Pacino and De Niro Angry at Being Portrayed as Watchmen
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy
Al Pacino and Robert De Niro finally co-starred together last year in Righteous Kill, and now they're teaming up again: to sue the film's distributor, Overture, and the Tutima watch manufacturer for allegedly misusing their names to sell watches. Yes, these two will appear in terrible films until the cows come home -- but don't you DARE suggest they endorse a particular brand of wristwatch. According to the Reuters news service, a series of ads last year (such as the one pictured) used the actors' names, voices, and faces to endorse Tutima watches. In addition to print advertisements, a clip from Righteous Kill appeared on Tutima's website. The actors claim they never gave permission for such an endorsement, and that they'd have said no if they'd been asked.
In the words of the lawsuit, De Niro has only ever endorsed a product "under very specific and compelling circumstances," and Pacino "has never commercially endorsed any product or service in the United States." The stars of 88 Minutes and The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle have standards, you know. (I suspect one of those standards is that they'll do whatever you want; you just gotta pay them.)
Actors do have the right to control when their names, images, and voices are used for commercial purposes, of course. If Overture really didn't make the proper arrangements with Pacino and De Niro before allowing Tutima to use them, well ... they're gonna be in trouble. According to the Associated Press, Overture was surprised by the lawsuit, takes all legal action very seriously, etc., etc.
And this isn't the first time Tutima has been in trouble over this movie. In January, Righteous Kill's production company, Millennium Films, claimed that Tutima had failed to pay the $50,000 they'd promised in exchange for Pacino wearing their watch in the film for a few seconds. What I want to know is, what kind of idiot would deliberately piss off De Niro and Pacino? If you're going to misuse someone's picture, choose someone who won't come after you with a crowbar and beat your face in. Rainn Wilson, for example. What's he gonna do?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-06-2009 @ 10:25AM
Mike D said...
"Al Pacino and Robert De Niro finally co-starred together last year in Righteous Kill"
They co-starred together in Heat. I don't know how many watches they wore, though.
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 10:39AM
Sue C said...
How can you say that Al Pacino and Robert De Nero make terrible films? They make films that are good. It is obvious that you have forgotten the movies that have made them the greats that they are. I saw Al Pacino's "88 Minutes", it was an on the edge of your seat triller that kept everyone in the theater captivated and talking as we left. The theater was packed. Both Al Pacino and Robert De Nero have proven that they can do drama and comedy as well. You, Mr. Eric D. Snider, have more than likely given rave reviews to idiots like Tom Cruise, who does some of the most boring films ever made. Get it together.
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 11:11AM
Jonathan Kuhn said...
I am beyond certain that Eric is aware of the countless amazing films both of these performers were involved in...15-30 years ago. Neither of them has made a great film in a long time but both of them have made a lot of terrible ones.
3-06-2009 @ 10:42AM
StanleyNickels said...
Part of the justification for Righteous Kill's existence was that the diner scene from Heat wasn't enough. And I guess the other part was to sell wristwatches.
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 11:18AM
AndyIII said...
I wonder if the watchmakers can get the settlement reduced by arguing that they only used the eye of DeNiro and the forehead and nose of Pacino.
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 1:03PM
Mandi said...
??? Obviously none of you have seen Men of Honor or The Good Shepherd. Even Meet the Parents was rather entertaining. De Niro is phenomenal @ all times, perhaps taking the occasional less than epic role, but regardless shines through as the inherent bad@ss he is.
Pacino... I have no defense for.
Reply
3-06-2009 @ 1:20PM
Brandon said...
Honestly, they have the right to not want to be associated with a certain product. Just because they have starred in some bad movies doesn't mean they should be desperate to be in any ad just to get SOME publicity. The argument made in this article that they are being babies about it is irrelevant because their movies should really have nothing to do with their choice to not want to be associated with a product.
http://manonthemoon-filmblog.blogspot.com/
Reply