Regal to Fox: No 3D Glasses? Then No 'Ice Age 3D' at Regal
Filed under: Exhibition
Regal Cinemas, the largest theater chain in the U.S., has told Fox precisely where they can stuff their 3D should exhibitors be forced to pay for the glasses. It's a line in the sand on behalf of all exhibitors, and the beginning of what promises to be an interesting dance between studios and theaters.As reported on Tuesday, reps for 20th Century Fox have been quietly informing exhibitors that, having already hit them up for co-financing for 3D theater upgrades, the studio wouldn't be providing the 3D glasses necessary for audiences to enjoy upcoming fare like Ice Age 3: Dawn of the Dinosaurs, slated for release on July 1. As word spread though the annual ShoWest film-industry convention in Las Vegas this week, theater-owners responded with a combination of anger and disbelief.
The major theater chains cut a deal some time ago with the studios, agreeing to install the digital equipment and special screens to support the slew of 3D product that's currently in the pipe. Receiving an eleventh-hour announcement that the studio won't provide the glasses is seen by many as something of a betrayal, and an annoying negotiation that should have already been taken care of.
One exhibitor told Entertainment Weekly, "I'm already paying fees to RealD for the systems. I'm paying to put in the silver screens and I'm paying to train employees to run the product. To come in at this point and say they aren't going to pay for the glasses, yet they want all the upside of the revenue, is ridiculous."
Sources close to the company told EW that, in response, Regal has told Fox that they'll only show Ice Age 3 on their 2D screens. It's rumored that Cinemark and AMC will join Regal, as well. Or they might choose to simply profit from the kerfuffle by capitalizing on Regal's opt-out. There are undoubtedly men in suits sitting around large tables, negotiating all of this stuff as we speak.
"It's a chess game about who's going to reap the most profits from 3-D," a studio distribution executive told the LA Times Patrick Goldstein.
Mixing his metaphors hilariously, the exec continued: "Regal has let Fox know it's willing to raise the ante. Now Fox may threaten to give a big potential summer hit film to Regal's rivals. Someone who has a real vested interest in the long-term financial success of 3D will have to come in and negotiate a solution, where Fox can save some face and Regal can play the movie."










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-03-2009 @ 3:19PM
Eric said...
Boy Fox has some balls. I am more and more convinced that this company shit.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 3:37PM
pAT said...
However will we watch Wolverine 3D: The SNIKT Experience?
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 4:48PM
Kurt Munro said...
All theaters should just refuse to buy them and that'll be that.
Reply
4-03-2009 @ 6:01PM
John B said...
Wow. Just ... wow.
"Hey, we're going to make a 3D movie to allow the audience to pay their ticket money (of which 90% if not more of the proceeds go to us, not you, Mr. Theatre Owner) to enjoy our movie -- oh, but you have to pay for the glasses that will serve no purpose except for our movie."
Fox has a case of testicular elephantiasis with that move!
Reply
4-04-2009 @ 6:36AM
russ said...
I already have a plan in place for all the upcoming 3D movies.
I kept a pair of glasses from the past 2 3D films I paid to see.
When a new 3D movie comes out, It'll be one I sneak into (after seeing a paid for movie first of course) and then I'm sure one of the two pairs of previously used glasses will work on it.
no more paying $16 to see a 3D movie in NYC for me.
4-04-2009 @ 4:56PM
Paul T said...
I'm with russ about keeping the glasses (except for the sneaking in part), but I'd like to take it a step further. How about a discount if you already have the glasses? I have several pairs from seeing older RealD movies, and they seem fairly substantial. My 3D theater costs $15 a pop...make it the "regular" $10.75 if I bring my own specs.
Reply
4-05-2009 @ 9:11AM
lainix said...
I'm not sure of all theaters, but the ones in my area charge an extra fee, so isn't the customer the one paying for the glasses?
Reply
4-18-2009 @ 3:03PM
Dizzle said...
Theaters charge extra for 3-D films whether or not you bring your own glasses or not, so you can sneak in all the old pairs of glasses that you want, it won't save you anything. They claim that they are charging the extra money for the "experience" and not the glasses.
Reply
6-04-2009 @ 9:57PM
MsTina said...
Well I just got back from seeing "UP" that was available in 3D or no 3D for $4.00 less at the discounted matinee showing. Since being out of work nearly a year, getting out to see a movie is not only a big thrill but also a blow to my tight budget. The movie was so worth it but I left wondering what I missed since I did not fork over the extra $$ to see it in its intended state.
Since some states/stores give you a credit for bringing in your own grocery bag, the theater should give a discount for not having to supply the 3D glasses. I am sure they can be used at other movies-or maybe not.
Reply
6-18-2009 @ 4:12PM
stephb said...
With the big push for going green and recycling, getting a new pair of 3D glasses each time seesm like a step in the wrong direction. I'm sure some of the price of those glasses is figured into the cost of the ticket one way or another, so a discount for those who are thrifty to save a pair to use again certainly isn't unreasonable.
Reply