James Marsden Grabs the Lead in the 'Straw Dogs' Remake
Filed under: Classics, Drama, Horror, Casting, Remakes and Sequels
If there's one remake that's solidly irking the masses, it would be Rod Lurie's plan to re-do Sam Peckinpah's Straw Dogs. Remaking a big studio film is one thing -- remaking a controversial and violent Peckinpah film is something else entirely. In March and August of 2007, Cinematical readers weighed in with their distaste, and now a few years later, this sucker is finally getting cast ... with Cyclops.The Hollywood Reporter posts that James Marsden will be taking over Dustin Hoffman's shoes to play David Sumner. This time around, the man will be an LA screenwriter who moves to his wife's deep-South hometown before the marriage troubles begin and locals get violent.
I have to admit it; I'm kind of intrigued. It's not that I want a remake (I almost never do), but I really want to see what Lurie is doing with this. He's already expressed his distaste in the rape controversy, and swears it will be much different in his film, and he's moved the whole project over to an entirely different social landscape. Why? And then picking Marsden? I can't decide if this is a move of genius, and something that could set the actor on more of a Hoffman path than a rom-com and annoying eye-zapper path, or if this is just another reason to ignore this remake.
So far, it's like a garish accident, you're compelled to look even if you don't really want to... But what do you think? Does Marsden make you want to pick up the pitchforks and revolt, townie-style?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-23-2009 @ 3:55PM
Eric said...
God someone tell me why they want to even try and remake this film. It's a classic, plus any remake will just strip what made the original so disturbing.
Reply
4-23-2009 @ 4:35PM
I HEART WIM said...
really?
Reply
4-24-2009 @ 2:19AM
jenni said...
Agree w/Eric.
Reframing the story in a different time period and place will definitely take away what made the original so startling and disturbing. For example, the rape scene is upsetting for many reasons, but it's informed by when it was made and attitudes towards women and rape, which have changed a great deal since then. (Witness the O&R date-rape arguments.) I'm interested to see how Lurie handles this scene, since it's an important plot device. And it's supposed to make you queasy.
I can't imagine a remake leaving such a lasting impression on audiences today. And I'm skeptical about changing it to LA to the South, although it does keep in character with the subtext class issues of the original. I just don't know if it will have the same resonance. Especially with Cyclops as Dustin Hoffman.
Reply
4-27-2009 @ 10:06AM
lw said...
Just what we need, a worthless remake and more South bashing.
Why do movies always have to perpetuate the stereotype of THE DEEP SOUTH with its backwoods rednecks and white trash locals. I have no idea if any of that will be in this movie but just the fact that it will take place in the "deep -South" already has me worried.
Reply