathes?
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 2:21PM
Martin said...
I'm not wholly familair with Mr. Miller's ouevre, but it seems odd for an artist of any kind to hate his audience. We (and when I say we, I generally mean you, as I don't own any Miller memorabilia) are paying his wages.
I cannot stand arrogance, especially when it is as unjustified as it appears to be here.
I'll skip the Spirit.
Happy new year to you, too, Elisabeth and everyone else.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 5:40PM
Kurt said...
hehehe, "gorram"...
Love it.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 7:26PM
Rudy said...
Thanks for taking the geek bullet on this one, Elisabeth!
I'll wait for Blu Ray with a bottle of wine - it made "Speed Racer" watchable.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 7:42PM
paul said...
I noticed Eva Mendez had an uncomfortable look on her face while having her picture taken w/ the man. prolly doesn't mean anything. and as a side note i was diggin' through the back stock one day and happened across a signed copy of Ronin. got it cheap.
as you were.
Reply
12-30-2008 @ 9:33PM
Bryan said...
As hokey and corny as it was, I think you might be overreacting a little. What it lacked in depth it gained in great laughs and a decent amount of fun. I talk about it more at goodmoviebadmovie.blogspot.com
Reply
12-31-2008 @ 6:06AM
Angry Fangirl said...
I prayed for months that this movie would fail. It had too, I wanted Frank Miller to feel as embarrassed as I was.
The average person on the street now thinks this is The Spirit. How many will go out and find the books and see Not the Emo-Band lookin' Batman type and see instead a Nicely dressed, square jawed anti-superhero(no super powers) man in Blue suit and gloves, will they be happy or disappointed?
I am a fan of the Original Eisner Spirit, a character with wit, warmth, caring and ALWAYS wore his striped boxer shorts! Spirit never killed anyone, he wasn't depressed and he wasn't a Guardian of Central City, he was a detective that wanted to continue to do his work only now he could do it in secret, since people thought he was dead( Dr Cobra's vat o' secret stuff- and he wasn't dead and he isn't immortal.)
As a Spirit fan I was embarrassed and continue to be so- because now I feel like I have to explain the difference between the two. I think Will Eisner was given a black eye not accolades from his "biggest fan" Miller.
I hope no one lets Miller get his hands on the Late Hugo Pratt's Corto Maltese- another character he supposedly "loves" ( although I heard the Spirit talks to cats in the film- that was from a story called "Fable in Venice"-Corto who talks to cats, not the Spirit.) I don't think he should be able to direct anymore adaptations of other's work, he should just stick to his own.
I guess what I'm saying is- Don't let this man have any other beloved icons- and don't let him direct.
I write comics too- but that doesn't make me qualified to director either, or does it?????
The only thing that will possibly be worse than this film is what they are going to do to The Green Hornet....
Reply
12-31-2008 @ 1:22PM
Krumhorn said...
I don't get all this tortured angst about THE SPIRIT. I thought the movie was very good......not the best I've ever seen....but certainly not as bad as all the fanboys (and angry fangirls) try to make it appear.
What is impressive is the visceral emotion that jumps off these reviews. Almost pure bile and hatred for Miller
My favorite review started out by saying that it's hard to say precisely when the movie hit rock bottom. I also loved the review that started by saying that any reference to cardboard characters and plot would be a disparagement of a useful packaging material.
Such heat.
I enjoyed the movie. I am surprised to learn that women very often love it. Clearly, Miller tried to make the comic book come to life using techniques to which Eisner didn't have access. It was pure popcorn-eating entertainment.
I just don't get all this emotionality about it. Not justified in the least.
- Krumhorn
Reply
1-01-2009 @ 1:02PM
Mike said...
Krumhorn the question I would have for you is are you a fan of the source material?
Most comic book reader are passionate about their favorite stories or characters and when the see those properties taken in directions far from the source it is off putting. Generally the new direction is not an improvement. If you are not a fan of the source you have no investment going in, so if a character is portrayed in a manner that's out of character with its source as a non-fan that wouldn't faze you. As a fan it could go from mildly to extremely disturbing. Angry fangirl makes the point, people whose first exposure to the Spirit is this movie will assume that it is a mirror image of the comic when it's not. I've gone through the same issue with other comicbook inspired properties that bare only passing resemblance to the source and it is very annoying .
As for Mr Miller, I too am a fan of some of his comic work. Mostly his early work. I don't think he is on his game anymore. His good stuff was so good I think a lot of people are willing to give him a pass on the crappy work. He made a big name for himself early on and his name demands and deserves respect in the comic community but IMHO his work of late has been of very low quality. 300 was good but that story was written 10 years ago. I've even heard Sin City (comic) fans say how the later books in the series are much weaker than earlier books.
I won't see the Spirit. I'm not familiar with the source, though I am aware of it. I know who Will Eisner was and had heard of the Spirit long before the movie but I haven't read the comics. I was at Comic-con when they showed trailers and clips from the movie and wasn't impressed at all. The reaction so far tells me my gut was right.
Reply