Review: Monsters vs. Aliens
Filed under: Action, Animation, Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Theatrical Reviews, Family Films, Dreamworks

I know this is going to sound familiar, but I absolutely adore feature-length animation. It bugs me that the medium is STILL -- a mere 900 years after Snow White came out -- considered "kids only" by a large portion of the population. Even my mom, who was moved to tears by Beauty and the Beast, absolutely adores Toy Story, and cites Sleeping Beauty as an all-time fave, turns her nose up when I offer her a DVD like Flushed Away or The Iron Giant. (Or Fear(s) of the Dark.) "Meh," she says, "that's kiddy stuff." But I know that if she actually sat down and focused on, say, The Incredibles -- she'd start to see what I see: An eye-tickling landscape of endless cinematic opportunities.
And here's where I kick the chair out from under you by saying that Monsters vs. Aliens is NOT one of those transcendent animated features, the sort that bridges the gap between kid stuff and grown-up art with no discernible effort whatsoever. No, Monsters vs. Aliens is a loud, rushed, choppy, silly, colorful Nintendo game of a movie, and if you're judging an 88-minute family flick by those specific criteria, then odds are you'll have a diverting time with DreamWorks' new production. But if you're looking for the artistry, the warmth, or the extra dimensions of a Pixar production, I'd say you wait for Up, or just lower expectations where Monsters vs. Aliens is concerned.
The problems lie not within the field if visual coolness. Like all of DreamWorks' animated films (Over the Hedge, Madagascar, Shrek), Monsters vs. Aliens sure looks like a billion bucks. From the cleverly-rendered monsters to the flashy set pieces and all the lovely landscapes in between, the movie is a feast for the retina. (Especially if you see it in 3-D!) And the concept is certainly nifty enough: That the Earth is being invaded by mean aliens, and the only ones who can save us are a bunch of monsters that our government has kept locked up for decades. The voice actors are fun, the action scenes are cool, and there's a lot of plain ol' pleasantness right up there on the screen.
Yet ... aside from the basic-yet-nifty premise of, yes, monsters battling aliens, the film has no idea where it wants to go. We seem to be treated to one (rather clumsy) character arc as we see poor Susan Murphy (aka Ginormica) go from blushing bride to massive freak to liberated woman, but all of this stuff feels like filler material -- narrative lip service paid as passage to bolt from one action scene to the next. Problem is, Susan is not that interesting of a character, her development is clunky and scattershot, and the scenes between her and her callous ex-boyfriend (Paul Rudd) do nothing but drag the film to a halt.
The problem, quite simply, is the screenplay. What began as the cool concept I just mentioned has become a framework on which to hang a long line of wheezing jokes. From the obtuse president (a thoroughly misused Stephen Colbert) and his Axel F. Theme references to the bored banter of the otherwise charming monsters, the flick feels like it was written, re-written, and hastily mega-re-written until nobody could really tell what was FUNNY anymore. (Between "screenplay" and "story," the flick went through at least seven writers.) The only consistent chuckles come from a goofy blue blob with the voice of Seth Rogen, and those giggles come mainly from the actor's enthusiasm for the part -- not from any jokes that are all that snappy.
The rest of the voice cast -- Reese Witherspoon as a heroic giant of a woman, Kiefer Sutherland as a gruff general, Hugh Laurie as a brilliant cockroach, Will Arnett as a Black Lagoon-type gill-creature, Rainn Wilson as an evil robot overlord -- seem to be on board for either marquee value or comedy cred ... but virtually none of 'em are allowed to kick back and make with the FUNNY. Such are the constraints of animated comedy, I suppose, but DreamWorks has made lots of funny flicks (I still love Over the Hedge!) without sacrificing anything in the story department.
But these are slightly grown-up complaints being tossed in the face of a big, wacky action / comedy that the kids (especially little boys) will adore, and the adults will dig just enough to stay awake. If Monsters vs. Aliens had aimed its sights in just a slightly more mature direction (for the folks who actually GREW UP on monster movies and alien epics), I'd be calling it one of my favorite animated flicks of the past ten years. As it stands, it's passable, slight, flashy, often fun and amusing, but nothing more ... and therefore a relative disappointment in my book.










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-27-2009 @ 10:28AM
Scott K. said...
That's unfortunate. I too was hoping for one of their better films (Kung Fu Panda was good), and was really (cautiously) looking forward to this one. Now, I think I'll just wait for the DVD.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 10:32AM
Kevin said...
Sounds like most Dreamworks projects. Good enough to see in the theaters once and then totally forget about. They're too concerned with pop culture references and hiring the most famous voice actors as opposed to hiring the best writers and directors. I've never understood that. You never actually see Reese Witherspoon on screen, so why pay her salary when you can get someone else for pennies on the dollar and devote more time to animation and story.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 1:12PM
filmsuki said...
You'd think that with the success of Pixar, all the other CG companies would jump on the success bandwagon by toning down the pop culture references, sticking to the original screenplay, and prioritizing story over vfx.
But aside from Over the Hedge and Kung fu Panda, Dreamwork's CG movies become cheesy and out of date once all the pop culture reference cease to be relevant or cool.
As a whole, North American CG films can't seem to break out of the Disney mold, with everything tagged PG. If only Final Fantasy Spirits Within had more commercial successful, and Advent Children got a theatrical release (and a publicly consumable storyline). The Japanese are way still ahead of the game when it comes to pushing the boundaries of animated films gear towards older people.
(That said, if Japan did this film, Susan would be in a miniskirt and we'd have 30 minutes worth of upskirt panty shots. :)
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 4:52PM
Jenn Brown said...
All that being said, I'll still go check it out on the nifty new 3D system at Alamo Village. Just not this weekend.
3-27-2009 @ 1:13PM
Midnight13 said...
'Kiefer Sutherland as a gruff general', just like the gruff army guy the voiced in "The Simpsons? Kiefer is the first ever animated typecast.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 2:22PM
ML said...
Bummer. I'd kind of hoped it had something "for the folks who actually GREW UP on monster movies and alien epics." Thanks for letting us know.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 3:53PM
alex said...
I agree with you... I just back from seeing it and I thought this is great for kids, but the adult layers found in similar movies were completely left out.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 4:05PM
Spanky said...
I don't know what movie the critic saw, but I just got back from this flick and I loved it, and so did the theater full of kids and adults. The 3D is beyond amazing, and the story is what I expect from a Saturday matinee type movie. Funny, charming, and full of unique ideas, no "Memento". My kid never took his eyes off it, in fact not a kid got up to pee the whole movie. That's a miracle, not just a fun flick.
Why must we expect the screenplay from "My Left Foot" for every movie they see? It's called entertainment! Stop looking for hidden plot lines and enjoy the movie already.
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 4:52PM
scotteweinberg said...
I don't know what review you just read, but we seem to be in agreement on MOST things.
Thanks for reading. And double-thanks to the commenters. OK fine, triple-thanks. Jeez.
3-27-2009 @ 6:16PM
Curt_Holman said...
I agree with this -- I think it's a step back from 'Kung Fu Panda.' It gets a little credit for being one of the rare CGI cartoon features that has a female as the main character.
Here's a piece that traces the 1950s lineage of the five monsters:
http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/culturesurfing/2009/03/23/the-creature-features-that-spawned-monsters-vs-aliens/
Reply
3-27-2009 @ 9:23PM
Joe said...
"No, Monsters vs. Aliens is a loud, rushed, choppy, silly, colorful Nintendo game of a movie"
That's pretty insulting towards good old Nintendo!
Reply
3-29-2009 @ 3:11PM
LDLO Fan said...
When the president meets the alien you hear a cool new version of the B-52's Planet Claire played by Les Deux Love Orchestra, which features members of Henry Mancini's original Peter Gunn Orchestra.
Reply
3-29-2009 @ 4:13PM
Luis said...
I saw it with 3 kids, 2 grandparents, and 6 of us who are in our 20's and 30's and we all loved it (and my usual taste is indie or foreign films).
The voice acting was the best part for me. I thought everyone worked well. It slows near the first clash with aliens as Ginormica is still feeling her way through her abilities, but other than that, I thought it was well-paced. And the audience clapped after it was over.
Also, for you 80's kids like me, there was a trailer for "Cloudy With A Chance of meatballs "(based on the book by Judy Barrett) which was filled with laughs.
Reply
3-30-2009 @ 12:23AM
stephen said...
I was really wanting to go see.As a 53 year old male, I still enjoy watching full-length animation.My two best that children and adults can see are "The Iron Giant" and " The Incredibles", thanks to Brad Bird's writing talent.At least now I can put on my dvd's and watch "Ghost in the Shell-Stand Alone Complex."
Reply
3-30-2009 @ 5:14AM
joe said...
Scott Weinberg clearly has an affinity for his "animation classic" darlings Pixar and Disney.
"Monsters vs. Aliens is NOT one of those transcendent animated features, the sort that bridges the gap between kid stuff and grown-up art with no discernible effort whatsoever."
Hmm, it doesnt seem like the reviewers above hold studio preference - and instead seem to enjoy films for what they are. But of course, they clearly are not as knowledgeable nor as insightful as Mr. Weinberg.
I think many persons, myself included, enjoy the 'wackiness' and creativity coming out of DreamWorks - they kind of go 'against the grain' of most animation flicks Ive seen coming out of other studios.. Sure the writers and directors might not be well-known, but some people there certainly are talented up-and-comers.
Reply
5-11-2009 @ 10:14AM
JChevais said...
I saw this film this weekend with my kids. OK. I saw it in French so the cultural references were all out the window, but I have to agree. When I saw Kung Fu Panda I was all: "OMFG! THAT WAS AMAZING" (And yes, it's amazing in French too). For this one, I was all: "Meh." You articulated my "Meh" quite well.
Le Sigh.
Reply