The Geek Beat: A Sci-Fi Renaissance
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, The Geek Beat

There are times I feel like I should be shunned from my professional community -- and right now, I feel like I should be cast out for my stubborn ambivalence toward Star Trek. My fellow writers keep asking me if I can sleep at night with such excitement in the air, while my friends have the release date marked on their calendars. But I watch every trailer and film clip hoping I'll get wound up. I wrote about this when the trailer first premiered, and I haven't changed my opinion very drastically, despite the favorable reviews pouring out of Austin and Australia.
One of the reasons why I've been ambivalent toward Trek is because I would have preferred seeing all that time and energy spent on creating original science fiction. Gene Roddenberry and George Lucas were able to do it, after all. Why should we go backwards and retread what they did, when there are thousands of space stories just waiting to be told?
But, we live in a more cautious world of entertainment now and I find myself glad Star Trek is on the horizon, because I think it will help bring in what so many of us want -- a sci-fi renaissance. I think this is the year we're going to get one. If 2008 was the year of the funnybooks, I think 2009 will be the year of the outer limits.
Of course, it's impossible to predict these things, but I think that's the way the zeitgeist is blowing. We live in a weird time -- we just experienced an election which seemed to inspire unprecedented hope, we seem to be enjoying limitless technology, and yet we're crippled by a lot of fear and doubt. The environment is hurting; the economy is failing. For me, I feel like the slightest push will either send us spiraling Beyond Thunderdome, or into the magical future of the Jetsons.
People are flocking to superhero films for a lot of reasons, but part of it is a craving for limitless adventure. By that I don't mean they want "bigger, louder, faster" (although that's part of it), but more that they want stories where you can't find the edges. They want to see a world where Iron Man just keeps flying. If he keeps going, so do we.
At the same time, the anxiety and fear has to be addressed ... but it's best tackled in an alternate world. I think that might just be one reason why Battlestar Galactica did so well. BSG was about death and decay, and yet it was also about the need to fight, hope, and believe. You can't ask for a better theme for these awkward, eerie times.
I think that's why Star Trek, Terminator: Salvation, District 9, The Surrogates, and Moon couldn't have picked a better year. They're away from the comic books, riding on a post-BSG wave, and are poised to take full advantage of moviegoers' thirst for alternate worlds and stories. There's a sci-fi story for everyone on that list, with selections that are pure popcorn to stories exploring the nature of humanity. Science fiction has always played in both ends of the pool, and we've seen the finest examples of the genre come from both sides.
The possibilities of a sci-fi renaissance is, well, endless. Oh, to see adaptations of Robert Heinlein, Isaac Asimov, Ray Bradbury, Ursula LeGuin, and Connie Willis ... I mean, the amount of original stories out there is staggering, and they've been snubbed for years because sci-fi is too nerdy, too expensive, or too impossible. Now, nothing is impossible and one of the oddest examples of that might just be the Star Trek reboot. Who ever thought we'd see a new Captain Kirk or Mr. Spock?
So, let's boldly go already. And with any hope, we'll keep on going. That final frontier hasn't been claimed yet, not by a mile.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-14-2009 @ 12:57PM
Astin said...
Let's not forget Avatar, which will be THE deciding factor if Sci-Fi goes Comics-huge. If Star Trek does great Box Office and gets critical acclaim, then it will lead to more Trek. If Avatar breaks records, it will lead to dozens of imitators, some of which may actually be good.
I think an argument could be made that many of the comic adaptations qualify as Science Fiction as well. Iron Man, Hulk, Watchmen, and even Batman have strong Sci-Fi elements in them. It doesn't have to be set in the future t o be science fiction after all.
Reply
4-14-2009 @ 1:19PM
Paul Nicholson said...
Even the animated films are into this year with Battle For Terra
Reply
4-14-2009 @ 2:49PM
myra said...
EVERLASTING
Selling Planet Earth in Exchange for a Utopia? What’s the Catch?
Humans sold planet Earth for peace, but little did they know peace would come at such a high cost.
A long time ago, Humanity sold planet Earth to a group called the Evers in order to gain peace and a virtual utopia for themselves and for future generations. However, the cost of this paradise turns out to be too much for some to deal with and the humans soon find themselves ruled cruelly by the very beings who offered them salvation and at one point given them so much hope.
Humans that were originally treated with high regards, made to feels special, are now being treated as animals, some humiliated and shipped away to some unknown fate…each being told what they could or could not do, under the guise of it being in humanities best interest.
With a feeling of dread, a small group declares war on the more advanced Evers in hopes of returning things to the way they should be…to the way they had been. John and his make-shift crew of humans and hybrids (half human/half Ever) must not only find a way to break free of the mistakes of the past and find out the disturbing secrets that the Evers have hidden away, but they must also deal with their own personal issues and learn to live, grow, and deal with each others’ emotional issues of love, regret and fear.
Will man give up youth and perfect health to live in the past? And will John take the chance of restoring Earth to its former state even though there’s a good chance his life-threatening disease can return?
Publisher’s Web site: www.eloquentbooks.com/Everlasting.html
Reply
4-14-2009 @ 3:09PM
rivndellelf said...
Just a random note:
2009 is the International Year of Astronomy.
Seems appropriate.
Reply
4-14-2009 @ 4:57PM
vlatka said...
Especially with a series concerned so much with the future and "where no man has gone before" is it right that we should be going back to the first load of seminal narrative in hopes that the audience will forget the formula that was strong enough to birth the whole ST universe to begin with?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lilD2aFxYxM
Reply
4-15-2009 @ 9:08PM
munky said...
Are you going to StarFest this weekend? Will it get a mention in the Geek Beat?
Reply
4-15-2009 @ 9:19PM
Elisabeth said...
To be honest, I hadn't thought about it! I've been in years past and never had a very good time (there's quite a saga there, actually). Now it's just gotten so expensive that I just save up and go to ComicCon instead.
It probably would have made for a good column though!
4-22-2009 @ 1:22PM
Chad said...
I agree with you on Star Trek...almost. I am looking forward to the movie, but I would have so prefered to have an original work be created. Sci-fi seems to be living in the past with Trek and Terminator, though Avator could turn things around.
This is also true in sci-fi literature. Just look at the novels you bring up as potential movie ideas. They are old! Can we please break out of the grand old days of sci-fi for something new.
Reply