Poll: Should George Lucas Retire?
.jpg)
Sean Connery did it, Joaquin Phoenix apparently did it, and countless other actors, actresses and filmmakers have talked about it at one point or another -- leaving us, along with the pages of People Magazine, to wonder when, how or what if. It's funny, too, because you don't find many people who want to retire from the entertainment business, simply because most either never make it, fall out of the spotlight or wind up overdosing on drugs, their own ego or something along those lines wayyy before they'd ever reach an age to retire at. But here's a good question: Could the fans at home ever force someone into retirement?
Our good friend Jenna Busch wrote a little thing for Sci Fi Wire on nine reasons why George Lucas should retire ... like, now. Say what you want about Lucas and his career choices, but the man definitely still has his fans -- as poor Jenna is feeling the fanboy wrath in the comments section of her post. Her reasons, of course, mention Lucas' "additions" to the original Star Wars films, the fact that he refuses to release any of his flicks in hi-def, his work on both Willow and Howard the Duck (two awesome guilty pleasures, in my opinion), etc ...
While I've thrown more than a few internet punches at Lucas over the years, I have to say I'm really enjoying the Clone Wars animated show on Cartoon Network (seriously, watch it), I didn't loathe Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull as much as the rest of you did, and I feel Lucas still has a few good chunks of awesomeness left in him. That said, you all (including the lovely Jenna) may feel differently. So have at it below: Should Lucas retire?









Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
1-07-2009 @ 4:20PM
Astin said...
Let him produce. Maybe let him come up with very rough ideas for movies. Do NOT let him write, and keep him away from the director's chair if possible.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 5:04PM
Mike J said...
I agree totally, but on a side note what is the coming out of his mouth?
1-07-2009 @ 5:27PM
LiqwidZero said...
More than likely, since he's frozen in carbonite, it is a breathing tube. If breathing wasn't regulated, then he would die.
He's not in there of course, but it just makes sense that it would connect to a breathing aparatus.
1-07-2009 @ 4:34PM
Brian said...
I too love Willow, can't say the same thing about the horrendous Howard The Duck.
The two little guys from Willow were absolutely some of the best characters in movie history...."We stole the baby!!!!"
Why that movie gets panned, it has to be Val Kilmer not being media friendly.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 4:40PM
Robert said...
I miss Sean Connery.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 4:46PM
Andy Tanguay said...
Oh god yes...that would be great.
As an old school Star Wars fan, I hate the 'additions' he's made to the Star Wars universe, and they do sully my opinions of even the original trilogy. But I've learned to tune everything out lately...Clone Wars movies and video games and all these goofy products.
But from what most people can gather, he's responsible for a lot of what was wrong with the last Indiana Jones movie. And I'm sorry Erik, but that was an awful steaming pile of a movie. So having him move on to messing up other things is just getting old.
He suffers from the vacuum he lives in. He lives with hundreds if not thousands of people around him telling him how every one of his farts is a symphony and every burp like the singing of angels. Even the most brilliant person needs an editor from time to time.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 5:21PM
Clark Parker said...
I think he should do whatever the damn hell he wants... If some imbalanced fans think George has done damage to franchises that he created, to them I say suck it up... They were his to damage. I sure as hell didn't create Star Wars, no matter how much I like or dislike it ... So why should I get a say in it's future? Certainly my ten bucks doesn't give me the right to anything more then a viewing and my opinion after said viewing is as much my own as the film is his.
In the end, if people don't like what he has to offer, they don't have to watch it... Or at the very least they can pretend it never happened. Call it the vanishing fridge technique, if you like but I think it's preposterous to tell someone what then can and can not do with their lives or careers, within legal limits of course... But even then, Jar Jar was not a crime against humanity, no matter how many people he bothered. Most of us can't go to the corner store without bumping into someone that gets on our nerves, I imagine it to be entirely likely that a whole damned galaxy is bound to contain a few people that are going to be annoying.
That said, I don’t personally think he is particularly talented in the director’s chair to begin with, my favorite Star Wars film wasn’t even directed by him and yet he has done an incredible amount for the industry as a whole and doesn’t exactly make lousy movies, maybe they didn’t live up to hype, maybe they did, I really don’t care about that stuff. It’s none of my business. He has made flicks I’ve enjoyed and he has made some I didn’t… The same can be said of most directors or producers or actors or anyone in the game. This is why I am not inherently against remakes. There is always room for improvement (the opposite is, of course, also true) and so I just don’t let it bother me if something wasn’t what I wanted from it. We can always try again later and barring that, no adaptation or remake or so-called shoddy sequel will ever erase the source material that got us so pumped in the first place.
Do we really need to lynch the guy just because it turned out that Anakin was as much the whiny little bastard that his son turned out to be?
Reply
2-17-2009 @ 4:14PM
KPl. said...
CP,
The problem is that only by mass shunning we create a democracy of the wallet sufficient to make our opinions worthwhile in STOPPING THE MADNESS that is bad film making omnipresent throughout Hollyweird these days.
And to get that consensus of empowerment, we need forums like this where we can compare evidence and opinion.
My own view is that George Lucas is a shyster extraordinaire.
Having his Film Utopia group essential recraft even his vague story for 'Star Wars' about 50 times from 1974-1976 before it was presentable as -their- work and then hiring his 'good friends' the Huycks to finish polishing the characterization and dialogue on the eve of shooting in 1976 _because he admits he is a lousy writer_. And ANH wasn't ready, that late in the game, for shooting.
Which is where your argument falls down. Because if he didn't do 'A New Hope'. And he didn't do 'The Empire Strikes Back' (K3 and Leigh Brackett) and _all the rest is crap_. Then you have to start judging the man by the majority of his known-owned work.
And four of six SW films sucking sewage water is simply not a bettable fraction for this man ever getting better.
The great sadness being the Lucas has legally destroyed any hope of a remake/reboot/continuation of the series. With or without himself at the wheel.
And so we will never know if your theory about Mulliganing a movie is true.
1-07-2009 @ 5:41PM
terrymcbeer said...
George Lucas has never made a great movie. Star Wars was as close as he came.
Irv Kirschner made Empire Strikes Back and in that file essentially made Star Wars.
Indiana Jones may have been a Lucas idea, but Spielberg reigned him in.
When George Lucas is good, he comes up with an idea and gets the right people involved and lets them run with it. He should have let the last 3 Star Wars pics be directed by someone with talent.
Then again, Indiana Jones looked like a turd and had an incoherent plot and horrid acting and dialouge and Spielberg didn't bother to fix any of that. They're just past their prime.
Can you imagine David Fincher or Tim Burton directing Star Wars? Let them do the thrawn series. Let someone else do an Indiana Jones movie. Why not.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 5:57PM
Rich said...
He should be hung for Crimes against Films...
I will grant he comes up with some fantastic ideas, but he needs to stay away from writing the script and directing the movie.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 12:18AM
Candyland said...
Wow good thing EVERYONE hasn't said that already.
1-07-2009 @ 8:17PM
spamstratagem said...
I don't care if he retires or not. It would be nice if he would stop revisiting and tampering with his films.
I'm still patiently waiting for a version of the original THX-1138 on DVD/ Blueray.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 11:33PM
skapig said...
THX-1138 has already been released on DVD with pretty nice quality.
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was simply embarassing for everyone involved. It starts out as being fairly fun and tolerable, but by the end you're left scratching your head wondering how a movie so long in the making could end up so painfully bad. Cliches everywhere. Worst of all, a few mind-numbingly awful scenes (the vine-swinging perhaps being the worst of them). Guess Lucas and Speilberg have a bunch of ass-kissers working for them because a true professional or friend would have pointed out the issues.
The new Clone Wars cartoon is surprisingly decent; however, Lucas again feels the need to dumb it down for the kids. The droid soldiers got turned into bungling idots for the sake of cheap comic relief. Completely useless bits that could easily be cut out. Fortunately it seems that approach has been toned down after the first few episodes. That doesn't forgive the unwarranted Jar Jar love (give kids a little credit!). A whole episode was devoted to him and it sounds like he'll be in the next one too.
1-08-2009 @ 12:48PM
Stephen said...
THX IS available on DVD; however, it is not the 'original' film. Lucas went back and made some changes (http://www.maverick-media.co.uk/movies/thx_1138_1971/changes_001.html). Some for the better, some for the worse. I'd really like to see it in its original form.
1-07-2009 @ 9:07PM
Kurt said...
Anyone watch this week's Zero Punctuation? The first award given out was the "Indiana Jones in the Fridge Franchise Death Award".
So, yeah.
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 9:47PM
Jay said...
I'm kind of inclined to agree with Clark. I know people who simply refuse to believe that Episodes 1-3 have been made, but it's all personal preference. Regardless of whether you think any or all of the Star Wars films are a disappointment, it's not like the guy didn't make it up in the first place! I say leave him alone, he's wealthy enough that he might actually be able to get away with telling satan himself to retire from the soul-harvesting business.
-Jay
Reply
1-07-2009 @ 11:25PM
Bryan Price said...
My wife and I were just talking about this. She thinks Christensen might have been an OK actor if he wasn't spewing so much manure for lines. I personally liked Jumper, so I'm definitely in the "Lucas ruined it" camp. We need JCV to go back in time and force Lucas to give up writing after Epi IV. To hell with his wife and kid!
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 12:31AM
Jason Lawless said...
A Thrawn series of movies would be awesome! The books were very engaging and an amazing addition to the mythology. The comic book adaption was also a great read.
Should Lucas retire? While many of us have been crushed as our collective childhoods have been raped over and over - the already mentioned "indiscretions" perpetrated on Indy & SW, Transformers (that might get another thread started altogether I'm sure), upcoming possibilities G.I.Joe (man I hope not!), it does not mean that a specific person should get out.
We may not agree with any of the "updates" and "additions", but they are here and we can't do anything about it. I would love to see some other people get a crack at certain projects such as Guillermo del Toro on a Star Wars epic maybe? Heir to the Empire anyone?. His monsters are not CG and offer a real world feel to make me believe they could actually exist and his almost complete devotion to the source material makes me giddy to say the least.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 12:41AM
Madge said...
No disrespect to him and what he's brought to the world, but it doesn't really seem like he's going anywhere nor has any drive to do so. What has he done recently that was actually original? Why doesn't he move on to other worlds and stories? Were Indiana Jones and Star Wars really the only things he had in him? Obviously both have been very lucrative for him, but he's locked himself into a creative box. He seems to be more of a business man by this point, pursuing his little projects out of a lark more than any necessity or call for them to be made.
And I'm not saying he shouldn't do whatever he feels is right or that he should give a damn about what we think, but that's my opinion on the matter and he's completely free to ignore it.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 2:54AM
Mike S said...
George Lucas retired 31 years ago after the original Star Wars film became a monumental success.
This is how he spends his retirement - by making movies!
You no like, you no watch - simple.
Remember kids - nobody's got a gun to your head!
Reply